Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Citing virus, senior senator proposes $500 million for voting at home

Sen. Ron Wyden

Fearing the coronavirus may drive down turnout, Sen. Ron Wyden proposed giving states money to cover the costs of voting by mail.

Samuel Corum/Getty Images

With the coronavirus now officially labeled a pandemic by the World Health Organization, concerns about its impact on the election keep growing.

Candidates are canceling rallies. Sunday's Democratic presidential debate in Phoenix won't have a live audience. And election officials are worried the disease's unpredictable spread will dampen turnout in the remaining primaries and in November.

An influential senior senator is proposing a remedy for that last concern: Make it easy for voters to cast their ballots from home.


Democrat Ron Wyden of Oregon plans to introduce legislation Wednesday that would establish a $500 million federal fund for creating vote-by-mail systems in times of national crisis. The bill would also give all Americans the right to vote from home this year if more than a dozen states declared a coronavirus emergency.

At least for now, the bill will be a decided long shot in the gridlocked Senate, where the Republican majority has opposed all proposals for giving Washington more influence over how states and counties conduct elections.

Voting by mail has become increasingly popular. In the 2018 midterm, more than 31 million ballots were cast this way, a quarter of the total. All states offer voters with excuses related to travel, age or disability the option to mail in their votes. But over the past two decades, many states have expanded use of the practice.

Twenty years ago, Wyden's home state of Oregon became the first to adopt vote-by-mail for all elections. Colorado, Utah, Washington and (for the first time this year) Hawaii are also entirely vote-by-mail states; voters automatically receive a ballot that they can return by mail, in a secure dropbox or at a polling station. Sixteen other states have provisions that allow certain elections to use mail-in voting.

Mailing in ballots would not only protect voters from public health crises, but would also prevent poll workers — who tend to be elderly and therefore more at risk — from getting sick.

Long lines, which thousands have faced already in recent primaries, would also no longer be a problem with widely implemented vote-at-home measures.

That's what voting by mail is all about, according to Amber McReynolds of the National Vote at Home Institute, which advocates for widespread use of vote-by-mail systems. "It's delivering democracy through an existing infrastructure: the U.S. Postal Service," she said Wednesday.

An added bonus is that most Americans consider the Postal Service to be the most trustworthy brand in the country, according to a January survey by Morning Consult.

McReynolds said Wyden's plan captures many of the best practices her organization has recommended, including paying for postage and secure drop boxes.

No such measure has been introduced in the Democratic House, where its prospects would be better. But if the idea gains unexpected traction because of COVID-19, the bill could be enacted in time for November.

"I hope this bill garners bipartisan support because it's something that serves the entire electorate," McReynolds said. "And hopefully it will relieve some of the burden placed on people by the coronavirus."

Read More

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’
Independent Voter News

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’

The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation.

The Princeton Gerrymandering Project developed a “Redistricting Report Card” that takes metrics of partisan and racial performance data in all 50 states and converts it into a grade for partisan fairness, competitiveness, and geographic features.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Vote Here" sign

America’s political system is broken — but ranked choice voting and proportional representation could fix it.

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Election Reform Turns Down the Temperature of Our Politics

Politics isn’t working for most Americans. Our government can’t keep the lights on. The cost of living continues to rise. Our nation is reeling from recent acts of political violence.

79% of voters say the U.S. is in a political crisis, and 64% say our political system is too divided to solve the nation’s problems.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. President Barack Obama speaking on the phone in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Barack Obama talks President Barack Obama talks with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a phone call from the Oval Office on November 2, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, The White House

‘Obama, You're 15 Years Too Late!’

The mid-decade redistricting fight continues, while the word “hypocrisy” has become increasingly common in the media.

The origin of mid-decade redistricting dates back to the early history of the United States. However, its resurgence and legal acceptance primarily stem from the Texas redistricting effort in 2003, a controversial move by the Republican Party to redraw the state's congressional districts, and the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. This decision, which confirmed that mid-decade redistricting is not prohibited by federal law, was a significant turning point in the acceptance of this practice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand of a person casting a ballot at a polling station during voting.

Gerrymandering silences communities and distorts elections. Proportional representation offers a proven path to fairer maps and real democracy.

Getty Images, bizoo_n

Gerrymandering Today, Gerrymandering Tomorrow, Gerrymandering Forever

In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace declared, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." (Watch the video of his speech.) As a politically aware high school senior, I was shocked by the venom and anger in his voice—the open, defiant embrace of systematic disenfranchisement, so different from the quieter racism I knew growing up outside Boston.

Today, watching politicians openly rig elections, I feel that same disbelief—especially seeing Republican leaders embrace that same systematic approach: gerrymandering now, gerrymandering tomorrow, gerrymandering forever.

Keep ReadingShow less