Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Mind Is a Terrible Thing to Waste - What To Do

Opinion

African American elementary student and his friends studying over computers during a class in the classroom.

A 20-year education veteran examines the decline of student performance in America, highlighting the impact of screen time, overreliance on technology, weak fundamentals, and unequal school funding—and calls for urgent education reform.

Getty Images, StockPlanets

The motto of the United Negro College Fund can today be applied to all children in our school systems—not just the socially disadvantaged, or poor, or intellectually challenged, but all children regardless of SES characteristics or intelligence. I say this based on 20 years of working as a volunteer tutor or staff in elementary and middle schools in various parts of the country.

The problem has several components. The first is the pervasive negative impact on children's minds of their compulsive use of screens, social media, and the internet. There is no shortage of articles that have been written, both scientific and anecdotal, about the various aspects of this negative impact. Research shows that the compulsive use of screen devices leads to a variety of social interaction and psychological problems.


Then there is the use that is being made of computers in schools as a major part of the instruction program. From what I have seen, students spend more time on the laptop than receiving instruction from their teacher. While computers have a place in a learning program, I believe that too much reliance has been placed on them. Research adds credence to this feeling.

Parents don't seem to place the same emphasis on learning that they used to, and as a result, children are less committed to the process. As learning is not an easy process, and definitely often not "fun," this lack of commitment results in many students frequently tuning instruction out. (I found no research on this.)

Both ELA and math instruction are based on and depend on the mastering and understanding of fundamentals—for ELA, phonics; for math, the basic rules for adding and subtracting, and most importantly, the multiplication table. Yet time and again, I have found that students who have not mastered these fundamentals are moved forward regardless. Most schools today promote all students to the next grade, regardless of performance; I've been told that parents don't want their children held back.

Teachers are often blamed for the fact that the national scores of students' knowledge of English and Math have declined. But while there no doubt is some blame there, there is just so much a teacher can do when faced with children who don't care about education, who think learning is irrelevant for them, and who have minds that have a short attention span because of the impact of technology.

Another problem is that even with all the money the Federal government pours into our schools, there are still many children who are left behind because they don't receive the remedial instruction they need; teachers just don't have the time. I'm not talking so much about the children in Special Ed or Title 1 programs, I'm talking about the many children who don't qualify for these programs but just never learned the basics in elementary school, not because of a learning disability but because they just couldn't keep up, and so each year fall farther and farther behind as they are promoted to the next grade. This applies to both English and Math. Even if they learn some process in 5th or 6th grade, the basics—whether it's phonics or the multiplication tables—need to be applied, and if those were never mastered, the student is stuck.

But school districts uniformly do not spend the money to provide one-on-one remedial services to such children. Because they fall between the cracks of the various Federal programs, they are doomed to low functioning in life. In a country as rich as ours, this is disgraceful. No child should be left behind.

Finally, the way in which schools are funded in this country is a recipe for inequality. Local property taxes account for 45% of school funding; another 45% comes from the state, with the federal government contributing only 10%. Although states often apply equalization formulas, they usually don't work. As a result, children who grow up in areas that have a better tax base receive a better funded, and typically a better, education. Thus, poor children—both White and people of color—never receive the education that gives them the equal opportunity that is promised in the Declaration of Independence to pursue happiness.

The result of all these factors is that untold millions of minds are wasted. This is not just an unnecessary tragedy for the individuals so impacted, but it is a drag on our society and economy because these individuals will never be able to contribute to the economy as they otherwise would and their participation in society is limited.

Regarding the impact of technology on children's lives, after numerous studies around the world of the negative impact on children, there is movement to limit the use of smartphones and other technology by children under 16. Regarding the use of technology in the classroom, I am not aware of any movement to return to a system of greater teacher involvement. Regarding those that never master ELA or math, parent, teacher, and school organizations must lobby state and federal governments for funds to provided one-on-one remedial instruction for such children, initially whatever grade they're in; at some point, it should only be necessary in the elementary grades where those skills are taught.

But beyond such efforts, it is critical that parents emphasize the importance of learning to success and happiness in one's life. There is a reason why certain cultures, both in fact and stereotype, produce students who excel more in their education—Asian and Jewish come to mind immediately—it is that parents in these cultures, regardless of their social status, generally emphasize the importance of education, not just to get ahead for a better life.

All parents should be encouraged by whatever agencies or health providers they come in contact with to bring education into the home and emphasize its importance to their children. If a parent is not comfortable with that because of their own low-level of educational attainment, they need to be shown how they can do this simply but effectively.

This should be seen as a component part of the push for equal opportunity in our society. Everyone at all levels of society should be committed to this goal that has its roots in the words of the Declaration of Independence, that:

"all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men."

