Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Philanthropy Must Accelerate a Just Energy Transition

Opinion

Protestors wearing masks and holding signs.

A deCOALonize protest against coal held in 2019 in Nairobi, Kenya.

Photo courtesy of deCOALonize.

After crucial global progress toward tackling the climate crisis in recent years, we are re-entering an era where powerful industrial nations are again resorting to military force to control fossil fuel reserves as both a key aim and lever of geopolitical power.

The United States’ illegal military intervention on January 3 in Venezuela, a colonialist power play for the country’s vast oil reserves, is among the latest outcomes of the dangerous pivot away from global efforts to reduce carbon emissions. Days after its military incursion in Venezuela, the U.S. became the first nation in the world to withdraw from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), an international treaty ratified by Congress in 1992 that seeks to limit the amount of climate pollution in the atmosphere.


For climate philanthropists, these moments must be a wake-up call. It is time for philanthropy to accelerate and deepen investments in activists, coalitions, and movements. Around the world, they are fighting to keep fossil fuels in the ground and working to build and scale the clean, renewable energy systems centered on human rights principles required to overcome the climate crisis.

Over the past year, climate scientists have been sounding the alarm that our planet is on track, at least temporarily, to overshoot a 1.5 °C rise in the world’s temperature – the target set by the Paris Agreement beyond which the world will experience far more catastrophic impacts of climate change and ecosystem collapse. If we don’t accelerate efforts to phase out fossil fuels and advance a just energy transition, not only will our planet suffer, but the pursuit for boundless extraction of fossil fuels will continue to dictate geopolitical relations and spur further aggression toward sovereign nations.

Philanthropy has an obligation to scale up flexible and long-term funding for the solutions we know are needed to ensure a just energy transition. Our sector has both the means and the reach to play a catalytic role in making that vision a reality. As a funder, I’ve seen such philanthropy empower grassroots climate activists and movements across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean, pushing back against further oil and coal expansion in their countries.

In Thailand, for example, after the Thai government announced plans in 2014 to build a coal-fired power plant in Krabi, we supported the activist groups Save Andaman Network and the Centre for Ecological Awareness Building to organize thousands of residents on nearby Koh Lanta. For eight years, this grassroots movement demonstrated across the region and in Bangkok. Local hotels hung anti-coal signs and recruited tourist testimonials against coal. They eventually helped to shape new narratives on the need for renewable energy systems that protect the basis of life. In 2022, Thailand’s Ministry of Energy relented and cancelled plans for the power plant.

In Kenya, we supported similar efforts of a coalition of activist groups called deCOALonize. They had been fighting the development of a coal-fired plant on the country’s northern coast. If completed, the plant would have been a grave threat to air quality and vital ecosystems, like marine life and mangroves, on which the region relies. The Lamu islands are also home to East Africa’s oldest Swahili settlement – a UNESCO Heritage Site. It took nine years of organizing, protesting, advocacy, and public interest litigation, but last October, a high court in Kenya permanently blocked the power plant from being built.

Several of our partners from Mesoamerica and elsewhere around the world also attended the COP30 in Belem, Brazil, in November. There, they added to the powerful chorus of social movement voices calling for governments around the world to commit to phasing out fossil fuels in line with the Paris Agreement’s goal of reigning in the global temperature increase.

Activists have the most decisive role in this crisis, but philanthropy must amplify its message. The fight for climate justice is an existential one, and it can only be enriched by aligned and deepened philanthropic investment. As President Trump will continue to demonstrate, fossil fuels will keep driving wealthy, authoritarian, and imperialist regimes toward military aggression and wars against sovereign nations. By urgently investing in social justice movements, philanthropy can empower grassroots leaders to promote renewable energy systems that transcend the logic of domination and extraction, and that will bring us toward a safer and more sustainable future.


Payal Patel works at the American Jewish World Service and is the director of their grantmaking and programmatic work on Land, Water and Climate Justice. AJWS is a human rights grantmaking and advocacy organization that supports activists and movements across Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean.


Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly attributed another author.


Read More

 Cracked Dry Earth - stock photo A pair of worn brown boots stand on cracked, dry earth. Sparse green plants struggle to grow amidst the barren landscape, creating a stark contrast.

After the AfD’s historic wins in Saxony-Anhalt and Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, an analyst links climate migration to democratic decline and a possible fix.

Climate, Migration and the Far Right: Democracies Need a Short-Term Plan

On September 6, the far-right German party Alternative for Germany (AfD) made a historic breakthrough. 100 years after Hitler’s official reorganization of the Nazi Party, a group that has openly strategized and worked with neo-Nazis won a plurality of the vote in the state of Saxony-Anhalt and is on the precipice of forming a government there. 14 days later, they won a plurality again in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania. This is the AfD's strongest electoral result yet, and the closest a far-right party has come to a majority in postwar Germany.

In a country with numerous safeguards against right-wing co-option – from a 5% minimum threshold to enter the Bundestag to bans for undemocratic parties – this democratic victory of a far-right movement shook the country to its core. Whether AfD is able to make up the handful of seats it needs in coalition agreements to form governments in both states isn’t the point; AfD’s stock is on the rise, and at this rate, they will likely continue to win at both the state and federal level. Even if Chancellor Merz’s coalition government can start delivering for the increasingly underemployed and isolated German people, by all signs, far-right support will only continue to increase.

Keep ReadingShow less
Humans May Start Wildfires. Climate Change Makes Them Catastrophic.
A forest fire glowing with bright orange flames and smoke at night
Photo by Egor Vikhrev on Unsplash

Humans May Start Wildfires. Climate Change Makes Them Catastrophic.

The summer of 2026 once again saw wildfire smoke from the West Coast and Midwest blanketing East Coast skies. Smoke-filled summer skies now seem to be the norm across America, and wildfire season isn’t even close to over.

The public response is also becoming normal. When investigators determine that a person started a wildfire, online chatter usually centers on the idea that humans are the cause and that climate change could not have played a role. That argument confuses the ignition source with the complex conditions that contribute to wildfire. A spark may explain where a wildfire began. It cannot, on its own, explain why flames spread so far and devastate entire communities.

Keep ReadingShow less
Aerial view of a large Google Data Center

AI data centers consume huge amounts of water and power. Tucson’s Project Blue shows why communities need clearer, verifiable transparency from tech companies.

Getty images

The True Cost of AI: Are Tech Companies Reducing the Damage?

Ever since the AI boom of 2022 with the release of OpenAI’s large language model “ChatGPT” to the public, we have seen the exponential rise of AI being seemingly forced into our daily lives. It makes sense after all; who doesn’t like an uncanny Will Smith eating spaghetti, making funny faces?

Fast forward 4 years, and that same technology is being used to create almost undetectable videos of posthumous celebrities doing things they never did. High school teachers and college professors must worry daily about the effects AI is having on both the work turned in and the brains of those submitting it.

Keep ReadingShow less
data server

Abstract image of a futuristic server with light blue and green LED lights.

Getty Images

The One Thing Both Sides of the Data Center Fight Already Agree On

In Festus, Missouri, a town that gave Donald Trump 67 percent of its vote, residents have filed to recall the mayor and three council members over a $6 billion data center. In New York, a Democratic governor has signed the first statewide moratorium on new ones. Across seven states, at least 33 recall campaigns are targeting as many as 58 local officials for the same reason, and the reason is not a party. It is a building.

That makes data centers the rarest thing in American politics right now: an issue where the folding chairs in a red county and a blue one are filled with people saying the same words. They are not saying "no technology." They are saying the box across the road raises their power bill, drains their water, takes the farm, and was negotiated behind a nondisclosure agreement before anyone in town knew its name. In Luther, Oklahoma, the moratorium passed only after word leaked that the mayor had been in closed talks with a developer for months. The anger is not about servers. It is about being handed a decision that was already made.

Keep ReadingShow less