Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

How New Jersey’s Ballot Slogans Could Put Power Back in Voters Hands

Coordinated ballot slogans offer voters a way to challenge entrenched power.

Opinion

How New Jersey’s Ballot Slogans Could Put Power Back in Voters Hands

New Jersey, USA flag, person voting

AI generated image

With American democracy in crisis amid national turmoil, neither political party is prepared to lead us out of the wilderness. However, here in New Jersey, voters can bring in outsiders through one legal strategy to overcome barriers: the ballot slogan system.

This year, New Jersey's primary elections are unusually open. Until recently, party organizations could manipulate voters' choices by the deceptive arrangement of candidate names, a system called the county line. This guaranteed that nominees would be the parties' handpicked choices.


But two years ago, that system was blocked in a landmark federal voting rights lawsuit. I should know - I was an expert witness in that lawsuit, and helped do away with that unfair rule. Now all candidates compete on a more level playing field.

But there’s still the problem of name recognition. How can we tell the difference between an establishment candidate and someone who can make real change? The answer is in the ballot slogan. Candidates in New Jersey are allowed to list a slogan of up to six words describing their views.

The ballot slogan can be used by individuals to express their views. There’s still the problem of whether someone is a serious candidate. A slogan like “free pizza and beer on Fridays” is, after all, six words. Such a slogan would not speak to problems well-suited to legislation.

But the slogan can take on new force, both by being serious - and by coordination between many candidates. Protest movements gain power in numbers. If a whole slate of candidates used the same slogan, that would show a unified front and a movement. For example, in the Democratic primary in every congressional district in New Jersey, imagine 12 candidates - one for each district, using “No Kings” in their ballot slogan. They could convey a message that harnesses the energy of protests across the Garden State. Such a slogan would support the kind of radical rescue operations that Democrats think are urgently needed.

We're living in a time when our institutions have failed us. Our parties, our elected officials, business, law, universities—all are weakening or caving out of fear. But one element of society has less to lose by speaking the truth and more to gain by saving the system: individual voters. The slogan system gives those voters a real say.

Democratic Party leadership is responding very slowly to the radical changes of the last 12 months. While their party base is becoming increasingly infuriated by the actions of ICE in Minneapolis and across the nation, their consultants are urging a more cautious approach. But ICE's aggression is just the beginning. Drastic changes to the administration of law, corruption at the highest levels of government, and the undermining of public health and science threaten to upend the prosperity and peace of the last 50 years. This is not even to mention the undoing of progress on civil rights and voting rights. In the face of this, Democrats would rally behind new leaders willing to do whatever it takes to save the nation.

Although entrenched party organizations may be afraid to call for necessary action, individual candidates are not similarly constrained. Their slogan can be free of any pressure from party elders. Think of a ballot slogan like "Abolish ICE. Prosecute crimes. No kings." With 46% of Americans in favor of abolishing ICE and 43% opposed, such a slogan starts with a natural advantage.

And since primaries are dominated by party activists, such a slogan could be galvanizing. Recall that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez used the Democratic primary to oust a longtime veteran of Congress, Joseph Crowley. Amplify that to hundreds of districts nationwide. Such a message would resonate with rank-and-file voters all over the nation. New Jersey could lead the way.

The same path is available to Republicans. Members of Congress are largely voting in lockstep with the Trump Administration - even as that Administration takes ever more extreme actions. If they are dismayed by the radicalism that has gripped their party, they can express a slogan that points toward a better way. Imagine Republican outsiders running under the slogan “Restore the Fed, NATO, and integrity.” Old-school Republicans and conservatives who want to, well, conserve, would find their home at last.

The candidate filing deadline is March 23. For any candidates who can gather signatures by that date, a path is open to expressing the rage of Democrats, the uneasiness of Republicans, and the millions of independents who have no home in either party. Through the ballot slogan system, the banner is ready for a new generation of candidates to pick up.

