Writing in 1958, Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, compared stripping someone of their citizenship to torture. He argued that “Citizenship is not a license that expires upon misbehavior. And the deprivation of citizenship is not a weapon that the Government may use to express its displeasure at a citizen's conduct, however reprehensible that conduct may be.”
You would never know that from the way the Trump Administration has been trying to use that weapon. They are apparently determined to use it against Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, a naturalized citizen and vocal critic of the president.
She has been on his enemies' list for a long time.
This effort came to light after Homeland Security agents carried out a predawn search of her home on October 12. They obtained a warrant alleging immigration fraud and false statements in conjunction with her naturalization process.
Targeting Omar is precisely the sort of thing Warren had in mind when he warned against the perils of government efforts to use deprivation of citizenship to punish people who offend or displease powerful public officials. All of us have a stake in this case.
It is blatantly unconstitutional and cruel, and it is another shameful episode in the saga of the Trump presidency.
USA Today notes that Omar is not alone in being targeted for denaturalization. “The Trump administration has spent the past year reviving denaturalization, a legal tool once reserved mostly for war criminals and terrorism suspects.”
“For decades,” it adds, “the government averaged about 11 such cases a year…. Since Trump returned to office, the Justice Department has filed at least 163 cases and set a goal of 250 this month.”
He ramped up denaturalization efforts on the first day of his second term when he signed an Executive Order that directed the Secretary of State, in coordination with the Attorney General, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Director of National Intelligence, to "ensure the devotion of adequate resources to identify and take appropriate action for offenses described in 8 U.S.C. § 1451."
Six months later, Brett Shumate, the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, ordered lawyers in that division to ramp up denaturalization proceedings. Civil denaturalization is an easier route than doing it as a criminal punishment. It avoids the restriction imposed by the Supreme Court in 1958, since in that case the loss of citizenship was imposed as a punishment for the commission of a crime.
And according to the New York Times, in December 2025, the Trump Administration directed “U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services field offices…(to) ‘supply Office of Immigration Litigation with 100-200 denaturalization cases per month’ in the 2026 fiscal year.”
Congress has laid out a series of circumstances under which denaturalization can occur in a provision of the law known as “8 U.S.C. § 1451.” One of those circumstances is if the “certificate of naturalization…(is) illegally procured or (was) procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation…”
This seems to be the basis on which the Trump Administration hopes to strip Rep. Omar of her citizenship. They allege that she lied about her age to obtain citizenship through her father’s naturalization, “a route open only to children under 18. Investigators are trying to determine whether the family misstated her birth date so she would qualify….”
The denaturalization law, 8 U.S.C. § 1451, states that someone can lose their citizenship if their “certificate of naturalization (was) illegally procured or…procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation.”
Echoing the concerns of another era, it also states that someone can be denaturalized if they “become a member of or affiliated with any organization, membership in or affiliation with which at the time of naturalization would have precluded such person from naturalization… (and indicates) that such person was not attached to the principles of the Constitution of the United States and was not well disposed to the good order and happiness of the United States at the time of naturalization….”
Professor Patrick Weil recalls that during World War I, the administration of President Woodrow Wilson denaturalized German citizens as well as anarchists and people who opposed the war. And, during World War II, the Roosevelt Administration stripped the citizenship of people who were members of the pro-Nazi German American Bund.
However, in 1943, the Supreme Court clamped down on denaturalization efforts when it rejected the government’s effort to denaturalize “an admitted member of the Communist Party of the United States.” As Justice Frank Murphy explained, “We are… a heterogeneous people…who sought refuge in the new world from the cruelty and oppression of the old, where men have been burned at the stake, imprisoned, and driven into exile in countless numbers for their political and religious beliefs.”
“Here,” Murphy said, “they have hoped to achieve a political status as citizens in a free world in which men are privileged to think and act and speak according to their convictions, without fear of punishment or further exile so long as they keep the peace and obey the law.”
All Americans should heed Murphy’s words even if the Trump Administration does not.
Murphy warned that allowing the government “to turn the clock back” after citizenship is granted “is more serious than a taking of one's property, or the imposition of a fine or other penalty. For it is safe to assert that nowhere in the world today is the right of citizenship of greater worth to an individual than it is in this country.”
For people around the world, Murphy observed, American citizenship “is regarded as the highest hope of civilized men.”
Today, because of what the Trump Administration has done and is doing, that may no longer be as true as it once was. That is one sign of the terrible price this country is paying for having elected Trump president.
One way of describing that price is to recall what Chief Justice Warren said about the loss of citizenship. It “destroys for the individual the political existence that was centuries in the development,” and amounts to taking away “the right to have rights.”
If the Trump Administration can do that to Ilhan Omar, it will send a chilling message to the 26 million naturalized citizens in this country that they, too, can lose that right if and when they behave in ways that offend the president and his cronies. None of us, no matter our citizenship status, should want to live under such a regime, a regime that, in the words of the political theorist Hannah Arendt, is displaying the signs of what she called “totalitarian infection.”
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell professor of jurisprudence and political science at Amherst College.




















U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Pinnacle Bank Expo Center on the Nebraska State Fairgrounds on October 05, 2026 in Grand Island, Nebraska.
The President Invited Iran to Bomb My Home
I was driving home to San Diego from Los Angeles on Monday night when I heard that the President of the United States had offered both cities up to Iran as bomb targets. At a rally in Nebraska, defending his war, Trump told the crowd, “let [Iran] take out Los Angeles, let ‘em take out San Diego.” It was, he said, “a very small price to pay.”
