Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Want to Influence Government? Start With Your Story

Opinion

Someone holding a microphone.

Personal stories from constituents can profoundly shape lawmakers’ decisions. This excerpt shows how citizen advocacy influences Congress and drives real policy change.

Getty Images, EyeEm Mobile GmbH

[The following article is excerpted from "Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."]


Rep. Nanette Barragán (D-California) wanted to make a firm statement in support of continued funding of the federal government’s Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) during the recent government shutdown debate. But instead of making a speech on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, she traveled to the Wilmington neighborhood of her Los Angeles district to a YMCA that was distributing fresh food and vegetables to people in need. She posted stories on X and described, in very practical terms, the people she met, their family stories, and the importance of food assistance programs.


There is a cloud of cynicism that envelopes American politics, leading many to believe that their voice doesn’t make a difference. And, sure, on some politically charged issues, like guns or immigration, it is probably unlikely that one story will change a politician’s position. But on everything else (which is most of what Congress does), it is impossible to overstate the importance of constituents’ personal stories and the influence they have in the policy process.

During an interview with a member of Congress for a book I was writing on citizen engagement, I asked him to recount to me a difficult decision he made in the past and what were the factors that influenced his final decision. “Oh yes,” he said immediately. “The issue was federal funding for stem cell research,” which is quite controversial due to its connection to the abortion debate. He explained to me that he was genuinely torn on the issue and had not come to a final decision. Then, one day, he was visited by a teenager from his district. “Congressman, I have juvenile diabetes,” the young man said to the congressman, “and it is my hope that this research might someday lead to a cure for me and others like me.” The congressman leaned into me and said, “That meeting just stuck with me.” He explained how he did further research on the topic and eventually became a cosponsor of legislation to increase funding for the stem cell research … and he was a pro-life Republican.

Legislators trying to determine the best policy outcome can wrestle with facts and figures until they are blurry-eyed. And yet, when they come face-to-face with an actual person whom the policy affects, it completely focuses their thinking. They no longer see data and reports associated with that policy; they see a person. And no matter the legislator’s position on the issue—pro or con—she feels an obligation to the person: either to help him, or to adequately explain why she can’t. “The most effective way to influence a lawmaker is for a constituent to talk to a legislator about how the policy will affect the person or a particular group,” said one House Democrat.

If the story is powerful enough and demonstrates some societal injustice or ill, it can actually be translated into legislation. “Meagan’s Law” requires law enforcement authorities to make information regarding sexual offenders available to the public. It was enacted because of the powerful story of a little girl who was abducted, raped, and killed. There is now a popular trend of naming bills after victims, such as “Heather’s Law,” “Rachel’s Law,” “Haley’s Act,” and the Amber Alert system.

On the lighter side, a constituent told a congressman about an unpleasant experience he had at the doctor’s office. After being told to disrobe and put on a flimsy paper smock that didn’t close in the back, the man was asked to sign papers related to his care without fully understanding their meaning. He felt quite uncomfortable and disadvantaged in the setting—and told his congressman so. This led the legislator to introduce a bill, “The No Private Contracts to Be Negotiated When the Patient is Buck Naked Act.” Amusingly, this bill was introduced by Rep. Pete Stark (D-California), so it quickly became known as the “Stark Naked Act.” (It actually gained 18 cosponsors!)

One House Democrat, who was a member of the powerful House Appropriations Committee, had a memorable experience that demonstrates the value of personal stories. “I went to a luncheon that was hosted by cancer centers in my state,” he said. “Instead of having those guys in white coats doing their lobbying, they brought in patients—kids and their parents. They all got up and told their story. When it was done, there wasn’t a dry eye in the room. They gave us the human importance of those dollars we're being asked to appropriate. Every group needs to do that.”

By putting a face on an issue, the citizen-advocate makes the policy pitch real in a way that a lobbyist cannot. “I’ve seen my boss change his mind because of a personal story,” said one House chief of staff. When petitioning the government and meeting with a federal, state, or local lawmaker, the smart citizen-advocate will come to the meeting with the most powerful tool at their disposal: their story.


Bradford Fitch is the former CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation and author of “Citizens’ Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials.”


Read More

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

Fight For Today For A Better Tomorrow sign

Canva

Allies United Holds Cross‑Community Meetings to Protect Civil Rights Across Chicagoland

En español

Operation Midway Blitz outraged much of the Chicagoland community last September when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents raided neighborhoods, arrested thousands of individuals, and fatally shot Mexican immigrant Silverio Villegas González.

Witnessing these injustices across the country and in Chicago, two local coalitions came together last year to form Allies United, a Chicago-based coalition initially focused on responding to immigration raids, and now prioritizing protecting civil rights and building long-term cross‑community solidarity.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose
white red and blue textile

A Republic at 250: What History Teaches — and What Americans Must Choose

As the United States approaches both a consequential election cycle and the 250th anniversary of its founding, Americans stand at a crossroads the framers anticipated but hoped we would never reach: a moment when citizens must decide whether to allow the Republic to erode or restore it through vigilance. This is not about left or right. It is about whether we still share a common vision of the country we want to be — and whether we still believe in the same Republic.

The Founders never imagined “the land of the free” as a place dependent on benevolent leaders. They built a system in which the people — not the government — were the safeguards against overreach. James Madison warned that “the accumulation of all powers…in the same hands…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny,” a reminder that freedom depends on restraint, not trust in any single individual. George Washington pledged that the Constitution would remain “the guide which I will never abandon,” signaling that loyalty to the Republic must always outweigh loyalty to any leader. These were not ceremonial lines. They were instructions — a blueprint for preventing institutional strain, polarization, and distrust we see today.

Keep ReadingShow less
A document representing the Declaration of Independence.

As trust in institutions declines, America’s 250th anniversary offers a chance to rediscover the civic lessons, leadership principles, and democratic values that sustain a republic.

Getty Images

America at 250: Will We Learn from Our Past?

We call it the American Experiment. Yet too often we celebrate it without studying it, invoke it without interrogating it, and inherit it without improving it. A republic designed to learn from experience cannot afford to ignore its own lessons from history.

As the United States approaches the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence, the country faces a deeper question than how to celebrate its founding. Do we still know how to learn from it?

Keep ReadingShow less