Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Hidden Infrastructure of Democracy: Professionalizing and Diversifying Election Staff

News

The Hidden Infrastructure of Democracy: Professionalizing and Diversifying Election Staff

Dr. Shaniqua Williams, assistant professor of political science

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems—spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Below is an interview with Dr. Shaniqua Williams, Assistant Professor at West Virginia University. Her research focuses on state politics, race and ethnicity, Black political behavior, Black women’s descriptive and substantive representation, and election administration. She is also a Research Fellow with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, where her work focuses on election administration, workforce development, infrastructure, and policy.


Her Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative will focus on strengthening impartiality, transparency, and trust in U.S. election administration by developing an evidence-based framework to train and professionalize mid-level election staff and expand pathways to diversify the election workforce.

—--------------------------------

Question: Tell us a little bit about your journey to this project. What experiences or feelings led you to believe that the project you’re engaging in is important?

Shaniqua Williams: I've been working with election administrators for years. Through that experience and my fellowship with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, I thought about who the people are working in elections. A lot of the research and attention are on chief election officials who are at the top of the food chain, and then your temporary workers such as poll workers. But the election workforce is huge. We have so many people who are involved in elections 365 days a year and there's not a lot of focus on them. Through my conversations I saw firsthand how much responsibility mid-level staff carry, and how access to training is uneven. I got involved and interested in professionalization and workforce pipelines, seeing how both could strengthen our capacity and expand access to the field.

Question. Could you describe the project, your approach, and your anticipated work with stakeholders?

Shaniqua Williams: I'm focusing on strengthening training standards for mid-level election staff while also expanding pathways into the profession. And through this project I plan to produce two essays. The first will outline scalable professionalization and training frameworks specifically focused on that mid-level staff. And the second essay will propose workforce pipeline partnerships between election offices and minority serving institutions. And so at the end of this project I plan to have quite a few deliverables and frameworks that could be used within academic institutions as well as within election offices for training and for recruiting diverse members into the workforce.

Question: What practical outcomes do you expect?

Shaniqua Williams: I plan to create one page implementation guides as well as partnership models that connect election offices with universities, especially minority serving institutions. Strengthening these professional development systems will help offices retain experienced staff. It will also improve operational consistency and create transparent career ladders.

I also think that expanding entry pathways will also help diversify the workforce and that will strengthen institutional legitimacy and public trust. So, within these pathways we will create a partnership framework, and it will provide a replicable model that jurisdictions can adopt to build recruitment pipelines through these minority serving institutions.

Question: How might citizens or other key stakeholders utilize your work on this project to approve American democracy.

Shaniqua Williams: Citizens benefit when elections are administered professionally, consistently, and transparently, which happens by strengthening training standards and expanding workforce pathways. This project’s goal is to enhance operational quality, institutional legitimacy, and trust in elections.

See a short video of Dr. Williams here:

- YouTube youtube.com

Bradford Fitch is the former CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation, a former congressional staffer, and author of “The Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."


Read More

​U.S. Sen.-elect James Talarico (D-TX) and Texas gov.-elect, State Rep. Gina Hinojosa toast with a fountain beverage at a Whataburger restaurant with a crowd of people around them taking photos.

U.S. Sen.-elect James Talarico (D-TX) and Texas gov.-elect, State Rep. Gina Hinojosa toast with a fountain beverage at a Whataburger restaurant at the conclusion of a midterm election night watch party at the Long Center on November 3, 2026 in Austin, Texas.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Fear Politics Lost. Voters Chose a Different Future

Fear is the easiest message in American politics. It is cheap to produce, quick to spread, and usually reliable on Election Day.

For years, this fearfulness has told Americans that the person next door is the enemy. On Tuesday, a great many of them stopped listening. In places almost nobody expected, voters turned away from candidates who vowed to tear things down and rewarded those who treated the country as something worth rebuilding and their opponents as people to persuade.

Keep ReadingShow less
Israel's Path to Peace and Security

A voter casts her ballot at a polling station on October 27, 2026 in Jerusalem, Israel.

Noam Galai/Getty Images

Israel's Path to Peace and Security

Most people do not think that such a thing—peace and security for Israel—is possible. Yet it is possible—but it requires the wisdom and courage to chart a new path.

The old path has been to think of the Arabs—including Palestinians, even including Palestinian Israeli citizens—as being the enemy. And peace and security could only be achieved through military superiority and dominance over an implacable enemy. Whether the government was Labor (liberal) or Likud (right-wing), that has been the underlying assumption of this country founded in the aftermath of the Holocaust and driven by its memory.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mahatma Gandhi addressing some of his thousands of followers on a lawn.

Mahatma Gandhi addressing some of his thousands of followers on the lawn of the home of Dr. Ansari where Gandhi stopped during his peace meetings with Viceroy Lord Irwin.

Bettmann/Getty Images

Everyone Wants Peace. That’s the Problem.

In 2007, the United Nations gathered to declare an International Day of Non-Violence. It fittingly chose Gandhi’s birthday, October 2nd, for the occasion: a day to affirm “the universal relevance of the principle of non-violence” and strive toward a common culture of tolerance and understanding.

The resolution passed by consensus, co-sponsored by 140 member nations. Each attested to what nearly everyone believes: that they—their culture, their country, their party, their movement—want peace.

Keep ReadingShow less
The U.S. Capitol in autumn.

New surveys of nearly 20,000 battleground voters find bipartisan majorities say Congress ignores the public, and that more public influence would help.

Philip Yabut/Getty Images

Americans Say the People Can Lead Congress to Common Ground; It Appears They Are Right

New surveys in battleground states and districts across the country, as well as nationwide, find that Americans—both Republicans and Democrats—believe Congress does what most Americans would do less than half the time.

They also found that majorities agree that if Congress were to be more influenced by the people, it would be more likely to find common ground. In fact, surveys show that majorities of Republicans and Democrats agree on what to do about many issues that Congress is stuck on.

Keep ReadingShow less