Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Kitchen Table Truths: Why America Needs a Pay Raise

Opinion

Crumpled dollar bills, two coins, a wallet, book, glasses, and home phone on a table.

Inflation and stagnant wages are squeezing working families. A modest cut to the lowest income tax bracket could offer real relief.

Getty Images, David Harrigan

Affordability as a political issue would in no way surprise my family. During Sunday dinners with my two-jobs, blue-collar mother and my retired grandparents, a former truck driver and former cafeteria worker, prices were always a topic of conversation. Even when inflation was low. Why? All three were running on a treadmill to keep up. My mother had less leverage to get the wage increases that she needed than others had in our economy, and Social Security payments go up only after a year of declining purchasing power and increased Medicare premiums.

Call it “sticky wages” and “fixed income.” I would also call it kitchen table truths. Inflation above 2% is unacceptable. The difference between 3% inflation and 2% inflation is the difference between prices doubling in only 24 years versus 36 years. Add that inflation from the Biden era, which peaked at 9.1%, is baked into the current price level.


Inflation is feeding the already existing problems of cynicism and distrust in institutions. As the famous economist John Maynard Keynes wrote, “There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction.”

Sticker shock afflicts the American voter every time they go to the store. They can shift spending habits, substituting a cheaper product for a more expensive product, and thereby making inflation seem less. Say, yogurt for eggs. Producers can shrink the amount of a good contained in a package or otherwise reduce value. Say, reducing cereal in a box by a few ounces. Yet it will not feel like inflation is going down.

There is talk among the political class about bringing down prices, not just the rate of inflation. Of course, such deflation would be no solution. Profits would be destroyed and jobs along with those profits. What is needed is stable money, but then what of those who have struggled to keep up with recent inflation? Voters feeling neglected by the political class are more susceptible to political polarization and radicalization. High-stakes economic anxiety may undermine the sort of civic participation we need.

Americans require a pay raise. This most of all means policies boosting real economic growth. Yet we could also add to real income and wage growth: Reducing the lowest income tax bracket.

Currently, the lowest tax bracket is 10%, a rate established under the George W. Bush administration to reward work by those barely making enough to pay income taxes. He frequently cited the example of a single mother working as a waitress, reminding me of those Sunday dinners. With inflation in 2025 running at nearly 3%, we could reduce the 10% bracket by this amount, creating a 7% income tax bracket. This would mean a pay raise of up to $348 for every single taxpayer and $696 for every couple.

A back of the envelope calculation based on the number of returns paying federal income tax says the cost would be less than $80 billion per year. The number of years for the lower rate rate could be limited if necessary. If we add in a one-time $348 check sent to every Social Security recipient, the cost would be an additional $24 billion.

Whenever the 7% tax rate is scheduled to revert to 10%, we will find ourselves debating our fiscal future again, as we did with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and it locking in other income tax rates. We should be looking for pay-fors when this time comes, such as limiting itemized deductions. This is necessary as the national debt continues to stand at an unprecedented level. Yet I cannot shake those Sunday dinners. They will always impact me and, for that, I am grateful.


Scott Miller is a graduate of Widener School of Law, a former chief of staff in Congress, and the author of 'Christianity & Your Neighbor's Liberty.


Read More

A person sits at a table, going through papers, using a calculator.

Middle-class families face rising costs and policy uncertainty as economic rules shift. How instability in governance is reshaping the American Dream.

Getty Images, Olga Rolenko

America’s Middle-Class Contract Is Breaking Down

In a growing suburb outside Columbus, Ohio, two households are coming to the same realization: the rules they have long relied on still exist, but they are no longer working for them.

Jake and Emily Carter, both in their early 30s, had planned to buy their first home this spring. He manages a retail store; she’s a nurse. Together, they earn about $85,000 a year, near the local median. They’ve saved carefully and thought they were ready. But the numbers no longer add up. Mortgage rates shift, insurance is higher than expected, and grocery bills remain stubborn. Add in tariffs, healthcare uncertainty, and shifting tax policy, and the path forward is unclear.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bar graph of shopping carts

A deeper look at inflation in today’s economy—beyond money printing. Explore how trade fragmentation, geopolitics, tariffs, and industrial policy are driving structural inflation and rising costs in the U.S.

Andriy Onufriyenko/Getty Images

Inflation Has Changed—And So Has Who Pays for It

A familiar conservative argument is back: inflation is the result of government printing and overspending. Too many dollars, too much demand, not enough goods. It is a tidy explanation, one that has the advantage of clarity and a long intellectual pedigree. It is also incomplete.

That story assumes a stable, globalized economy in which production is efficient, supply chains are reliable, and market signals dominate political ones. In that world, inflation can plausibly be reduced to a question of monetary discipline or fiscal restraint. But today’s economy no longer operates under those conditions. Inflation is now driven less by excess demand and more by rising costs tied to trade fragmentation, industrial policy, and geopolitical conflict. These forces are not temporary disruptions. They are reshaping how goods are produced, where they are produced, and at what cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
People sitting at desks in an office.

A policy-driven look at AI-era job displacement and how “Transition Launch Pads” can speed reemployment through local hubs, retraining, and employer collaboration.

Getty Images, Bill Pugliano

Layoff Headlines Keep Coming, Policy Answers Don't. Here’s One Solution

Every week brings another round of displacement announcements. Tech companies, logistics firms, financial institutions, retailers — cutting headcount at a pace that no longer surprises anyone. The headlines are routine. What isn't routine — in fact, what is conspicuously absent — is any serious account of what comes next. Not for the companies. For the workers.

That absence is a policy failure, and it is getting more expensive for us all by the quarter. The longer folks remain unemployed, the greater the costs. The individual and their loved ones obviously suffer. The community does as well due to that productive individual sitting on the sidelines and the high costs of sustaining unemployment.

Keep ReadingShow less
Someone sitting at a desk, writing with a pen on paper, with a calculator and papers by their side.

An in-depth analysis of the U.S. economy reveals how federal budget priorities—shifting toward defense spending and away from domestic programs—are quietly increasing financial pressure on middle-class families despite strong headline numbers.

Getty Images, Maskot

The Math Isn’t Working: More for War, Less for America’s Future

On paper, the economy’s numbers look robust. But for many Americans, the math isn’t working.

A family like Mike and Lisa Hernandez, a middle-class couple in suburban St. Louis, is doing everything right. He manages a warehouse. She works part-time as a dental assistant. They have employer-sponsored insurance, a new house, and two kids. They’re living the American dream.

Keep ReadingShow less