Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Four ways to fix voting before the next election

absentee ballot
Wikimedia Commons

With only five days remaining before Nov. 3, it's not too early to take stock of how things should have been different. Here are four things that need to happen before the next election. All four reforms derive from actual controversies over the past six months, things that never should have been the subject of extended legal or political battles.


First, in every state, all voters should have a choice of three ways to cast ballots, to maximize their ability to participate in this fundamental civic duty. All voters should be able to vote in-person on Election Day, of course. They should be able to vote in-person prior to Election Day. And they should be able to use a mail-in ballot (whether or not it is returned by mail, or instead by hand delivery). It's long past time to reject the anachronistic view that any voter who is sufficiently committed can find a way to get to the polls on Election Day. Even before the 2020 pandemic, that view betrayed a class bias contrary to any genuine effort to foster a robust democracy with full citizen participation. (An alternative would be to make Election Day a holiday, an often-proposed reform that deserves full consideration, although easy mail-in voting would still be needed.)

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Second, local election jurisdictions should be able to establish as many early voting centers and ballot drop-box locations as needed. Voting should be convenient. Because urban, suburban and rural jurisdictions face different issues, they shouldn't be constrained by inflexible standards.

Third, states should allow voters to mark and send in their mailed-in ballots through Election Day. These ballots should be counted if they are postmarked by Election Day. The cut off should be several days after Election Day (the specific deadline to be determined after a thorough investigation of mail processing times).

Fourth, all states should permit mail-in ballots to be pre-processed before Election Day, so that all such ballots received by Election Day can be tabulated that day. That will avoid the unnecessary days of processing and counting that will follow after Nov. 3 this year.

Many states already follow these four principles, but they deserve to be standard throughout the United States. Imagine how much litigation and uncertainty could have been avoided this year had these four practices already been in place. These provisions could easily form the core of a reform effort, potentially in conjunction with other proposed federal legislative reforms, to be applicable to all future federal elections.

Steven Huefner is professor of law and deputy director of the election law program at The Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law. Read more from The Fulcrum's Election Dissection blog.

Read More

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.
Jeff Swensen/Getty Images

The election went remarkably well. Here's how to make the next one even better.

We haven't yet seen evidence that would cast doubt on the legitimacy of the 2020 presidential election — even with the unprecedented challenges of a global pandemic, the threat of foreign interference, civil unrest and greater turnout than any time since 1900. That counts as a resounding success.

Once the final tallies are certified, we need to thank the election administrators and poll workers whose heroic efforts preserved American democracy. After that, we need to assess what worked best and what needs to improve, so we can identify achievable steps to make future elections even more secure.

Based on what we know so far, here are five things that should be on the U.S. elections to-do list:

Keep ReadingShow less
Georgia voting stickers
Stop the presses, says appeals court, even if that means longer Georgia voting lines
Jessica McGowan/Getty Images

The three steps to ensure a well-run runoff in Georgia

Hold the champagne: The 2020 Election Season isn't over just yet. Neither of Georgia's Senate races resulted in a victor on Election Day, sending both contests to January runoffs that will likely determine control of the U.S. Senate. And while many folks are understandably focused on the political repercussions of these races, I'm pulling for a different candidate: democracy.

While Georgia will likely conduct a risk-limiting audit and recount of the presidential election later this month, the state appears to have done a good job administering the 2020 presidential election. As a former election administrator and expert on the integrity of elections, my assessment is there is no reason to question the integrity of the election outcome. If any concrete evidence suggesting that wrongful disenfranchisement has or will affect the accuracy of the outcome, that assessment could change. Right now, there isn't.

Regardless, these are three steps Georgia officials could take now to ensure the integrity of the state's runoff elections in January:

Keep ReadingShow less
Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

Even if it's not official, Republicans should acknowledge Biden's win

The nation has a new president-elect, Joe Biden. At the same time, there is no official president-elect, because the electoral process itself hasn't yet reached that point.

How can both these assertions be true? And if they are, how are Americans supposed to understand that? Most importantly, how can Americans of opposite parties get on the same page, so that we can move forward together as one country, as our new president-elect in his impressive victory speech is urging us to do?

When it comes to ending elections, there are actually two different processes at work, and they operate on different timelines.

Keep ReadingShow less
What's next for U.S. democracy after the president's stress test?
Jay Cross/Flickr

What's next for U.S. democracy after the president's stress test?

In another assessment of the 2020 vote so far, Election Dissection sat down with Laura Williamson, who works on voting rights and democracy at Demos. We spoke about President Trump's election night remarks as a stress test for the United States. Williamson had plenty to say about the state of the elections and some things that need fixing after the votes are finally counted.

What was your reaction to the president?

The president's remarks and actions are a test of our ability to show up, as a people, to mass mobilize and resist his authoritarian calls to end the counting. The basis of our democracy is that we pick our leaders. It's not the president or the courts that choose. So it's a test of our ability as a people to resist what is so clearly an anti-democratic attack.

And Americans are rising to the test. We're seeing masses of people calling for every vote to be counted. They're showing up and exercising their political power. We flexed our political power one way, by voting before or on Election Day. Now we're exercising it again in a different way — showing up in the streets and demanding every eligible vote is counted.

Keep ReadingShow less