Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Hollywood Gets Congress Wrong—and It’s Costing America Trust in Democracy

Opinion

Hollywood Gets Congress Wrong—and It’s Costing America Trust in Democracy

Hollywood sign and The Capitol

AI generated picture

The following article is excerpted from "Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."

Since the 1970s, public trust in American institutions—including Congress—has steadily declined. Approval ratings for the House and Senate usually hover in the teens. Certainly, some misdeeds by our elected leaders have contributed to this decline, and mainstream national media can claim its fair share of “credit” in portraying Congress in a negative light. Yet another major ingredient in the ugly formula poisoning public opinion of Congress is Hollywood. Movies and TV shows routinely portray Congress as craven, corrupt, selfish, and completely indifferent to the public interest. Regrettably, this is a wholly incorrect portrayal of our nation’s legislators.


Some years ago, Amazon premiered a TV show, Alpha House, loosely based on the true story of four male members of Congress living as roommates in a Washington, DC home. In one scene, a freshman senator agrees to provide a ride to a colleague to visit the home as a prospective new roommate. The senator arrives at the Senate office building in a limousine, drinking champagne with his mistress at his elbow. The truth is, the only people who would ride in a limo in Washington are Hollywood types, visiting for some black-tie dinner. Members of Congress are scrupulous about appearances and would never be caught on camera emerging from a fancy car.

There are many things Hollywood gets wrong about Washington; here are a few.

What Motivates Congress? While there are certainly self-interested jerks who attain public office, most of Congress is comprised of decent, hardworking public servants. A few years ago, a national polling firm asked Americans if they agreed with this sentence: “Most members of Congress care what their constituents think.” Only 11 percent of Americans agreed with that statement (which is probably a scarier number than Congress’s low approval rating, since the governing class listening to those they govern is pretty much the bedrock of our democracy). However, in a survey in which members of the U.S. House were asked to rate the most important aspects of their job, 95 percent said “staying in touch with constituents.” Members of Congress view it as both their political and moral responsibility to be accountable to their constituents.

How Members of Congress Live. In 1994, not long before he was about to make history as the first speaker of the House of Representatives in 130 years to be ousted in a re-election bid in his home congressional district, Speaker Thomas S. Foley (D-WA) watched a focus group of constituents. The facilitator asked voters in eastern Washington about their congressman's life. An ironworker described what he thought dinner would be like at a congressman’s house: a limousine would take him to a mansion in Georgetown, and he would be served a sumptuous meal, eating foods the constituent would not recognize and using utensils the average person would not know how to use.

Foley was stunned. The gap between the constituents’ perception and the reality of his daily routine was shocking. He was probably remembering the tuna sandwich he wolfed down for lunch earlier that day, snuck in between 13 meetings over a 14-hour stretch—a common schedule for him and for most members of Congress. While members of Congress are paid more than the average American family, they must maintain two households. Some even sleep in their offices because they cannot afford the steep rent in metropolitan Washington. I once had a most amicable conversation with the House Minority Leader as he was shopping for vegetables at a Washington grocery store. Most members of Congress are a lot more like the head of a typical American family, just trying to balance the challenges of an incredibly hard job with raising a family.

While some fictional portrayals of Congress have captured Washington accurately, most get it wrong. Former Washington Post White House correspondent Juliet Eilperin penned a wonderful rebuttal to the cynics who revel in distorting Washington. “Many journalists and the officials they cover moved to this town because they care about the ideas and the policies that help shape the world we live in. … It’s why my parents moved here nearly half a century ago, and it’s why I have stayed.” I’m not saying that the American public does not occasionally send a Frank Underwood to Congress (the devious politician from House of Cards). That doesn’t change the perhaps boring truth: the vast majority of members of Congress are solid public servants who sacrifice much for their districts, states, and nation.

Bradford Fitch is the former CEO of the Congressional Management Foundation, a former congressional staffer, and author of “The Citizen’s Handbook for Influencing Elected Officials."


Read More

Strange Days Indeed: Why ‘Nobody Told Me’ Echoes America Today

Political Polarization and Extremism

Getty Images

Strange Days Indeed: Why ‘Nobody Told Me’ Echoes America Today

I was driving in my car the other day when a familiar song from my youth came on the radio. The opening line of John Lennon’s “Nobody Told Me” immediately hit me with unexpected force . A song I loved fifty years ago suddenly felt like it was written for this very moment.

Nobody told me there’d be days like these. Strange days indeed.

Keep ReadingShow less
Jennifer Lawrence speaks during the "Die My Love" press conference at the 78th annual Cannes Film Festival at Palais des Festivals on May 18, 2025 in Cannes, France.

Jennifer Lawrence questions whether celebrity activism still matters in politics. As the 2026 midterms approach, explore the decline of celebrity endorsements, rising polarization, and the evolving role of pop culture in shaping voter behavior.

Getty Images, Pool

Jennifer Lawrence Questions Whether Stars Still Influence Politics

Eight months before the 2026 midterms, one of Hollywood’s most recognizable figures has offered a blunt assessment of her industry’s political influence. Jennifer Lawrence, known for speaking out on issues from gender equality to democratic norms, now questions whether celebrity activism has any real impact.

In a recent interview, Lawrence stated that “celebrities do not make a difference whatsoever in who people vote for.” This is notable both because of her prominence and because it comes at a time when American politics is deeply intertwined with culture and entertainment. She described the Trump era as a time when she felt she was “running around like a chicken with my head cut off,” trying to use her platform to sound alarms. But after years of backlash, polarization, and the sense that celebrity statements only “add fuel to a fire that’s ripping the country apart,” she’s questioning the value of speaking out.

Keep ReadingShow less
What the Oscars can teach us about democracy
An oscar statue on display in a glass case
Photo by Martti Salmi on Unsplash

What the Oscars can teach us about democracy

On Sunday night, millions of Americans will watch the Academy Awards. They may tune in for the red carpet, Conan O'Brien’s jokes, or the live performance of the hit song “Golden.”

But behind the glitz and glamour, the Oscars have a bigger lesson to teach – how changing the way we vote can improve our democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less
Michael B. Jordan standing next to Delroy Lindo

Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo at the 41st Annual Santa Barbara International Film Festival.

Getty Images, Phillip Faraone

Not OK: Curb Slurs and Hate Speech To Avoid The Monstrous

John Davidson shouted out the n-word while Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo presented a prize recently at the British Academy Film Awards.

Was it hate speech or a mistake made due to a disability?

Keep ReadingShow less