Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

America’s Operating System Needs an Update

Opinion

America’s Operating System Needs an Update

Congress 202

J. Scott Applewhite/Getty Images

As July 4, 2026, approaches, our country’s upcoming Semiquincentennial is less and less of an anniversary party than a stress test. The United States is a 21st-century superpower attempting to navigate a digitized, polarized world with an operating system that hasn’t been meaningfully updated since the mid-20th century.

From my seat on the Ladue School Board in St. Louis County, Missouri, I see the alternative to our national dysfunction daily. I am privileged to witness that effective governance requires—and incentivizes—compromise.


My fellow board members and I function effectively, not because we are more "neighborly" or morally superior to members of Congress. We function because the machinery of our governance incentivizes our decision to do so. We are bound by mandatory balanced budgets, strict sunshine laws, and inescapable face-to-face accountability. These forces prioritize serving the institution over performing for a camera or chasing social media traction.

Unlike a member of Congress who refuses open town hall meetings with constituents or fundraises off a viral clip of yelling at a witness in an empty committee room, the school board member has nowhere to hide. If the bus doesn’t show up, or the roof leaks, or the math curriculum is failing, I cannot blame "the deep state" or "corporate media." I have to answer to a parent I will inevitably run into at the grocery store that week. Ideology hits a hard ceiling when it meets reality.

The Crisis of Inverted Incentives

Our federal government lacks these enforcement mechanisms. In fact, its incentive structure has been inverted: Conflict is profitable, and resolution is suspect.

In the private sector—or indeed, on a local school board—failure to perform the core function of the job usually results in termination. In Washington, it now means a cable news booking. A government shutdown is not a mark of shame; it is a fundraising opportunity. Because we lack a mechanism that punishes failure, the stakes of our politics have artificially inflated. A Supreme Court vacancy is no longer an administrative event; it is a cultural apocalypse. A presidential election is no longer a transfer of power; it is viewed as a regime change.

At its core, this is not a crisis of the personnel that have been elected; it is a crisis of architecture. We cannot rely on local exceptions to save this republic; we must fix the national foundation. Fortunately, the remedy has been sitting in a drawer for years, albeit largely ignored by Washington.

A Modern “Team of Rivals”

In 2022, the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia convened the Constitution Drafting Project to draft the blueprint we need. They assembled three teams of legal scholars: Conservatives (led by Ilan Wurman), Progressives (led by Caroline Fredrickson), and Libertarians (led by Ilya Shapiro).

This was not a group of centrists splitting the difference to find a lukewarm middle. These were principled partisans recognizing that the current system is serving no one well. Despite conflicting fundamental beliefs, they negotiated a manual for structural repair. They agreed on five constitutional amendments designed to restore the accountability that local boards practice daily.

First, end the Supreme Court’s actuarial lottery. Currently, the balance of power shifts with the health of a single octogenarian. The proposed amendment establishes staggered 18-year term limits for justices. Crucially, it makes appointments automatic if the Senate does not vote within three months—ensuring that a nomination never again languishes in political purgatory.

Second, modernize the executive impeachment process. They proposed a trade-off: Raise the threshold to impeach (to three-fifths of the House) but lower the threshold to convict (to three-fifths of the Senate). This forces a broader consensus to bring charges and inhibits a small partisan minority from shielding a corrupt president.

Third, create a legislative veto. This would empower Congress to rein in the administrative state by overriding agency regulations with majority votes—effectively overturning the Supreme Court’s 1983 INS v. Chadha decision. It compels Congress to take accountability for the laws we live under, rather than delegating difficult choices to unelected agencies.

Fourth, remove the "natural-born" barrier. Allow naturalized citizens with 14 years of citizenship to serve as President—aligning the highest office with America’s sacred promise of meritocracy. After all, we are a nation defined by a creed, not by soil.

Fifth, unlock the amendment process itself. Recognizing that a system unable to adapt is destined to crack, they proposed lowering the threshold for new constitutional amendments to three-fifths of Congress and two-thirds of the states. This change keeps the judiciary from becoming a “permanent constitutional convention.”

