Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Opinion

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.


2 – Working together. No institution works well when the members of that institution pick sides and refuse to work with the other side. This is true in companies, in laboratories, in houses of worship, and in the arts. Collaboration is essential to a quality work product. Members of Congress should resolve to work with each other – to listen to each other – to stop attacking each other. According to Public Agenda, 93% of Americans want to reduce political divisiveness. And two-thirds of Americans believe doing so is “very important.” One way to begin to do this in Congress could be for members to direct their staffs to work together – to have them jointly identify issues, seek facts, and select and interview witnesses. Another way is for members to visit the districts and states of members of the opposite party – with those members. They can try to see issues through another member’s eyes – and the needs of another member’s constituents.

3 – Returning to the normal legislative process, something we call Regular Order. It’s been years – even decades – since Congress followed the regular order in passing legislation and appropriations. No school, company, house of worship, small business, PTA – no organization could survive long if it fails to address its budget and prepare for the coming year’s finances. Board members would be derelict in their duty if that were to happen, but Congress routinely lets the established order of the budget process and appropriations process slip so that, in the end, either all the bills are bunched together by the leadership at the last minute, and no one knows everything that’s in them, or the government shuts down. As they say – “that’s no way to run a government.” Congress should resolve to follow the normal budget and appropriations process — hold hearings, take public and expert testimony, have committee mark-ups (where bills are considered and possibly amended), issue committee reports explaining the contents of the bills, and allow for full Senate and House consideration in a timely and inclusive manner. This would be a big one.

4 – Balancing the budget or at least bringing the deficit within range. Again, no company, social organization, or religious community could survive under the mountain of debt that Congress has allowed the nation to accumulate. To achieve fiscal sustainability, tough decisions have to be made. The discrepancy in wealth that has been allowed and that grows each year is intolerable. And Congress must – based on facts and not partisanship -- direct its attention to separating the wheat from the chaff in our federal programs.

5 – Supporting government watchdogs. Agency inspectors general and the Government Accountability Office were established by Congress to help identify and address waste, fraud, and abuse. They should be fully funded, kept out of political influence, and have their budget-saving recommendations adopted. That’s called being responsible.

6 – Stopping the name-calling. There was a popular book many years ago titled “Everything I Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten.” One such “thing” is to be polite and not call people names. It’s embarrassing for our grandchildren to hear the words some of our leaders use to describe a fellow human being. Decency and respect go a long way to building trust, and trust can yield accommodation and accomplishment. Congress should resolve to follow decorum and speak with decency and respect.

This is just a start – but how different our country would be if Congress would adopt these resolutions and stick to them!


Linda Gustitus served for 24 years (from 1979 to 2013) as Staff Director and Chief Counsel for Senator Carl Levin (D-MI).


Read More

Protestors holding signs outside of the Idaho statehouse.

Protesters rally for abortion rights outside of the Idaho Statehouse in downtown Boise, Idaho, on May 14, 2022.

Sarah A. Miller/Idaho Statesman/AP

Idaho Voters Will Weigh In on One of the Strictest Abortion Bans in the Country

Idaho voters will weigh in on their state’s abortion laws this November. The secretary of state’s office certified a ballot measure that could, if passed, overturn one of the strictest bans in the country, the campaign to restore abortion rights in Idaho confirmed on Monday.

The measure would enact a new law establishing a state right to “reproductive freedom,” which it defines as allowing residents to make their own decisions in areas including fertility treatment, contraception and abortion. But it would not amend the state’s constitution, meaning it could still be overturned by the state’s Republican legislature. Currently, Idaho bans abortion in nearly all circumstances, with a narrow exception if staying pregnant threatens someone’s life.

Keep ReadingShow less
People wearing vests with "ICE" and "Police" on the back.
The latest shutdown deal kept government open while exposing Congress’s reliance on procedural oversight rather than structural limits on ICE.
Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

Where Can Immigration Enforcement Take Place?

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

The Origins: The Clinton Administration

Keep ReadingShow less
The Iran war could shape American policy for decades

U.S. forces patrol the Arabian Sea near M/V Touska on April 20, 2026, after firing upon the Iranian-flagged vessel that the U.S. accused of attempting to violate the U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz.

(U.S. Navy/Getty Images/TNS)

The Iran war could shape American policy for decades

The war with Iran that never really ended is back on. Like everybody else, including the Trump administration and the Iranian regime, I have no idea how it will end. But it eventually will, and how it will be remembered will matter enormously.

Politics is about many things, but whether you call it “spin,” “framing” or “narrative competition,” storytelling is never far from the heart of it. As the philosopher Richard Rorty observed, “Competition for political leadership is in part a competition between differing stories about a nation’s self-identity, and between differing symbols of its greatness.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Presidential powers: Corporate abuses big concern after SCOTUS move

An oil production operation is shown in North Dakota. With the U.S. Supreme Court granting more presidential powers to the executive branch, environmental groups warned key agencies will have a harder time going after polluters.

(Adobe Stock)

Presidential powers: Corporate abuses big concern after SCOTUS move

A U.S. Supreme Court opinion issued last month expands presidential power over independent federal agencies, prompting warnings from environmental advocates about potential implications for states such as North Dakota.

The court’s conservative majority said President Donald Trump had the authority to fire a former Federal Trade Commission member without cause. Legal observers countered the opinion nullifies longstanding precedent involving the role of Congress in insulating certain federal agency officials from direct presidential control.

Keep ReadingShow less