Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

University Roundtable Puts Latino Mental Health Front and Center

News

University Roundtable Puts Latino Mental Health Front and Center

woman holds "Hablo Espanol" button

Picture Provided

“Keep it to yourself. Push it down. Don’t say anything.” That is how Isis Lara Fernandez was taught to live with her status as an undocumented immigrant in the United States.

At 6-years-old, Lara Fernandez fled to the U.S. with her mother and siblings to escape domestic violence in Honduras. From that point forward, Lara Fernandez navigated life with a persistent fear that her secret could be discovered at any point in time.


“There was this impending amount of fear that was happening that you kind of learned to suppress,” Lara Fernandez said in an interview. “My mom didn’t know how to manage it, so she just learned to not say anything. That was a terrible strategy but that’s the only one I knew.”

On Oct. 22, the University of Washington’s Center for Communication, Difference and Equity (CCDE) hosted a roundtable discussion on the state of mental health in Latino communities. The roundtable covered the work being done across governmental, medical and non-profit agencies to provide critical resources to Latino individuals in need.

Latino individuals have been increasingly targeted by President Donald Trump’s mass deportation measures. According to a 2025 analysis conducted by the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs’ Center for Neighborhood Knowledge, Latinos accounted for nine out of ten Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrests over the past six months.

Gloria Martinez Sierra, an outreach manager of the bilingual program for Parents of Adolescents and Teens (PAT) at Programs for Early Parent Support (PEPS) in Seattle, said she has seen a decline in community participation from Latino individuals at in-person events due to an increased anxiety of deportation.

Isabella Herrera, a licensed mental health counselor at UW Medicine Harborview Medical Center’s Edward Thomas House Respite, has noticed a similar decline in the number of Latino individuals she treats. The Edward Thomas House Respite provides acute medical care to individuals experiencing homelessness, treating a range of ailments such as cancer, substance abuse and psychiatric disorders.

She said that many of her patients know friends or family members who have been deported or detained, which has deterred them from going to their doctor’s appointments and receiving the critical medical care they need. As a result, health disparities in Latino communities have been exacerbated.

“For a lot of our people, engaging in their medical care is essential,” Herrera said in the roundtable. “It’s not just a primary care appointment, it’s a life-sustaining kind of treatment.”

Lara Fernandez has seen a similar trend from undocumented immigrant mothers as the equity and social justice coordinator at the City of Shoreline. Many have requested that she not enroll them in federally-funded programs like SNAP, EBT or Medicaid.

“That is the stuff that really broke my heart because this is a very vulnerable population that had no access and an excessive amount of barriers in front of them,” Lara Fernandez said in the roundtable.

Dr. Carmen Gonzalez, the director of UW’s CCDE and an associate professor in the department of communication, said culture plays a significant role in limiting conversations about mental health in Latino communities. This resistance has caused many to suffer in silence.

“If we can’t name anxiety, then it’s really tricky to come out of it or to develop coping mechanisms for how to deal with it,” Gonzalez said in an interview.

She began studying anti-immigrant rhetoric in the media as a graduate student to understand how ethnic media can mobilize protests and encourage marginalized communities to speak out against anti-immigration legislation.

Dr. Carmen Gonzalez is the director of UW’s CCDE and an associate professor in the department of communication. Photo by Corey Olson.

She said social media platforms like TikTok help promote conversations about mental health to fill in generational gaps within immigrant communities, but also spread massive amounts of misinformation that can contribute to cultural stigmas and taboos.

“I think we’re in a much better place than when I started doing research in this area, because I feel like mental health is just less taboo,” Gonzalez said in an interview.

During the roundtable, Lara Fernandez shared her experience being detained in 2014 and the role her upbringing played in how she dealt with the situation. She was detained in Texas while returning to Washington state after visiting family in Honduras. She was held in a processing center for about one month and was released after her sister set up a successful GoFundMe page to raise money for an immigration lawyer.

After her release, Lara Fernandez began working in social services, assisting immigrant and refugee unaccompanied minors at the Washington state border as they were transferred into the state’s foster care system. She focused on her work in an effort to forget the experience of being detained, but later began using alcohol as a way to cope.

“In a way, I was trying to give back to the same people that were suffering something I had just suffered,” Lara Fernandez said in an interview. “Since I was doing that, I thought I would be okay. But I was not attending to my feelings and was suppressing them a lot.”

Lara Fernandez became sober in 2018 and is currently doing research on substance use disorders and addiction in Black and Brown communities as part of her Ph.D. in leadership and change program at Antioch University.

Despite experiencing an increase in her post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms from her work with undocumented individuals, she has found healing in openly talking about her experience in spaces like the roundtable.

“It’s like I’m feeling so happy of how much I’ve overcome, but without crying,” Lara Fernandez said in an interview.

She believes it’s important for Latino communities to understand that healing can look different for different people, despite the cultural norms surrounding conversations about mental health.

“It’s kind of ingrained in our culture,” Lara Fernandez said in an interview. “I’m probably privileged speaking out about being detained because I am no longer undocumented, but speaking truth to the things that were hidden in the shadows is helpful to any healing process.”

At the end of the roundtable, Gonzalez asked each speaker what brought them hope during this difficult time for Latino communities. Every response had one thing in common: the roundtable.
“This live stream just in itself is a way of giving hope to others,” Lara Fernandez said at the roundtable. “It gives me hope that we might continue this series because I think it’s beneficial. And maybe the next one will be in all Spanish, para nuestra gente verdad.”

University Roundtable Puts Latino Mental Health Front and Center was first published on Washington Latino News and was republished with permission.

