Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Nope. Nevermind. Some DHS agencies still shut down.

News

A TSA employee standing in the airport, with two travelers in the foreground.

A Transportation Security Administration (TSA) worker screens passengers and airport employees at O'Hare International Airport on January 07, 2019 in Chicago, Illinois. TSA employees are currently working under the threat of not receiving their next paychecks, scheduled for January 11, because of the partial government shutdown now in its third week.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

House Republicans reject clean bill to open shut-down DHS agencies (March 28 update)

House Republicans (and three Democrats) rejected the Senate's clean bill to end the shutdown late Friday night. Instead, the House passed a different bill that fully funds every agency in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) but for only 60 days with the knowledge that this short-term continuing resolution will not pass in the Senate.

Both chambers are out until April 13 so the shutdown is expected to last until then at least. Hope that no major weather disasters occur before then because FEMA is one of the DHS agencies out of commission (though some of its employees may be working without pay). It's possible that air travel security lines won't get worse since the President signed an Executive Order authorizing DHS to pay TSA workers. New DHS Secretary Mullin says paychecks will start to go out as early as Monday. How long can this approach continue? Unknown. Leaving aside the questionable legality of repurposing funds in this way, DHS may not be willing to keep paying TSA from these other funds long-term.


The Senate proposal to end the shutdown didn't contain specific rest-of-year funds for the immigration agencies ICE and CBP, or for that matter any of Democrats' prior demands for immigration enforcement reform. Congress gave ICE and CBP $75 billion dollars last year in the reconciliation bill, more than enough to carry the agencies for a few years without the specific yearly appropriation that House Republicans now demand, which is why those agencies aren't shut down but the rest of DHS, like TSA and CISA are. So it's unclear what House Republicans are really after other than appearances.

Instead, the impasse will drag on for no one knows how long.

Other legislative activity last week

This has been, measured by bills that passed, a highly productive week for Congress.

All of the bills listed on the House's Weekly Schedule for the week of March 23-27 passed. Many were by voice vote. You can see everything that got some kind of action this week at this variation of our Legislation Advanced Search. You want to look at the second column which tells you what happened (example: Passed House, Senate Next or vice versa) and the date.

None of the bills voted on by the House will become law until addressed by the Senate, but still, it's been a while since everything they intended to hold a vote on got a vote and even longer since they all passed.

The Senate's bill to fund DHS

Because we get our data from Congress and there's always a slight delay, the biggest item of the week, the Senate's bill for nearly complete funding of the Department of Homeland Security, isn't showing up yet on that Advanced Search (at least as of the morning of March 27).

But it did happen! At a little after 2am Eastern time on March 27, the Senate passed a funding bill that excludes ICE and parts of CBP by unanimous consent.

Unanimous consent is basically what it sounds like. No Democrat or Republican stood in the way of passing it.

The bill does not contain any of Democrats' prior demands for immigration enforcement reform.

This would not instantly resolve the massive lines at airports. Over 500 TSA agents are reported to have quit. So, even if all agents who've been calling in sick rather than work without pay come back, there's still going to be a shortage of TSA workers for some time.

The President announced yesterday that he would, by Executive Order, have TSA agents paid the paycheck they've missed. It's not clear if this is even legal.

It went to the House next where it was rejected, as noted at the top.

More coming on a major ethics violation

Programming note: we will be writing separately about yesterday's (March 26) Adjudicatory Hearing covering Rep. Cherfilus-McCormick's (D-FL20) ethics investigation.

The immediate effect is that the Ethics Committee says they believe she violated nearly all of the items listed in the Statement of Alleged Violations. They say they will decide on a recommendation for action to the full House when they return from the April recess.


Nope. Nevermind. Some DHS agencies still shut down. was originally published by GovTrack and is republished with permission.


Read More

An Iranian flag and the message "No King" graffitied on the ruins of the data center building of Sharif University of Technology after a U.S.-Israeli missile strike on April 7, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

How has the meaning of military victory changed? Explore Iran, deterrence, nuclear weapons, and why modern wars are fought with limited objectives.

Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images

The Last War We Understood

Every modern conflict seems to produce the same debate.

Supporters argue that military action achieved its objectives. Critics ask why the enemy still exists. Iran is only the latest example.

Keep ReadingShow less
United States Capitol building and blurred American flag against blue sky

America’s aging Congress has no maximum age limit. Could a constitutional amendment create age limits for lawmakers and better represent younger voters?

TGI /Tetra Images

Congress Has an Age Floor and No Ceiling. That's Backwards for Gen Z.

Senator Dianne Feinstein's visible decline in her final years in office. Senator Lindsey Graham's sudden death. Senator Mitch McConnell's own recent hospitalization, and his halting explanation of it afterward. Three senators, three separate incidents, no obvious connection between them, except that the saga of these three senators is really one story about the problem of not knowing when to step down. That framing asks the right question of individual leaders. But it assumes the problem is a matter of personal judgment, each senator, in his or her own time, finding the wisdom to recognize the moment has passed. I think that gets the American version of this problem backwards. Congress's age problem is not a string of individual judgment calls. It is a structural feature of the Constitution itself, and it is quietly reshaping who gets represented in American government.

The Constitution sets a floor for federal office and no ceiling. A representative must be at least twenty-five. A senator must be at least thirty. A president must be at least thirty-five. Nothing in the document says how old is too old. Combine that asymmetry with the enormous advantages of incumbency, better name recognition, fundraising networks, committee seniority, and the result is predictable: a Congress that can start young but can never age out. It can only age up. The 119th Congress is now the third oldest in American history, with an average member age of nearly fifty-nine and a Senate averaging in the mid-sixties. This is not a temporary blip. It is the natural output of a system with a gate on one end and no gate on the other.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first
a large white building with a flag on top of it

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the third and final installment of our series on “Article the first.” Previous parts examined the history of the single inverted word that turned an intended floor into a ceiling and its impact on the amendment’s failed ratification. This concluding part outlines the path forward for enlarging the House today.

Part 3 — The Path Forward

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

Painting from 1856 by Junius Brutus Stearns of George Washington at the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the second of a three-part series on the First Amendment proposed by Congress in 1789—often called “Article the first”—which was never ratified. Part 1 explained how a single inverted word in the text created a mathematical absurdity that has been misread for 237 years. This second part explores the untold history of how that defect affected the original ratification process in state legislatures.

Part 2 — The Untold History

Keep ReadingShow less