Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

DEI Dilemma? Start Building Community within Your Organization

Opinion

DEI Dilemma? Start Building Community within Your Organization

Team of male and female entrepreneurs working on computers at office

Getty Images

Amid the pushback to DEI, an essential truth often gets lost: You have agency over how you approach building diversity, equity, and inclusion into your organization.

No executive order or unhinged rant can change that.


Yes, DEI, in acronym form, has become a quagmire that poses real risks. But in spirit and intent, there’s no reason it can't flourish as a core value and standard practice within your organization.

To achieve this requires shifting away from the political to the possible. It remains possible to commit to building a work environment where differences are not simply celebrated, but leveraged for greater impact and stronger results.

After all, we still have reams of research-backed conclusions that organizations that embrace and promote diversity are more successful than those that don’t.

DEI never was, and never will be, a tangible thing. It’s a value-driven, data-affirmed belief that all of society advances when everyone has the opportunity to achieve their full potential.

The pressing question then becomes, what is the most promising path forward?

Moving beyond the acronym

The first step is to reframe our efforts through the lens of building and strengthening thriving communities within our respective workplaces.

There’s both a practical and aspirational rationale for this.

The practical aspect acknowledges the reality on the ground that DEI, as a formally structured approach, has been weaponized and distorted to the extent that it no longer offers a viable path to progress.

There are times when certain ideas and initiatives become so easily reduced to tidy acronym-wrapped packages that the package itself becomes the primary focus, rather than the contents within. Taken to its extreme, that package becomes toxic to everyone it touches, regardless of their view on its value.

That leaves us with the challenge of pursuing the data-and-research-proven benefits of a diverse, equitable, and inclusive workplace while avoiding the constant need to fend off attacks or water down our goals.

To do so will require expressing values and benefits in ways that speak to a broader audience, while freeing organizations to strive for the success that a diverse and inclusive work environment creates.

Framing this approach around the concept of community building can help unlock the path to achieving that goal. Pretty much everyone likes the concept of community – from your Trump-stomping neighbor to the woman down the street who still has an Obama-era Hope & Change placard in her window.

The promise of community framing

There’s sound research to back this up.

PACE’s Civic Language Perceptions Project annually surveys registered voters to gauge their reactions to words and terms that are frequently used in communications about civic issues.

Its most recent survey found ‘community’ is a word that resonates with liberals and conservatives alike. It scores well whether you live in a small town or a big city, or whether you’re young or old.

As a leader of an executive search firm navigating the current climate — while ensuring organizations have access to a blend of excellent candidates with diverse experiences, backgrounds, skills, and unique strengths — we are finding that introducing community framing offers promise.

Think about it. The best workplaces foster and grow a strong sense of community. It’s a mindset that is central to building welcoming and thriving cultures. If you can maintain an authentic sense of community, you become an organization where everyone wants to contribute -- and deeply values the contribution of others.

Isn’t that a place where you could do your best work? And attract others who feel the same?

Key characteristics of healthy communities

So ask yourself: Which communities seem to operate in the most meaningful and healthy ways?

In my experience, these communities:

  • Benefit from a range of people committed to the same values and goals while also bringing diverse perspectives drawn from their individual experiences, backgrounds, passions, and priorities.
  • Thrive when there is an underlying and persistent sense of fairness and opportunity for all based on a shared, often unspoken, belief that the community operates at its full potential when success and advancement are encouraged and celebrated by all.
  • Foster loyalty and greater retention by ensuring employees recognize the ongoing commitment to inclusivity and equity.
  • Become more powerful and resilient when everyone feels welcomed and appreciated for offering up their authentic selves, which, taken together, create a stronger collective.

If those traits bring to mind the fundamental elements of a certain acronym that has become a volatile flashpoint, I think we’re on the same page.

Yet viewed another way, when the DEI principles are put into service thoughtfully and with intention, aren’t they ultimately driving toward the aim of fostering a strong sense of community?

That is the moment that demands evolved thinking – thinking that gets to the essence of what is most valuable and how we can move forward in positive ways.