Corey Olson is a fourth-year student pursuing a double major in Journalism and Public Interest Communication and Law, Societies, and Justice at the University of Washington, Seattle.


Read More

Political and Economic Pressures Set Up a Healthcare Shift in 2026
man in white dress shirt holding white paper

Political and Economic Pressures Set Up a Healthcare Shift in 2026

Healthcare in 2025 was consumed by chaos, conflict and relentless drama. Yet despite unprecedented political turmoil, cultural division and major technological breakthroughs, there was little meaningful improvement in how care is paid for or delivered.

That outcome was not surprising. American medicine is extraordinarily resistant to change. In most years, even when problems are obvious and widely acknowledged, the safest bet is that the care patients experience in January will look much the same in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Finish Line Is a Commons
Athletes compete in a hyrox event with puma branding.

The Finish Line Is a Commons

A decade ago, bootcamp workouts had little to do with appearance or chasing personal records. For me, they meant survival. They offered a way to manage stress, process grief, and stay upright beneath the weight of vocation and responsibility. Pastoral leadership, specifically during the time of “parachute church-planting,” often convinces a person that stillness is an unattainable luxury and that exhaustion is a sign of virtue. Eventually, my body defied those assumptions. So I went to the workout and may have discovered the “secret sauce” behind such entrepreneurial success. Then I returned. And kept returning. Mornings meant emerging outdoors at first light. I found myself in empty parking lots, on tracks, inside gyms, and eventually in a neighboring storefront home to BKM Fitness, owned by Braint Mitchell. There was no soundtrack, only measured breath and occasional encouragement called out by someone who hardly knew my name.

I could not have predicted that such spaces would become the most honest civic grounds I occupy. Today, my sense of belonging unfolds less in churches, classrooms, or boardrooms, and more in bootcamp circles, running groups, the leaderboard on Peloton, and, more recently, at a Hyrox start line—a hybrid fitness space where community looks and feels different.

Keep ReadingShow less
Freezing Child Care Funding Throws the Baby Out with the Bathwater
boy's writing on book

Freezing Child Care Funding Throws the Baby Out with the Bathwater

In the South, there is an idiom that says, “Don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.” It means not discarding something valuable while trying to eliminate something harmful. The Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) proposed response to unsubstantiated child care fraud allegations in Minnesota risks doing exactly that.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has frozen child care and family assistance grants in five states, and reports indicate that this action may be extended nationwide. Fraud at any level is wrong and should be thoroughly investigated, and once proven to be true, addressed. However, freezing child care payments and family assistance grants based on the views of a single social media “influencer” is an overcorrection that threatens the stability of child care programs and leaves families without care options through no fault of their own.

Across the nation, Americans rely heavily on child care. According to the Center for American Progress, nearly 70 percent of children under age six had all available parents in the workforce in 2023, underscoring how essential child care is to family and economic stability.

Child care funding, therefore, is not optional. It is a necessity that must remain stable and predictable.

Without consistent funding, child care operations are forced to significantly reduce capacity, and some are forced to close altogether. In 2025, a longtime family child care owner made the difficult decision to close her business after state budget cuts eliminated critical child care funding. While this example reflects a state-level funding failure, the impact is the same. When funding becomes unreliable, as is the case with the current funding freeze, child care business owners, employees, parents, and children all suffer.

The economic consequences extend well beyond families. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, when parents cannot find or afford child care, they are pushed out of the workforce, and businesses lose skilled employees. Child care gaps disrupt staffing across industries and cost states an estimated $1 billion annually in lost economic activity.

Child care is no longer just a family issue. It is an economic issue. It is one of the few sectors that directly affects every other industry. At a time when women are being encouraged to have more children, a strong support system must also exist, and that includes consistent, reliable child care funding.

Misuse of government funds is not a new concept. During the COVID-19 pandemic, more than $200 billion in federal relief funding across programs was reportedly misused. Fraud occurs in every industry, and no system is immune to it.

If allegations of child care fraud are substantiated, safeguards should absolutely be implemented to prevent future misuse; however, freezing child care funding would further delay payments to a sector already plagued by late reimbursements, disrupt services for children and families, and destabilize small businesses that operate on thin margins.

The solution is straightforward. Strengthen oversight to mitigate risk, without punishing the entire field. We must acknowledge that the vast majority of child care programs operate in good faith and in compliance with the law, providing care to millions of children nationwide. According to a 2020 report by the United States Government Accountability Office, only seven states since 2013 have had errors in more than 10 percent of their child care fund payments.

Yes, accountability matters, but solutions must be precise and measured. Sweeping actions based on unsubstantiated claims destabilize the entire child care system. When child care collapses, families lose care, caregivers lose income, small businesses close, and the economy suffers.

We can strengthen safeguards without dismantling the system that families and the economy depend on. We can address misuse if and where it exists. But we cannot afford to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Eboni Delaney is the Director of Policy and Movement Building at the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC), and a Public Voices Fellow of the OpEd Project in Partnership with the National Black Child Development Institute.

Keep ReadingShow less
The ACA’s Missing Mandate: Why Costs Keep Rising

Repealing the ACA’s individual mandate destabilized insurance markets, drove premiums higher, and left families paying the price.

Getty Images

The ACA’s Missing Mandate: Why Costs Keep Rising

By repealing the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate, policymakers allowed healthy Americans to walk away—leaving insurers with risk pools dominated by those most likely to need care. The result was inevitable: premiums soared, markets destabilized, and families were left paying the price.

When Congress passed the ACA, its most controversial feature was the individual mandate—the requirement that all Americans carry health insurance or pay a penalty. Critics called it coercion. In reality, it was the glue holding the system together.

Keep ReadingShow less