Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

How New Jersey’s Ballot Slogans Could Put Power Back in Voters Hands

Coordinated ballot slogans offer voters a way to challenge entrenched power.

Opinion

How New Jersey’s Ballot Slogans Could Put Power Back in Voters Hands

New Jersey, USA flag, person voting

AI generated image

With American democracy in crisis amid national turmoil, neither political party is prepared to lead us out of the wilderness. However, here in New Jersey, voters can bring in outsiders through one legal strategy to overcome barriers: the ballot slogan system.

This year, New Jersey's primary elections are unusually open. Until recently, party organizations could manipulate voters' choices by the deceptive arrangement of candidate names, a system called the county line. This guaranteed that nominees would be the parties' handpicked choices.


But two years ago, that system was blocked in a landmark federal voting rights lawsuit. I should know - I was an expert witness in that lawsuit, and helped do away with that unfair rule. Now all candidates compete on a more level playing field.

But there’s still the problem of name recognition. How can we tell the difference between an establishment candidate and someone who can make real change? The answer is in the ballot slogan. Candidates in New Jersey are allowed to list a slogan of up to six words describing their views.

The ballot slogan can be used by individuals to express their views. There’s still the problem of whether someone is a serious candidate. A slogan like “free pizza and beer on Fridays” is, after all, six words. Such a slogan would not speak to problems well-suited to legislation.

But the slogan can take on new force, both by being serious - and by coordination between many candidates. Protest movements gain power in numbers. If a whole slate of candidates used the same slogan, that would show a unified front and a movement. For example, in the Democratic primary in every congressional district in New Jersey, imagine 12 candidates - one for each district, using “No Kings” in their ballot slogan. They could convey a message that harnesses the energy of protests across the Garden State. Such a slogan would support the kind of radical rescue operations that Democrats think are urgently needed.

We're living in a time when our institutions have failed us. Our parties, our elected officials, business, law, universities—all are weakening or caving out of fear. But one element of society has less to lose by speaking the truth and more to gain by saving the system: individual voters. The slogan system gives those voters a real say.

Democratic Party leadership is responding very slowly to the radical changes of the last 12 months. While their party base is becoming increasingly infuriated by the actions of ICE in Minneapolis and across the nation, their consultants are urging a more cautious approach. But ICE's aggression is just the beginning. Drastic changes to the administration of law, corruption at the highest levels of government, and the undermining of public health and science threaten to upend the prosperity and peace of the last 50 years. This is not even to mention the undoing of progress on civil rights and voting rights. In the face of this, Democrats would rally behind new leaders willing to do whatever it takes to save the nation.

Although entrenched party organizations may be afraid to call for necessary action, individual candidates are not similarly constrained. Their slogan can be free of any pressure from party elders. Think of a ballot slogan like "Abolish ICE. Prosecute crimes. No kings." With 46% of Americans in favor of abolishing ICE and 43% opposed, such a slogan starts with a natural advantage.

And since primaries are dominated by party activists, such a slogan could be galvanizing. Recall that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez used the Democratic primary to oust a longtime veteran of Congress, Joseph Crowley. Amplify that to hundreds of districts nationwide. Such a message would resonate with rank-and-file voters all over the nation. New Jersey could lead the way.

The same path is available to Republicans. Members of Congress are largely voting in lockstep with the Trump Administration - even as that Administration takes ever more extreme actions. If they are dismayed by the radicalism that has gripped their party, they can express a slogan that points toward a better way. Imagine Republican outsiders running under the slogan “Restore the Fed, NATO, and integrity.” Old-school Republicans and conservatives who want to, well, conserve, would find their home at last.

The candidate filing deadline is March 23. For any candidates who can gather signatures by that date, a path is open to expressing the rage of Democrats, the uneasiness of Republicans, and the millions of independents who have no home in either party. Through the ballot slogan system, the banner is ready for a new generation of candidates to pick up.

Sam Wang is a professor of neuroscience at Princeton University and a leading expert on statistical analysis in public policy. He is the founder of Fixing Bugs in Democracy where he covers topics related to democracy, data analysis, and potential reforms.