Take an aspirational approach

That’s where the aspirational part comes into play.

As you consider your current team – and how you’d like to grow and strengthen it – think about what kind of community you have built within your organization – and how you can ensure it thrives in the future. To do that, ask yourself:

  • In what ways could future hires support the existing community while adding unique strengths and insights?
  • How could those hires strengthen a sense of purpose and excite fellow community members about the potential to advance your mission further?
  • And in what ways could adding to your leadership team expose everyone to new ideas and fresh thinking in ways that naturally encourage meaningful discourse and collaboration?

No doubt, the political war against diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives will continue to rage. Yet you have the power and agency to write your own narrative.

A good place to start is by building a community within your organization where people from all backgrounds and walks of life feel seen, valued, and welcome.

Vincent Robinson is the founder and managing partner of the 360 Group, an executive search company that places leaders at nonprofits and foundations.

Read More

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

The rise of book bans and erasure of Black history from classrooms emotionally and systematically harms Black children. It's critical that we urge educators to represent Black experiences and stories in class.

Getty Images, Klaus Vedfelt

White Books and Curriculum Damage Black Children

When my son, Jonathan, was born, one of the first children’s books I bought was "So Much" by Trish Cooke. I was captivated by its joyful depiction of a Black family loving their baby boy. I read it to him often, wanting him to know that he was deeply loved, seen, and valued. In an era when politicians are banning books, sanitizing curricula, and policing the teaching of Black history, the idea of affirming Black children’s identities is miscast as divisive and wrong. Forty-two states have proposed or passed legislation restricting how race and history can be taught, including Black history. PEN America reported that nearly 16,000 books (many featuring Black stories) were banned from schools within the last three years across 43 states. These prohibitive policies and bans are presented as protecting the ‘feelings’ of White children, while at the same time ignoring and invalidating the feelings of Black children who live daily with the pain of erasure, distortion, and disregard in schools.

When I hear and see the ongoing devaluation of Black children in schools and public life, I, and other Black parents, recognize this pain firsthand. For instance, recently, my teenage granddaughter, Jaliyah, texted me, asking to visit the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C., because she had heard that the President planned to close it. For what felt like the millionth time, my heart broke with the understanding that too many people fail to rally on behalf of Black children. Jaliyah’s question revealed what so many Black children intuitively understand—that their histories, their feelings, and their futures are often treated as expendable.

Keep Reading Show less
Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

equity, inclusion, diversity

AI generated

Pluralism or DEI - or Both - or None?

Even before Trump’s actions against DEI, many in the academic community and elsewhere felt for some time that DEI had taken an unintended turn.

What was meant to provide support—in jobs, education, grants, and other ways—to those groups who historically and currently have suffered from discrimination became for others a sign of exclusion because all attention was placed on how these groups were faring, with little attention to others. Those left out were assumed not to need any help, but that was mistaken. They did need help and are angry.

Keep Reading Show less
Two people in business attire walking into an office.

Dr. Valentina Greco reflects on how accent bias, internalized gatekeeping, and hidden prejudices shape academia—and how true change begins by confronting our own discomfort.

Getty Images, Marco VDM

How Do We Become the Gatekeepers?

“Do you have a moment?”

I turned and saw my senior colleague, Paul (not his real name), a mentor and sponsor, at my office door.

Keep Reading Show less
So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

Conceptual image of multiple human face shapes in a variety of colors illustrating different races

Getty Images

So DEI doesn’t work. OK, what would be better?

It is no secret that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs are under attack in our country. They have been blamed for undermining free speech, meritocracy, and America itself. The University of Virginia is the latest to settle with the government and walk away from its DEI initiatives rather than defend its programs or find a new solution.

Those who decry DEI say they do so in the name of meritocracy. They argue that those who benefit from DEI programs do so at the expense of other, more qualified individuals, and that these programs are weakening professions such as our military, science, education, and healthcare. But these arguments have it exactly backwards. DEI programs were never designed to give privilege to underrepresented people. They were put in place to chip away at discrimination and nepotism, both concepts that are antithetical to meritocracy.

Keep Reading Show less