Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Seniors Face Unfair Rents and Homelessness. They Need Rent Control

Opinion

Seniors Face Unfair Rents and Homelessness. They Need Rent Control

Large group of houses shape made from US currency.

Getty images

From mobile home parks in Maine to modest apartments in California, seniors desperately need rent control to protect themselves against skyrocketing rents charged by predatory landlords. Our grandparents, parents, aunts, and uncles, many of whom live on fixed incomes, face serious, life-altering consequences if politicians don’t protect them. They need rent control now.

One of the most alarming housing stories over the years is that more and more seniors in the United States have been pushed into homelessness due to unfair, excessive rents. In fact, the U.S. Government Accountability Office noted in 2025 that “about 20 percent of those experiencing homelessness (or one in five) were older adults, ages 55 and up.”


In California, CalMatters reported that seniors had become the fastest-growing population of the homeless. Not only that, the number of seniors who sought homelessness services increased by a whopping 84 percent – more than any other age group. In 2024, Capitol Weekly described that trend as a “silent crisis,” noting that 25 percent of California’s homeless population is aged 55 or older.

It’s totally unacceptable, especially if our politicians don’t help our seniors.

In 2025, LAist reported that Los Angeles, the largest city in California, saw a shocking spike in homelessness among seniors of 36 percent between 2022 and 2024. And The Guardian found that more than 3,000 of the 11,500 people who died while unhoused in L.A. County between 2014 and 2023 were 60 and older.

It’s outrageous, but not surprising: Eviction Lab, the prestigious think tank at Princeton University, found that unaffordable rents are linked to higher mortality rates. Seniors on fixed incomes are especially vulnerable.

There have also been numerous reports over the years about the plight of seniors who live in mobile home parks in Maine and other states. Once an affordable way to live for fixed-income seniors, corporate landlords have bought up mobile home parks and suddenly charged outrageous rent hikes – or what Manufactured Housing Action, a nationwide advocacy group, termed as “rent-gouging grandma.”

Over and over again, the real estate industry sees our grandparents and parents not as human beings, but merely as vehicles for their outsized profits.

But, with all this bad news, there is an urgent solution: rent control. It is the only tool that will quickly rein in predatory landlords and stabilize rents for our older loved ones.

In fact, rent control, going back to World War I, has been widely used in America to protect our most vulnerable residents. With seniors facing life-threatening homelessness, politicians should quickly establish rent regulations again.

At the same time, elected leaders must go further and implement a sensible, multi-pronged strategy for the housing affordability and homelessness crises called the “3 Ps”: protect tenants through rent control and other protections; preserve existing affordable housing, not demolish it to make way for expensive luxury housing; and produce new affordable and homeless housing using such concepts as adaptive reuse and prefabricated housing.

It’s an approach that emphasizes helping the people who need it most: the poor, middle, and working-class, which includes millions of seniors.

Seniors need help now, not later. Their lives are literally on the line. They can’t wait any longer for politicians to do the right thing. And if the politicians don’t act, that will speak volumes about their lack of concern for older Americans. Our grandparents and parents deserve much more respect.

Patrick Range McDonald is the award-winning advocacy journalist for Housing Is A Human Right, the housing advocacy division of AIDS Healthcare Foundation.


Read More

Donald Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House on September 21, 2026, in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Finn Gomez/Getty Images)

Mixed Economy, Sour Mood: Voter Anxiety Threatens Trump in November

Less than two months before the November election, it is turning into a referendum on President Donald Trump’s second term. The key question that is usually asked in referendum elections like this one is: “Am I better off now than I was two years ago, at the time of the last election?

In answer to that question, the United States is kind of in a schizophrenic place—stuck between statistical indicators of how the economy is doing and individual Americans’ perceptions of how their own personal situation is faring in the Trump economy. Looking at the economic indicators – which at this point are unlikely to change between now and November – the performance is fairly mixed. Not great, but not horrible.

Keep ReadingShow less
A man in a green shirt and a man in a flannel shirt.

A man in a green shirt and a man in a flannel shirt marched and chanted down the street in protest.

Getty Images

Failed Supply-Side Economics Needs Immigrants as Scapegoats

From a political economy perspective, supply-side economics relies on immigrant scapegoating to divert public attention from the structural inequality and wage stagnation caused by its own policies.

By shifting the blame for economic anxiety away from corporate deregulation, underfunded public services, and upward wealth distribution onto a vulnerable out-group, proponents of supply-side policies can protect their core economic agenda.

Keep ReadingShow less
battery electrolyte facility

BlueOval, a Ford manufacturing campus in Stanton Tennessee, laid off workers at its battery electrolyte facility in March, as it prepared to transition to SK On Tennessee.

(Adobe Stock)

Canceled Clean Energy Grants Threaten Tennessee Projects, Jobs

The Sierra Club of Tennessee said the Trump administration's decision to scrap $7.6 billion in clean energy grants has affected eight projects in the state.

Court documents confirmed the federal government canceled more than 300 grants in 16 states because they voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 election.

Keep ReadingShow less
American dollars positioned around each other.

With the national debt topping $40.05 trillion, economists across the political spectrum argue that relying exclusively on Supply-Side Economics is damaging the American economy structurally.

dblight/Getty Images

$40 Trillion National Debt & Future of Failed Supply-Side Economics

The U.S. gross national debt has officially surpassed $40 trillion, an unprecedented milestone that marks a critical turning point in the decades-long debate over supply-side economics.

The core promise of supply-side economics—famously popularized by the Laffer Curve—is that tax cuts and deregulation stimulate so much business activity and capital investment that they eventually "pay for themselves" through increased tax revenue. However, the reality of a $40 trillion debt load, accelerated by massive deficit-financed tax packages like the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 and the subsequent 2025 tax cuts under the Trump administration, effectively dismantles this theory.

Keep ReadingShow less