Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

O’Rourke opens with generic call for ‘fixing our democracy’

Beto O'Rourke put a passionate if totally undefined call for fixing democracy at the center of his presidential announcement today.

"The challenges that we face right now – the interconnected crises in our economy, our democracy and our climate – have never been greater, and they will either consume us or they will afford us the greatest opportunity to unleash the genius of the United States of America," the former Democratic congressman from El Paso declared in his announcement video. "In other words, this moment of peril produces perhaps the greatest moment of promise for this country."


O'Rourke went on to tick off an expansive roster of topics he would address as president including job creation, access to medical care, immigration, criminal justice reform, the rural economy and climate change. But, he said before enumerating those challenges, "We can begin by fixing our democracy and ensuring that our government works for everyone and not just for corporations."

He did not say anything more specific – about campaign finance, partisan gerrymandering, access to the polls, voting rights, ranked-choice voting, government ethics or any other topic in the "democracy reform" playbook.

Presumably, his agenda would include legislation designed to reduce the influence of money in politics, reflecting his Senate campaign in Texas last year. He came surprisingly close to unseating Republican Ted Cruz after cultivating a celebrity brand rooted in a decision to forgo donations from political action committees – and instead cultivating an ocean of small-dollar donors across the country and shattering fundraising records with almost $80 million in mostly lesser amounts.

With his announcement, though, O'Rourke is positioning himself as the most prominent White House aspirant so far – at least from the party's center-left wing – to make the challenges facing our democracy a campaign focus. Further to his left, of course, Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont put criticisms of big-money politics at the heart of his 2106 quest and is starting to do so again.


Read More

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

A woman sifts through the rubble in her house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026, in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Is the U.S. at "War" with Iran?

This question is not an exercise in double-talk. It is critical to understand the power that our Constitution grants exclusively to Congress, and the power that resides in the President as Commander-in-Chief of the military.

The Constitution clearly states that Congress has the power to declare war. The President does not have that power. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 recognizes that distribution of power by saying that a President can only introduce military force into an existing or imminent hostility if Congress has declared war or specifically authorized the President to use military force, or there is a national emergency created by an attack on the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less
Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less