Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America at 250: Patriotic Lament From Her Darker Sons

Opinion

America at 250: Patriotic Lament From Her Darker Sons

As the United States nears its 250th anniversary, Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson explores the nation’s founding contradictions, enduring racial inequalities, and the ongoing struggle to align democratic ideals with reality.

Getty Images

As the United States approaches its 250th birthday, the nation confronts a moment that should stir both celebration and sober reflection. A quarter millennium is no small achievement in the long arc of human governance. Republics have faltered far sooner. Yet anniversaries, especially ones of this magnitude, are not merely commemorations of survival. These observances are invitations to take inventory. Thus, demanding that we ask not only what we have built, but what we have become.

The American story is told in two intertwined registers. One is triumphant: a daring rebellion reshaping political thought, expanding liberty. The other is quieter and often suppressed: a republic professing universal rights while sanctioning human bondage, preaching equality but benefiting only a select few. In our 250th year, we are invited to see these two narratives as inseparable, each shaping and challenging the other.


For those of us who inherit both America's ideals and its failures, the upcoming anniversary brings a complex sense of hope and heaviness. As a fifty-one-year-old Black American, trained to interrogate history rather than accept it at face value, I cannot ignore the contradictions at the nation’s origins. The same parchment that boldly declared “all men are created equal” was signed in a country where my ancestors were denied their humanity. This is not an aside to the American story; it is at its center. A century later, James Baldwin expressed the same tension, writing that he loved America more than any other country in the world and, for that reason, insisted on the right to criticize her perpetually. Their patriotism, like mine, was not sentimental but demanding. It was the patriotism of those who believe the American creed is worth holding accountable and worth redeeming.

That tension remains unresolved today. Two hundred and fifty years have not erased the color line that W.E.B. Du Bois described as the defining problem of the twentieth century; the divide between Black and white Americans and the system of racial separation that governed so much of the nation's life. If anything, this color line has proven remarkably adaptable, reappearing in the persistent segregation of schools and neighborhoods, the disproportionate incarceration of people of color, and enduring racial wealth gaps. The right to vote, once secured through the sacrifices of abolitionists and civil rights activists, has again become a contested terrain. Disinformation circulates with unprecedented speed, turning the public square into an arena where facts themselves are up for negotiation.

Such conditions tempt a nation toward two extremes: nostalgia for a mythic, unified past and fatalism that democracy is nearing its end. Both positions misread the American project. The United States has never been stable or morally settled. It is, and has always been, an argument about who belongs and what freedom requires.

To understand the significance of the 250th anniversary, we must resist the urge to see the founding as a finished achievement. The Constitution was not meant to be a monument, but a framework open to revision and debate. American progress has never come from complacency. It has advanced through the efforts of abolitionists, suffragists, labor organizers, civil rights activists, and countless citizens who refused to accept imposed boundaries. Our democracy survives because of persistent dissent and the willingness to challenge what has come before. As we approach this milestone, the real test is not only whether the nation has endured, but whether it has learned from its past.

Learning, in this context, means telling the truth about the past without falling into cynicism or myth. It means acknowledging that the American experiment began in contradiction and required generations of struggle to align ideals with reality. Expanding democracy did not diminish the founding vision, but furthered it.

For America to thrive for another 250 years, the republic must protect the mechanisms through which citizens hold leaders accountable. The right to vote should serve as the bedrock of legitimacy, not as a tool for partisan gain. It is just as vital to confront economic inequalities that threaten the middle class and erode faith in social mobility. These responsibilities also extend beyond our borders, as the nation navigates a world where democratic norms face growing pressure. Crucially, we must recognize that America is not a completed story, but an ongoing negotiation between aspiration and reality. The changing place of those previously excluded. Those who were denied, later contested, and are now indispensable. Revealing something central about the country itself—America's promise grows stronger only when those at its margins make their voices heard.

This is why the most honest form of patriotism may be the kind that refuses to flatter the nation into complacency. The prophets of American democracy, like Frederick Douglass, the journalist and activist Ida B. Wells, the author and essayist James Baldwin, and the civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr., did not love the country despite its contradictions. They loved it by confronting them. Their critique was based on the conviction that the ideals set forth in 1776 make a just society possible. The 250th anniversary is not merely a birthday. It is a test.

