Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Orders Are an ‘Un‑American Attack’

Opinion

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Orders Are an ‘Un‑American Attack’

US citizens and American people

Getty Images

The Trump Administration’s latest executive orders targeting birthright citizenship are not just legally dubious—they are a direct challenge to the Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the millions of Americans whose citizenship is guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.

Less than six weeks after the Court reaffirmed in Trump v. Barbara that “birthright citizenship is the law of the land,” the administration has returned with new orders designed to narrow who counts as American. legal experts view these actions as an attempt to “override constitutional guarantees” through executive fiat, despite the Court’s clear ruling.


This moment demands clarity: birthright citizenship is not a policy preference. It is a constitutional promise. And when a president attempts to rewrite that promise unilaterally, the threat is not theoretical—it is immediate, targeted, and deeply destabilizing.

Civil‑rights organizations have responded with urgency. Voto Latino called the orders “a direct assault on the Fourteenth Amendment,” and President and CEO María Teresa Kumar warned, “This is not about policy. This is about power — and about stripping millions of Americans of their constitutional rights.” Executive Director Beatriz Lopez added that the orders represent “a dangerous attempt to undermine the very foundation of American citizenship,” noting that Latino families and mixed‑status households would bear the brunt of the harm.

The Hispanic Federation issued one of the strongest rebukes. Frankie Miranda, its President and CEO, said the administration had shown “their obstinate efforts to violate the U.S. Constitution, undermine immigrant communities, target people of color, and disregard separation of powers.” He reminded the public that the Supreme Court had already rejected the administration’s previous attempt, stating, “Birthright citizenship is the law of the land, and no executive order can overturn a right so directly embedded within the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Miranda also highlighted the cruelty of singling out U.S. territories—especially Puerto Rico—in these orders. “Families in U.S. territories…are uniquely and cruelly singled out in this latest attack, threatening millions of Americans who already face their unique set of challenges.” His warning underscores a truth often ignored in national debates: attacks on citizenship do not fall evenly. They fall hardest on communities of color, immigrant families, and Americans living in territories whose political power is already constrained.

Constitutional scholars see little legal path forward for these orders. The Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause has been “consistently upheld for more than a century,” and the Court’s recent ruling leaves “little room for reinterpretation.” Yet the administration’s persistence reveals something deeper than a legal strategy—it reveals a political project aimed at redefining who belongs in America.

That project must be confronted directly. As Miranda put it, “We are confident that these orders will not survive judicial scrutiny,” but litigation alone is not enough. He urged Congress to “reassert its authority to push back on these un‑American attacks.” Voto Latino echoed that call, insisting that lawmakers must defend the Constitution and the communities targeted by these unlawful orders.

The fight over birthright citizenship is no longer a hypothetical debate or a fringe argument. It is now a test of whether the nation will uphold one of its most fundamental guarantees: that all people born on U.S. soil are equal in their citizenship, equal in their rights, and equal in their belonging. The administration’s latest orders challenge that principle at its core. The response must be as strong as the threat—rooted in law, history, and the lived reality of the Americans whose citizenship is not up for negotiation.

Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Orders Are an ‘Un‑American Attack’ was first published by the Latino News Network and republished with permission.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of The Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network, and twice president of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists.


Read More

​Christa Pike

Christa Pike in an undated photo.

(Tennessee Department of Correction/ZUMA Press/TNS)

How death penalty opponents share the blame for botched executions

“Botched” is a perfectly fine word for golf, cooking, or home repair. It seems inadequate for the taking of a life, even the life of Christa Pike, a heinous murderer.

In 1996, a jury found Pike guilty of the torture and murder of her Jobs Corps classmate, Colleen Slemmer. Pike was sentenced to death. In the 30 years since, her case has gone through at least seven major rounds of appeal and judicial review, including four petitions to the Supreme Court. All were rejected. This doesn’t even include the many more attempts to reopen or reverse her sentence that went nowhere. She is guilty, lawfully and rightly convicted.

Keep ReadingShow less
A solemn portrait of a woman looking down, bathed in dramatic light and shadow from window blinds, emphasizing solitude and deep thought in monochrome.

After the Lindsay Clancy mistrial, we must confront postpartum mental illness and ask how to better support mothers before tragedy strikes.

Viktoriya Skorikova/Getty Images

The Questions We Should Be Asking About the Lindsay Clancy Case

Three children are dead.

Nothing that follows should ever diminish that heartbreaking reality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

President Donald Trump speaks before signing the Secure America Act in the Oval Office of the White House on June 10, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Federal Court Blocks Trump’s ‘Loyalty Question’ on Civil Service Job Applications

A court’s decision to block the Trump administration from including a “loyalty question” on federal job applications was a win not only for the nonpartisan civil service, but also for the communities public employees serve, said one labor leader whose union was among the plaintiffs in the case against the Office of Personnel Management.

Patrick Moran, president of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) union, said Friday that the loyalty questions the OPM placed on job applications for public servants were a “blatantly illegal attempt to hire partisan cronies who would endanger our communities by putting politics before people, rather than dedicated, qualified public service workers.”

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. standard certificate of live birth application form next to flag of USA.

U.S. standard certificate of live birth application form next to flag of USA.

Getty Images

Birthright Citizenship Explained: History, SCOTUS Rulings & Executive Orders

Birthright citizenship has been part of American law for more than 150 years. As the American public continues to see challenges against its constitutionality, brought on by the Trump administration, it is important to remember why.

After the Civil War, Congress adopted the 14th Amendment in 1868 to overturn Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), which had denied citizenship to Black Americans, dampening their federal protections. While the 13th amendment had abolished slavery a few years earlier, Free Black Americans were considered noncitizens by many, and thus had to work around a separate set of laws, meaning they could never be fully integrated as members of American society. In response to this issue, the 14th Amendment declares that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to its jurisdiction, are citizens of the United States.

Keep ReadingShow less