Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Cassidy’s Latest Chance To Boost The Small Businesses He Has Long Championed

Opinion

A café owner hangs an “Open” sign on the front door at the start of the business day. Concept of entrepreneurship and readiness.
Getty Images, Willie B. Thomas

When election season rolls around, voters are accustomed to hearing politicians proclaim their support for small businesses–institutions that routinely top Gallup’s list of America’s most trusted by a country mile.

It’s easy to talk the talk during campaign season. It’s much harder to do the work when the cameras are off, and the spotlight fades.


In Louisiana, entrepreneurs have no firmer ally than our senior senator, Bill Cassidy. For those of us in the franchise community, Senator Cassidy has been a consistent and steadfast advocate—and that matters, especially as our state continues to face economic headwinds. In 2025, Louisiana ranked near the bottom of CNBC’s “Top States for Business.” We cannot afford policies that make it harder to grow.

As a franchisee operating two family-run Chicken Salad Chick locations in the New Orleans area and soon to open a third, I’ve seen firsthand how federal policy decisions ripple through local businesses like mine. Senator Cassidy has stood up not just for me, but for the more than 12,000 franchise establishments across Louisiana that provide jobs and opportunity in communities large and small.

Like many entrepreneurs, I chose the franchise model because it offers the best of both worlds: the independence to run my day-to-day operations while benefiting from the strength of a proven brand. It’s a uniquely American system with roots tracing back to Benjamin Franklin’s printing press.

Yet the foundation of franchising depends on a clear line between franchisor and franchisee—a line defined in federal policy by what’s known as the “joint employer standard.”

This rule determines whether franchise owners remain truly independent operators or become little more than middle managers under distant corporate control. When that line blurs, the consequences are significant. Expanded joint employer standards expose entire brands to increased litigation, higher insurance costs, compliance burdens, and legal fees. Those pressures inevitably trickle down to local operators, our employees, and ultimately the customers we serve.

Franchising works because of appropriate independence between franchisor and franchisee. Undermine that balance, and you undermine a system responsible for nearly nine million American jobs.

In 2023, when the Biden Administration sought to expand the joint employer standard through the National Labor Relations Board, Senator Cassidy led a bipartisan effort to overturn the rule under the Congressional Review Act. The measure passed both chambers of Congress before ultimately being vetoed. In 2024, a federal court vacated the rule—a decision Senator Cassidy rightly celebrated as a win for workers and small businesses alike.

But small businesses should not have to rely on court decisions or shifting political winds to preserve our operating model. Regulatory ping-pong creates uncertainty that makes it harder to invest, hire, and grow.

That’s why now is the moment for Congress to act. The American Franchise Act offers a bipartisan, straightforward legislative solution. With more than 100 co-sponsors in the House and growing support in the Senate, the bill would permanently codify a clear and appropriate federal joint employer standard—removing it from partisan swings and judicial uncertainty.

Unlike many bills weighed down by unrelated provisions, the American Franchise Act is focused and practical. It provides clarity. And clarity is what small businesses need most.

Family-run operations like mine are still navigating the aftershocks of the pandemic, persistent supply and labor challenges, and new uncertainties tied to tariffs and shifting economic policy. In the restaurant business, margins are thin on our best days. Added regulatory instability only makes it harder to keep prices reasonable, retain employees, and reinvest in our communities.

Senator Cassidy has consistently stood with Louisiana’s franchise owners. By championing the American Franchise Act, he can once again provide the certainty and stability that local businesses depend on.

Small businesses are counting on him.


With more than 30 years in the restaurant and hospitality industry, Bill DiPaola is the CEO and Founder/Owner of Nibbles Hospitality Group, and owns and operates the Chicken Salad Chick location in Metairie


Read More

Construction worker


Low angle view of male construction workers framing a new house

Getty Images

Latino Workers Are the Backbone of America — But Inequities Persist

WASHINGTON — As the nation pauses today to mark Labor Day 2026, a glaring spotlight is shining on the massive economic influence, historical legacy, and evolving challenges of the Latino labor force. Once relegated to the margins of the broader American labor narrative, Latino workers are stepping into the national conversation as the indisputable backbone of the modern United States economy.

According to recent findings from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the overall labor market has shown unexpected strength, with a stable baseline keeping the Hispanic and Latino unemployment rate hovering around 4.8%. While this reflects a significant drop from the 5.3% peak recorded a year ago, advocacy groups argue that the metrics mask deeper inequalities that holiday celebrations tend to overlook.

Keep ReadingShow less
US $1 dollar bill in mid air melting, red gradated background

From $215B to $7.14T: how outbound investment, falling labor share, and rising corporate profits reveal trickle-down economics' core flaw.

PM Images/Getty Images

Trickle-Down-Economics was Doomed from Day-One; yet Defended to Present-Day

By 1972, U.S. direct investments abroad amounted to $94.0 billion. This was two years prior to the development of the Laffer Curve in 1974 by American economist Arthur Laffer, famously sketched on a restaurant napkin during a dinner meeting in Washington, D.C. Therefore, the writing was on the wall regarding the vulnerability of Trickle-down economics, years prior to Reagan’s Economic Recovery Tax Act (ERTA) of 1981.

Trickle-down economics fails primarily because outbound foreign direct investment (FDI) allows corporations and wealthy individuals to invest tax-cut windfall profits globally rather than domestically. The theory of Trickle-down economics predicted that lowering taxes on businesses and high earners will stimulate local capital accumulation, leading to domestic business expansion, job creation, and wage growth for everyone. However, in a highly globalized economy, capital is hyper-mobile. Instead of filtering downward into the domestic economy, these untaxed or low-tax profits frequently exit the country entirely.

Keep ReadingShow less
Business owner hanging an open sign at a cafe

Black wealth is rising but the racial wealth gap is widening. From Douglass to Mays to today, the freedom struggle's unfinished business is ownership.

Luis Alvarez/Getty Images

Salute A True America 250: Black History Lessons on Power Everyone Needs Today

From Emmaus, Pennsylvania and Staten Island to Veterans of Foreign Wars posts in Kansas, Tennessee, N. Carolina and more, as well as the Ohio State Fair's butter cow theme (and deviled egg recipes), the celebration of America 250 continues throughout the rest of the sesquicentennial year.

Added to the recent Sail250 tall ship event culminating in Boston’s harbor attended by millions was part of the country’s s 1776 official birthdate of independence, but the persistent calls for Black freedom of the last two centuries are still ignored.

Keep ReadingShow less
United States' Constitution and Declaration of Independence on a flag background

The Constitution didn't create American prosperity — geography, immigration, and historical luck did. Here's why that matters for reform debates.

miflippo/Getty Images

The Constitution Did Not Make America Rich

Americans are taught a reassuring story about their country’s success. The United States became prosperous, powerful, and free because the framers wrote an exceptional Constitution. The miracle of Philadelphia produced the miracle of America.

The story appears in classrooms, campaign speeches, judicial opinions, and serious scholarly works. Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson have argued that institutions securing property and constraining expropriation help separate rich nations from poor ones. But the popular American version takes that insight and turns it into something much stronger – and misguided: that our prosperity flowed from our particular constitutional design, and that altering it would put the wealth at risk.

Keep ReadingShow less