Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Florida’s Anti-DEI Politics Will Destroy the Culture Museums are Created to Support

Opinion

National Museum of African American History and Culture, a Smithsonian museum with unique exhibits on African American history, culture & community, Washington, D.C., USA

The National Museum of African American History and Culture, a Smithsonian museum with unique exhibits on African American history, culture & community, Washington, D.C., USA

Getty Images, PurpleImages

Recently, I sat in my museum’s annual public programming meeting, expecting the usual work of dreaming up the next year: what our community needs and what children deserve. But when Florida’s anti-DEI measure, SB 1134, came up, the room shifted from possibility to fear.

That meeting is usually the best part of our jobs. This time, however, the conversation turned to risk: what would become too dangerous to defend and what would be dropped before anyone even had to tell us to drop it. One of our managers finally said, “Culture is dead.” What I heard was more precise: culture is not dead. It is being killed.


When our history is wiped from the very institutions that are supposed to teach us who we are, we are cutting children off from the stories that should anchor them. Florida has a long history of this—from the Ocoee massacre in 1920 to Rosewood in 1923. This country has long known how to attack what gives marginalized people strength, from the federal boarding school system for Native children to today’s censorship.

And museums need to decide, right now, who we are in this moment.

The threat is no longer theoretical; it is a documented federal and cultural campaign. In March 2025, the Trump administration issued an executive order targeting the Smithsonian Institution, accusing the National Museum of African American History and Culture (NMAAHC) of promoting a “race-centered ideology.” As reported by AP News, this order empowers officials to prohibit programs deemed to “divide Americans based on race,” essentially moving to sanitize the uncomfortable truths of slavery and Jim Crow.

The "so what?" of this issue is found in the physical removal of history. Recent reports from NBC4 Washington confirm that artifacts like an 1880 book by Rev. George Washington Williams and a Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Bible were returned to their owners following federal pressure on the NMAAHC. While some cite routine loan rotations, the timing fuels a broader climate of fear. When oversight turns into censorship, it undermines the public’s right to know the full history of racial injustice.

This impact ripples outward. Museums like the National Civil Rights Museum at the Lorraine Motel, though not under federal control, are now battling donor withdrawals and school district hesitancy to host visits. Corporate sponsors are increasingly avoiding “controversial” history to escape political blowback. As a result, we are seeing reduced attendance and program eliminations that strip communities of their "truth-tellers."

As someone in museum education, I worry most about the human cost. I have seen what happens when a child recognizes themselves in history. So when I ask what museums should do now, the answer is simple: tell the truth, protect the educators, and stay accountable to the communities we serve. A history museum that cannot tell history honestly is no longer doing its job; it is just storage. If, in the name of being “nonpartisan,” museums retreat from their responsibility, they become just another venue where fear wins.

Protecting our nonpartisan role does not require silence. It requires honesty. Reflecting the full reality of our communities is not a political act; it is public service. Museums cannot just issue careful statements. They have to fight for inclusive education in public and with legislators. If museums want to call themselves civic institutions, this is the moment to prove it.

Once an institution shows what it will surrender under pressure, the public believes it. We have already seen the consequences of following political winds. After Target scaled back parts of its DEI agenda in January 2025, it faced a massive boycott. Reuters later reported that the backlash hurt sales while the company's market value plummeted. This should be a warning to every museum: when you abandon the people who trusted you, the cost is not only moral—it is public, reputational, and financial.

We cannot celebrate culture when it is marketable and abandon it when it becomes politically inconvenient. History will remember who stood as a community anchor and who became an accomplice to erasure. Our museums are resilient, but they cannot stand alone. They belong to us, and it is our responsibility to ensure they remain the truth-tellers our nation desperately needs.


Natalie Williams is Senior Director of Education & Exhibits at Miami Children’s Museum and a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project in partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.

Read More

Two soccer, football, players colliding over the ball.

Alex Freeman #16 of the United States competes for the ball against Jeremy Doku #11 of Belgium during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Round of 16 match between USA and Belgium at Seattle Stadium on July 06, 2026 in Seattle, Washington.

Luke Hales/Getty Images

World Cup in Living Color

Scan the faces on this summer’s European World Cup squads: France, England, Germany, the Netherlands. The jerseys hang on shoulders brown, black, olive, fair. These are not the sanitized, single-story teams that once stood for “nation.” They’re unruly, multicolored, undeniably global. And for once, the United States—so often an outlier—seems less exceptional and more like a willing participant in this reimagining of who “belongs” on the field.

Football—let’s call it what it is, the world’s game—has always reflected the societies that shape it, sometimes as a mirror, sometimes as a funhouse. For decades, European countries clung to self-mythologies, their national teams meant to be pure expressions of heritage: the most French of Frenchmen, the most English of the English. But the game, like the world, refused to stand still. The children and grandchildren of immigrants kept arriving, first in club academies and then on national teams, until no one could deny what was already on the field.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Vice President JD Vance

U.S. Vice President JD Vance speaks to members of the media at the Buergenstock Resort Lake Lucerne, after the U.S. and Iran held high-level talks at the Lake Lucerne Summit on June 22, 2026 near Stansstad, Switzerland.

Pool / Getty Images

The Feigned Confusion of JD Vance: Erasure by Design

"What did Black people do to this administration that has allowed it to really stigmatize folks of color?" Whoopi Goldberg asked Vice President JD Vance last week, when he joined The View to discuss his new memoir. Rather than answer the question, Vance's first response was to feign ignorance. But he wasn't confused. Vance has simply learned that feigned confusion buys him room to say what an entire administration actually believes—not that Black people are hated, but that we are an inconvenience to be erased.

Goldberg and her cohost, Sunny Hostin, followed up with specifics: the removal of Black history from government buildings, Black military leaders sidelined, and contributions denigrated at every turn. Vance's response was to insist everyone is welcome in their political coalition. It wasn't an answer.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Night at Chase Field Revealed a Different America

Mexican Heritage Night, June 4, 2026

A Night at Chase Field Revealed a Different America

I didn’t love seeing the charge for the baseball tickets hit my credit card. Like Americans, I’ve watched expenses and discretionary costs rise. A night at the ballpark felt like a luxury rather than a routine outing. Still, I wanted time with my two grandsons—one a devoted Los Angeles Dodgers fan, the other a loyal Arizona Diamondbacks fan.

That alone promised an interesting evening.

Keep ReadingShow less