Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Biden’s immigration actions provide work permits for some, but not all

Biden speaing at a podium

President Joe Biden delivers remarks during an event marking the 12th anniversary of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals in the White House on June 18.

Michael A. McCoy for The Washington Post via Getty Images

Sedeño is the immigration policy analyst for the Latino Policy Forum.

“¡Tengo treinta años aquí! ¡No califico para esto!” ( “I’ve been [in this country] for 30 years! I do not qualify for this!”)

The words of this long-time immigrant worker were not easily forgotten as dozens of immigrants, advocates, elected officials, labor unions, and faith and business leaders gathered at The Resurrection Project on June 19 to respond to President Joe Biden’s recent actions on immigration. Once implemented, these actions will streamline paths to work authorization and legal status for hundreds of thousands of undocumented immigrants and DREAMers across the country — the largest move since the Obama administration instituted the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program in 2012.


The proclamation, as announced, would help immigrants in two key ways:

  1. Allow certain undocumented spouses of U.S. citizens to apply for “ parole-in-place (PIP),” a protection against deportation, while inside the country. This will allow many to access a work permit and legal permanent residency. Approximately half a million undocumented immigrants and their children will be eligible. Eligible spouses and children will be able to apply beginning Aug. 19.
  2. Allow DACA recipients and other DREAMers, who have earned a bachelor’s degree or higher and who have received an offer of employment from a U.S. employer in a specialized field related to their degree, to more quickly receive work visas, which in time, could provide a pathway to legal permanent residency.

The announcement came just one month after the Illinois General Assembly became the largest governing body in the country to pass a resolution calling on Biden to use his executive authority to grant work permits through parole to all long-term undocumented immigrants in Illinois amid prolonged workforce shortages.

“[Passing HJR 69 was] a declaration of our state’s commitment to both economic pragmatism and human rights,” said Latino Policy Forum President and CEO Sylvia Puente.

Every year, 400,000-plus workers contribute $1.9 billion to the Illinois economy without official work authorization. Nearly 30 percent have been residing in the United States for 20 or more years. The resolution made it very clear: granting work permits to this population would increase tax contributions to the state, secure fair wages and protections for workers, and keep families and businesses thriving.

Passing HJR 69 took an enormous amount of issue education, advocacy and organizing by 100-plus members of the Work Permits for All campaign, which officially launched in August of last year, alongside the national Here to Work Campaign. Advocates and allies organized rallies and press conferences across the country, including in Washington, D.C., where over 2,000 people attended to express their support. The first political responses came from the Chicago City Council and the Cook County Board, which passed the first resolutions calling for work permits for the long-term undocumented in December 2023.

In the winter and spring of 2024, rallies and educational workshops continued, Mayor Brandon Johnson announced his public support, and by the end of May, HJR 69 passed with overwhelming support in both chambers of the legislature.

As a member of the campaign, the Latino Policy Forum quickly became a leader in developing a legislative advocacy strategy, policy language and analysis. Biden’s announcement provided the one thing the campaign needed and hoped for — political will.

However, as the immigrant worker’s justified frustration reminds us, the new PIP policy will only grant work permits and protections to some — not all undocumented immigrants. There are many immigrants who will be left out — spouses who were unable to marry before the arbitrary cutoff date, spouses who have been in the country only nine years but still pay taxes, parents of U.S. citizens, long-time workers, caregivers, etc. Many immigrants who are ineligible for PIP will not even be able to obtain a work permit.

For many immigrant and worker advocates, work permits for all is still the goal, along with a meaningful pathway to citizenship. For far too long, immigrant communities have had to collectively celebrate wins even though many will not benefit. While this action is a significant step forward in protecting mixed-status families, more work needs to be done to secure relief for the other 10.5 million undocumented immigrants.

A version of this article was first published by the Latino Policy Forum and has been republished with permission.

