Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Biden’s immigration actions provide work permits for some, but not all

Biden speaing at a podium

President Joe Biden delivers remarks during an event marking the 12th anniversary of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals in the White House on June 18.

Michael A. McCoy for The Washington Post via Getty Images

Sedeño is the immigration policy analyst for the Latino Policy Forum.

“¡Tengo treinta años aquí! ¡No califico para esto!” ( “I’ve been [in this country] for 30 years! I do not qualify for this!”)

The words of this long-time immigrant worker were not easily forgotten as dozens of immigrants, advocates, elected officials, labor unions, and faith and business leaders gathered at The Resurrection Project on June 19 to respond to President Joe Biden’s recent actions on immigration. Once implemented, these actions will streamline paths to work authorization and legal status for hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants and DREAMers across the country — the largest move since the Obama administration instituted the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in 2012.


The proclamation, as announced, would help immigrants in two key ways:

  1. Allow certain undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens to apply for “ parole-in-place (PIP),” a protection against deportation, while inside the country. This will allow many to access a work permit and legal permanent residency. Approximately half a million undocumented immigrants and their children will be eligible. Eligible spouses and children will be able to apply beginning Aug. 19.
  2. Allow DACA recipients and other DREAMers, who have earned a bachelor’s degree or higher and who have received an offer of employment from a U.S. employer in a specialized field related to their degree, to more quickly receive work visas, which in time, could provide a pathway to legal permanent residency.

The announcement came just one month after the Illinois General Assembly became the largest governing body in the country to pass a resolution calling on Biden to use his executive authority to grant work permits through parole to all long-term undocumented immigrants in Illinois amid prolonged workforce shortages.

“[Passing HJR 69 was] a declaration of our state’s commitment to both economic pragmatism and human rights,” said Latino Policy Forum President and CEO Sylvia Puente.

Every year, 400,000-plus workers contribute $1.9 billion to the Illinois economy without official work authorization. Nearly 30 percent have been residing in the United States for 20 or more years. The resolution made it very clear: granting work permits to this population would increase tax contributions to the state, secure fair wages and protections for workers, and keep families and businesses thriving.

Passing HJR 69 took an enormous amount of issue education, advocacy and organizing by 100-plus members of the Work Permits for All campaign, which officially launched in August of last year, alongside the national Here to Work Campaign. Advocates and allies organized rallies and press conferences across the country, including in Washington, D.C., where over 2,000 people attended to express their support. The first political responses came from the Chicago City Council and the Cook County Board, which passed the first resolutions calling for work permits for the long-term undocumented in December 2023.

In the winter and spring of 2024, rallies and educational workshops continued, Mayor Brandon Johnson announced his public support, and by the end of May, HJR 69 passed with overwhelming support in both chambers of the legislature.

As a member of the campaign, the Latino Policy Forum quickly became a leader in developing a legislative advocacy strategy, policy language and analysis. Biden’s announcement provided the one thing the campaign needed and hoped for — political will.

However, as the immigrant worker’s justified frustration reminds us, the new PIP policy will only grant work permits and protections to some — not all undocumented immigrants. There are many immigrants who will be left out — spouses who were unable to marry before the arbitrary cutoff date, spouses who have been in the country only nine years but still pay taxes, parents of U.S. citizens, long-time workers, caregivers, etc. Many immigrants who are ineligible for PIP will not even be able to obtain a work permit.

For many immigrant and worker advocates, work permits for all is still the goal, along with a meaningful pathway to citizenship. For far too long, immigrant communities have had to collectively celebrate wins even though many will not benefit. While this action is a significant step forward in protecting mixed-status families, more work needs to be done to secure relief for the other 10.5 million undocumented immigrants.

A version of this article was first published by the Latino Policy Forum and has been republished with permission.

Read More

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep ReadingShow less
Two groups of glass figures. One red, one blue.

Congressional paralysis is no longer accidental. Polarization has reshaped incentives, hollowed out Congress, and shifted power to the executive.

Getty Images, Andrii Yalanskyi

How Congress Lost Its Capacity to Act and How to Get It Back

In late 2025, Congress fumbled the Affordable Care Act, failing to move a modest stabilization bill through its own procedures and leaving insurers and families facing renewed uncertainty. As the Congressional Budget Office has warned in multiple analyses over the past decade, policy uncertainty increases premiums and reduces insurer participation (see, for example: https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61734). I examined this episode in an earlier Fulcrum article, “Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis,” as a case study in congressional paralysis and leadership failure. The deeper problem, however, runs beyond any single deadline or decision and into the incentives and procedures that now structure congressional authority. Polarization has become so embedded in America’s governing institutions themselves that it shapes how power is exercised and why even routine governance now breaks down.

From Episode to System

The ACA episode wasn’t an anomaly but a symptom. Recent scholarship suggests it reflects a broader structural shift in how Congress operates. In a 2025 academic article available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN), political scientist Dmitrii Lebedev reaches a stark conclusion about the current Congress, noting that the 118th Congress enacted fewer major laws than any in the modern era despite facing multiple time-sensitive policy deadlines (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5346916). Drawing on legislative data, he finds that dysfunction is no longer best understood as partisan gridlock alone. Instead, Congress increasingly exhibits a breakdown of institutional capacity within the governing majority itself. Leadership avoidance, procedural delay, and the erosion of governing norms have become routine features of legislative life rather than temporary responses to crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s ‘America First’ is now just imperialism

Donald Trump Jr.' s plane landed in Nuuk, Greenland, where he made a short private visit, weeks after his father, U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, suggested Washington annex the autonomous Danish territory.

(Ritzau Scanpix/AFP via Getty Images)

Trump’s ‘America First’ is now just imperialism

In early 2025, before Donald Trump was even sworn into office, he sent a plane with his name in giant letters on it to Nuuk, Greenland, where his son, Don Jr., and other MAGA allies preened for cameras and stomped around the mineral-rich Danish territory that Trump had been casually threatening to invade or somehow acquire like stereotypical American tourists — like they owned it already.

“Don Jr. and my Reps landing in Greenland,” Trump wrote. “The reception has been great. They and the Free World need safety, security, strength, and PEACE! This is a deal that must happen. MAGA. MAKE GREENLAND GREAT AGAIN!”

Keep ReadingShow less
The Common Cause North Carolina, Not Trump, Triggered the Mid-Decade Redistricting Battle

Political Midterm Election Redistricting

Getty images

The Common Cause North Carolina, Not Trump, Triggered the Mid-Decade Redistricting Battle

“Gerrymander” was one of seven runners-up for Merriam-Webster’s 2025 word of the year, which was “slop,” although “gerrymandering” is often used. Both words are closely related and frequently used interchangeably, with the main difference being their function as nouns versus verbs or processes. Throughout 2025, as Republicans and Democrats used redistricting to boost their electoral advantages, “gerrymander” and “gerrymandering” surged in popularity as search terms, highlighting their ongoing relevance in current politics and public awareness. However, as an old Capitol Hill dog, I realized that 2025 made me less inclined to explain the definitions of these words to anyone who asked for more detail.

“Did the Democrats or Republicans Start the Gerrymandering Fight?” is the obvious question many people are asking: Who started it?

Keep ReadingShow less