Ronald L. Hirsch is a teacher, legal aid lawyer, survey researcher, nonprofit executive, consultant, composer, author, and volunteer. He is a graduate of Brown University and the University of Chicago Law School and the author of We Still Hold These Truths. Read more of his writing at www.PreservingAmericanValues.com


Read More

A person reaches for a book on a shelf in a library.

A daughter of Cultural Revolution survivors argues U.S. school book bans are about power, not protection, and how a freedom-to-read law offers a way forward.

LAW Ho Ming/Getty Images

My Parents Lived through a Book Ban. Americans Should Demand the Freedom to Read.

At the start of this school year, a Texas schoolteacher from my home school district went nationally viral. In a video, Darius Williams sobbed as he explained that after he “gave them the answers,” his high school seniors still could not complete an exercise comprising two sentences to read and one to write. Reading scores in the country currently languish at a twenty-year low. In the new year, a historic set of new state lawmakers around the country should prioritize reversing ineffective policies that have kept critical reading materials out of school libraries.

Since 2021, book bans have reached a level “never before seen in the life of any living American” (34,000 total in public schools across the country, according to PEN America). Some institutions are even preemptively removing materials to avoid controversy, a phenomenon termed “soft censorship.”

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth stands for anthems at the Pentagon on October 15, 2026 in Arlington, Virginia. The two defense officials discussed NATO financial commitments by European countries.

Hegseth’s order ending tenure at the service academies punishes scholars and leaves future officers less prepared for war. Here’s why Congress should step in.

Finn Gomez/Getty Images

Secretary Hegseth's Tenure Ban Fails Our Officers and the Academy

Yesterday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth fired another round of shots in his war on higher education, and once again he fought it in his own backyard. After pulling books off the shelves of the Naval Academy and cutting the Pentagon’s ties to graduate programs at Harvard and Princeton, he signed a memo ordering the service academies to stop granting tenure to civilian professors, effective immediately. Tenure, he wrote, breeds “academic stagnation, faculty complacency,” and belongs to a broader academic structure that serves to “dilute our focus on lethality.” This assault on the academy is a mistake, both wronging the scholars who teach at the academies, and leaving the cadets and midshipmen who learn from them less prepared for war.

In his depiction of the tenure system's shortcomings, Hegseth mischaracterizes it as a finish line, where receiving tenure marks the moment a professor stops running. Granted, there is a grain of truth here: a study of over 12,000 American faculty members published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences found that in non-lab-based fields like political science and sociology, publication rates do fall once tenure is secured. Lab-based fields, meanwhile, sustain high research output. More importantly, however, the same study found that after receiving tenure, scholars turn toward newer, riskier questions, also known as the kind that occasionally transforms a field.

Keep ReadingShow less
Students in a classroom.​

Civics is a practice, not a quiz. See how immigrant and Indigenous communities are teaching schools to build, not blend in, as America turns 250.

Getty Images, andresr

Schools Can’t Teach Democracy Without Valuing Students’ Lived Experiences

Recently, I gathered with a group of dads outside Philadelphia to clear out a neighborhood park through Dads for All, the organization I co-founded. Some of us grew up in that neighborhood, some had never set foot in it, and plenty of us had no idea what we were doing. Our kids, ages three to seventeen, hauled branches and swung tools nearly as long as they were tall — and they were delighted.

Here's what I watched them figure out: A park is where a kid gets to be free. It's where you run, where you pretend to be a superhero, where the ground belongs to you. And you assume it just shows up. That morning, our children learned that it doesn't. Somebody has to see what it could be. Somebody has to partner with the people who own it and the people who use it. And then somebody has to pick up the loppers. That was the most honest civics lesson my son has ever had, and unfortunately, that is where the problem is.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Window to Safely Managing the Education Freedom Tax Credit is Closing Fast
Empty wooden tables and chairs in a library with shelves of books
Photo by Tuyen Vo on Unsplash

The Window to Safely Managing the Education Freedom Tax Credit is Closing Fast

There is a major change in how students, schools, and educational programs can be funded, taking effect on January 1, 2027, with a small window of time to ensure the program is well managed. We have to move fast.

The Education Freedom Tax Credit (EFTC) creates a new federal tax credit for taxpayers who make qualified contributions to approved nonprofit Scholarship Granting Organizations (SGOs). SGOs, in turn, use that money to award scholarships for tutoring, tuition, or other qualified education expenses for students, regardless of whether they attend public, private, or charter schools. The money is contributed directly to SGOs by taxpayers, who can receive a dollar-for-dollar tax credit on their 2027 tax filing, up to $1,700 for individuals and $3,400 for married taxpayers filing jointly.

Keep ReadingShow less