Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

How to fight Trump's voter intimidation army

How to fight Trump's voter intimidation army

Trump supporters blocked voters' access to an early-voting location in Virginia

For Black Americans, the polling station has long been a militarized space, "guarded" by the violence and intimidation of white supremacists. After the Civil War when freemen began amassing political power in state legislatures, whites used murder, rape, lynching and other forms of violence to discourage Black voting.

Conservatives are organizing another network of vote intimidators for the November election, which could disenfranchise millions of voters of color. As registration deadlines approach, states must address the potential for intimidation at polling sites to ensure a free, fair and non-discriminatory election.


Voter intimidation — intimidating or threatening someone with the goal of interfering with their right to vote — is illegal under federal law. But it wasn't always so. Whites — both vigilantes and legal authorities — used intimidation to block access to the voting booth. When Union troops began to withdraw from the South after Reconstruction, groups like the Ku Klux Klan and the Knights of the White Camellia used racial terrorism to discourage freemen and their white allies from voting. During the civil rights movement, segregationists like Bull Conner likewise assaulted Black demonstrators calling for integration and voting rights with dogs and fire hoses.

Throughout U.S. history, voter intimidation not only disenfranchised Black Americans, but also cost those who sought the right to vote their very lives.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

In 2020, we must also ring the alarm around the coordinated effort to intimidate Black and Latino voters. Conservatives have invested $20 million to mobilize 50,000 volunteers to "guard the vote" during early voting and on Election Day. President Trump has even called for stationing armed guards at the polls while stoking widely debunked myths of in-person voter fraud. It is critical that Black and Latino voters who led national protests against state violence in 2020 are able to cast ballots free from hostility.

What can we do to ensure they can access the polls safely?

One, we must educate them so they can identify and appropriately respond to any voter intimidation they witness or experience. If someone aggressively questions you, harasses you or challenges your eligibility to vote outside of the polls, document and report the incident to an election official at the site. Request any person engaging in this behavior be removed from the polling place. Call the national Election Protection hotline (1-866-OUR-VOTE), which is staffed by voting rights lawyers who can help you in real time.

Second, advocates should work with election officials to limit the role of police at the polls. Election officials should also restrict firearms at polling sites. Police at the polls may intimidate voters who are justice-involved, while the recent killings in Kenosha, Wis., highlight the danger when deadly weapons are brought to contested spaces.

To be sure, it is important police are quickly dispatched to polling locations in an emergency. But state and local officials should recruit enough poll workers to manage social distancing in long lines, control crowd flow and provide assistance to voters with disabilities or language access needs. These roles are inappropriate for law enforcement.

Finally, we must restore the Voting Rights Act. Prior to the Supreme Court's weakening of this law in the Shelby v. Holder case, federal employees would monitor elections in states with a history of racial discrimination. In 2020, it is clear that the Department of Justice won't be saving Black voters from voter intimidation. It is up to the organizers, advocates, and grassroots leaders to continue the fight.

Gilda Daniels is litigation director of the Advancement Project and the former deputy chief in the Voting Section of the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division. Read more from The Fulcrum's Election Dissection blog or see our full list of contributors.

Read More

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.

We haven't yet seen evidence that would cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election — even with the unprecedented challenges of a global pandemic, the threat of foreign interference, civil unrest and greater turnout than any time since 1900. That counts as a resounding success.

Once the final tallies are certified, we need to thank the election administrators and poll workers whose heroic efforts preserved American democracy. After that, we need to assess what worked best and what needs to improve, so we can identify achievable steps to make future elections even more secure.

Based on what we know so far, here are five things that should be on the U.S. elections to-do list:

Keep ReadingShow less
USA map with flags
FotografiaBasica/Getty Images

Distorted U.S. democracy underscores urgency of Electoral College reform

On Dec. 14, the Electoral College will cast its votes. Barring any unforeseen outrage, a majority will vote for Joe Biden, the popular vote winner in the general election, to sighs of relief. Many may conclude the creaky Electoral College works most of the time, and that any fixes are just too hard to worry about.

That would be a mistake.

Keep ReadingShow less
Georgia voting stickers
Stop the presses, says appeals court, even if that means longer Georgia voting lines
Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

The three steps to ensure a well-run runoff in Georgia

Hold the champagne: The 2020 Election Season isn't over just yet. Neither of Georgia's Senate races resulted in a victor on Election Day, sending both contests to January runoffs that will likely determine control of the U.S. Senate. And while many folks are understandably focused on the political repercussions of these races, I'm pulling for a different candidate: democracy.

While Georgia will likely conduct a risk-limiting audit and recount of the presidential election later this month, the state appears to have done a good job administering the 2020 presidential election. As a former election administrator and expert on the integrity of elections, my assessment is there is no reason to question the integrity of the election outcome. If any concrete evidence suggesting that wrongful disenfranchisement has or will affect the accuracy of the outcome, that assessment could change. Right now, there isn't.

Regardless, these are three steps Georgia officials could take now to ensure the integrity of the state's runoff elections in January:

Keep ReadingShow less
Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

The nation has a new president-elect, Joe Biden. At the same time, there is no official president-elect, because the electoral process itself hasn't yet reached that point.

How can both these assertions be true? And if they are, how are Americans supposed to understand that? Most importantly, how can Americans of opposite parties get on the same page, so that we can move forward together as one country, as our new president-elect in his impressive victory speech is urging us to do?

When it comes to ending elections, there are actually two different processes at work, and they operate on different timelines.

Keep ReadingShow less