Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

What is your take?

What is your take?
Credit: Rudzhan Nagiev/Getty Images

This week’s question is: “What change would most quickly strengthen or restore your faith in our democratic system of governance?” This was timed to sync with the Biden administration hosting the Summit for Democracy.

Activists in the reform community were generally united around four changes.


  1. Overcome the Supreme Court’sCitizens United ruling (or engage in other forms of campaign finance reform).
  2. End gerrymandering (or other forms of redistricting to reduce partisanship).
  3. Open the primary system to more voters.
  4. Pass voting protections in Congress.

Outside of electoral reform, we had varied responses:

  • Ending the filibuster.
  • Canceling student debt and easing other fiscal pressures for everyday Americans.
  • Increasing accountability for elected officials.
  • Addressing and minimizing toxic polarization.
  • Shoring up our information integrity.

Still others mentioned the need for ongoing and quality civic education so we can fulfill our responsibilities as citizens. There are many nuances and good ideas to explore.

A sampling of responses:

Electoral Reforms

I think the U.S. has a lot of nerve hosting a “summit on democracy.” America has lost her way. We no longer even have a functioning democracy. We can’t even choose our representatives to the U.S. House. They’ve already been chosen for us by gerrymandered redistributing maps. That is not how a democracy works.
- Dwight Willis

If Congress were to support a constitutional amendment to adopt, establishing for presidential elections: nonpartisan primaries nationwide, final-five ranked-choice voting and eliminate the Electoral College.
- Mike O

I think a geographic approach should be required in the redistricting process. Redistricting should be required to encompass entire communities when their population does not exceed the requirements. Representative democracy becomes meaningless if no single representative is responsible and accountable to a community. The current system destroys lines of accountability when two, three or four legislators represent pieces of a neighborhood or municipality.
- Steve Yaffe

Term limits. Federal legislation to overrule Citizens United.
- Amelia Bland Waller

Preclearance on gerrymandering and voting laws. Eliminate state laws providing partisans the authority to overturn elections
- Jon Thomas

There are so many things that it is hard to choose one! It seems that the beginning of the end of our democracy was the Citizens United decision that truly opened the floodgates to big money ruling politics and guiding legislation. Long live democracy!
- Eileen Henderson

The important election innovations must be implemented at the state level --- the "laboratories of democracy" that write most election laws and administer our elections. I agree with those who call for a healthy, robust "New Federalism" as one antidote for the unnecessary nationalization and polarization of every single political issue (and election). After all, isn't it okay if, within constitutional limits, Tennessee decides to do things differently from California? Onward!
- Eric H. Bronner

Restoring faith in our failing democracy: 1.Preventing party gerrymandering: District boundaries should be agreed upon by representatives from Republican, Democratic and independent voters, not just the party in power in the state in question. Representatives should not be picking their voters using gerrymandered districts. 2. Allow open primaries. Closed ones tend to choose the far left or far right. We need the far middle (check out this video for that concept as it applies to the climate issue).
- Peter Garrett

Voting

Our democracy is at the edge of a Grand Canyon precipice of authoritarians who just want office to control the majority of Americans. If there is something we must do now, it is abolishing the filibuster and immediately pass voting rights legislation at the federal level.
- Fernando F Seisdedos

The only thing that would restore my faith in a democratic system of governance is if the "red" states would stop passing voting laws that prohibit people of color from voting and reverse the laws that have already been passed. Barring that, Congress needs to pass all three voting rights acts.
- Nancy Ray

Voter suppression and disenfranchisement are raging across the country. Our house (aka democracy) built by Democrats, Republicans and independents is on fire -- and the fire brigade doesn't go on recess to watch the building burn down!
- David Goodman

Securing the integrity of our voting system such that every eligible voter gets one vote, and the preference of an independently verified majority cannot be superseded by elected officials. We can tackle campaign finance reform and ending gerrymandering at the same time, or as a separate, next priority action.
- Morris Effron

Easing economic burden

Literally the only thing the Democrats or Biden could do at this point to restore my faith in “democracy” is cancel student loan debt effective immediately.
- Jennifer Stefanow

Pass support for youth and children including Romney’s permanent child credit legislation. Suspend filibuster for voting rights now. Expand Medicare to older employees with company premiums for revenue. Reclaim market negotiation for Medicare pharmaceuticals. Need I go on?
- Tom C

I'd like to see our elected government officials working together instead of feeding the division in our country. I'd also like to see free trade, fewer restrictions on companies large and small, more conservative spending focused on encouraging self-sufficiency. Many of the big-spending bills are full of "pet projects" that really have nothing to do with helping the country as a whole.
- Cathy Pfeifer

Civic education and being better citizens

Giving the next generation of citizens - today's public school students - the skills to talk to people with different perspectives, and to work towards finding common ground in order to address issues that affect them directly.
- David K. Hutchinson

The system of democracy is fine. The problem is in the thinking of the people who are currently speaking out within/from the system that protects their freedom of speech. A democracy works when the individuals comprising that democracy are educated/trained in how to support the system that protects their democratic rights. It requires democratic individuals who are competent to sustain their democratic rights.
- Charlie

Polarization

Seeing people who represent “the system” invite people with no faith in it into conversations about improving the system. That’s why I’m attracted to bridging work. As an individual, I see “the system” as having an elasticity that many do not observe. But, I see why it isn’t readily observable for many folks.
- Pedro

Effectively addressing our intractable differences.
- Lou

The president needs to set forth a plan to do what he said on Inauguration Day: Unite our divided, polarized country. This could begin with a White House meeting of Pelosi, McCarthy, Schumer, and McConnell. He must ask them to give "A Pledge to Put America before Party," focusing on reforming Congress to operate in a bipartisan way going forward. This might include a bipartisan committee to make specific reforms of procedures and policies that incentivize bipartisanship to find common ground.
- Al Smith

