Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Homelessness Just Declined in the U.S.–Trump’s Plans Will Take Us Backwards.

Opinion

 a house made of brown cardboard in a person's hands.
Shifting the narrative on homelessness in America
Thing Nong Nont / Getty Images

Earlier this month, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) finally released the long-awaited homelessness numbers for 2025, revealing a 3.3 percent decrease in overall homelessness between January 2024 and January 2025.

To be clear, this modest decline is not cause for celebration – 745,652 people remain homeless on a given night in this nation, which we can all agree is unacceptable.


Yet, for nearly a decade, homelessness has been on the rise, driven by skyrocketing rents and an economy that simply doesn’t work for regular working people. If we are making progress in the midst of the current affordability crisis, one would expect our leaders to double down on our most recent success. Yet, the Trump administration has decided to go in the opposite direction by proposing to defund and dismantle massive swaths of the nation’s homelessness response system.

As someone who has worked on homelessness for decades, including working at HUD under three administrations, take it from me: this is an extraordinarily short-sighted and destructive approach. It is guaranteed to only make homelessness worse at a time when no community can afford that.

Unfortunately, this is not a new shift for the president.

Since before his second term, President Trump has been fixated on outdated and historically failed homelessness policies that directly mirror Project 2025 proposals. These include a troubling emphasis on the kind of heavy-handed law enforcement and involuntary commitment tactics that are all too reminiscent of the administration’s immigration enforcement efforts.

But his proposals extend much further than that. In fact, in the past year, the Trump administration made several unprecedented attacks on homeless responses.

At a time when record numbers of people need help addressing the cost of housing – the key driver of homelessness -- this administration has incomprehensively proposed a 13 percent cut to HUD’s budget for FY 2027. This would virtually assure that fewer people would get the help they need to stay in their homes.

This administration has also illegally meddled in federal grants, attempting to force communities to adopt the administration’s policies on immigration and transgender rights to receive federal homelessness funding.

It has attempted to limit the amount of federal funds that can be spent on permanent housing solutions for people experiencing homelessness – a move that will force at least 170,000 formerly homeless people out of their housing and back onto the streets, including older adults, veterans, families with children, and those struggling with serious physical and mental disabilities.

And it has relentlessly attempted to erode support for people experiencing homelessness by characterizing them as criminals and threats against the community. In fact, this administration advanced an Executive Order that directs law enforcement to raid more encampments and involuntarily commit unhoused people, despite officers not having the training or tools to do so safely, effectively, or responsibly.

All of this is taking place amid an affordability crisis that is driving an astounding 17,500 people a week into homelessness systems for the very first time, according to HUD.

Any one of these proposals is shortsighted and dangerous. Collectively, they represent a needless broadside against the lifesaving efforts of frontline homeless services workers. It is yet another catastrophically reckless response to a crisis that deserves better leadership.

To be sure, our homelessness systems can and must run more effectively. Providers are too often understaffed due to low pay, burnout, and turnover among frontline workers. They are hampered by unhelpful regulations and administrative burdens that slow the time it takes to get people off the streets and into housing. Many homelessness policies lack the flexibility that would make them more practically useful for people who need help. And we need much closer collaboration between the various systems that serve people before, during, and after their homelessness.

Addressing these needs would benefit everyone: providers, local businesses, neighbors, and, of course, people who are homeless. Unfortunately, that isn’t where the administration is focused.

America’s homelessness crisis is not acceptable, full stop. If we are going to sustain any of our progress, we have to all work together. Our frontline workers are meeting that challenge. Mayors and governors are meeting that challenge. Members of Congress are meeting that challenge.

It’s time for the administration to work for our most vulnerable neighbors, and not against them.


Ann Oliva is the CEO of the National Alliance to End Homelessness.


Read More

Cardboard ballot box with a voter slip being placed into it by a hand, with a blue and red coloured background.

Cardboard ballot box with a voter slip being placed into it by a hand, with a blue and red coloured background.

Getty Images

The Leverage Ethic and the Spirit of Tripartisanship

I made the immodest proposal in my edited interdisciplinary volume Leveraging: A Political, Economic, and Societal Framework that the contemporary analogue to what Max Weber called the "Protestant Work Ethic" in The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism was what I called "the Leverage Ethic."

Moreover, I suggested that the Leverage Ethic has more or less replaced what the late Harvard sociologist Daniel Bell called the "Consumer Ethic" in his classic book The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, which he argued more or less replaced the Protestant Work Ethic.

Keep ReadingShow less
“We Will Not Let This Destroy Our Sacred Sites”: Indigenous Leaders Fight Trump Administration’s Border Wall

Lorraine Marquez Eiler, a Hia-C’ed O’odham elder, listens as Tohono O'odham Chairman Verlon Jose speaks during a news conference at the Quitobaquito Springs site on Monday, Aug. 24, 2026.

Stephanie Casanova

“We Will Not Let This Destroy Our Sacred Sites”: Indigenous Leaders Fight Trump Administration’s Border Wall

Standing near the pond at Quitobaquito Springs, Lorraine Marquez Eiler, a Hia-Ced O’odham elder, shared how her ancestors held ceremonies at the sacred site — a desert oasis in a national park that the federal government is set to bulldoze for a new border wall.

She pulled out a photo of her great-great grandparents and her great-grandparents, who would walk about 50 miles through the Sonoran Desert to the springs. The O’odham call the water flow A’al Vaipia. She showed the image of her ancestors to a group that included Indigenous leaders and a U.S. congressional representative — all there on Monday to condemn the border wall construction.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Unrecognizable doctor prescribing pharmacy to patient.

After a 30-year decline, U.S. abortions are rising again. Texas data suggests bans may shift where abortions happen — not whether they do.

Natalia Gdovskaia/Getty Images

Pro-Life and Pro-Choice: Bridging the Gap

Introduction

We have spent decades arguing about abortion policy on ideological grounds. I think we now have an opportunity to step back, look at what actually happened, and ask a more fundamental question: What policies actually reduce the number of abortions?

I believe that is a question on which pro-life and pro-choice people should be able to agree. Whatever our differences about abortion itself, surely, we can agree that fewer abortions would be a good outcome.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Capitol.

A rundown of the House bills most likely to become law this week — from seafood fraud enforcement to a sanctions bill critics call a tariff bill.

Photo by Andy Feliciotti on Unsplash

Both Chambers in Session this Week

Last Minute Rush

We’re not going to describe every bill the House aims to take action on this week because there’s lots. Instead, we’re going to focus on the ones that will become law if passed by the House and pull a few notable bills at the beginning of the legislative process. We’ll use the same level of discretion at the end of this week when we review what actually happened between today, Monday Sept. 14 and Friday, Sept. 18.

Probable New Laws

In addition to the bills listed below are also a couple of park renamings. All of these will, if passed, then go to the President for signing and once that’s done, become law.

Keep ReadingShow less