Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Family First: How One Program Is Rebuilding System-Impacted Families

News

Family First: How One Program Is Rebuilding System-Impacted Families

Close up holding hands

Getty Images

“Are you proud of your mother?” Colie Lavar Long, known as Shaka, asked 13-year-old Jade Muñez when he found her waiting at the Georgetown University Law Center. She had come straight from school and was waiting for her mother, Jessica Trejo—who, like Long, is formerly incarcerated—to finish her classes before they would head home together, part of their daily routine.

Muñez said yes, a heartwarming moment for both Long and Trejo, who are friends through their involvement in Georgetown University’s Prisons and Justice Initiative. Trejo recalled that day: “When I came out, [Long] told me, ‘I think it’s awesome that your daughter comes here after school. Any other kid would be like, I'm out of here.’” This mother-daughter bond inspired Long to encourage this kind of family relationship through an initiative he named the Family First program.


Long founded the program through Georgetown’s Prisons and Justice Initiative (PJI), where he serves as a program associate. Long was incarcerated when he was 18 years old and sentenced to life without parole. He served 26 years in various federal prisons before he regained his freedom in 2022 through DC’s Second Look Amendment Act, which expanded on previous legislation and allowed incarcerated individuals who were under 25 years old at the time of their crime and had served at least 15 years to request a reduced sentence. He started taking Georgetown classes through PJI’s Prison Scholars program when in the DC Jail, earned his Georgetown degree, and began working with PJI just days after his release.

PJI hosts many successful prison education and reentry programs to assist currently and formerly incarcerated individuals, but Long noticed a key gap in their work. “All our programs are a response-based method to this problem called mass incarceration,” he said. “How come we can’t incorporate a more preventative method program? You know, targeting the youth and the children of justice-impacted families and working on [breaking] the cycle of intergenerational incarceration?”

Nearly half of incarcerated individuals held in state prisons have children under the age of 18, and about 1.25 million children have an incarcerated parent. Many of these children’s lives are uprooted as they are forced to move in with other family members. They often face health and cognitive challenges during their development, as well as stigma that can lead to isolation and make it difficult for them to enjoy a “normal” childhood. Prisons and jails also make it difficult for parents and children to maintain contact. Two-thirds of incarcerated parents never receive visits from their children, mainly due to strict visitation policies and being located far—often hundreds of miles—from home.

“Men and women coming back to society have a certain apprehension as far as reintegrating themselves back into their child’s lives. They already feel a sense of shame, a sense of abandonment,” Long said. “So when we create experiences where the child and the parent can laugh together…you see how the family structure starts to reintegrate itself. And that end itself helps me combat the system of having children repeat the patterns that they saw from their parents.”

The Family First Program aims to strengthen family bonds through programming and outings for system-impacted parents and their children to experience together. Long began gaining interest by reaching out to families who were alumni of other PJI initiatives, including Trejo.

A Los Angeles native, Trejo was incarcerated for five years in federal prison before she moved to DC in 2021 in search of a fresh start. She graduated from the MORCA-Georgetown Paralegal Program in 2023 and now works at the DC Office of Human Rights. She also regained custody of Muñez after not having seen her for seven years, and soon after, her niece, Joellie. “I was learning to be a mother again all over,” she shared.

Trejo and Muñez have participated in the program since its first event, a two-hour financial literacy workshop for parents and children, which allowed them to learn and grow together. Other events since include trips to Legoland and Six Flags, kayaking on the Potomac River, and a holiday lunch. Up to 20 families usually participate, depending on the event, and children range from three years old to teenagers.

“The whole thing is how do we rebuild family bonds… by creating these experiences that were robbed due to the parents’ incarceration?” Long said. “As far as the actual outcome of the program, it’s beautiful.”

“It’s an amazing feeling,” Trejo said. “You know, to be able to create those memories through a program that's catered to returning citizens and their children.” She was thrilled that Nuñez loved the kayaking trip so much that she asked Trejo if they could do it again, just the two of them.

“I think Jessica and Jade really played a big part for me, just seeing that and witnessing that,” Long said. “Like, damn, this is something that’s needed.”

“I think that’s a critical missing aspect of crime prevention that people really don’t invest in,” he shared. “It’s easy to respond to something versus to actively prevent something from happening.”