Read More

How A 2022 Law Changed Election Certification: Assessing the Electoral Count Reform Act

A sign that reads: Voting

E4C

How A 2022 Law Changed Election Certification: Assessing the Electoral Count Reform Act

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • The Electoral Count Reform (ECRA) of 2022 modernizes the 1887 Electoral Count Act, which governed how Congress counts Electoral College votes. The original Act has been widely criticized as vague and susceptible to exploitation.
  • The ECRA clarifies that the Vice President’s role is ceremonial, raises the objection threshold to 20 percent of both chambers, and designates governors as responsible for submitting elector certificates.
  • Supporters argue that the bipartisan reform prevents future election disputes and protects democratic stability, while critics contend that it was rushed, doesn’t address deeper election integrity issues, and raises concerns about federalism.
  • The Act reflects bipartisan cooperation but continues debates about federalism and the balance of power between states and Congress.

The Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act (ECRA) was introduced by Senator Susan Collins (R-ME) in July 2022 and signed into law by President Joe Biden in December 2022. It is a reform to the Electoral Count Act of 1887 (ECA), a law that governs how Congress counts the Electoral College votes for president every four years. The Act is also a response to President Donald Trump’s efforts to dispute the 2020 presidential election results, which revealed several gaps in the law that could be exploited by a presidential candidate.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Bipartisan War on Independent Voters
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

The Bipartisan War on Independent Voters

The Washington Post editorial board penned a bold piece (Bill Cassidy and America’s Increasingly Broken Primary System) in the wake of President Trump’s successful vendetta against the Louisiana Senator. They could have taken the easy route and pointed a finger at the Republicans. Instead, they took issue with both parties and their insatiable appetite to control the rules of the game and punish anyone who steps out of line.

In a media landscape dominated by partisan propaganda, it’s refreshing to read an opinion piece that encourages readers to actually look at what’s happening.

Keep ReadingShow less
Oregon Pioneered Vote-by-Mail. Its Ballot Access Laws Are Still in the Covered Wagon Era.
white printer paper on white table

Oregon Pioneered Vote-by-Mail. Its Ballot Access Laws Are Still in the Covered Wagon Era.

Oregon's primary election was on May 19. Neither of the two major-party candidates in Oregon's 6th Congressional District faced a primary opponent. They'll automatically advance to November's general election ballot, without a single voter really needing to weigh in, without collecting a single petition signature, and without knocking on a single door. The Democratic incumbent represents a party that accounts for 29.75 percent of registered voters in this district. The Republican nominee represents a party with 24.78 percent of the vote. Together, the two parties represent a minority of OR-6's electorate, and both of their candidates are already on the November ballot.

I represent the largest voting bloc in this district. Nearly 40 percent of OR-6's registered voters are unaffiliated, more than either party. These voters have never had a candidate who answers only to them—not to party bosses, party lines, or special interests. I am trying to be that candidate. And I am still on the porch, clipboard in hand, collecting the 5,500 hand-signed paper petitions I will need just to guarantee that my name appears beside theirs in November.

Keep ReadingShow less
Election Officials Warn of Rising Threats As Security Funding Declines Ahead of Midterms

Reps. Laurel Lee (R-Fla) and Terri Sewell (D-Ala) at Wednesday’s House Administration Elections Subcommittee hearing titled, “Examining Best Practices for Strengthening Election Security.”

(Kaitlin Bender-Thomas/MedillNews Service)

Election Officials Warn of Rising Threats As Security Funding Declines Ahead of Midterms

WASHINGTON –Election officials warned lawmakers on Wednesday that threats against election workers and voting systems are escalating even as federal funding for election security remains far below 2020 levels, posing risks ahead of the 2026 midterms.

In 2020, Congress allocated $425 million for election security grants, compared to $15 million in 2025 and $45 million this year. The Trump administration has also proposed a $707 million cut to the CyberSecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s fiscal 2027 budget and ended the agency’s election security support for state and local governments.

Keep ReadingShow less