Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

WI professor: Dems face breaking point over DHS funding feud

News

WI professor: Dems face breaking point over DHS funding feud

Republicans will need some Democratic support to pass the multi-bill spending package in time to avoid a partial government shutdown.

(Adobe Stock)

A Wisconsin professor is calling another potential government shutdown the ultimate test for the Democratic Party.

Congress is currently in contentious negotiations over a House-approved bill containing additional funding for the Department of Homeland Security, including billions for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, as national political uproar continues after immigration agents shot and killed Alex Pretti, 37, in Minneapolis during protests over the weekend.


Howard Schweber, professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, argues that any compromise could result in a complete collapse of the Democratic Party.

"This is a moment of genuine crisis for the leadership of the Democratic Party," Schweber contended. "If they fail to either stand strong and shut down the government, or obtain dramatic spending cuts for DHS and constraints on DHS operations, I think that their leadership of the Democratic Party is over."

The multi-bill package budgets more than $64 billion for DHS. The Senate has until Jan. 30 to approve or amend it or they will risk another government shutdown.

Schweber emphasized Democratic voter support has significantly eroded due to leadership decisions perceived as concessions to Republican demands. He explained during the previous government shutdown, Democratic senators voted to continue funding the government based on promised compromises from the Trump administration, which never materialized.

"The stakes are incredibly high, much higher than they've been in past shutdowns," Schweber emphasized. "The usual arguments – about avoiding hardship to federal employees or avoiding being blamed for an economic negative consequence – I don't think have purchase this time around, because the issue of violence in the streets has reached a level of intensity that just creates a whole new political environment."

Schwaber noted the deployment of border czar Tom Homan to Minnesota might signal potential White House willingness to adopt more targeted, less aggressive deportation approaches. He's widely seen by GOP lawmakers as a more practical enforcer of current immigration strategies.

Judith Ruiz-Branch is an award-winning journalist with over a decade of experience as a reporter/producer for TV, radio, print and podcast news.


Read More

An Iranian flag and the message "No King" graffitied on the ruins of the data center building of Sharif University of Technology after a U.S.-Israeli missile strike on April 7, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

How has the meaning of military victory changed? Explore Iran, deterrence, nuclear weapons, and why modern wars are fought with limited objectives.

Kaveh Kazemi/Getty Images

The Last War We Understood

Every modern conflict seems to produce the same debate.

Supporters argue that military action achieved its objectives. Critics ask why the enemy still exists. Iran is only the latest example.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first
a large white building with a flag on top of it

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the third and final installment of our series on “Article the first.” Previous parts examined the history of the single inverted word that turned an intended floor into a ceiling and its impact on the amendment’s failed ratification. This concluding part outlines the path forward for enlarging the House today.

Part 3 — The Path Forward

Keep ReadingShow less
The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

Painting from 1856 by Junius Brutus Stearns of George Washington at the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the second of a three-part series on the First Amendment proposed by Congress in 1789—often called “Article the first”—which was never ratified. Part 1 explained how a single inverted word in the text created a mathematical absurdity that has been misread for 237 years. This second part explores the untold history of how that defect affected the original ratification process in state legislatures.

Part 2 — The Untold History

Keep ReadingShow less
Bill of Rights
Happy 230th birthday, Bill of Rights
leezsnow/Getty Images

The Enduring Illusion of Article the first

This is the first of three parts exploring “Article the First,” the forgotten proposal in the original Bill of Rights. For 237 years, a single, inverted word has created a “semantic illusion,” leading historians and policymakers to misread the founders' intended guarantee of a growing House as a ceiling. This series uncovers the error, tracks its consequences, and explores why reclaiming the founders’ original vision is the path to meaningful representation reform.

Part 1 — The Inverted Word

Keep ReadingShow less