Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Orders Are an ‘Un‑American Attack’

Opinion

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Orders Are an ‘Un‑American Attack’

US citizens and American people

Getty Images

The Trump Administration’s latest executive orders targeting birthright citizenship are not just legally dubious—they are a direct challenge to the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the millions of Americans whose citizenship is guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Less than six weeks after the Court reaffirmed in Trump v. Barbara that “birthright citizenship is the law of the land,” the administration has returned with new orders designed to narrow who counts as American. legal experts view these actions as an attempt to “override constitutional guarantees” through executive fiat, despite the Court’s clear ruling.


This moment demands clarity: birthright citizenship is not a policy preference. It is a constitutional promise. And when a president attempts to rewrite that promise unilaterally, the threat is not theoretical—it is immediate, targeted, and deeply destabilizing.

Civil‑rights organizations have responded with urgency. Voto Latino called the orders “a direct assault on the Fourteenth Amendment,” and President and CEO María Teresa Kumar warned, “This is not about policy. This is about power — and about stripping millions of Americans of their constitutional rights.” Executive Director Beatriz Lopez added that the orders represent “a dangerous attempt to undermine the very foundation of American citizenship,” noting that Latino families and mixed‑status households would bear the brunt of the harm.

The Hispanic Federation issued one of the strongest rebukes. Frankie Miranda, its President and CEO, said the administration had shown “their obstinate efforts to violate the U.S. Constitution, undermine immigrant communities, target people of color, and disregard separation of powers.” He reminded the public that the Supreme Court had already rejected the administration’s previous attempt, stating, “Birthright citizenship is the law of the land, and no executive order can overturn a right so directly embedded within the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Miranda also highlighted the cruelty of singling out U.S. territories—especially Puerto Rico—in these orders. “Families in U.S. territories…are uniquely and cruelly singled out in this latest attack, threatening millions of Americans who already face their unique set of challenges.” His warning underscores a truth often ignored in national debates: attacks on citizenship do not fall evenly. They fall hardest on communities of color, immigrant families, and Americans living in territories whose political power is already constrained.

Constitutional scholars see little legal path forward for these orders. The Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause has been “consistently upheld for more than a century,” and the Court’s recent ruling leaves “little room for reinterpretation.” Yet the administration’s persistence reveals something deeper than a legal strategy—it reveals a political project aimed at redefining who belongs in America.

That project must be confronted directly. As Miranda put it, “We are confident that these orders will not survive judicial scrutiny,” but litigation alone is not enough. He urged Congress to “reassert its authority to push back on these un‑American attacks.” Voto Latino echoed that call, insisting that lawmakers must defend the Constitution and the communities targeted by these unlawful orders.

The fight over birthright citizenship is no longer a hypothetical debate or a fringe argument. It is now a test of whether the nation will uphold one of its most fundamental guarantees: that all people born on U.S. soil are equal in their citizenship, equal in their rights, and equal in their belonging. The administration’s latest orders challenge that principle at its core. The response must be as strong as the threat—rooted in law, history, and the lived reality of the Americans whose citizenship is not up for negotiation.

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Orders Are an ‘Un‑American Attack’ was first published by the Latino News Network and republished with permission.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of The Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network, and twice president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.


Read More

Statue of justice, gavel, and open book on table
Statue of justice, gavel, and open book on table

Partisan Loyalty Now Drives Americans’ Trust in Justice

Americans have rarely trusted their institutions less. In June, Gallup found average confidence in the 14 institutions it tracks was near a record low. Some 9% of the public trusted Congress, 27% trusted the Supreme Court, and 45% trusted the police. The criminal justice system, as a whole, ranked near the bottom.

Below those totals, however, lies a more telling story of divergence. Trust increasingly depends not on how an institution behaves, but on whether your side happens to run it. Republicans and Democrats each only have even a modest degree of confidence in Congress when their party is in control.

Keep ReadingShow less
What Comes Next for the 1 Million People Who Have Lost – or Will Soon Lose – Temporary Protected Status

People hold Haitian flags and signs during a July 2026 rally in San Diego in support of immigrants living in the U.S. with Temporary Protected Status.

What Comes Next for the 1 Million People Who Have Lost – or Will Soon Lose – Temporary Protected Status

At the beginning of President Donald Trump’s second term, 1.3 million individuals from 17 countries were living and working in the U.S. under Temporary Protected Status, or TPS.

TPS is a humanitarian form of protection from deportation for people who cannot return to their home countries because of an armed conflict, environmental disaster or other extraordinary circumstances.

Keep ReadingShow less
United States Customs and Border Protection sign

Signage over the headquarter entrance of the United States Customs and Border Protection building in Washington, D.C.

Getty Images

New bill seeks to limit TSA data sharing with ICE

A newly proposed bill in Congress would restrict the Department of Homeland Security from using airline passenger information for immigration enforcement, following growing scrutiny over a previously undisclosed data-sharing agreement between the Transportation Security Administration and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The “No TSA Data for ICE Act,” introduced earlier this month by U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Detroit), comes amid concerns over how information collected from passengers for air travel is being used by federal immigration authorities.

Keep ReadingShow less
Judge's hand holding wooden hammer

A lawyer breaks down 'rule of law' using everyday analogies—sports, board games—to explain why recent government actions threaten this founding principle.

naruecha jenthaisong/Getty Images

The Rule of Law Is Simple—and Essential to American Democracy

This series from Lawyers Defending American Democracy connects the words of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to current events that threaten democracy and the justice system. Each piece highlights the unique responsibility lawyers carry—through their oath, professional obligations, and roles in their communities—to help the public understand what’s at risk and to speak out when democratic principles are under threat. LDAD’s call to action is straightforward: as the Founders once did, we must recognize threats to constitutional values, demand accountability, and act to defend them.

Before the first No Kings rally last year, I carefully hand-lettered a sign that I thought perfectly encapsulated the day's theme. On one side, it read “IN THIS COUNTRY, THE RULE OF LAW IS KING." On the other, it read, "A GOVERNMENT OF LAWS, NOT OF MEN (John Adams)." I carried my sign proudly, certain that it would be a big hit. But the only reaction I got was someone asking me, “Are you a lawyer?” I wonder what gave me away.

Keep ReadingShow less