Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Construct or Destruct: The American Promise is at a Crossroad!

America’s promise endures only when citizens grow the skills democracy requires.

Construct or Destruct: The American Promise is at a Crossroad!
shallow focus photo of Statue of Liberty

In my US History class, I asked a simple question: What keeps democracy alive[DK1]? Most students answered, “good leaders” or “strong laws.” One student paused and said, “People who know how to listen to each other.” That answer is at the heart [DK2] of the American Promise and may matter more than any election.

America has always been defined as much by its promises as by its policies. From the Declaration of Independence to modern political speeches, leaders and thinkers alike have tried to answer a central question: What is America supposed to be?


Today, that question feels more urgent than ever.

Political speeches promise prosperity, security, and national strength. Yet beneath those promises lies a deeper question: not just what policies should change, but what kind of people must we become for democracy to work?

Today, that question feels more urgent than ever.

Political speeches promise prosperity, security, and national strength. Yet beneath those promises lies a deeper question: not just what policies should change, but what kind of people must we become for democracy to work?

What Is the “Promise of America”?

America is not just a place. It is a promise! Early Americans worked until they fell and slept until they worked because they believed in the promise, despite its imperfections. They still believed that all people deserve life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness[DK3]; that government should exist for the people; and that each generation must protect and improve this promise. America isn’t guaranteed to be great forever. Every generation either builds on the promise or breaks it.

Construct Systems and Destruct Systems

As part of my Human Resources Development graduate studies I learned that societies move in one of two directions: towards a Destruct System [DK4] that (1) Produces fear, rewards division, and simplifies complex problems into slogans; (2) Fails to develop the skills citizens need to function in a democracy, and (3) Replaces responsibility with blame, or a Construct System that: (1) Develops human potential (2) Builds skills, responsibility, and cooperation (3) Expands opportunity and participation.

Construct Systems that invest in developing citizens. Destruct Systems depend on controlling them. Where we put our resources reveals our values. To date, we have perfected our skills and technology to guarantee the destruction of 20 million people in one hour, yet we cannot guarantee constructive growth and development of one American child for twenty years. We are not so much helpless victims as we are active perpetrators.

Regardless of which political party is in leadership, a country can sound strong, look successful, have powerful leadership, and still be drifting into a Destruct System if the truth is bent, people are divided, and responsibility is avoided. America fulfills its promise only when it becomes a Construct System!

Democracy Does Not Survive on Opinions. It Survives on Capabilities

Psychologist Albert Bandura, one of the most cited social scientists of the modern era, described a concept known as self-efficacy—the belief that individuals and communities can influence events through their actions.

Bandura wrote: “People’s beliefs in their capabilities to produce desired effects by their actions play a key role in how they behave.”

When people believe their actions matter, they participate. When they feel powerless, they withdraw. The long-term health of a democratic society depends on the capabilities of its people and their capacity to listen, especially when they disagree; evaluate truth, cooperate across differences, and take responsibility for the common good. When those capabilities grow, society becomes constructive. When they weaken, society becomes destructive.

A Warning Sign We Can Measure

Recent data suggests that civic capability may be under strain.

According to Gallup, trust in major US institutions has fallen below 30% for the first time in modern history. This decline reflects not only dissatisfaction with institutions, but also a weakening of the shared civic trust that democracies depend on.

At the same time, research from the Pew Research Center shows that political polarization has reached historic highs, with large portions of Americans viewing those on the other side not just as wrong, but as a threat! These are not just political trends. They indicate a system drifting away from a Construct System.

The good news is that civic capability can be strengthened.

Research in education, psychology, and civic engagement points to practical steps that help societies move toward constructive systems:

  • Teaching media literacy and critical thinking through organizations like the National Literacy Project, the Encampment for Citizenship, and the James Baldwin Project.
  • Creating spaces for respectful civic dialogue, like local libraries and YM/YWCAs
  • Strengthening community institutions that encourage cooperation, such as branch NAACP and ACLU chapters.
  • Developing leadership models that combine authority with accountability, such as student government for our youth and school board deliberations in local government.

