Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Elks, Rotarians, and Both Party’s Lust for Control

Opinion

Elks, Rotarians, and Both Party’s Lust for Control
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

When it comes to the issue of open primaries, DSA true believers like Brad Lander in New York and MAGA mouthpieces like Governor Abbott in Texas sing from the same hymnal: open primaries invites mischief and party raiding. If we let independents vote we’d get pandemonium. Democracy needs guardrails, and political parties need integrity. You wouldn’t want Elks voting in Rotarians’ elections would you?

There is a certain logic to it. Except Abbott, Lander and all their fellow partisan warriors have it completely backwards.


And now we have the data to prove it.

New polling from Open Primaries and the Independent Voter Project of 1300 registered Democrats in NYC revealed something astonishing: 40% of registered Democrats do not consider themselves to be Democrats. 40%. They register to vote as Democrats simply to be able to vote in the primary election, the only election that matters in the Big Apple.

Among Hispanic New Yorkers, only 1 in 3 Democrats are actual Democrats!

The numbers are astonishing. And very revealing. When you force people to join a private political organization in order to vote in a public election, don’t be surprised if you end up with a political party of reluctant registrants, not true believers. And the “party raiding” that politicians use to scare voters away from open primaries is actually going on in closed systems! On a huge scale.

We've known for years that independents join parties in order to vote - now we have the hard evidence. But what the numbers don't tell is what it feels like to be forced by your own government to join a political organization you don’t believe in just to be able to cast a ballot. A group of us sat down with MSNOW last week to discuss exactly that.


- YouTube youtu.be

Closed primary elections are a huge manipulation. They force voters to lie to vote and exclude those unwilling to do so.

But New York and 15 other states remain entrenched, so we have to keep building pressure to let all voters vote.

I never thought anyone would write this, but Texas is hellbent on following New York’s example. The GOP now has Governor Abbott’s blessing to move ahead with their legal challenge to the state’s open system. And the Democrats are mute, as per usual. Within a year or two, Texas (arguably the state with the most independent culture in America) will have a fully closed system in which independent voters will be categorically excluded. The results will be terrible for Texas.

The political parties are private organizations. And they are incredibly powerful. They do not need government protection. If anything, we, the people, need the protection from the parties! They want to gerrymander us out of existence and keep us out of primaries, where all the action is.

Open systems that give people full access don’t invite chaos and manipulation. Party-controlled systems do. And until we pry control of our democracy from the grip of private organizations, chaos will dominate.

John Opdycke is the president of Open Primaries, a national election reform organization.


Read More

Kevin Kiley Left the Republican Party Over Gerrymandering. Now He's Testing Whether an Independent Can Beat the Map Drawn to Defeat Him.

U.S. Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-CA) on Capitol Hill on January 22, 2026 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Al Drago/Getty Images)

Kevin Kiley Left the Republican Party Over Gerrymandering. Now He's Testing Whether an Independent Can Beat the Map Drawn to Defeat Him.

Independent voters now represent the largest share of the American electorate, and yet they remain almost entirely unrepresented in Congress. Both major parties have spent decades optimizing for their bases, leaving the near majority of Americans who identify as independent with the choice of either voting for a party candidate they don't fully support or staying home.

A handful of high-profile independent candidates are trying to change that in 2026. They are often covered as fringe candidates whose stories are told through the lens of how they'll impact the outcome between a Republican and a Democrat, rather than on their own terms. This series exists because independent voters deserve better than that.

Keep ReadingShow less
CT election security group honors 10 years of fighting for democracy

A 2021 poll shows 73% of Connecticut voters supported the amendment giving all voters the option to vote by absentee ballot without needing an excuse.

(Adobe Stock)

CT election security group honors 10 years of fighting for democracy

A Connecticut voting-rights group is celebrating its 10th anniversary.

Bridgeport Generation Now has worked to broaden voting access and ensure fairer elections for city residents. Some of its most important work came at a time when many Bridgeport residents felt their votes didn't matter, pointing to absentee ballot fraud as the cause.

Keep ReadingShow less
Voting Is Not a Closed-Book Test
white and black labeled box

Voting Is Not a Closed-Book Test

The Supreme Court closed out its term and issued decisions that could affect millions of Americans. Among them is Watson v. Republican National Committee, in which the court decided in a 5-4 decision to uphold longstanding Mississippi law and allow mail-in ballots received post-Election Day to be counted.

The legal implications of the decision will be analyzed for months, if not years. But beyond the legal questions is a practical one: What role does mail voting actually play in helping Americans participate in elections?

Keep ReadingShow less
The New Fight Over Election Observation
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

The New Fight Over Election Observation

As a member of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), the U.S. has signed the foundational agreement committing all participating states to open elections to external scrutiny and inviting fellow members to observe through the Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). The 2024 ODIHR observation mission to the U.S. found the fundamentals reassuring—a well-run process, active engagement, free campaigning—but issued 31 recommendations to align U.S. elections with international standards and commitments. Four stand out: federal pre-clearance legislation against discriminatory election-law changes; reassessing the Electoral College; balanced representation in election administration; and guaranteed access for international and nonpartisan observers—notable, since 17 states still legally bar international observation, which is at odds with commitments made by all 57 OSCE states. Yet over a year later, follow-through is thin: no pre-clearance restoration, no Electoral College review, unchanged observer-access laws. Where movement exists—in disinformation tools, in financial disclosure—it remains piecemeal.

An uncomfortable convergence

Keep ReadingShow less