Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Elks, Rotarians, and Both Party’s Lust for Control

Opinion

Elks, Rotarians, and Both Party’s Lust for Control
A pole with a sign that says polling station
Photo by Phil Hearing on Unsplash

When it comes to the issue of open primaries, DSA true believers like Brad Lander in New York and MAGA mouthpieces like Governor Abbott in Texas sing from the same hymnal: open primaries invites mischief and party raiding. If we let independents vote we’d get pandemonium. Democracy needs guardrails, and political parties need integrity. You wouldn’t want Elks voting in Rotarians’ elections would you?

There is a certain logic to it. Except Abbott, Lander and all their fellow partisan warriors have it completely backwards.


And now we have the data to prove it.

New polling from Open Primaries and the Independent Voter Project of 1300 registered Democrats in NYC revealed something astonishing: 40% of registered Democrats do not consider themselves to be Democrats. 40%. They register to vote as Democrats simply to be able to vote in the primary election, the only election that matters in the Big Apple.

Among Hispanic New Yorkers, only 1 in 3 Democrats are actual Democrats!

The numbers are astonishing. And very revealing. When you force people to join a private political organization in order to vote in a public election, don’t be surprised if you end up with a political party of reluctant registrants, not true believers. And the “party raiding” that politicians use to scare voters away from open primaries is actually going on in closed systems! On a huge scale.

We've known for years that independents join parties in order to vote - now we have the hard evidence. But what the numbers don't tell is what it feels like to be forced by your own government to join a political organization you don’t believe in just to be able to cast a ballot. A group of us sat down with MSNOW last week to discuss exactly that.


- YouTube youtu.be

Closed primary elections are a huge manipulation. They force voters to lie to vote and exclude those unwilling to do so.

But New York and 15 other states remain entrenched, so we have to keep building pressure to let all voters vote.

I never thought anyone would write this, but Texas is hellbent on following New York’s example. The GOP now has Governor Abbott’s blessing to move ahead with their legal challenge to the state’s open system. And the Democrats are mute, as per usual. Within a year or two, Texas (arguably the state with the most independent culture in America) will have a fully closed system in which independent voters will be categorically excluded. The results will be terrible for Texas.

The political parties are private organizations. And they are incredibly powerful. They do not need government protection. If anything, we, the people, need the protection from the parties! They want to gerrymander us out of existence and keep us out of primaries, where all the action is.

Open systems that give people full access don’t invite chaos and manipulation. Party-controlled systems do. And until we pry control of our democracy from the grip of private organizations, chaos will dominate.

John Opdycke is the president of Open Primaries, a national election reform organization.


Read More

The Gerrymandering Solution
person holding white and red box

The Gerrymandering Solution

The 250th anniversary of American independence should remind us what’s wrong with gerrymandering. Due to partisanship, however, it now not only persists but rachets tighter in a tit-for-tat cycle that threatens to strangle representative rule. There is a solution to gerrymandering, however, if only politicians will act.

Inspired by revolutionary Enlightenment Era ideals, the Declaration of Independence and the new state constitutions of 1776 call for representative rule. The people would be sovereign, they proclaimed, with governments drawing their just powers from the consent of the governed. Nothing of the sort had ever been tried on a large scale and the founders struggled with how to implement it. Everything turned on establishing a truly representative governing assembly for each newly independent colony or state.

Keep ReadingShow less
Voting rights groups hail SCOTUS decision on ballot grace period

California sends mail-in ballots to all registered voters unless they opt out.

(Adobe Stock)

Voting rights groups hail SCOTUS decision on ballot grace period

Voting rights experts are praising a U.S. Supreme Court decision Monday, which upheld a state’s right to set a grace period for counting mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day, as long as they were postmarked on time.

The challengers to Mississippi’s grace period argued accepting ballots after Election Day threatens election integrity. Supporters of the decision said the U.S. Constitution delegates election administration to the states.

Keep ReadingShow less
Violating Voting Rights or Protecting Polls? Breaking Down the Executive Order to Restrict Mail-In Ballots
A sign points the way to the polling station.

Violating Voting Rights or Protecting Polls? Breaking Down the Executive Order to Restrict Mail-In Ballots

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

On March 31, 2026, President Donald Trump issued an executive order aimed at reshaping how mail-in voting is administered in federal elections. The order directs federal agencies to compile state-by-state lists of eligible voters and restricts mail-in ballots from being sent to voters who are not on those lists. The order has already been met with lawsuits, setting the stage for a broader debate over executive power and the federal government’s role in elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Voter Information Requirement Could Hinder Arizona Mail-In Ballots

Arizona permits some elections to be conducted entirely by mail-in balloting, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

(Adobe Stock)

Voter Information Requirement Could Hinder Arizona Mail-In Ballots

Arizona voting rights advocates are resisting President Donald Trump’s executive order directing the U.S. Postal Service not to deliver mail-in ballots to residents if a state refuses to send its voter rolls to Washington.

The Trump administration said the order is part of an effort to ensure voting integrity. In Arizona, 84% of voters cast their ballots by mail in the 2024 presidential election.

Keep ReadingShow less