Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Hollywood Gets Congress Wrong—and It’s Costing America Trust in Democracy

Opinion

Hollywood Gets Congress Wrong—and It’s Costing America Trust in Democracy

Hollywood sign and The Capitol

AI generated picture

The following article is excerpted from "Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."

Since the 1970s, public trust in American institutions—including Congress—has steadily declined. Approval ratings for the House and Senate usually hover in the teens. Certainly, some misdeeds by our elected leaders have contributed to this decline, and mainstream national media can claim its fair share of “credit” in portraying Congress in a negative light. Yet another major ingredient in the ugly formula poisoning public opinion of Congress is Hollywood. Movies and TV shows routinely portray Congress as craven, corrupt, selfish, and completely indifferent to the public interest. Regrettably, this is a wholly incorrect portrayal of our nation’s legislators.


Some years ago, Amazon premiered a TV show, Alpha House, loosely based on the true story of four male members of Congress living as roommates in a Washington, DC home. In one scene, a freshman senator agrees to provide a ride to a colleague to visit the home as a prospective new roommate. The senator arrives at the Senate office building in a limousine, drinking champagne with his mistress at his elbow. The truth is, the only people who would ride in a limo in Washington are Hollywood types, visiting for some black-tie dinner. Members of Congress are scrupulous about appearances and would never be caught on camera emerging from a fancy car.

There are many things Hollywood gets wrong about Washington; here are a few.

What Motivates Congress? While there are certainly self-interested jerks who attain public office, most of Congress is comprised of decent, hardworking public servants. A few years ago, a national polling firm asked Americans if they agreed with this sentence: “Most members of Congress care what their constituents think.” Only 11 percent of Americans agreed with that statement (which is probably a scarier number than Congress’s low approval rating, since the governing class listening to those they govern is pretty much the bedrock of our democracy). However, in a survey in which members of the U.S. House were asked to rate the most important aspects of their job, 95 percent said “staying in touch with constituents.” Members of Congress view it as both their political and moral responsibility to be accountable to their constituents.

How Members of Congress Live. In 1994, not long before he was about to make history as the first speaker of the House of Representatives in 130 years to be ousted in a re-election bid in his home congressional district, Speaker Thomas S. Foley (D-WA) watched a focus group of constituents. The facilitator asked voters in eastern Washington about their congressman's life. An ironworker described what he thought dinner would be like at a congressman’s house: a limousine would take him to a mansion in Georgetown, and he would be served a sumptuous meal, eating foods the constituent would not recognize and using utensils the average person would not know how to use.

Foley was stunned. The gap between the constituents’ perception and the reality of his daily routine was shocking. He was probably remembering the tuna sandwich he wolfed down for lunch earlier that day, snuck in between 13 meetings over a 14-hour stretch—a common schedule for him and for most members of Congress. While members of Congress are paid more than the average American family, they must maintain two households. Some even sleep in their offices because they cannot afford the steep rent in metropolitan Washington. I once had a most amicable conversation with the House Minority Leader as he was shopping for vegetables at a Washington grocery store. Most members of Congress are a lot more like the head of a typical American family, just trying to balance the challenges of an incredibly hard job with raising a family.

While some fictional portrayals of Congress have captured Washington accurately, most get it wrong. Former Washington Post White House correspondent Juliet Eilperin penned a wonderful rebuttal to the cynics who revel in distorting Washington. “Many journalists and the officials they cover moved to this town because they care about the ideas and the policies that help shape the world we live in. … It’s why my parents moved here nearly half a century ago, and it’s why I have stayed.” I’m not saying that the American public does not occasionally send a Frank Underwood to Congress (the devious politician from House of Cards). That doesn’t change the perhaps boring truth: the vast majority of members of Congress are solid public servants who sacrifice much for their districts, states, and nation.

Bradford Fitch is the former CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation, a former congressional staffer, and author of “The Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."


Read More

Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Show Rekindles America’s Cultural Divide

Bad Bunny performs onstage during the Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show at Levi's Stadium on February 08, 2026 in Santa Clara, California.

(Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Show Rekindles America’s Cultural Divide

As a child of the 60s and 70s, music shaped my understanding of the world as it does for so many young people stepping into adulthood today. Watching Bad Bunny stand alone at midfield during the Super Bowl, hearing the roar as his first notes hit, and then witnessing the backlash the next day, I felt something familiar to the time of my youth. The styles have changed, but the cultural divide between young and old, between left and right, around music remains the same. The rancor about who gets to speak, who gets to belong, and whose voices are considered “American” remains remarkably constant.

The parallels to the 1980s are striking. President Ronald Reagan, in a 1983 speech lamenting what he saw as the “decay of values” among my generation, warned that “there are those who portray America as a land of racism, violence, and despair. That is not the America we know.” In his radio commentaries, he went further, arguing that “some of the so‑called protest songs seem more intent on tearing down America than lifting it up.” Fast‑forward to today, and the pattern repeats itself. Before the Super Bowl even began, President Trump announced he would boycott the game and blasted the NFL’s choice of performers as “a terrible choice,” setting the tone for the wave of outrage that followed Bad Bunny’s appearance.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Message: We Are All Americans

Bad Bunny performs onstage during the Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show at Levi's Stadium on February 08, 2026 in Santa Clara, California.

(Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Message: We Are All Americans

Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl performance was the joy we needed at this time, when immigrants, Latinos, and other U.S. citizens are under attack by ICE.

It was a beautiful celebration of culture and pride, complete with a real wedding, vendors selling “piraguas,” or shaved ice, and “plátanos” (plantains), and a dominoes game.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny: Bridging Cultural Divides Through Song and Dance

Bad Bunny-inspired coquito-flavored lattes.

Photo provided by Latino News Network

Bad Bunny: Bridging Cultural Divides Through Song and Dance

Exactly one week before his Apple Music Super Bowl LX Halftime Show performance, Bad Bunny made history at the 68th Grammy Awards after his latest studio album, DeBÍ TiRAR MáS FOTos, became the first Spanish-language project to win Album of the Year in Grammy history. Despite facing heavy criticisms that expose existing socio-cultural tensions in the U.S., Bad Bunny, born Benito Ocasio, will continue to make history as the first Spanish-language solo headliner at the Halftime Show, bridging sociocultural divides in the most Boricua way: through song and dance.

The NFL’s announcement of this year’s Super Bowl headliner in late September drew significant criticism, particularly from American audiences.

Keep ReadingShow less
Word Kill: Politics Can Be Murder on Poetry

A poster featuring Renee Good sits along the street near a memorial to Good on January 16, 2026 in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

(Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Word Kill: Politics Can Be Murder on Poetry

Across the United States and the world, millions are still processing the recent killing of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis by ICE agents. Reactions have intensified as more recently ICE agents shot a Venezuelan man in the same city, and additional National Guard troops have been deployed there.

Many were shocked learning of Good’s shooting, and the shock grew as more information and details about the events leading up to her death, as well as facts about Good herself.

Keep ReadingShow less