Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Pennsylvania to pay postage for absentee voters

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf

Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf says the state will pay the postage for absentee ballots used in the fall election.

Lisa Lake/Getty Images

In the latest move to make mail balloting more appealing in a swing state, Pennsylvania has decided to pay for the return postage on all absentee ballots in the fall election.

The announcement by Democratic Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar will add the nation's sixth biggest state, if only this year, to the roster of 17 others that routinely foot the bill for mailing back a remote voting envelope. These include other presidential battlegrounds led by Wisconsin and Arizona.

The decision also makes Pennsylvania the 25th state where normal laws or regulations have been relaxed, either proactively or because of a lawsuit, to make casting a ballot easier and safer in November in light of the coronavirus. On that list, just one other state, reliably red South Carolina, has also decided to pay for postage on mailed ballots — a move that will eliminate a minor logistical hassle for everyone along with a financial burden for the very poor.


An unprecedented share of the presidential vote looks to come through the mail this fall — perhaps more than half, up from a quarter last time, an expected wave that's presenting states with logistical problems culminating in the challenge of opening and tabulating so many envelopes on election night.

Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf plans to pay for the postage with some of the state's share of federal emergency coronavirus aid.

"It's our job as public servants to make the voting process as seamless as possible for our citizens," said David Pedri, the county manager in Wilkes Barre. "This is the right move because it makes it even easier for all Pennsylvanians to make sure their voices are heard."

Friday's announcement comes as the state intensifies a legal battle with President Trump's re-election campaign over expanding vote-by-mail rules. The campaign filed its first lawsuit last month, asking a federal judge to restrict mail-in voting, and Democrats responded with a lawsuit of their own in state court seeking to loosen those same rules.

Both suits are seeking to address ballot drop boxes, poll watcher eligibility and the use of ballot secrecy envelopes for mail-in ballots.

This is the first year Pennsylvanians may vote absentee without providing a specific excuse, the centerpiece of an extensive rewrite of election law enacted with bipartisan support in Harrisburg last fall. The change resulted in more than 1.8 million voters requesting a remote ballot for the state's June 2 primary, with six out of seven of those people returning them in time.

The numbers suggest the share of votes cast by mail statewide in November may see an exponential increase compared to 2016, when it was just 5 percent.

Read More

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

Why Doing Immigration the “White Way” Is Wrong

The president is granting refugee status to white South Africans. Meanwhile, he is issuing travel bans, unsure about his duty to uphold due process, fighting birthright citizenship, and backing massive human rights breaches against people of color, including deporting citizens and people authorized to be here.

The administration’s escalating immigration enforcement—marked by “fast-track” deportations or disappearances without due process—signal a dangerous leveling-up of aggressive anti-immigration policies and authoritarian tactics. In the face of the immigration chaos that we are now in, we could—and should—turn our efforts toward making immigration policies less racist, more efficient, and more humane because America’s promise is built on freedom and democracy, not terror. As social scientists, we know that in America, thinking people can and should “just get documented” ignores the very real and large barriers embedded in our systems.

Keep ReadingShow less
Insider trading in Washington, DC

U.S. senators and representatives with access to non-public information are permitted to buy and sell individual stocks. It’s not just unethical; it sends the message that the game is rigged.

Getty Images, Greggory DiSalvo

Insider Trading: If CEOs Can’t Do It, Why Can Congress?

Ivan Boesky. Martha Stewart. Jeffrey Skilling.

Each became infamous for using privileged, non-public information to profit unfairly from the stock market. They were prosecuted. They served time. Because insider trading is a crime that threatens public trust and distorts free markets.

Keep ReadingShow less
Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

A pump jack seen in a southeast New Mexico oilfield.

Getty Images, Daniel A. Leifheit

Supreme Court Changes the Game on Federal Environmental Reviews

Getting federal approval for permits to build bridges, wind farms, highways and other major infrastructure projects has long been a complicated and time-consuming process. Despite growing calls from both parties for Congress and federal agencies to reform that process, there had been few significant revisions – until now.

In one fell swoop, the U.S. Supreme Court has changed a big part of the game.

Keep ReadingShow less