Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Jasmine Clark Is Poised To Be the First Black Woman Ph.D. Scientist in Congress

Clark, a Georgia state representative and Ph.D. microbiologist, won the Democratic primary to represent a safely blue House seat in Georgia.

News

Jasmine Clark Is Poised To Be the First Black Woman Ph.D. Scientist in Congress

Jasmine Clark first ran for office and flipped a Republican-held state legislative district in 2018.

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post/Getty Images

LILBURN, GEORGIA — When state Rep. Jasmine Clark launched her campaign for Congress on a mission to enact generational change, she didn’t realize she could also make history.

Now, she’s poised to become the first Black woman Ph.D. scientist to serve in Congress. If she wins, she’ll be representing Georgia’s 13th Congressional District.


“Whenever you’re the first, it’s almost like you become representative of what that will be, and so I do not take that lightly,” Clark told The 19th in a Monday interview at a coffee shop overlooking a lake in Lilburn, where she lives.

“I feel like what I have, what I’ve accomplished, the things that I’ve been able to do, I do feel as if I’m ready for this moment,” she added.

“I feel like what I have, what I’ve accomplished, the things that I’ve been able to do, I do feel as if I’m ready for this moment,” she added.

Clark, a mother of two who earned her doctorate in microbiology from Emory University and teaches at the university’s nursing school, first ran for office and flipped a Republican-held state legislative district in 2018. Last year, she announced she was challenging the former Rep. David Scott in the safely Democratic and majority non-White seat located in the racially diverse suburbs east of Atlanta.

Scott, the district’s longtime representative, had filed to run for another term despite concerns from other Democrats about his health and fitness for office before he died in April at the age of 80.

Clark, who had already exceeded Scott and her other opponents in fundraising, is now projected to win the Democratic primary for the seat, which includes several counties east of Atlanta, according to Decision Desk HQ. Scott’s name remained on the ballot, but his votes were disqualified.

Dr. Jasmine Clark stands in a stairwell wearing glasses, patterned earrings and a bright blue campaign T-shirt that reads “re-elect Dr. Jasmine Clark.”

(Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post/Getty Images)

Clark is one of several younger Democrats who lined up to challenge older incumbents in safe blue seats. They are part of a growing conversation in the Democratic Party about age, one that increased in urgency after President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 presidential race amid widespread concerns about his age and mental acuity, and after several House Democrats, including Scott, died in office.

“I think the call for generational change is basically a call for lack of stagnation and making sure that we’re moving forward as a country,” Clark said. “We have to be intentional about making sure that the institutional knowledge doesn’t leave with us.”

Her race has drawn both national attention and outside spending from groups like 314 Action Fund, which supports candidates with backgrounds in science. The largest outside investment has come from Protect Progress, a political action committee that is part of the pro-cryptocurrency Fairshake network and spent at least $4.2 million on ads and mailers supporting her campaign.

In Congress, Clark said she wants to tackle issues like healthcare access and maternal mortality, which affects Black women at the highest rates.

President Donald Trump’s second administration has slashed public health funds programs and medical research, especially in areas disproportionately affecting women, people of color and LGBTQ+ people. The cuts hit the Atlanta area, a hub for scientific research and the home of the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention, particularly hard.

“Looking at our public health system, it’s an absolute mess in a way I couldn’t have even imagined it could get.” Clark said. “Having [Robert F. Kennedy Jr.] as the head of Health and Human Services has been an absolute disaster for our country.”

Defunding that research, Clark argued, is cutting a “lifeline” for communities like hers. She highlighted the need for more research into diseases like prostate cancer and triple-negative breast cancer, which affect Black patients at higher rates and in more aggressive forms.

“There are people in this district that will get the scariest diagnosis they will ever get in their life,” she said. “And they’re going to want to know what is out there that can prolong my life or save my life, and that stuff comes from research.”

Clark said that she’ll bring her expertise as a scientist working directly in academic research settings and with federal grants to Congress.

“It’s just a perspective that’s not in the room right now,” she said. “And I’m not saying that people aren’t fighting for these things, but they’re not fighting for them from the perspective I’m fighting for them — having a Ph.D. in microbiology, but also just having that science lens.”


Jasmine Clark Is Poised To Be the First Black Woman Ph.D. Scientist in Congress was originally published by The 19th and is republished with permission.


Read More

U.S. Vice President JD Vance

U.S. Vice President JD Vance speaks to members of the media at the Buergenstock Resort Lake Lucerne, after the U.S. and Iran held high-level talks at the Lake Lucerne Summit on June 22, 2026 near Stansstad, Switzerland.

Pool / Getty Images

The Feigned Confusion of JD Vance: Erasure by Design

"What did Black people do to this administration that has allowed it to really stigmatize folks of color?" Whoopi Goldberg asked Vice President JD Vance last week, when he joined The View to discuss his new memoir. Rather than answer the question, Vance's first response was to feign ignorance. But he wasn't confused. Vance has simply learned that feigned confusion buys him room to say what an entire administration actually believes—not that Black people are hated, but that we are an inconvenience to be erased.

Goldberg and her cohost, Sunny Hostin, followed up with specifics: the removal of Black history from government buildings, Black military leaders sidelined, and contributions denigrated at every turn. Vance's response was to insist everyone is welcome in their political coalition. It wasn't an answer.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Night at Chase Field Revealed a Different America

Mexican Heritage Night, June 4, 2026

A Night at Chase Field Revealed a Different America

I didn’t love seeing the charge for the baseball tickets hit my credit card. Like Americans, I’ve watched expenses and discretionary costs rise. A night at the ballpark felt like a luxury rather than a routine outing. Still, I wanted time with my two grandsons—one a devoted Los Angeles Dodgers fan, the other a loyal Arizona Diamondbacks fan.

That alone promised an interesting evening.

Keep ReadingShow less
Illustration of Sojourner Truth after a Photograph

Portrait of Sojourner Truth (ca. 1797-1883), leader of the Underground Railroad.

Bettmann / Getty Images

Sojourner’s Truth

As the United States prepares to mark the 250th anniversary of its founding later this summer, there will be extensive celebration and reflection about our democracy and the values it embodies. But the 250th is not the only anniversary that should capture our attention. Indeed, our nation’s story is an evolution of moments built over time.

One of these building blocks occurred 175 years ago, in 1851, during the Women’s Convention in Akron, Ohio. There, on May 29th, Sojourner Truth delivered a legendary speech that called on attendees to reject the racial and gender biases used to limit her place in society and to defy a status quo that devalued her as a Black woman and treated her as invisible and expendable. Her speech is worthy of reflection today because it reveals an important story about how different people experience our democracy — and that story should inform how we build a more inclusive vision for our future.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Word ‘Black’ Has Disappeared From a Set of Bills Aimed at Addressing Black Maternal Health

The Momnibus Act was previously known as the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act, but the word 'Black' has been removed from the title and appears only once across the latest package.

Emily Scherer for The 19th

The Word ‘Black’ Has Disappeared From a Set of Bills Aimed at Addressing Black Maternal Health

The word “Black” has been almost completely removed from a package of bills that have long been viewed as Congress’ main legislative vehicle to address the Black maternal health crisis, frustrating some advocates who feel Black women are being erased from the policy.

The key change this year is the title. The Momnibus Act — filed in mid-March — was called the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act in 2023; before that it was the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act of 2021 and the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act of 2020. None of the previous packages, which were championed by Democrats, have been enacted.

Keep ReadingShow less