I was coming from a Bernie Sanders rally for Proposition 40, the one-time tax on California billionaires that would send 90% of its revenue to healthcare. We desperately need it to pass because, in order to give tax breaks to billionaires, Trump signed a law that will strip health coverage from 10 million Americans; this tax will make sure we can still cover Californians. Call me crazy, but I think taxing billionaires one time so we can make sure kids in California get to see a doctor is a very small price to pay. I also think that even if Trump were joking, it is indefensible to make jokes about the potential destruction of so many lives. Human life is never a small price to pay. Human life is priceless.
Plus, the reality is: here in San Diego, we’re already paying the price for Trump’s actions, and it’s not small at all. He has gutted FEMA, tried to kill climate resiliency programs, and destroyed public health standards, while his signature law is set to cut off health insurance and food support for hundreds of thousands of San Diegans. Like plenty of American cities, San Diego is already busy finding local solutions to respond to the problems this president has recklessly created.
Not to mention, at least 19 American service members have been killed in this war already. Human rights monitors have documented more than 3,600 dead in Iran by April alone. Here at home, gas is sitting just pennies below its all-time record. Taxpayers have already spent more than $45 billion on the war, while Trump’s oil and gas portfolio has grown by roughly $15.5 million this year alone. Of course anything is a “small price” to someone paying free.99 for this war, and profiting from it. Meanwhile, We the People are paying twice: first for the war, and then for the consequences of that war. But now he wants San Diego to pay a third time, flippantly offering us up to Iran.
It is worth noticing which cities he thought to name. Were San Diego and Los Angeles strategically chosen to signify something to his audience, or were they simply the first cities that came to mind as expendable places? Either way, the effect is to normalize—-and to gauge a crowd’s reaction to–the idea of massive violence in major California cities, suitable targets because of their perceived liberal lean. So what if Iran needs to bomb a little bit of America before the war can be over? Who cares, says Trump, if they target Los Angeles and San Diego?
By the way, why didn’t he offer up San Francisco, the free-love hippie-town MAGA loves to hate (and also my birthplace)? Could it be because that’s where the tech titans live? The same ones who joined Trump for Xi Jinping’s state dinner, a guest list worth a combined $2.4 trillion?
San Diego may have fewer billionaires, but it is home to more than 115,000 active-duty service members and 230,000 veterans. One in six active-duty sailors–in the entire Navy–is stationed here. So is one in four Marines. You cannot throw a rock in this county without hitting a military family: brats and spouses and veterans are among us. I got out of the Navy last year after ten years, and eight of those were here in San Diego. When Trump says “let ‘em take out San Diego,” he’s talking about the backbone of the United States military. He’s also talking about the people fighting his war.
San Diego has not been watching this war from the sidelines. Today, the USS Abraham Lincoln returns to North Island after an almost yearlong deployment to the Middle East that featured food shortages, broken toilets, and mold in the showers after 286 days at sea without a single port call. Eight sailors in the Lincoln’s strike group attempted suicide, but in August, when a reporter asked whether the deployment had gone on too long, Trump said “not nearly long enough.” Now he has told a crowd in Nebraska that we should let Iran take out the city those sailors call home. These are sociopathic sentiments.
Last week at Quantico, Pete Hegseth closed his address to the force by telling them, “President Trump has your back and so do I.” To the contrary, President Trump has put one of the biggest military towns in the country forward as a target for our adversaries. With friends like these, the “domestic” in “against all enemies, foreign and domestic” starts to sound a lot less hypothetical.
San Diego is home to Naval Air Station North Island, Naval Base San Diego, Naval Amphibious Base Coronado, the Point Loma submarine base, Camp Pendleton, and Miramar (and I have been permanently stationed at or trained at all of them). If Iran bombed San Diego and Los Angeles, aside from the devastating loss of life, it would cripple an immense share of our national security readiness.
And for what, exactly? Trump says the war is “essentially almost over with.” This is the same man who claimed in June 2025 that Iran’s nuclear program had been “obliterated,” then launched a war over it anyway on February 28. More than seven months later, he wants us to believe two things at once: that we’ve basically won, and that we might need to sacrifice an American city or two to finish winning. If the war is almost over, why does anybody need to take out San Diego?
I wonder if Trump’s endorsed candidate for California’s 48th District here in San Diego County will respond to these remarks. He recently said “no pain, no gain,” when referring to the gas prices San Diegans are paying. Jim Desmond, would you apply that same mindset if we were bombed? Or do you have the moral courage to stand up for the people you’re running to represent?
Last November, six Democratic members of Congress, all veterans, including Senator Mark Kelly, recorded a video reminding troops of their duty to disobey unlawful orders, restating the law that says so. Trump called it “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH,” and then his Justice Department went looking for an indictment, which a grand jury refused. The president treated reading the law out loud to the troops as a capital offense, but then he himself invited a foreign enemy to destroy two American cities, possibly as a punchline. Is anyone calling the latter sedition? Who is demanding accountability?
Calling our lives a small price to pay affirms a moral bankruptcy, as well as an obvious dereliction of duty to the office he holds. While we can’t impeach him or invoke the 25th Amendment ourselves, we must stop being so quiet about what we’re paying already. We can make our voices heard by calling our representatives, writing op-eds, knocking doors, phone banking, and voting in defiance of the man who threatens the safety of our city. Ballots are already arriving in mailboxes. Vote, and vote yes on 40 (and no on 41 and 42).
Trump has been harming our cities for a while, but now he is inviting our military adversaries to join him in the harm. If we have any self-respect as Americans, we must not tolerate our leaders disregarding the dignity of lives in this way. We must fight for our home.
Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.