Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Philanthropy Must Accelerate a Just Energy Transition

Opinion

Protestors wearing masks and holding signs.

A deCOALonize protest against coal held in 2019 in Nairobi, Kenya.

Photo courtesy of deCOALonize.

After crucial global progress toward tackling the climate crisis in recent years, we are re-entering an era where powerful industrial nations are again resorting to military force to control fossil fuel reserves as both a key aim and lever of geopolitical power.

The United States’ illegal military intervention on January 3 in Venezuela, a colonialist power play for the country’s vast oil reserves, is among the latest outcomes of the dangerous pivot away from global efforts to reduce carbon emissions. Days after its military incursion in Venezuela, the U.S. became the first nation in the world to withdraw from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), an international treaty ratified by Congress in 1992 that seeks to limit the amount of climate pollution in the atmosphere.


For climate philanthropists, these moments must be a wake-up call. It is time for philanthropy to accelerate and deepen investments in activists, coalitions, and movements. Around the world, they are fighting to keep fossil fuels in the ground and working to build and scale the clean, renewable energy systems centered on human rights principles required to overcome the climate crisis.

Over the past year, climate scientists have been sounding the alarm that our planet is on track, at least temporarily, to overshoot a 1.5 °C rise in the world’s temperature – the target set by the Paris Agreement beyond which the world will experience far more catastrophic impacts of climate change and ecosystem collapse. If we don’t accelerate efforts to phase out fossil fuels and advance a just energy transition, not only will our planet suffer, but the pursuit for boundless extraction of fossil fuels will continue to dictate geopolitical relations and spur further aggression toward sovereign nations.

Philanthropy has an obligation to scale up flexible and long-term funding for the solutions we know are needed to ensure a just energy transition. Our sector has both the means and the reach to play a catalytic role in making that vision a reality. As a funder, I’ve seen such philanthropy empower grassroots climate activists and movements across Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean, pushing back against further oil and coal expansion in their countries.

In Thailand, for example, after the Thai government announced plans in 2014 to build a coal-fired power plant in Krabi, we supported the activist groups Save Andaman Network and the Centre for Ecological Awareness Building to organize thousands of residents on nearby Koh Lanta. For eight years, this grassroots movement demonstrated across the region and in Bangkok. Local hotels hung anti-coal signs and recruited tourist testimonials against coal. They eventually helped to shape new narratives on the need for renewable energy systems that protect the basis of life. In 2022, Thailand’s Ministry of Energy relented and cancelled plans for the power plant.

In Kenya, we supported similar efforts of a coalition of activist groups called deCOALonize. They had been fighting the development of a coal-fired plant on the country’s northern coast. If completed, the plant would have been a grave threat to air quality and vital ecosystems, like marine life and mangroves, on which the region relies. The Lamu islands are also home to East Africa’s oldest Swahili settlement – a UNESCO Heritage Site. It took nine years of organizing, protesting, advocacy, and public interest litigation, but last October, a high court in Kenya permanently blocked the power plant from being built.

Several of our partners from Mesoamerica and elsewhere around the world also attended the COP30 in Belem, Brazil, in November. There, they added to the powerful chorus of social movement voices calling for governments around the world to commit to phasing out fossil fuels in line with the Paris Agreement’s goal of reigning in the global temperature increase.

Activists have the most decisive role in this crisis, but philanthropy must amplify its message. The fight for climate justice is an existential one, and it can only be enriched by aligned and deepened philanthropic investment. As President Trump will continue to demonstrate, fossil fuels will keep driving wealthy, authoritarian, and imperialist regimes toward military aggression and wars against sovereign nations. By urgently investing in social justice movements, philanthropy can empower grassroots leaders to promote renewable energy systems that transcend the logic of domination and extraction, and that will bring us toward a safer and more sustainable future.


Payal Sinha is a distinguished attorney who serves as Director of Strategic Partnerships and Community Engagement at the Tahrirh Justice Center, a national nonprofit that serves women, girls and all immigrant survivors of gender-based violence. She is a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project


Read More

Chicago’s First Environmental Justice Ordinance Faces Uncertain Future in City Council

David Architectural Metals, Inc. is a longtime Chicago metal fabrication company for commercial and industrial construction. The company is situated in the same area as the other sites.

Chicago’s First Environmental Justice Ordinance Faces Uncertain Future in City Council

CHICAGO— Chicago’s first environmental justice ordinance sits dormant in the City Council’s Zoning Committee. Awaiting further action, some activists and alders have been pushing to get it passed, while others don’t want it passed at all.

At a Nov. 3 rare special committee meeting, Ald. Bennett Lawson (44th Ward), chair of the City Council’s Zoning Committee, said he would not call for a vote on the ordinance. His decision signaled the measure may lack enough support to advance, but its sponsors think there is enough community support to push it forward.

Keep Reading Show less
Planting Hope in a Hard Season
selective photo of petaled flower
Photo by raquel raq on Unsplash

Planting Hope in a Hard Season

In an Advent reflection penned several years ago, Anne Lamott wrote, “even as everything is dying and falling asleep…something brand new is coming. Hope is coming….swords will be beaten into plowshares, spears into pruning hooks.

“This is a little hard to buy,” she admitted, “with a world stage occupied by—well, I’m not going to name names. But setting aside one’s tiny tendency toward cynicism,…in Advent — we wait; and hope appears if we truly desire to see it….we find it where we can….”

Keep Reading Show less
Mandatory vs. Voluntary Inclusionary Housing: What Cities Are Doing to Create Affordable Homes

affordable housing

Dougal Waters/Getty Images

Mandatory vs. Voluntary Inclusionary Housing: What Cities Are Doing to Create Affordable Homes

As housing costs rise across United States cities, local governments are adopting inclusionary housing policies to ensure that some portion of new residential developments remains affordable. These policies—defined and tracked by organizations like the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy—require or encourage developers to include below-market-rate units in otherwise market-rate projects. Today, over 1,000 towns have implemented some form of inclusionary housing, often in response to mounting pressure to prevent displacement and address racial and economic inequality.

What’s the Difference Between Mandatory and Voluntary Approaches?

Inclusionary housing programs generally fall into two types:

Keep Reading Show less
A thick cloud of exhaust rises up from a chimney in the blue sky

A comparative look at how New Jersey and Texas regulate refinery and chemical-plant pollution—and how weakened federal protections leave communities breathing unequal risks.

Getty Image, Hartmut Kosig

The Wind Doesn’t Know State Lines, Washington Doesn’t Seem To Care

As you cross the George Washington Bridge heading west, you can smell New Jersey. You pass through notorious Superfund marshes and speed through Newark's refinery smokestacks. East Coasters love to mock this “pollution alley," but here’s the twist: starting in the 1970s, New Jersey built some of the tightest refinery regulations in the country. If that corridor still feels toxic 50 years later, what's happening in states with far fewer protections?

When federal safeguards weaken, local rules decide how clean—or how dirty—the air gets. In mid-2025, the White House granted two-year delays for certain hazardous-air-pollutant standards covering dozens of large chemical-manufacturing facilities, including one within the Phillips 66 complex in Borger, Texas. Meanwhile, its sister refinery in New Jersey must carry on under the full force of both federal and state oversight. For families living near these plants, geography now dictates protection. Nearly 845,000 residents live within ten miles of New Jersey’s Bayway refinery—barely 2,200 around Borger’s—two very different stories emanating from similar operations and riding similar winds.

Keep Reading Show less