Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Mind Is a Terrible Thing to Waste - What To Do

Opinion

African American elementary student and his friends studying over computers during a class in the classroom.

A 20-year education veteran examines the decline of student performance in America, highlighting the impact of screen time, overreliance on technology, weak fundamentals, and unequal school funding—and calls for urgent education reform.

Getty Images, StockPlanets

The motto of the United Negro College Fund can today be applied to all children in our school systems—not just the socially disadvantaged, or poor, or intellectually challenged, but all children regardless of SES characteristics or intelligence. I say this based on 20 years of working as a volunteer tutor or staff in elementary and middle schools in various parts of the country.

The problem has several components. The first is the pervasive negative impact on children's minds of their compulsive use of screens, social media, and the internet. There is no shortage of articles that have been written, both scientific and anecdotal, about the various aspects of this negative impact. Research shows that the compulsive use of screen devices leads to a variety of social interaction and psychological problems.


Then there is the use that is being made of computers in schools as a major part of the instruction program. From what I have seen, students spend more time on the laptop than receiving instruction from their teacher. While computers have a place in a learning program, I believe that too much reliance has been placed on them. Research adds credence to this feeling.

Parents don't seem to place the same emphasis on learning that they used to, and as a result, children are less committed to the process. As learning is not an easy process, and definitely often not "fun," this lack of commitment results in many students frequently tuning instruction out. (I found no research on this.)

Both ELA and math instruction are based on and depend on the mastering and understanding of fundamentals—for ELA, phonics; for math, the basic rules for adding and subtracting, and most importantly, the multiplication table. Yet time and again, I have found that students who have not mastered these fundamentals are moved forward regardless. Most schools today promote all students to the next grade, regardless of performance; I've been told that parents don't want their children held back.

Teachers are often blamed for the fact that the national scores of students' knowledge of English and Math have declined. But while there no doubt is some blame there, there is just so much a teacher can do when faced with children who don't care about education, who think learning is irrelevant for them, and who have minds that have a short attention span because of the impact of technology.

Another problem is that even with all the money the Federal government pours into our schools, there are still many children who are left behind because they don't receive the remedial instruction they need; teachers just don't have the time. I'm not talking so much about the children in Special Ed or Title 1 programs, I'm talking about the many children who don't qualify for these programs but just never learned the basics in elementary school, not because of a learning disability but because they just couldn't keep up, and so each year fall farther and farther behind as they are promoted to the next grade. This applies to both English and Math. Even if they learn some process in 5th or 6th grade, the basics—whether it's phonics or the multiplication tables—need to be applied, and if those were never mastered, the student is stuck.

But school districts uniformly do not spend the money to provide one-on-one remedial services to such children. Because they fall between the cracks of the various Federal programs, they are doomed to low functioning in life. In a country as rich as ours, this is disgraceful. No child should be left behind.

Finally, the way in which schools are funded in this country is a recipe for inequality. Local property taxes account for 45% of school funding; another 45% comes from the state, with the federal government contributing only 10%. Although states often apply equalization formulas, they usually don't work. As a result, children who grow up in areas that have a better tax base receive a better funded, and typically a better, education. Thus, poor children—both White and people of color—never receive the education that gives them the equal opportunity that is promised in the Declaration of Independence to pursue happiness.

The result of all these factors is that untold millions of minds are wasted. This is not just an unnecessary tragedy for the individuals so impacted, but it is a drag on our society and economy because these individuals will never be able to contribute to the economy as they otherwise would and their participation in society is limited.

Regarding the impact of technology on children's lives, after numerous studies around the world of the negative impact on children, there is movement to limit the use of smartphones and other technology by children under 16. Regarding the use of technology in the classroom, I am not aware of any movement to return to a system of greater teacher involvement. Regarding those that never master ELA or math, parent, teacher, and school organizations must lobby state and federal governments for funds to provided one-on-one remedial instruction for such children, initially whatever grade they're in; at some point, it should only be necessary in the elementary grades where those skills are taught.

But beyond such efforts, it is critical that parents emphasize the importance of learning to success and happiness in one's life. There is a reason why certain cultures, both in fact and stereotype, produce students who excel more in their education—Asian and Jewish come to mind immediately—it is that parents in these cultures, regardless of their social status, generally emphasize the importance of education, not just to get ahead for a better life.

