Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Washington’s Failure to Face Generation Imbalance is Divisive

Opinion

 Grandmother and adult granddaughter sitting on windowsill

America's growing generational divide is straining the social contract as younger Americans face housing, debt, and economic challenges.

Oliver Rossi / Getty Images

Outside Pittsburgh, a retired couple sitting around their dining-room table worries about whether Social Security will still be there in ten years. Their daughter and son-in-law, living across town, struggle with a different question: whether they will ever be able to buy a home, pay off their student loans, and raise two children without going bankrupt.

Their fears are real. They are normal responses to an economy and political system that increasingly forces generations to compete for financial security instead of building conditions in which they can thrive.


The United States faces a dangerous generational divide, not because older Americans are selfish or younger Americans are entitled, but because the political system increasingly lacks either the ability or the will to balance the needs of both. Programs for seniors remain politically protected while investments in younger generations are repeatedly delayed, diluted, or discarded altogether.

This political imbalance is creating more than fiscal strain. It is undermining the social contract itself.

A Political System Tilted Toward Seniors

The problem begins with demographics and political incentives. Older Americans vote more frequently than younger citizens. In the 2024 election, Census and CIRCLE, a non-partisan civic research center, showed turnout among Americans over 65 exceeded 70%, while turnout among voters under 30 lagged far behind. Also, organizations representing retirees, most notably AARP, are among the most powerful lobbying forces in Washington, while younger Americans remain politically underrepresented. The result is predictable: preserving current benefits becomes politically sacred, while long-term investments in the future are treated as optional.

While Social Security and Medicare are enormously important programs—millions of seniors depend on them for survival—protecting seniors should not require systematically underinvesting in younger Americans.

Young people face housing costs that have vastly outpaced wages, staggering student debt burdens, delayed family formation, and declining rates of homeownership. Americans under 35 control only about 4% of the nation's wealth, while Americans over 70 control roughly 30%, according to Federal Reserve data. Childcare costs now rival mortgage payments in many metropolitan areas. Public universities increasingly shift costs onto students. Starter homes have become unaffordable in many regions.

Education policy clearly reveals the imbalance. Politicians routinely promise to defend retirement programs while investments in schools, universities, and research are treated as expendable. Federal spending on children has fallen substantially as a share of the federal budget over the past several decades, while state funding for public universities has steadily declined since the 1990s, shifting more of the burden onto students and families.

According to the Urban Institute, federal spending on children is projected to decline as a share of total federal spending in the coming years, even as spending on Social Security and Medicare continues to grow, suggesting a government increasingly consumed by the obligations of an aging society.

The upshot is an undermining of future opportunity. Weakening public education and reducing support for higher education does not merely hurt students; it undermines the country's long-term economic capacity and civic health.

The Civic Cost of Generational Politics

Another peril is democratic thinning: our institutions continue to function procedurally while losing their capacity to generate broadly shared legitimacy and long-term trust. Younger Americans increasingly believe the system is not designed for them. Older Americans fear the protections they earned may disappear. Each side grows more suspicious of the other, even though both are reacting to the same institutional dysfunction.

As NY Times columnist David French recently observed, many older Americans increasingly feel threatened in public life. In an era of "OK boomer" politics, some seniors encounter a hostile message: your generation created today's problems, you refuse to step aside, and the country would be better off without your influence.

The frustration behind these sentiments is understandable. Yet the blame is frequently misplaced.

The real problem is not older Americans. Nor is it younger Americans. The problem is a political system that has become increasingly adept at protecting commitments to older Americans while neglecting future investments that benefit the young. When institutions fail to balance the needs of different generations, citizens begin blaming one another for problems that originate in Washington. The result is precisely the kind of intergenerational resentment that healthy democracies must avoid.

Other countries have begun confronting these tensions more honestly than the United States. Some have expanded child benefits, subsidized housing construction, invested heavily in vocational education, or linked immigration policy directly to demographic needs. In America, by contrast, leaders often prefer symbolic cultural battles over difficult fiscal trade-offs.

Rebuilding the Social Contract

Eventually, however, reality prevails over political messaging.

The solution is not abandoning seniors. Nor is it blaming younger Americans for struggling in an economy increasingly stacked against them. The real challenge is rebuilding a political system capable of balancing obligations across generations instead of pitting them against one another.

