Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Construct or Destruct: The American Promise is at a Crossroad!

America’s promise endures only when citizens grow the skills democracy requires.

Construct or Destruct: The American Promise is at a Crossroad!
shallow focus photo of Statue of Liberty

In my US History class, I asked a simple question: What keeps democracy alive[DK1]? Most students answered, “good leaders” or “strong laws.” One student paused and said, “People who know how to listen to each other.” That answer is at the heart [DK2] of the American Promise and may matter more than any election.

America has always been defined as much by its promises as by its policies. From the Declaration of Independence to modern political speeches, leaders and thinkers alike have tried to answer a central question: What is America supposed to be?


Today, that question feels more urgent than ever.

Political speeches promise prosperity, security, and national strength. Yet beneath those promises lies a deeper question: not just what policies should change, but what kind of people must we become for democracy to work?

Today, that question feels more urgent than ever.

Political speeches promise prosperity, security, and national strength. Yet beneath those promises lies a deeper question: not just what policies should change, but what kind of people must we become for democracy to work?

What Is the “Promise of America”?

America is not just a place. It is a promise! Early Americans worked until they fell and slept until they worked because they believed in the promise, despite its imperfections. They still believed that all people deserve life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness[DK3]; that government should exist for the people; and that each generation must protect and improve this promise. America isn’t guaranteed to be great forever. Every generation either builds on the promise or breaks it.

Construct Systems and Destruct Systems

As part of my Human Resources Development graduate studies I learned that societies move in one of two directions: towards a Destruct System [DK4] that (1) Produces fear, rewards division, and simplifies complex problems into slogans; (2) Fails to develop the skills citizens need to function in a democracy, and (3) Replaces responsibility with blame, or a Construct System that: (1) Develops human potential (2) Builds skills, responsibility, and cooperation (3) Expands opportunity and participation.

Construct Systems that invest in developing citizens. Destruct Systems depend on controlling them. Where we put our resources reveals our values. To date, we have perfected our skills and technology to guarantee the destruction of 20 million people in one hour, yet we cannot guarantee constructive growth and development of one American child for twenty years. We are not so much helpless victims as we are active perpetrators.

Regardless of which political party is in leadership, a country can sound strong, look successful, have powerful leadership, and still be drifting into a Destruct System if the truth is bent, people are divided, and responsibility is avoided. America fulfills its promise only when it becomes a Construct System!

Democracy Does Not Survive on Opinions. It Survives on Capabilities

Psychologist Albert Bandura, one of the most cited social scientists of the modern era, described a concept known as self-efficacy—the belief that individuals and communities can influence events through their actions.

Bandura wrote: “People’s beliefs in their capabilities to produce desired effects by their actions play a key role in how they behave.”

When people believe their actions matter, they participate. When they feel powerless, they withdraw. The long-term health of a democratic society depends on the capabilities of its people and their capacity to listen, especially when they disagree; evaluate truth, cooperate across differences, and take responsibility for the common good. When those capabilities grow, society becomes constructive. When they weaken, society becomes destructive.

A Warning Sign We Can Measure

Recent data suggests that civic capability may be under strain.

According to Gallup, trust in major US institutions has fallen below 30% for the first time in modern history. This decline reflects not only dissatisfaction with institutions, but also a weakening of the shared civic trust that democracies depend on.

At the same time, research from the Pew Research Center shows that political polarization has reached historic highs, with large portions of Americans viewing those on the other side not just as wrong, but as a threat! These are not just political trends. They indicate a system drifting away from a Construct System.

The good news is that civic capability can be strengthened.

Research in education, psychology, and civic engagement points to practical steps that help societies move toward constructive systems:

  • Teaching media literacy and critical thinking through organizations like the National Literacy Project, the Encampment for Citizenship, and the James Baldwin Project.
  • Creating spaces for respectful civic dialogue, like local libraries and YM/YWCAs
  • Strengthening community institutions that encourage cooperation, such as branch NAACP and ACLU chapters.
  • Developing leadership models that combine authority with accountability, such as student government for our youth and school board deliberations in local government.

These solutions do not eliminate political disagreement. Democracy depends on disagreement. Rather, they improve the way disagreements are handled.