The test is whether Americans can summon the civic imagination required to extend democracy into the next century. Can the nation move beyond the reflexive tribalism that has come to dominate political life? Can it build institutions resilient enough to withstand the pressures of misinformation and the temptation of authoritarianism? Can it cultivate a public ethic that recognizes diversity not as a threat but as a source of democratic vitality? The answers to those questions will not be determined by commemorative speeches. They will be determined by the everyday choices of citizens, who decide whether democracy is something they practice or merely inherit.

As one of America’s darker sons, I write not to indict but to lament. The American experiment is incomplete, its history marked by both failure and renewal. Each generation inherits unfinished work. The story of our nation will not be written by those who turn away from its challenges, but by those who confront its complexities with honesty and resolve. As we approach 250 years, let our patriotism be measured by our willingness to strive for a more just and inclusive future. This milestone is not just a time to remember, but a charge to build the America that its highest ideals promise. The next chapter depends on all of us.


Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.


Read More

Liberty and Justice for Some

Stephanie Toliver examines book bans, transgender rights in Kansas, the impacts of ICE detentions, and the history of conditional equality in America’s schools, libraries, and churches.

Getty Images, Catherine McQueen

Liberty and Justice for Some

Late February brought two stories that most Americans filed under separate categories. In Kansas, the state government invalidated the driver's licenses and birth certificates of transgender residents, erasing legal identities with the stroke of a pen. In New York, a Columbia University neuroscience student named Ellie Aghayeva was taken from her campus apartment by federal agents who misrepresented themselves to get through the door and held by ICE until the city's mayor personally petitioned for her release. Different people, different states, different mechanisms. The same message: for some of us, the promises of this nation were always conditional.

And yet, many Americans hold onto the lie of equality because acknowledging the truth would mean that the foundational promise we have repeated since childhood — liberty and justice for all — was never meant for all of us. It is far easier to accept comfortable fictions than to reckon with a truth that destabilizes everything you thought you knew. That meritocracy is real. That all are equal. That the documents we carry and the institutions we enter will protect us the same way they protect everyone else. But for many of us, there was never a fiction to hold onto. We were born into the conditions the lie was designed to obscure.

Keep Reading Show less
Two individuals Skiing in the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Paralympic Games.

Oksana Masters of Team United States celebrates after winning gold in the Para Cross Country Skiing Sprint Sitting Final on day four of the Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Paralympic Games at Tesero Cross-Country Skiing Stadium on March 10, 2026 in Val di Fiemme, Italy.

Getty Images, Buda Mendes

The Paralympics Challenge Everything We Think We Know About Sports

If you’re a sports fan, you likely watched coverage of the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milano Cortina. But will you watch the Paralympics when approximately 665 athletes are expected in Italy to compete in the Para sports of alpine skiing, biathlon, cross-country skiing, ice hockey, snowboarding, and wheelchair curling?

The Paralympics, so-called because they are “parallel” to the Olympics, stand alone as the globe’s premier sporting event for elite athletes with disabilities. According to the International Paralympic Committee, 4,400 disabled athletes competed in the 2024 Paris Summer Games in track and field, swimming, and twenty other sports.

Keep Reading Show less
How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change

Claiming Contested Values

FrameWorks Institute

How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change

Claiming Contested Values: How Fairness, Stability and Freedom Can Help Us Build Demand for Transformative, Structural Change, produced by the FrameWorks Institute, explores how widely shared yet politically contested values can be used to strengthen public support for systemic reform. Values are central to how advocates communicate the importance of their work, and they can motivate collective action toward big, structural changes. This has become especially urgent in a climate where executive orders are targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, and some nonprofits are being labeled as threats based on their stated missions. Many civil society organizations are now grappling with how to communicate their values effectively and safely.

The report focuses on Fairness, Stability, and Freedom because they resonate across the U.S. public and are used by communicators across the political spectrum. Unlike values more closely associated with one ideological camp — such as Tradition on the right or Solidarity on the left — these three values are broadly recognizable but highly contested. Each contains multiple variants, and their impact depends on how clearly advocates define them and how they are paired with specific issues.

Keep Reading Show less