Sam Wang is a professor of neuroscience at Princeton University and a leading expert on statistical analysis in public policy. He is the founder of Fixing Bugs in Democracy where he covers topics related to democracy, data analysis, and potential reforms.


Read More

Americans Voting in an Election

Americans Voting in an Election

Getty Images

Voting Is Not Just a Privilege It Is Every Citizens’ Responsibility

Despite the consistent determinations that US elections are secure across the country and there is virtually no evidence of non-citizens voting, in reports released as recently as September 2026; President Trump has doubled down on his claims that voter fraud is a major problem in America and on October 20th, he announced a new $25 Million Fraud Whistleblower program to be administered by the Department of Justice.

This announcement achieves a variety of the president’s goals: (i) It intentionally perpetuates the misinformation, that voter fraud is a serious problem in the United States; (ii) it undermines the trust in the voting systems, as well as in the states administering the elections; (iii) it fosters distrust amongst neighbors, who are more likely to suspect people of color and report them for a reward. This has the concomitant benefit of (iv) intimidating people who are in fear of going to the polls and (v) It gives the illusion that the federal government is prepared to give away more free money (along with the Tariff rebate checks, the Trump Accounts, the DOGE dividend, the direct payments for healthcare and the $5,000 for supporting GOP midterm candidates.)

Keep ReadingShow less
Capitol building with American flag behind it

Political Polarization and Extremism

Getty Images

Both Parties Have Forgotten How to Lose: It’s Time for Guardrails

On November 3 Americans vote in the midterm elections, and the most important question may be whether the losers accept the result. A Pew survey this summer found that just 55 percent of Americans are confident the midterms will be run fairly and accurately, down from 64 percent in 2022. The partisan detail is more revealing. Since 2024, Republican confidence has risen and Democratic confidence has fallen from 77 percent to 58 percent. Trust in the referee now depends on who holds power.

Democracy rests on a kind of sportsmanship agreement. The theologian Reinhold Niebuhr put it well: man’s capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but his inclination to injustice makes it necessary. B. R. Ambedkar, the chief architect of India’s constitution, called democracy a method of bringing revolutionary change without bloodshed. Both understood that the system works only if the losing side agrees to try again next time instead of burning down the field. Americans in both parties are forgetting how to do that.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Patriotic paper ballot featuring red and blue stripes with the word vote

Patriotic paper ballot featuring red and blue stripes with the word vote inserted into a grey cardboard ballot box slot.

Getty Images

The First Amendment Does Not Belong to Political Parties

In a recent essay in Life & Liberty, Robert G. Natelson argues that open primaries may violate the First Amendment rights of political parties by allowing people who are not party members to participate in choosing their nominees. His argument starts with the rights of the party. The more fundamental question is whether it starts in the right place at all: When a state conducts a primary election, whose rights are we even talking about?

Natelson’s answer is primarily the rights of political parties. He argues that because parties have a First Amendment right to decide with whom they associate, the government cannot require them to allow people who are not party members to participate in choosing their nominees. He relies on a number of Supreme Court decisions involving political parties and places particular weight on National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC. But in doing so, he moves too quickly past the most important fact in the debate: a state primary is an election conducted by the government, not a private meeting of a political organization.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person receiving a "I voted" sticker

After voting for the first time, the proud mother puts an "I voted" sticker on her daughter.

Getty Images

The Surge of Independent Voters: Why Open Primaries Are Democratically Necessary

Across the United States, traditional political affiliations are shifting as a growing segment of the electorate steps away from major-party labels. Jeremy Gruber, senior vice president at Open Primaries, a national nonpartisan organization dedicated to expanding nonpartisan voter access, highlighted this dramatic evolution in voter registration and the structural hurdles these voters face in the latest episode of The Fulcrum Roundtable.

The decline in major-party allegiance is not temporary but a sustained movement that has been building over several decades.

Keep ReadingShow less