The Crossroad for the American Citizen

America does not lose its promise all at once. It shifts—gradually—based on the choices of its people. We don’t just inherit democracy—we either develop it, or we watch it decline. When future generations look back, they will ask:

· Did we allow fear to dominate our politics? Fear makes people willing to trade freedom for promises of safety.

· Did we invest in human development, or did we educate for information rather than wisdom?

· Did we choose division and polarization and talk past each other instead of with each other?

· Did we watch as rising inequality made opportunity more dependent on ZIP codes than on talent?

Societies decline not only because of leaders, but because of everyday choices made by everyday people. America is testing whether we will become a society of builders—or a society of destroyers. The choice is ours… for now.

Steve Davisis is the founder & CEO of The Institute for Human Relations, Inc. (IHRinc.org), is a human development strategist. Mr. Davis is a veteran educator, human development practitioner, and organizational leader with more than 30 years of experience in educational leadership, social justice, and sports science. He played in the Cotton Bowl and Sugar Bowl football classics under legendary Penn State coach Joe Paterno.


Read More

Veterans Don’t Stop Being Veterans at the Prison Gate

Veterans often lose VA healthcare, disability benefits, and education access during incarceration, disrupting PTSD and addiction treatment when continuity matters most.

Getty Images

Veterans Don’t Stop Being Veterans at the Prison Gate

A veteran’s PTSD doesn’t disappear when they enter prison. Traumatic brain injuries don’t cure themselves. Addiction doesn't vanish behind bars. Yet many of the systems designed to help veterans manage those conditions stop at the prison gate.

When veterans are incarcerated, they often lose access to VA healthcare, struggle to use education benefits, and face major cuts to disability compensation. The problem is not eligibility. The problem is continuity.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why I’m Using My Influence to Defend Democracy Now

A group of people waving small American flags at sunset.

Getty stock photo

Why I’m Using My Influence to Defend Democracy Now

It was about this time of year in 1997 that I moved across the country and took my first job in the sector broadly known as “civil society.”

Since then, I have grown in my career. I have developed a profile. By dint of sheer survival and longevity, I have accumulated seniority.

Keep ReadingShow less
NATO Has an Article 5. It Doesn't Have an Iran Policy

(L-R) Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, President of Turkey, Mark Rutte, Secretary General of NATO, Donald Trump, President of United States and Keir Starmer, Prime Minister of United Kingdom during a “family photo” at Beştepe Presidential Compound during a welcome ceremony for the NATO Summit on July 08, 2026 in Ankara, Turkey.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

NATO Has an Article 5. It Doesn't Have an Iran Policy

It seems just yesterday I was writing up a piece regarding the G7 summit taking place in southern France. In truth, it was a few weeks ago, but now that the NATO summit has wrapped up, I can’t be the only one with deja vu; world leaders meeting amid the continuing US-led war with Iran. I think I’ve seen this film before.

Welcome to Faultline. Last week, heads of NATO member states convened in Turkey for their yearly summit. Many issues were on the table for the summit, and the one expected to take center stage was the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, considering that the Iran war was supposed to be done, as had been announced weeks ago. However, less than 30 days into the alleged 60-day ceasefire, President Trump has announced that negotiations with Iran are over, and not because they reached an agreement.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs outside of the Idaho statehouse.

Protesters rally for abortion rights outside of the Idaho Statehouse in downtown Boise, Idaho, on May 14, 2022.

Sarah A. Miller/Idaho Statesman/AP

Idaho Voters Will Weigh In on One of the Strictest Abortion Bans in the Country

Idaho voters will weigh in on their state’s abortion laws this November. The secretary of state’s office certified a ballot measure that could, if passed, overturn one of the strictest bans in the country, the campaign to restore abortion rights in Idaho confirmed on Monday.

The measure would enact a new law establishing a state right to “reproductive freedom,” which it defines as allowing residents to make their own decisions in areas including fertility treatment, contraception and abortion. But it would not amend the state’s constitution, meaning it could still be overturned by the state’s Republican legislature. Currently, Idaho bans abortion in nearly all circumstances, with a narrow exception if staying pregnant threatens someone’s life.

Keep ReadingShow less