Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Elks, Rotarians, and Both Party’s Lust for Control

Opinion

Elks, Rotarians, and Both Party’s Lust for Control
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

When it comes to the issue of open primaries, DSA true believers like Brad Lander in New York and MAGA mouthpieces like Governor Abbott in Texas sing from the same hymnal: open primaries invites mischief and party raiding. If we let independents vote we’d get pandemonium. Democracy needs guardrails, and political parties need integrity. You wouldn’t want Elks voting in Rotarians’ elections would you?

There is a certain logic to it. Except Abbott, Lander and all their fellow partisan warriors have it completely backwards.


And now we have the data to prove it.

New polling from Open Primaries and the Independent Voter Project of 1300 registered Democrats in NYC revealed something astonishing: 40% of registered Democrats do not consider themselves to be Democrats. 40%. They register to vote as Democrats simply to be able to vote in the primary election, the only election that matters in the Big Apple.

Among Hispanic New Yorkers, only 1 in 3 Democrats are actual Democrats!

The numbers are astonishing. And very revealing. When you force people to join a private political organization in order to vote in a public election, don’t be surprised if you end up with a political party of reluctant registrants, not true believers. And the “party raiding” that politicians use to scare voters away from open primaries is actually going on in closed systems! On a huge scale.

We've known for years that independents join parties in order to vote - now we have the hard evidence. But what the numbers don't tell is what it feels like to be forced by your own government to join a political organization you don’t believe in just to be able to cast a ballot. A group of us sat down with MSNOW last week to discuss exactly that.


- YouTube youtu.be

Closed primary elections are a huge manipulation. They force voters to lie to vote and exclude those unwilling to do so.

But New York and 15 other states remain entrenched, so we have to keep building pressure to let all voters vote.

I never thought anyone would write this, but Texas is hellbent on following New York’s example. The GOP now has Governor Abbott’s blessing to move ahead with their legal challenge to the state’s open system. And the Democrats are mute, as per usual. Within a year or two, Texas (arguably the state with the most independent culture in America) will have a fully closed system in which independent voters will be categorically excluded. The results will be terrible for Texas.

The political parties are private organizations. And they are incredibly powerful. They do not need government protection. If anything, we, the people, need the protection from the parties! They want to gerrymander us out of existence and keep us out of primaries, where all the action is.

Open systems that give people full access don’t invite chaos and manipulation. Party-controlled systems do. And until we pry control of our democracy from the grip of private organizations, chaos will dominate.

John Opdycke is the president of Open Primaries, a national election reform organization.


Read More

Political Corruption Is Often Not a Voting Issue in America

electoral fraud/voter apathy/totalitarism

Getty Images - digitally generated image

Political Corruption Is Often Not a Voting Issue in America

Almost every week, there seems to be another story about the pay-to-play ethos that is dominant in Donald Trump’s Washington, DC. On July 30, the Wall Street Journal added a new one to the list.

The Journal described the president’s fervent interest in fundraising and how he checks almost nightly with his top fundraiser, Meredith O’Rourke, to find out “which companies and donors have cut checks and which haven’t, and for how much.” The story highlighted the way she channels his interest into making her pitch.

Keep ReadingShow less
Affordability Crisis - Role of Non-Popular Vote President’s  SCOTUS Appointees

Silhouette of a hand holding a vote putting in a ballot box in front of the national flag Stars and Stripes of USA.

Getty Images

Affordability Crisis - Role of Non-Popular Vote President’s SCOTUS Appointees

The 21st-century Supreme Court Justices appointed by presidents who did not win the popular vote have fundamentally reshaped the affordability crisis by dismantling federal regulatory authority, weakening consumer protections, and expanding landlords' and local governments' property rights over renters.

Specifically, five current justices fit this description: Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito (appointed by George W. Bush following the 2000 election), alongside Justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett (appointed by Donald Trump following the 2016 election). This conservative supermajority has heavily influenced cost-of-living metrics through historic rulings in administrative, housing, and financial law.

Keep ReadingShow less
California Latinos Showed Up—Now Party Insiders Want to Shut Them Out

Xavier Becerra

Getty Images

California Latinos Showed Up—Now Party Insiders Want to Shut Them Out

Political strategist, IVN commentator, and The Latino Century author Mike Madrid has a blunt warning for California: The campaign to repeal the state’s nonpartisan Top Two primary would disproportionately silence the fastest-growing segment of the electorate.

In a new Sacramento Bee op-ed, Madrid argues that Latino voters—particularly those who do not align with either major party—played a significant role in California’s record-setting June primary.

Keep ReadingShow less
David Becker on Defending U.S. Elections from New Threats

Man’s hand holding an “I Voted” sticker outside the U.S. Capitol building in Washington D.C.

Getty Images

David Becker on Defending U.S. Elections from New Threats

The Unity Forum presented by Alumni for Freedom & Democracy and the Fulcrum is a cross‑partisan civic education program that strengthens reasoned discourse and advances a more open society. Each episode features respected experts who help audiences make sense of current events, elevate civil dialogue, and deepen public understanding of the social, legal, and institutional challenges confronting the nation.

In a recent conversation, Unity Forum founder Chris Malone spoke with David Becker, Executive Director and Founder of the Center for Election Innovation & Research (CEIR). Becker is one of the nation’s most experienced election law experts, having led Pew’s elections program, spearheaded the creation of ERIC—the interstate system that has helped states update tens of millions of voter records—and served seven years as a senior trial attorney in the Department of Justice’s Voting Section. He also co‑authored The Big Truth and serves as CBS News’ election law contributor.

Keep ReadingShow less