One of the biggest challenges Long faces is organizing the events, given that all the participants—himself included—are still rebuilding their lives post-incarceration. Funding also always poses a challenge, and he hopes to have the means to fund more trips for more participants in the future.

What he is most hopeful for, however, is that Family First can serve as a model and inspire others to start similar initiatives. “I would appreciate that more than just somebody giving me money to continue running our program,” he said. “I’d love to see other people latch onto the idea and replicate it to a greater scale than I can do.”

“It gives a sense of pride for the child, you know, the child understands that yesterday, they may be able to remember time and their mom and dad wasn’t here, but it is also witnessing their mom and dad making strides to build a better life for the both of them.”

Alexis Tamm is a student at Georgetown University. An avid writer and aspiring journalist, she is passionate about solutions-focused reporting and driving change through storytelling.

Alexis was a cohort member in Common Ground USA's Journalism program, where Hugo Balta served as an instructor. Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network.

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists. Learn more by clicking HERE.


Read More

People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.

The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

A Shutdown Averted, and a Narrow Window Into Congress’s ICE Dilemma

Congress’s latest shutdown scare ended the way these episodes usually do: with a stopgap deal, a sigh of relief, and little sense that the underlying conflict had been resolved. But buried inside the agreement was a revealing maneuver. While most of the federal government received longer-term funding, the Department of Homeland Security, and especially Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), was given only a short-term extension. That asymmetry was deliberate. It preserved leverage over one of the most controversial federal agencies without triggering a prolonged shutdown, while also exposing the narrow terrain on which Congress is still willing to confront executive power. As with so many recent budget deals, the decision emerged less from open debate than from late-stage negotiations compressed into the final hours before the deadline.

How the Deal Was Framed

Democrats used the funding deadline to force a conversation about ICE’s enforcement practices, but they were careful about how that conversation was structured. Rather than reopening the far more combustible debate over immigration levels, deportation priorities, or statutory authority, they framed the dispute as one about law-enforcement standards, specifically transparency, accountability, and oversight.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

View of the Pier C Park waterfront walkway and in the background the One World Trade Center on the left and the Erie-Lackawanna Railroad and Ferry Terminal Clock Tower on the right

Getty Images, Philippe Debled

The City Where Traffic Fatalities Vanished

A U.S. city of 60,000 people would typically see around six to eight traffic fatalities every year. But Hoboken, New Jersey? They haven’t had a single fatal crash for nine years — since January 17, 2017, to be exact.

Campaigns for seatbelts, lower speed limits and sober driving have brought national death tolls from car crashes down from a peak in the first half of the 20th century. However, many still assume some traffic deaths as an unavoidable cost of car culture.

Keep ReadingShow less
Congress Has Forgotten Its Oath — and the Nation Is Paying the Price

US Capitol

Congress Has Forgotten Its Oath — and the Nation Is Paying the Price

What has happened to the U.S. Congress? Once the anchor of American democracy, it now delivers chaos and a record of inaction that leaves millions of Americans vulnerable. A branch designed to defend the Constitution has instead drifted into paralysis — and the nation is paying the price. It must break its silence and reassert its constitutional role.

The Constitution created three coequal branches — legislative, executive, and judicial — each designed to balance and restrain the others. The Framers placed Congress first in Article I (U.S. Constitution) because they believed the people’s representatives should hold the greatest responsibility: to write laws, control spending, conduct oversight, and ensure that no president or agency escapes accountability. Congress was meant to be the branch closest to the people — the one that listens, deliberates, and acts on behalf of the nation.

Keep ReadingShow less
WI professor: Dems face breaking point over DHS funding feud

Republicans will need some Democratic support to pass the multi-bill spending package in time to avoid a partial government shutdown.

(Adobe Stock)

WI professor: Dems face breaking point over DHS funding feud

A Wisconsin professor is calling another potential government shutdown the ultimate test for the Democratic Party.

Congress is currently in contentious negotiations over a House-approved bill containing additional funding for the Department of Homeland Security, including billions for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as national political uproar continues after immigration agents shot and killed Alex Pretti, 37, in Minneapolis during protests over the weekend.

Keep ReadingShow less