Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

How Joel Gurin Aims to Restore Civic Trust Through Better Data and Transparency

News

People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.


His Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative will create a set of public-facing tools to help users interpret trustworthy information, develop measures to assess information reliability, and produce actionable recommendations for citizens and policymakers.

Below is a transcript of an edited interview with Joel, followed by a link to a one-minute video of Joel describing the project.

Question: Tell us a little about your journey to this NAPA/ Bridge Alliance Fellowship. What experiences or feelings led you to believe that this, this project is necessary and important?

Joel Gurin. The overall direction and goals of strengthening democracy at this particular time are very well timed. I have personally been very involved over the last year as there have been some real changes to the federal data ecosystem and in looking at what that means and whether this is a moment of disruption. So, this could be an opportunity to build a more effective national data ecosystem and to build more public trust in that ecosystem.

Question: Could you describe your project, including listing the project title, your approach, and who you anticipate being potential collaborators and stakeholders?

Joel Gurin. My part of the project falls under the heading: “Trustworthy Information leads to Trust in Government.” And I think the idea that was really framed by the fellowship program was that democracy really depends not only on what we know but on how we know it, and the need to focus on restoring a sort of shared civic reality. A place where we all acknowledge the same information as reliable, and where there's real public trust in that information.

This whole question of trust and information is very multifaceted. Over the next year I’ll be diving into some of these key areas and expect that there will be an opportunity to talk to people who are looking at different aspects of these problems, from people who are working in federal statistical agencies, to people working in non-profits, or even businesses that rely on this kind of information and data to folks who are at the cutting edge of looking at alternative data sources.

Question. How might citizens or other key stakeholders utilize your work on this project to improve American democracy?

Joel Gurin. I think we're living at a time when people are very unsure about what information to trust and how to communicate trustworthiness of information to others. There are issues around disappearing data, particularly federal data issues around the validity of surveys and sampling around how we define the gold standard of science and around the impact of AI. I'm hoping to lay out some frameworks for thinking about these issues in a way that can then help people engage with them individually, organizationally, allowing them to develop some of their own thinking to address the ways that our whole information landscape is shifting very rapidly.

Enjoy the short video:

- YouTube www.youtube.com

Bradford Fitch is the former CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation, a former congressional staffer, and author of “The Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."


Read More

A balance.

A retired New York judge criticizes President Trump’s actions on tariffs, judicial defiance, alleged corruption, and executive overreach, warning of threats to constitutional order and the rule of law in the United States.

Getty Images

A Pay‑to‑Play Presidency Testing the Limits of Our Institutions

Another day, another outrage, and another attack on the Constitution that this President has twice taken a vow to uphold. Instead of accepting the Supreme Court decision striking down his imposition of tariffs, the President is now imposing them by executive order and excoriating the Justices who ruled against him. His disrespect for the Constitution and the judiciary is boundless.

To this retired New York State judge, all hell seems to have broken loose in our federal government. Congress lies dormant when it is not enabling the chief executive’s misuse and personal acquisition of federal funds, and, notwithstanding its recent tariffs ruling, a majority of the Supreme Court generally rubber-stamps the administration’s actions through opaque “shadow docket” rulings. In doing so, SCOTUS abdicates its role as an independent check.

Keep Reading Show less
Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

People clear rubble in a house in the Beryanak District after it was damaged by missile attacks two days before, on March 15, 2026 in Tehran, Iran. The United States and Israel continued their joint attack on Iran that began on February 28. Iran retaliated by firing waves of missiles and drones at Israel, and targeting U.S. allies in the region.

Getty Images, Majid Saeedi

Bravado Isn’t a Strategy: Why the Iran War Has No Endgame

Most of what we have heard from the administration as it pertains to the Iran War is swagger and bro-talk. A few days into the war, the White House released a social media video that combined footage of the bombardment with clips from video games. Not long after, it released a second video, titled “Justice the American Way,” that mixed images of the U.S. military with scenes from movies like Gladiator and Top Gun Maverick.

Speaking to reporters at the Pentagon, War Secretary Pete Hegseth boasted of “death and destruction from the sky all day long.” “They are toast, and they know it,” he said. “This was never meant to be a fair fight... we are punching them while they’re down.”

Keep Reading Show less
Bomb First, Debate Later: The Hidden Cost of How America Makes War Now

A general view of Tehran with smoke visible in the distance after explosions were reported in the city, on March 02, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

Getty Images, Contributor

Bomb First, Debate Later: The Hidden Cost of How America Makes War Now

For those old enough to remember the first Gulf War, the scenes feel painfully familiar: smoke rising over Tehran. Babies carried out of a bombed-out hospital in incubators. Missiles striking cities across the Middle East. Oil markets in turmoil as Iran threatens to close the Strait of Hormuz. The war of choice that began with Israeli and American strikes on Iran is widening by the hour, pulling in multiple countries, including NATO allies, and producing casualties that mount by the day.

Much of the early discussion has focused on obvious questions. How far will the conflict spread? How many people will die? What will it cost the United States in money, lives, and global stability?

Keep Reading Show less