Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

N.Y. shouldn't wait for Congress —  it can pass its own voting rights law

Opinion

John Lewis, Voting Rights Act

New York should honor the late John Lewis by passing voting rights legislation in his memory, writes William Fowler.

Rick Diamond/Getty Images

Fowler is on the communications staff of the New York City Campaign Finance Board, but the views here are his own.


"Democracy is not a state. It is an act," John Lewis declared in his final address to the nation, published last month on the day of his funeral. "The vote is the most powerful nonviolent change agent you have in a democratic society. You must use it because it is not guaranteed. You can lose it."

Last week marked 55 years since President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act. Yet millions of Americans, including many New Yorkers, have still effectively lost their right to vote because of changes to local voting laws and administrative practices that disenfranchise people and are not subject to any state or federal oversight.

This is one important way that New Yorkers can honor the legacy of Lewis, the icon of the civil rights movement who went on to represent Atlanta in Congress for 34 years: Press their lawmakers in Albany to pass legislation reinstating a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, invalidated by the Supreme Court in 2013, that protected voters from many of these types of discriminatory actions.

The provision, known as "preclearance," required states and parts of states with a history of suppressing minority voting rights to obtain permission from the Justice Department or a federal court before changing anything to do with how their elections were administered. The court ruled the law's formula for deciding which places were subject to preclearance was out of date and did not account for voting rights improvements in some places.

That rationale, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in her dissent, was akin to "throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet." Discarding your protection against a persistent problem, in other words, will assure that problem's return.

And, to Ginsburg's point, voter suppression is raining down across the country, including New York.

Twenty-five states have introduced hundreds of measures that make it more difficult to vote in the past decade, according to the Brennan Center for Justice. Examples include stricter voter ID laws, the purging of voter rolls, the closing of poll places and new challenges to eligibility.

"We may no longer have to guess the number of jelly beans in a jar in order to cast a ballot," former President Barack Obama remarked in eulogizing Lewis at his funeral. "But even as we sit here, there are those in power who are doing their darnedest to discourage people from voting — by closing polling locations, and targeting minorities and students with restrictive ID laws, and attacking our voting rights with surgical precision, even undermining the Postal Service in the run-up to an election that is going to be dependent on mailed-in ballots so people don't get sick."

While New York does not have a voter ID law, thousands of New York City voters saw their names purged from the voter rolls without notice in 2016, had their polling places changed without notice in 2017, and watched last year as a limited rollout of early voting poll sites was found to favor affluent white voters. As recently as this year's primary, in June, one in five voters in New York's 12th Congressional District had their ballots invalidated over postmarking issues out of the voters' control.

These are all issues that may have been prevented had there been preemptive oversight measures in place.

Nationally, lawmakers and advocates are calling for an overhaul of the Voting Rights Act. The House last year passed legislation, and has recently decided to name it after Lewis, that would create a new way to determine what places have violated minority voting rights so extensively that all their election laws should require federal approval.

States also have a role to play in protecting against voter suppression and increasing the pressure for this federal legislation, and New York should do its part. One path is to pass the legislation sponsored by state Rep. Latrice Walker and renamed the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York by a fellow Democrat from Brooklyn, state Sen. Zellnor Myrie. The bill would establish preclearance by requiring localities to seek approval from the state attorney general before changing any voting procedures.

"Ordinary people with extraordinary vision can redeem the soul of America by getting in what I call good trouble, necessary trouble," John Lewis famously and frequently said. We now have an opportunity to make some good trouble of our own, by calling on state legislators to pass this legislation and provide more oversight of New York elections and prevent voter suppression.


Read More

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Many Victims of Trump’s Immigration Policy–Including the U.S. Economy

Messages of support are posted on the entrance of the Don Julio Mexican restaurant and bar on January 18, 2026 in Forest Lake, Minnesota. The restaurant was reportedly closed because of ICE operations in the area. Residents in some places have organized amid a reported deployment of 3,000 federal agents in the area who have been tasked with rounding up and deporting suspected undocumented immigrants

Getty Images, Scott Olson

The Many Victims of Trump’s Immigration Policy–Including the U.S. Economy

The first year of President Donald Trump’s second term resulted in some of the most profound immigration policy changes in modern history. With illegal border crossings having dropped to their lowest levels in over 50 years, Trump can claim a measure of victory. But it’s a hollow victory, because it’s becoming increasingly clear that his immigration policy is not only damaging families, communities, workplaces, and schools - it is also hurting the economy and adding to still-soaring prices.

Besides the terrifying police state tactics, the most dramatic shift in Trump's immigration policy, compared to his presidential predecessors (including himself in his first term), is who he is targeting. Previously, a large number of the removals came from immigrants who showed up at the border but were turned away and never allowed to enter the country. But with so much success at reducing activity at the border, Trump has switched to prioritizing “internal deportations” – removing illegal immigrants who are already living in the country, many of them for years, with families, careers, jobs, and businesses.

Keep ReadingShow less
Close up of stock market chart on a glowing particle world map and trading board.

Democrats seek a post-Trump strategy, but reliance on neoliberal economic policies may deepen inequality and voter distrust.

Getty Images, Yuichiro Chino

After Trump, Democrats Confront a Deeper Economic Reckoning

For a decade, Democrats have defined themselves largely by their opposition to Donald Trump, a posture taken in response to institutional crises and a sustained effort to defend democratic norms from erosion. Whatever Trump may claim, he will not be on the 2028 presidential ballot. This moment offers Democrats an opportunity to do something they have postponed for years: move beyond resistance politics and articulate a serious, forward-looking strategy for governing. Notably, at least one emerging Democratic policy group has begun studying what governing might look like in a post-Trump era, signaling an early attempt to think beyond opposition alone.

While Democrats’ growing willingness to look past Trump is a welcome development, there is a real danger in relying too heavily on familiar policy approaches. Established frameworks offer comfort and coherence, but they also carry risks, especially when the conditions that once made them successful no longer hold.

Keep ReadingShow less
Autocracy for Dummies

U.S. President Donald Trump on February 13, 2026 in Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

(Photo by Nathan Howard/Getty Images)

Autocracy for Dummies

Everything Donald Trump has said and done in his second term as president was lifted from the Autocracy for Dummies handbook he should have committed to memory after trying and failing on January 6, 2021, to overthrow the government he had pledged to protect and serve.

This time around, putting his name and face to everything he fancies and diverting our attention from anything he touches as soon as it begins to smell or look bad are telltale signs that he is losing the fight to control the hearts and minds of a nation he would rather rule than help lead.

Keep ReadingShow less