Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

New coalition will push democracy reforms targeted to center and right

Fix the System leader Nilmini Rubin

"The political foundations of the United States require maintenance and cannot be taken for granted," said Nilmini Rubin, who is leading the Fix the System coalition.

Nilmini Rubin

Six of the most influential democracy reform groups are at the core of a new coalition, dubbed Fix the System, with the goal of putting more conservative and corporate muscle behind a cause that's generally dominated by progressives.

The effort comes at a time when many in the good governance movement worry their efforts are too diffuse and disconnected, and tilted too far left at a time of divided government. The hope is that, during a time of pandemic fear and economic distress, political polarization will ease enough to permit some good governance changes to muster bipartisan support.

The alliance has been in the works for months but was formally unveiled this week, along with its first public effort: getting Congress to include money to make voting easier and safer this year in the nearly $2 trillion coronavirus stabilization package.


"This pandemic shines a spotlight on the importance of protecting and safeguarding our democracy," said Nilmini Rubin, who is running the coalition. "The political foundations of the United States require maintenance and cannot be taken for granted."

Fix the System says a top priority will be recruiting business leaders and trade associations to advocate for proposals it views as capable of winning over Republicans as well as Democrats and independents: efforts to end partisan gerrymandering, improve civic education, combat foreign election interference, modernize election systems, bolster government oversight and ethics, reduce dysfunction in Congress, and increase campaign finance transparency.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

"Current business practices are perpetuating political dysfunction that thereby threatens economic growth," said Daniella Ballou-Aares of the Leadership Now Project, a coalition member. "Business leaders — their expertise, their resources and their networks — can be a part of the solution to fix the system and help restore Americans' trust in our political leaders and institutions.


Tell Congress to protect our elections nowyoutu.be


Rubin was most recently an executive overseeing the energy and internet portfolios of Tetra Tech Inc., a California engineering and consulting firm. She previously spent a dozen years as a senior foreign policy staffer in both the Senate and the House and was on the National Security Council staff under President George W. Bush.

These are the eight charter members of the group, which have overlapping but not entirely aligned priorities on their own:

    • RepresentUs, one of the first and now perhaps the biggest and best-financed organizations of its kind, focuses mainly on ballot initiatives and statehouse efforts to achieve the full spectrum of democracy reforms — from boosting government transparency and regulating lobbying to modernizing the election system and limiting money in politics.
    • Unite America, which does its own good governance advocacy work and also provides funding to other groups working to reduce partisanship and has a political arm that donates to centrist candidates and democracy-reforming referendum campaigns.
    • Issue One, which describes itself as the leading cross-partisan political reform group in Washington, relies on a cadre of former members of Congress from both parties to advocate for a similarly broad spectrum of proposals. (It also operates, but has no journalistic control over, The Fulcrum.)
    • Stand Up Republic, mainly known for promoting governmental accountability and electoral reform on social media, was created after the 2016 election by Evan McMullen and his running mate Mindy Finn. Their "never Trump" independent presidential bid garnered half of 1 percent of the popular vote.
    • Fix Us, which advocates for an array of democracy reforms as an arm of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. That group views its goal of long-term federal fiscal discipline as impossible without first making Washington function better.
    • Leadership Now Project, which was created by Harvard Business School alumni to bring an innovative corporate sensibility to fixing shortcomings in the political system.
    • Center for the Study of the Presidency & Congress, which promotes improved leadership and expertise among people who work in the executive and legislative branches.
    • The Lugar Center, a foreign policy and bipartisan governance think tank started by the late GOP Sen. Richard Lugar of Indiana.

    Read More

    Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

    Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

    Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

    Listen now

    Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

    Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

    There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

    On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

    Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

    Your Take: The Price of Freedom

    Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

    What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

    It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

    One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

    Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

    Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

    Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

    I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

    Keep ReadingShow less
    No, autocracies don't make economies great

    libre de droit/Getty Images

    No, autocracies don't make economies great

    Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

    One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

    In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

    Keep ReadingShow less