Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Radical Reconstruction: Looking to the Past To Move Forward

Opinion

 Side view of young African American male voter filling in ballot

An opinion piece argues that America must revisit Reconstruction after the Trump era, starting with the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.

Pressmaster/Getty Images

The last 11 years of electoral politics have plunged our nation into new lows: withdrawal and reentry into Middle Eastern conflicts, a politicized public health response during a pandemic, an attempted coup of the American government, and continual police brutality against people of color. Donald Trump’s existence on the political stage, in office or out, has held our nation hostage through repeated crises, leading us to the most divided time in our nation since the Civil War. The path forward for our young country doesn’t just require new ideas: we need to finally follow through on Reconstruction.

A blip in American history, Abraham Lincoln’s post-Civil War vision, called Reconstruction, was the proposed path forward for Southern reentry into American life. In exchange for loyalty to the Union and some guarantees of black civil protection, Lincoln prepared to readmit secessionist states into the Union, albeit with political restraints on numerous Confederate leaders.


Reconstruction was a bold stance by Lincoln, whose assassination prevented him from witnessing the civil rights gains made during the stage in American history he worked tirelessly to usher in. Under successive presidents Andrew Johnson and Ulysses S. Grant, the Reconstruction Era actualized much of Lincoln’s vision. In twelve years, “Radical Reconstruction” led to the ratification of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, saw former enslaved men and Union heroes such as Robert Smalls elected to state and federal office across the South, and culminated in the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1875.

But its staying power was marred by racial tension, loosened restrictions on political participation for former Confederate leaders, and political strife inside both parties over Reconstruction’s impact on White Southerners. The election of Rutherford B. Hayes in the 1876 presidential election ended Reconstruction and paved the way for Jim Crow across the American South, undoing the initial steps needed for a young country to learn from its past.

It took almost 90 more years for America to progress closer to Reconstruction’s intent with the Civil Rights and Voting Rights legislation of the 1960’s, and it’s still evident today that our baby steps toward addressing equal rights weren’t enough.

From the President’s petition to the Supreme Court to dismiss mail-in ballots to the gutting of the Voting Rights Act via the Louisiana v. Callais decision, 2026 alone has proven the need to aggressively expand voting rights for African Americans. America’s post-Trump era is merely 28 months away, and our nation can’t expect to brush off generations of wounds and move forward: we need to reflect on what we failed to accomplish post-Civil War and get back to the “Radical Reconstruction” our country still desperately needs.

It seems impossible to speculate on how to close the chapter on a period that officially ended 149 years ago, but the starting point is obvious: The John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act. A piece of legislation that would revitalize the Voting Rights Act of 1965, this bill would protect communities of color against racial gerrymandering and revamp protections for polling places and workers against any form of threat or violence.

The United States is at more than a crossroads; its soul is under attack. If we truly want to recover the soul of America, irrespective of party lines, then turning the clock on Reconstruction and delivering new voting rights legislation is the honest way forward.

Like President Rutherford B. Hayes, Donald Trump is just the current impediment to our path forward as a country. After President Trump leaves the White House in January 2029, Reconstruction could finally get us back on track and ensure that everyone, regardless of race, religion, or political affiliation, has an America whose laws treat them equally – fulfilling the original intent of Abraham Lincoln’s “Radical Reconstruction."


Seamus Love is a lawyer, political strategist, and founder of Shell Street Consulting


Read More

Person looking at computer screen at work.

Brenda Núñez, voter registration supervisor for Nueces County, shows the home screen of the state's voter registration system in 2024. Election officials say they're still struggling to use the system, known as TEAM, to complete essential tasks.

(==Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Election Officials Are Scrambling To Process Voter Registration Backlog Using a System They Say Does Not Work

At 6 p.m. a few days after the state sent Randall County election administrator Shannon Lackey a backlog of 3,388 of voter registration records, she was still at her desk, processing them after a full day of work.

She planned to stay late and get as much done as she could, then keep working from home. Lackey, whose department has five employees, isn’t expecting overtime pay or compensatory time off to make up for the extra work caused by the state error.

Keep Reading Show less
multiethnic American voters participating in the US election, showcasing the concept of choice in a democracy

Presidents who lost the popular vote often faced economic turmoil. See the pattern from Harrison to Trump and how a 50-state strategy could change it.

Alan Mazzocco/Getty Images

Path Forward from Economic Consequences of Non-Popular Vote Presidents

While losing the popular vote does not inherently cause economic ruin, the structural political weakness of entering office without a democratic majority mandate often compounded the economic challenges their administrations faced. These terms were marked by distinct economic hardships, structural imbalances, or severe financial crises.

Destabilizing Partisan Protectionism

Keep Reading Show less
people filling out their ballots at voting booths and submitting their vote.

Independent voters may hand Democrats control of Congress this fall — but as history shows, they'll get nothing in return. Here's how to change that.

Pressmaster/Getty Images

Swinging Outcomes Is Not Enough

The midterms are six weeks away, and polls predict that independent voters, who broke for Donald Trump in 2024, are planning on voting for Democrats by wide margins. Among Latinos, the numbers are staggering, to the point that the Republican gerrymanders in Florida and Texas may actually result in Democratic victories.

If the Democrats take control of Congress, it will be because of independents. And what do independents get in return?

Keep Reading Show less
Diverse People At Voting Booth. Vote Here Elections Sign

A political scientist examines how automatic voter registration is quietly turning non-affiliation into America's largest voting bloc.

AndreyPopov/Getty Images

When Neither Party Is the Default: Rethinking Representation As America’s Electorate Changes

For most of my career as a political scientist, representation was the central theme of my teaching and research. Early on, I studied how legislators understood their responsibilities to constituents — whether they saw themselves as delegates carrying out constituent mandates, trustees exercising independent judgment, or politicos combining both. That work asked a question that still matters: What does it mean to represent the public in a changing democracy?

Today I find myself asking a related question: What happens when the electorate changes but the institutions built to represent it do not?

Keep Reading Show less