The celebrating and showcasing of bipartisanship initiatives and policies -- I'm interested in how they came to be and were implemented/achieved, who was involved, timeline, really the nitty gritty -- and plans to make space for more of this plus expanding grantmaking in bridge-building work.
- Justine Lee

Information integrity

Since I'm not sure how to prevent disinformation or to stop threats of violence (and actual violence) against public officials, which may be the most acute problems.
- Riley Hart

Accountability of elected officials

When Trump and his minions still holding public office, appointed or elected, are arrested and held accountable for treason, including Sen. Mitch McConnell.
- Barb Rogers

What change?? How about taking care of Americans? What about not forcing people to take medicine or allowing rioting, looting? Biden? So far in the past 12 months, this man has changed our country for the worse. Why hasn't this Marxist takeover stopped? Who is profiting from this? Stop placating We have all had enough Shame on all of you.
- Gloria Graham

Other responses

I would lose the filibuster.
- Terry Shoemaker

The thing that would restore my faith in the system is the abolish of all political parties and restore the federal government to its Constitutional role by removing non federal duties such as education. Also, remove the Federal Reserve from the Treasury.
- Jack Closson

I'd also like to see the Electoral College and the Senate tweaked so that they come closer to proportional representation while still allocating some power to each state regardless of its population. This seems quite unlikely, though (at least until a new Constitution is created as democracy is re-established after the period of de facto autocracy that seems likely to start within a few years).
- Riley Hart

A balanced Supreme Court and a program/promotion/guidelines for scientific studies that are independently funded. Or barring that, independent reviews of studies.
- Leah Spitzer


Read More

Democratic Presidential candidate U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) holds his first presidential campaign rally at Brooklyn College on March 02, 2019 in Brooklyn, New York.

A lobbyist who worked for both Bernie Sanders and Fortune 500 clients explains what democratic socialist wins mean for business, and how to prepare.

VIEW press/Getty Images

I Campaigned for Bernie Sanders Then Lobbied for Amazon

In 2016, my political outreach company, Firehouse Phones, worked on the presidential campaign of a democratic socialist. It was one of many campaigns my firm touched, but that one stays on my resume for a reason: it taught me more about how persuasion actually works than any client engagement before or since.

Today I run Ohio River South, a government affairs firm focused on the nation's fastest-growing region — the American South. Over the past decade we've advocated for nearly two dozen Fortune 500 companies — Amazon in my earlier lobbying years, and later growing a client roster that included Alphabet, Microsoft, General Motors, United Healthcare, and Capital One.

Keep ReadingShow less
The White House
The white house with green lawn and trees
Photo by Josh on Unsplash

The Politics of Gratitude: Why Washington Punishes the Loyalty It Cannot Price

On a Sunday night in August, Senator Jon Ossoff told a campaign rally in Atlanta that President Trump would rather build his ballroom and “travel with Natalie” than do his job. He never used her last name. He did not need to. Natalie Harp, the White House aide known to colleagues as Trump’s “human printer” for trailing him with a portable printer and transcribing his social-media dictation, had become a punchline before most Americans knew who she was.

The backlash arrived within hours. White House officials accused Ossoff of insinuating an affair; Republican Rep. Brandon Gill noted that Harp survived bone cancer only because the Right to Try Act, which Trump signed in 2018, let her seek an experimental treatment outside the normal approval process, and dismissed any other reading of the moment as unfair. Weeks earlier, Harp had been at the center of a far more consequential story: in July, she was one of a handful of aides, alongside the defense secretary and two senior staffers, chosen to accompany Trump on a covert switch of aircraft as he left a security summit in Turkey after officials detected a credible Iranian threat, while most of the traveling delegation stayed behind on a decoy plane. That is the real proximity Ossoff's line was needling. Then came a detail that complicated the story further: Trump had personally given Harp and several other aides cash gifts of $45,000 apiece, which a former federal ethics official called troublesome, since money on that scale can leave a recipient feeling indebted to whoever signs the check.

Keep ReadingShow less
A map labeling Lake Ontario as "Lake America" is displayed behind U.S. President Donald Trump.

A map labeling Lake Ontario as "Lake America" is displayed as U.S. President Donald Trump signs an executive order during an event in the Oval Office of the White House on August 27, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Cartography of Convenience: Why Rushed Renaming Erodes Public Trust

In tough economic times, governments often reach for the easiest kind of progress: a new name on an old sign. Wage stagnation, inflation, crumbling roads, and rising rents are hard problems that take years and real money to fix. Renaming a street, a lake, or a strait is not. It costs a fraction as much and lets officials point to something they “did.” A new name never fixes a pothole or lowers a grocery bill. This year offered an unusually rich catalogue of the habit, reaching from a city council in Texas to a wartime waterway in the Persian Gulf.

A Concept Borrowed From the Cremation Ground

Indian philosophy has an old idea called shmashana vairagya, describing the sudden clarity a person feels standing at a cremation ground, when ordinary ambitions look small. The feeling fades once the mourner goes home. Public policy has its own version of this cycle. In the raw hours after a tragedy, a scandal, or a surge of national feeling, officials decide, sometimes within a single social media post, what belongs on a map or a sign forever. The emotion passes in hours. The bill, when there is one, stays for years.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump on February 6, 2026.

(Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

A Demagogue in the White House: Will the Guardrails Hold?

A demagogue does not seize all power at once. He takes it piece by piece.

In Trump’s second administration, those pieces accumulated in plain sight. The president generated so much disruption and noise that Americans struggled to keep pace. Each new controversy displaced the last, obscuring a more consequential story: the steady accumulation of presidential power.

Keep ReadingShow less