Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Voter registration deadlines are here. What if that didn't matter?

voter regisration sign
Let’s help millions escape from voter registration limbo
Joseph Sohm/Getty Images

It's two weeks from Election Day, and millions of potential voters are once again locked out of the democratic process. That's thanks to registration deadlines that have come and gone in many states, and the fact that fewer than half of states allow same-day voter registration.


This is no small problem. In November 2016, there were 66.5 million eligible but unregistered voters across the United States. Some of those may have tried to register before their state's deadline, only to be shut out by glitches and crashes like those we've seen again this cycle.

In Virginia, a severed cable took out the state's online registration system for several critical hours on the last day voters could register. In Florida, the online registration system also crashed at the deadline. On the single day following the crash that the state reopened registration (thanks to advocacy by my organization Demos and our partners New Florida Majority and the Advancement Project), 50,000 additional Floridians registered to vote. This in a state where the presidential race 20 years ago was decided by only 537 votes.

It shouldn't be this way. Voter registration is a remnant of a democracy designed to restrict the franchise to only those deemed worthy or competent, or in the words of the architects of Illinois' first registration law, to "preserve the purity of the ballot box." Born after the Civil War and enacted throughout the country through the early 20th century, voter registration laws have always had the effect of restricting the electoral and political power of Black people, immigrants and workers. Under California's first registration law, voters had to present themselves in person, and if the clerk did not know them, show evidence of their eligibility, a full three months before Election Day. Naturalized citizens could only register by bringing their original, court-sealed papers or by bringing two "legal voters" vouching for their eligibility. In Illinois, voters had to show up in person the third or fourth Tuesday before an election, and if their eligibility was challenged, they had to submit an affidavit and show up in person, again, the second Tuesday before the election and argue before an election judge.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Registration laws suppressed voter turnout from the very beginning, and they continue to reduce the number of registered Black and Latino voters today. Census data from 2016 show that 73 percent of whites were registered to vote, compared to 65 percent of Black people and just 39 percent of Latinos. Legislatures are finding new tactics to reject registrations and purge voters from the rolls to reduce the political power of Black, Latino, immigrant and working-class voters.

The United States is unique in the hurdles we make people clear to vote. In democracies around the world, verifying the eligibility of voters is the responsibility of the government. That's why Demos and others have called for a system of universal voter registration, in which all eligible people are automatically registered to vote, and those who are not registered when they show up to vote are allowed to do so on-site. This would begin to end this anachronistic system and build a more inclusive democracy.

Laura Williamson is a senior policy analyst working on voting rights and democracy at Demos. Read more from The Fulcrum's Election Dissection blog.

Read More

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.

We haven't yet seen evidence that would cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election — even with the unprecedented challenges of a global pandemic, the threat of foreign interference, civil unrest and greater turnout than any time since 1900. That counts as a resounding success.

Once the final tallies are certified, we need to thank the election administrators and poll workers whose heroic efforts preserved American democracy. After that, we need to assess what worked best and what needs to improve, so we can identify achievable steps to make future elections even more secure.

Based on what we know so far, here are five things that should be on the U.S. elections to-do list:

Keep ReadingShow less
Georgia voting stickers
Stop the presses, says appeals court, even if that means longer Georgia voting lines
Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

The three steps to ensure a well-run runoff in Georgia

Hold the champagne: The 2020 Election Season isn't over just yet. Neither of Georgia's Senate races resulted in a victor on Election Day, sending both contests to January runoffs that will likely determine control of the U.S. Senate. And while many folks are understandably focused on the political repercussions of these races, I'm pulling for a different candidate: democracy.

While Georgia will likely conduct a risk-limiting audit and recount of the presidential election later this month, the state appears to have done a good job administering the 2020 presidential election. As a former election administrator and expert on the integrity of elections, my assessment is there is no reason to question the integrity of the election outcome. If any concrete evidence suggesting that wrongful disenfranchisement has or will affect the accuracy of the outcome, that assessment could change. Right now, there isn't.

Regardless, these are three steps Georgia officials could take now to ensure the integrity of the state's runoff elections in January:

Keep ReadingShow less
Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

The nation has a new president-elect, Joe Biden. At the same time, there is no official president-elect, because the electoral process itself hasn't yet reached that point.

How can both these assertions be true? And if they are, how are Americans supposed to understand that? Most importantly, how can Americans of opposite parties get on the same page, so that we can move forward together as one country, as our new president-elect in his impressive victory speech is urging us to do?

When it comes to ending elections, there are actually two different processes at work, and they operate on different timelines.

Keep ReadingShow less
What's next for U.S. democracy after the president's stress test?
Jay Cross/Flickr

What's next for U.S. democracy after the president's stress test?

In another assessment of the 2020 vote so far, Election Dissection sat down with Laura Williamson, who works on voting rights and democracy at Demos. We spoke about President Trump's election night remarks as a stress test for the United States. Williamson had plenty to say about the state of the elections and some things that need fixing after the votes are finally counted.

What was your reaction to the president?

The president's remarks and actions are a test of our ability to show up, as a people, to mass mobilize and resist his authoritarian calls to end the counting. The basis of our democracy is that we pick our leaders. It's not the president or the courts that choose. So it's a test of our ability as a people to resist what is so clearly an anti-democratic attack.

And Americans are rising to the test. We're seeing masses of people calling for every vote to be counted. They're showing up and exercising their political power. We flexed our political power one way, by voting before or on Election Day. Now we're exercising it again in a different way — showing up in the streets and demanding every eligible vote is counted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why street protests may not be the best strategy to protect the election

Why street protests may not be the best strategy to protect the election

In the months leading up to Election Day, civil society organizations carried out an extraordinary effort to make sure people across the country knew what to expect. That laid the groundwork for the core messages that have dominated in recent days: Every vote needs to be counted; the system is not broken just because it is taking longer to determine the winner; and election officials are in charge and will get the job done.

News organizations have amplified these messages. They have impressively stepped up to the challenge of covering this complicated, highly contentious election. The result has been much more calm during an uncertain post-election period than might have been expected. A development that many feared could trigger chaos — President Trump unilaterally declaring victory — has been a bit like the proverbial barking dog ignored by the passing truck.

Keep ReadingShow less