The prospect of passing five amendments in our current climate may feel like a fantasy. Skeptics will argue that we cannot agree on the time of day, let alone the supreme law of the land. But the consensus achieved by these scholars—and the daily function of school boards in communities like mine—proves the divide is not unbridgeable.

We are destined to prosper—or fail—alongside the fellow Americans with whom we disagree. This package of amendments is the sturdiest off-ramp from our structural paralysis. It offers a truce based not on agreed ideology, but on shared maintenance of the house we all call home.

We need a federal government that fears failure as much as a school board member fears a rightfully disappointed constituent in the frozen food aisle. As we march toward July 4, 2026, we can keep shouting at one another while the roof caves in, or we can use the tools designed to repair it—should we desire another 250 years.

Peter Gariepy is a CPA and an elected member of the Ladue Schools Board of Education in St. Louis County, Missouri.


Read More

White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

This week's congressional agenda includes anti-fraud legislation, ICE funding, FISA Section 702 renewal debates, and major committee hearings.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

Fraud, Funding, and FISA

Fraud

This week in the House is Fraud Week based on the large number of bills likely to receive a vote that in some way are intended to decrease or eliminate many different kinds of fraud. Example bills up for a vote include:

Funding

One bill will likely become law this week if it passes the House:

Keep ReadingShow less
Anti-gerrymandering sign

Florida's new congressional map, the Supreme Court's Callais decision, and challenges to voting rights protections raise urgent questions about redistricting, representation, and democratic accountability.

Bill Clark/Getty Images

Florida’s New Map and the Shrinking Window for Accountability

When the Lines Began Moving Faster Than the Law

On May 4, Governor Ron DeSantis signed Florida’s new congressional map into law. The Legislature had passed it five days earlier, 83 to 28 in the House and 21 to 17 in the Senate. The map redraws four districts in ways that election analysts project would shift them from competitive or Democratic-leaning to safe Republican, potentially expanding a delegation Republicans already control 20 to 8.

The same day the Legislature voted, the Supreme Court decided Louisiana v. Callais. The Court ruled 6 to 3 that Louisiana’s majority-minority district could not survive Equal Protection scrutiny under the standards applied by the majority. In her dissent, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that the ruling “renders Section 2 all but a dead letter” in redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump is stuck between two realities. Neither serves the American people

image of U.S. President Donald Trump is displayed on a digital billboard in Times Square in New York on April 8, 2026.

(Timothy A. Clary/AFP via Getty Images/TNS)

Trump is stuck between two realities. Neither serves the American people

Normally, I worry that events may overtake a column. But not so with the Iran war.

I don’t worry about running afoul of a headline or Truth Social post from the president because what is said about the situation is no longer very relevant to the reality.

Keep ReadingShow less
The dome of the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., stands tall against a blue sky with the American flag waving proudly

A look at this week's congressional agenda, including House votes on Iran, Ukraine, FISA, appropriations, and key legislative priorities.

Getty Images, aire images

Legislative Preview for June 1, 2026

There will be plenty of coverage around the likely drama involved in picking up where House and Senate Republicans left off before this most recent week off. (For a recap, see our last post.) So we’re not going to go into any detail about what might happen with the reconciliation bill (originally only for two departments in the Department of Homeland Security; now enlarged with funding for the President’s ballroom project and overshadowed by the announcement of the President’s plan to pay off political allies with funds from the Department of Justice) or the FISA extension or the housing bill that’s been pingponging between chambers because you can read in sources like Politico about these marquee issue.

We will note that the Iran War resolution postponed in the House before the recess may be up for a vote this week, along with a resolution to remove US troops from Lebanon and a discharge petition (number 8) to put forward a bill authorizing support for Ukraine. Three privileged resolutions, of which one is a discharge petition (meaning it has 218 co-sponsors meaning at least a few House Republican co-sponsors), is a lot for one week. Especially when all three are expressing opposition to various administration stances and might get some House Republican votes.

Keep ReadingShow less