Read More

An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed upon entering the Jacob K. Javits Federal Building on June 6, 2023 in New York City. New York City has provided sanctuary to over 46,000 asylum seekers since 2013, when the city passed a law prohibiting city agencies from cooperating with federal immigration enforcement agencies unless there is a warrant for the person's arrest.(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)
An ICE agent monitors hundreds of asylum seekers being processed.
(Photo by David Dee Delgado/Getty Images)

The Power of the Purse and Executive Discretion: ICE Expansion Under the Trump Administration

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Core Constitutional Debate: Expanded ICE enforcement under the Trump Administration raises a core constitutional question: Does Article II executive power override Article I’s congressional power of the purse?
  • Executive Justification: The primary constitutional justification for expanded ICE enforcement is The Unitary Executive Theory.
  • Separation of Powers: Critics argue that the Unitary Executive Theory undermines Congress’s power of the purse.
  • Moral Conflict: Expanded ICE enforcement has sparked a moral debate, as concerns over due process and civil liberties clash with claims of increased public safety and national security.

Where is ICE Funding Coming From?

Since the beginning of the current Trump Administration, immigration enforcement has undergone transformative change and become one of the most contested issues in the federal government. On his first day in office, President Trump issued Executive Order 14159, which directs executive agencies to implement stricter immigration enforcement practices. In order to implement these practices, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), a budget reconciliation package that paired state and local tax cuts with immigration funding. This allocated $170.7 billion in immigration-related funding for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to spend by 2029.

Keep ReadingShow less
Towards a Reformed Capitalism
oval brown wooden conference table and chairs inside conference room

Towards a Reformed Capitalism

Despite all the laws and regulations that apply to corporations, which for the most part are designed to make corporations more responsive to the greater good, corporations have wreaked great harm on our environment, their workers, their customers, and the general public. Despite all the rules, capitalism can still pretty much do what it wants.

The problem is not that the laws and regulations are not enforced, although that is partly true. The problem is more that the laws and regulations are weak because of the strong influence corporations have on both Congress (this is true of Democrats as well as Republicans) and those responsible for regulating.

Keep ReadingShow less
Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

The Bring Our Families Home campaign brought together loved ones of Americans wrongly detained overseas to display portraits in the Senate Russell Rotunda on Wednesday, May 6.

(Jacques Abou-Rizk, MNS)

Families of Americans Overseas Wrongfully Detained Bring Advocacy to Capitol Hill

WASHINGTON – American journalist Reza Valizadeh visited his elderly Iranian parents in March 2024 for the first time in 15 years. Valizadeh’s stories for Voice of America and other U.S. government-funded outlets often criticized the Iranian regime. So before traveling, he sought and received confirmation that he would be safe from a high-ranking commander in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a branch of Iran’s armed forces. However, in September that same year, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps arrested Valizadeh, and Tehran’s Revolutionary Court sentenced him to ten years in prison for “collaboration with a hostile government.”

In the Rotunda of the Senate Russell Building last week, the Bring Our Families Home campaign set up portraits of Valizadeh and 12 other Americans currently wrongfully detained overseas. The group, family members of illegitimately detained Americans, appealed to Congress to push for their safe return. Each foam poster board included the name, home state, and country of detainment. The display also included portraits of the 33 people released after advocacy by the James W. Foley Foundation.

Keep ReadingShow less
DHS Funding During the Shutdown
Getty Images, Charles-McClintock Wilson

DHS Funding During the Shutdown

When Congress failed to approve funding for the Department of Homeland Security for the remainder of this fiscal year in February, almost all of its employees began to work without pay. That situation changed, however, on April 3, when President Donald Trump issued a memorandum ordering the DHS secretary and director of the Office of Management and Budget to “use funds that have a reasonable and logical nexus to the functions of DHS” to pay its employees and issue back pay.

Trump shifted money to avoid the political embarrassment that would be caused by the collapse of airport security screening through the actions of disgruntled agents and the disruption to air travel that would ensue. But it’s legally dubious.

Keep ReadingShow less