All parents should be encouraged by whatever agencies or health providers they come in contact with to bring education into the home and emphasize its importance to their children. If a parent is not comfortable with that because of their own low-level of educational attainment, they need to be shown how they can do this simply but effectively.

This should be seen as a component part of the push for equal opportunity in our society. Everyone at all levels of society should be committed to this goal that has its roots in the words of the Declaration of Independence, that:

"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men."

Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

President Trump getting on a plane.

U.S. President Donald Trump boards Air Force One on August 14, 2026 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Trump is traveling to Long Island to tour law enforcement facilities in Nassau County and rally support for local Republican candidates ahead of the upcoming midterm elections

Samuel Corum/Getty Images

Travel Far Enough, You Meet Yourself

Is it possible that our President has simply not traveled enough?

Born and raised in Queens and attending Fordham University in the Bronx, Donald Trump has no record of traveling outside New York until he was over 20, when he transferred to a college in the neighboring state of Pennsylvania. Were his formative years amiss, then, in his learning about other places and other people?

Keep ReadingShow less
students walking, college campus
a group of people walking on a sidewalk

Safe Spaces vs. Free Speech: Rethinking Campus Safety

“I really want to be able to discuss polarizing topics,” she said. “But as long as it’s a safe space.”

This common sentiment reflects recent data on students’ attitudes toward speech on campus: a 2024 Knight Foundation study found that 91% of students value free speech as “very important” or "important," while 64% of students believe colleges should offer “safe spaces” on campus, with only 15% opposed.

Keep ReadingShow less
Children's books on a shelf.
A 17-year-old changemaker from Ohio, Sahana Srikanth founded the Young Learners Foundation to tackle the literacy gap, donating over 18,000 books and empowering youth through mentorship, education, and community-driven impact.
Pexels

Darius Williams Went Viral. Fixing the Literacy Crisis Won’t.

On his second day of teaching at Wheatley High School in Houston, former food influencer Darius Williams faced a problem that has plagued U.S. classrooms for decades: his students couldn’t read or write on grade level. But he didn’t call a colleague or email a district literacy specialist. Instead, he posted a video.

In the clip, Williams sat in front of the camera, crying over the futures his students would be denied. "We have got to do something,” he wrote in the caption. “Something is broken somewhere. It has to be. To see this level of engagement with students who simply don't have literacy skills is completely disheartening. Whew. Yall did not prepare me for this."

Keep ReadingShow less
Military education. Student in soldier uniform learning at wooden table indoors, selective focus

Millions join the military to afford college. This essay examines military education benefits, student debt, and why higher education shouldn't depend on military service.

Liudmila Chernetska/Getty Images

You Shouldn't Have to Go To War to Go To College

There are many reasons to join the military, but one of the most enticing is education. Indeed, a 2017 poll conducted by the Department of Defense found that 49% of Army recruits signed up to pay for their education. It makes sense. Military education packages are incredibly attractive, which is quite the recruitment carrot. For a huge number of recruits, joining the military means finding a way to pay for school they couldn’t otherwise afford. That may say less about the luster of military benefits and more about a problem in our public policy. As education scholar William Ayers wrote back in 2006, as recruitment fell short of quotas, “High schools have thus become battlefields for the hearts and minds of young people…recruiters dangle gifts and promises of future benefits before teenagers in an effort to fill the ranks of an all-volunteer military.” Is our country making it hard to get an education on purpose?

Some critics suggest military recruitment strategies have sought to weaponize poverty. By the 1980s, the term "poverty draft" had gained traction, articulating the idea that the enlisted ranks of the military were composed of young people with limited economic opportunities. There is speculation that the Pentagon even embraced programs like No Child Left Behind as part of a broader strategy to improve recruitment by targeting low-income youth. Though these may be cynical perspectives on a simple matter of correlation, it does appear that the military struggles to draw youth to join the ranks whenever more attractive alternative economic pathways emerge. After a long recruitment drought, last year’s numbers finally climbed, but Army officials link it to “a higher unemployment rate among people aged 16 to 24…” In other words, if the economy is depressed enough, as long as the military is one of the few employers still hiring, a recruitment drought won’t be so obvious.

Keep ReadingShow less