Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Seniors Face Unfair Rents and Homelessness. They Need Rent Control

Opinion

Seniors Face Unfair Rents and Homelessness. They Need Rent Control

Large group of houses shape made from US currency.

Getty images

From mobile home parks in Maine to modest apartments in California, seniors desperately need rent control to protect themselves against skyrocketing rents charged by predatory landlords. Our grandparents, parents, aunts, and uncles, many of whom live on fixed incomes, face serious, life-altering consequences if politicians don’t protect them. They need rent control now.

One of the most alarming housing stories over the years is that more and more seniors in the United States have been pushed into homelessness due to unfair, excessive rents. In fact, the U.S. Government Accountability Office noted in 2025 that “about 20 percent of those experiencing homelessness (or one in five) were older adults, ages 55 and up.”


In California, CalMatters reported that seniors had become the fastest-growing population of the homeless. Not only that, the number of seniors who sought homelessness services increased by a whopping 84 percent – more than any other age group. In 2024, Capitol Weekly described that trend as a “silent crisis,” noting that 25 percent of California’s homeless population is aged 55 or older.

It’s totally unacceptable, especially if our politicians don’t help our seniors.

In 2025, LAist reported that Los Angeles, the largest city in California, saw a shocking spike in homelessness among seniors of 36 percent between 2022 and 2024. And The Guardian found that more than 3,000 of the 11,500 people who died while unhoused in L.A. County between 2014 and 2023 were 60 and older.

It’s outrageous, but not surprising: Eviction Lab, the prestigious think tank at Princeton University, found that unaffordable rents are linked to higher mortality rates. Seniors on fixed incomes are especially vulnerable.

There have also been numerous reports over the years about the plight of seniors who live in mobile home parks in Maine and other states. Once an affordable way to live for fixed-income seniors, corporate landlords have bought up mobile home parks and suddenly charged outrageous rent hikes – or what Manufactured Housing Action, a nationwide advocacy group, termed as “rent-gouging grandma.”

Over and over again, the real estate industry sees our grandparents and parents not as human beings, but merely as vehicles for their outsized profits.

But, with all this bad news, there is an urgent solution: rent control. It is the only tool that will quickly rein in predatory landlords and stabilize rents for our older loved ones.

In fact, rent control, going back to World War I, has been widely used in America to protect our most vulnerable residents. With seniors facing life-threatening homelessness, politicians should quickly establish rent regulations again.

At the same time, elected leaders must go further and implement a sensible, multi-pronged strategy for the housing affordability and homelessness crises called the “3 Ps”: protect tenants through rent control and other protections; preserve existing affordable housing, not demolish it to make way for expensive luxury housing; and produce new affordable and homeless housing using such concepts as adaptive reuse and prefabricated housing.

It’s an approach that emphasizes helping the people who need it most: the poor, middle, and working-class, which includes millions of seniors.

Seniors need help now, not later. Their lives are literally on the line. They can’t wait any longer for politicians to do the right thing. And if the politicians don’t act, that will speak volumes about their lack of concern for older Americans. Our grandparents and parents deserve much more respect.

Patrick Range McDonald is the award-winning advocacy journalist for Housing Is A Human Right, the housing advocacy division of AIDS Healthcare Foundation.


Read More

Empty money in wallet.

What does it mean to be the working poor? Explore the gap between poverty and a living wage, why millions of working Americans struggle, and solutions to reduce economic inequality.

photobyphotoboy/Getty Images

The Concept of the “Working Poor” Should Be Unacceptable

What does the phrase "working poor" mean? The first point is that you are working; you have a regular job—you aren't working catch as catch can; you are employed. But despite working, you are poor. What does it mean to be poor? It turns out that "poor” means different things depending on what standard you apply.

Some definitions seem rooted in the old institution of the poorhouse, which was a home for paupers. Thus, dictionary.com defines “poor” as having little or no money or other means of support. To me, that’s the definition of being destitute, not poor.

Keep ReadingShow less
Woman holding out an empty wallet at a table.

Many Americans wrongly associate poverty primarily with Black and Hispanic communities. Explore how this misconception influences public opinion, politics, and anti-poverty policy.

skaman306 / Getty Images

More Whites Live in Poverty than Either Blacks or Hispanics - Correcting the Perception of Poverty

From observing people and politicians over the years—I can find no data on this—I have the impression that liberals as well as conservatives think that the typical person living in poverty is Black or Hispanic. The image most Whites have of people of color is someone who is poor—except for celebrities—with little education; they are not aware of many people of color who are middle class. On the other hand, they are not aware of many Whites who are poor and so they think their number is low.

Why is the perception of poverty important? The perception of who is poor has significant impact on the support for government programs that aid the poor. Given the extent of racism in this country, whether subtle or violent, (see my post, “Whether the Issue is Gun Violence or Inequality, It Always Comes Back to Race/Racism”), it’s not surprising that support for anti-poverty programs is non-existent among MAGA Republicans and for that matter has always been weak among Republicans; 45% of Republicans would even cut food stamp support. Their attitude is "it's your fault;" so government has no responsibility to help. They feel the causes of poverty are personal: bad life choices, drugs, lack of work ethic, and the breakdown of families—all negative perceptions of Black culture.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress at sunset

America's national debt is projected to reach $45 trillion by 2029. Explore Congress's constitutional "Power of the Purse," federal spending, appropriations, and the policies contributing to rising deficits.

Bill Clark/Getty Images

Congress Must Enforce the Power of the Purse as Debt Soars

“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law” (Appropriations Clause, Article I, Section 9, Clause 7, U.S. Constitution). Congress’s “Power of the Purse” means the President cannot spend money or authorize expenditures unless Congress has passed a specific law funding it (Congress.gov).

According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, the total federal debt held by Americans is on track to hit $40 trillion by the end of 2026. Currently, every resident in America carries a $122,642 share of this debt.

Keep ReadingShow less
​A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes.

A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes in the Houch neighborhood, after being displaced for weeks by war between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia that has displaced 1.2 million Lebanese, on April 28, 2026, in Tyre, Lebanon.

Scott Peterson / Getty Images

Please Don't Feed the Warmongers

I was recently catching up with an old friend from my Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps days who told me about some young sailors he knew in Bahrain tasked with intercepting hostile drones. Critically, as highly disciplined professionals, they have become extraordinarily good at it. My friend and I, with over twenty years of active duty service as military officers between us, discussed the extent to which their competence and vigilance are keeping them, and other Americans deployed in the area, alive, all while their leadership in Washington treats war with an increasingly terrifying callousness.

As brave servicemembers risk their lives on the front lines, Trump brags about how much money he’s making as president. It is true that for those invested in the types of industries that thrive during armed conflict, this war in Iran is a windfall. Trump himself invested between $9.7 million and $24.3 million in arms manufacturers and Pentagon contractors in 2025. Why would he end the war?

Keep ReadingShow less