These solutions do not eliminate political disagreement. Democracy depends on disagreement. Rather, they improve the way disagreements are handled.

The Crossroad for the American Citizen

America does not lose its promise all at once. It shifts—gradually—based on the choices of its people. We don’t just inherit democracy—we either develop it, or we watch it decline. When future generations look back, they will ask:

· Did we allow fear to dominate our politics? Fear makes people willing to trade freedom for promises of safety.

· Did we invest in human development, or did we educate for information rather than wisdom?

· Did we choose division and polarization and talk past each other instead of with each other?

· Did we watch as rising inequality made opportunity more dependent on ZIP codes than on talent?

Societies decline not only because of leaders, but because of everyday choices made by everyday people. America is testing whether we will become a society of builders—or a society of destroyers. The choice is ours… for now.

Steve Davisis is the founder & CEO of The Institute for Human Relations, Inc. (IHRinc.org), is a human development strategist. Mr. Davis is a veteran educator, human development practitioner, and organizational leader with more than 30 years of experience in educational leadership, social justice, and sports science. He played in the Cotton Bowl and Sugar Bowl football classics under legendary Penn State coach Joe Paterno.


Read More

A hand casting a vote in a ballot box for an election

A hand casting a vote in a ballot box for an election in the Kentucky, USA

Getty Images

Kentucky’s Independent Voters Are Growing. Why Are They Still Shut Out?

Kentucky’s political establishment has just been handed a number it should not be able to ignore.

In July, more Kentucky voters registered as independent or “other” than registered as Republicans and Democrats combined. More than 8,500 Kentuckians registered to vote, and the “other” category grew by 2,530 voters, compared with 2,483 new Republicans and a decline of 32 Democrats.

Keep ReadingShow less
US Supreme Court

US Supreme Court, Washington, DC

Getty Images

If You Can’t Win, Disrupt

On Monday, the Supreme Court issued a decision overturning the stay issued by Judge Talwani of the US District Court for Massachusetts. The case was brought by 23 states and the District of Columbia to enjoin Executive Order No. 14399, issued by President Trump. The Executive Order (EO) was 90 pages long and is entitled “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections”.

The purpose of the EO according to its proponents is to (1) enhance the verification of the citizenship status of the voting public and to explicitly prohibit non-citizens from registering to vote or vote in federal elections; (2) to utilize the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the Social Security Administration (SSA) and the Systemic Alien Verification for Entitlements program (SAVE) to assist in verifying identity and voter eligibility. (3) Establish the transmission of state citizenship lists and prioritization of investigations and prosecutions related to election fraud. (4) Require the US Postal Service (USPS) to issue new rules on mail-in and absentee ballots. (5) Have the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commissioner of the SSA, and the Postmaster General, in coordination with the Secretary of Commerce, to effectuate all relevant aspects of the implementation of the Order. (6) Enforcement authority for this EO is vested in the Attorney General.

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol building in Washington, DC

Government reform

Getty Images

Why One Young Engineer Rejects the Two‑Party Binary

When Joshua Summers was in elementary school, his dad would come to class to perform science experiments. One time, they did an experiment to show how lightning bugs lit up.

“That was pretty cool,” he says. There was never one moment that drew him to science, but it may have helped that his mother was a nurse and his father was a mathematician.

Keep ReadingShow less
people in a boardroom


Happy female entrepreneur with colleagues sitting at a desk in an office

Getty images

Understanding The Dissolution of Federal DEI Offices and Initiatives: Debate and Implications

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Background

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) is a buzzword often used in political spaces, and its implementations, or lack thereof, have repercussions on many groups. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion efforts are organizational policies and initiatives that aim to equitably distribute opportunities and to create accepting workplaces for marginalized populations. These policies create hiring and recruitment guidelines to hire, retain, and promote individuals from those backgrounds. Supporters of these policies argue they are necessary in driving meaningful social progress, while critics argue they subordinate the role of merit in awarding opportunities.

Keep ReadingShow less