That means strengthening Social Security's finances through serious reform, including lifting payroll tax caps and pursuing sustainable immigration policies. It means investing far more aggressively in affordable housing, childcare, education, workforce training, and infrastructure. It also means forcing Congress to think beyond the next election cycle and toward the long-term stability of society itself.

A healthy democracy does not merely preserve the present. It prepares for the future.

Right now, Washington is failing at both.


Robert Cropf is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Louis University.


Read More

​A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes.

A Lebanese girl returns with her family to live amid the ruins of an apartment wrecked by Israeli strikes in the Houch neighborhood, after being displaced for weeks by war between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah militia that has displaced 1.2 million Lebanese, on April 28, 2026, in Tyre, Lebanon.

Scott Peterson / Getty Images

Please Don't Feed the Warmongers

I was recently catching up with an old friend from my Navy Reserve Officer Training Corps days who told me about some young sailors he knew in Bahrain tasked with intercepting hostile drones. Critically, as highly disciplined professionals, they have become extraordinarily good at it. My friend and I, with over twenty years of active duty service as military officers between us, discussed the extent to which their competence and vigilance are keeping them, and other Americans deployed in the area, alive, all while their leadership in Washington treats war with an increasingly terrifying callousness.

As brave servicemembers risk their lives on the front lines, Trump brags about how much money he’s making as president. It is true that for those invested in the types of industries that thrive during armed conflict, this war in Iran is a windfall. Trump himself invested between $9.7 million and $24.3 million in arms manufacturers and Pentagon contractors in 2025. Why would he end the war?

Keep ReadingShow less
A father voting, with his young son standing by him, watching him.

Citizens cast their vote during the 2026 presidential runoff in Colombia on June 21, 2026 in Barranquilla, Colombia. Ivan Cepeda, candidate for the Pacto Historico party and Abelardo de la Espriella, candidate for the Salvación Nacional, face in a tight runoff to rule Colombia from 2026 to 2030.

Leonardo Castañeda/Getty Images

Colombia’s Election Matters—Especially to Ecuador and the U.S.

In a closely fought election on June 21, conservative outsider Abelardo De La Espriella prevailed over Iván Cepeda, an ally of current leftist president, Gustavo Petro. Central to the electorate’s choice were distinct policy proposals to fight criminality and the drug cartels, who control large swaths of Colombian territory. The policies president-elect De La Espriella will bring to the fight against these issues matter greatly, not only to Colombia, but to neighboring Ecuador and the United States.

Earlier in March, Ecuadorian President Noboa, desperate to gain traction in his own drug war, announced a partnership with the U.S. to conduct joint operations against drug cartels. The partnership quickly went awry. A New York Times investigation of the first strike indicates that what the joint militaries considered a drug camp was in fact a dairy farm, with no drug connection. Then, on March 17, Colombia accused Ecuador of bombing within its territory with U.S. involvement. These incidents resulted in U.S. lawmakers calling for a suspension of joint operations on May 13. Very quickly, the U.S. partnership has reopened the scars of the Plan Colombia era of the early 2000s, where an overly militaristic approach to the drug war funded by the U.S. resulted in human rights abuses and false positives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Adult grandson teaching his grandfather to use laptop, close-up.

Social Security faces a funding crisis by 2032 that could cut retirement benefits by 22%. Learn what's driving the shortfall and how it could be fixed.

Westend61 / Getty Images

Social Security Faces a 2032 Crisis with Deep Benefit Cuts Ahead

A financial tsunami of giant proportions is heading our way. And it is due to arrive in about six years. Policymakers have known about this tsunami for some time, but in June, we found out the Big Wave is taller than anyone knew.

That’s when the Social Security Trustees released their latest report on the financial health of the popular Social Security retirement program. According to the trustees’ report, the outlook is not good – Social Security’s solvency is in danger. By 2032, the Social Security fund will fall short by about $2.5 trillion of the money needed to pay the 52 million American retirees their full retirement benefits. Previously, it was thought that the tsunami would make landfall in 2034, but the finances are deteriorating faster than expected. If no presidential and congressional intervention is mounted, retirees will take about a 22 percent haircut, meaning any senior beneficiary who was receiving $3000 per month will see that chopped to about $2300 per month, a loss of about $8000 per year.

Keep ReadingShow less
 Lego Bricks in child hands

How imagination shapes our future and the American spirit.

Ekaterina79 / Getty Images

The Dreams That Built America—and Will Carry Us Forward

Ah love, let us be true

To one another! For the world, which seems

Keep ReadingShow less