Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

How Joel Gurin Aims to Restore Civic Trust Through Better Data and Transparency

News

People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.


His Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative will create a set of public-facing tools to help users interpret trustworthy information, develop measures to assess information reliability, and produce actionable recommendations for citizens and policymakers.

Below is a transcript of an edited interview with Joel, followed by a link to a one-minute video of Joel describing the project.

Question: Tell us a little about your journey to this NAPA/ Bridge Alliance Fellowship. What experiences or feelings led you to believe that this, this project is necessary and important?

Joel Gurin. The overall direction and goals of strengthening democracy at this particular time are very well timed. I have personally been very involved over the last year as there have been some real changes to the federal data ecosystem and in looking at what that means and whether this is a moment of disruption. So, this could be an opportunity to build a more effective national data ecosystem and to build more public trust in that ecosystem.

Question: Could you describe your project, including listing the project title, your approach, and who you anticipate being potential collaborators and stakeholders?

Joel Gurin. My part of the project falls under the heading: “Trustworthy Information leads to Trust in Government.” And I think the idea that was really framed by the fellowship program was that democracy really depends not only on what we know but on how we know it, and the need to focus on restoring a sort of shared civic reality. A place where we all acknowledge the same information as reliable, and where there's real public trust in that information.

This whole question of trust and information is very multifaceted. Over the next year I’ll be diving into some of these key areas and expect that there will be an opportunity to talk to people who are looking at different aspects of these problems, from people who are working in federal statistical agencies, to people working in non-profits, or even businesses that rely on this kind of information and data to folks who are at the cutting edge of looking at alternative data sources.

Question. How might citizens or other key stakeholders utilize your work on this project to improve American democracy?

Joel Gurin. I think we're living at a time when people are very unsure about what information to trust and how to communicate trustworthiness of information to others. There are issues around disappearing data, particularly federal data issues around the validity of surveys and sampling around how we define the gold standard of science and around the impact of AI. I'm hoping to lay out some frameworks for thinking about these issues in a way that can then help people engage with them individually, organizationally, allowing them to develop some of their own thinking to address the ways that our whole information landscape is shifting very rapidly.

Enjoy the short video:

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Bradford Fitch is the former CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation, a former congressional staffer, and author of “The Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."


Read More

Person holding a sign in front of the U.S. capitol that reads, "We The People."

The nation has reached a divide in the road—a moment when Americans must decide whether to accept a slow weakening of the Republic or insist on the principles that have held it together for more than two centuries

Getty Images

A Republic Under Strain—And a Choice Ahead

Americans feel something shifting beneath their feet — quieter than crisis but unmistakably a strain. Many live with a steady sense of uncertainty, conflict, and the emotional weight of issues that seem impossible to escape. They feel unheard, unsafe, or unsure whether the Republic they trust is fading. Friends, relatives, and former colleagues say they’ve tried to look away just to cope, hoping the turmoil will pass. And they ask the same thing: if the framers made the people the primary control on government, how will they help set the Republic back on a steadier path?

Understanding the strain Americans are experiencing is essential, but so is recognizing the choice we still have. Madison’s warning offers the answer the framers left us: when trust erodes and power concentrates, the Constitution turns back to the people—not as a slogan, but as a structural reality.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on April 25, 2026, after the cancellation of the annual White House Correspondents Association Dinner.

Latest Attack Threatening President Trump Reflects Rising Political Violence in US

For the third time in three years, Donald Trump has come under threat by an attacker. Many facts remain unclear after a gunman stormed the Washington Hilton on April 25, 2026, during the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner.

As the investigation into the shooting continues, Alfonso Serrano, The Conversation’s politics and society editor, spoke with James Piazza, a political violence scholar at Penn State, about what is driving the rise of political violence in the U.S. and what can be done about it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Democracy Requires Losing. Americans Are Forgetting That.
an american flag hanging from a pole in front of a building
Photo by Calysia Ramos on Unsplash

Democracy Requires Losing. Americans Are Forgetting That.

Americans believe in democracy. What they don’t believe in is losing.

That distinction matters. Democracy depends on its participants’ willingness to accept loss. Without that, elections stop resolving conflict and start producing it.

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol Building.

An in-depth examination of the erosion of checks and balances in the United States, exploring Project 2025, executive overreach, and the growing strain on constitutional democracy—and the critical role of citizens in preserving it.

Getty Images, Rudy Sulgan

The Mirror Has Cracked: How the Three Branches Failed America

James Madison warned that the government would always mirror human nature — its virtues and its flaws. “What is government itself,” he asked, “but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?” The United States was built on a radical promise: a participatory government “of the people, by the people, for the people.” Today, that mirror is cracking in real time. What once reflected a nation striving toward freedom and equality now reflects something far more chaotic — a government drifting from its constitutional purpose and reshaped by loyalty tests, political revenge, and a blueprint designed to consolidate power.

In 2026, that reflection is unmistakable: a government shaped not by three independent branches, but by a president’s loyalists and a coordinated plan to remake American democracy from the inside out. The framers built guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, and independent institutions — to prevent the rise of authoritarian rule. Yet the country now faces a blueprint, Project 2025, that overrides those protections by placing independent agencies under presidential control, replacing civil servants with loyalists, and weaponizing the Department of Justice. This is not drift. It is design. And it has left the nation with a government that no longer reflects the people but instead reflects the ambitions of those who seek power without accountability.

Keep ReadingShow less