Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump is on the wrong side of AI issue

Opinion

Donald Trump holding a picture

President Donald Trump holds an image showing the size of Meta’s new data center during a cabinet meeting on Aug. 26, 2025.

(Mandel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images/TCA)

I’ve covered a lot of elections — and most times, the issues that are going to really matter to voters aren’t brand new or sprung on them with just two months to go, arriving out of nowhere. They’re predictable — the economy, a war, a long-contentious policy fight.

This year is different. While most voters tell us their biggest concern is affordability, a new issue has entered the chat, taking up an outsized amount of space on the campaign trail, on the airwaves, and in party war rooms.


AI.

The advent of giant data centers, along with new fears about artificial intelligence and the companies overseeing the technology, as well as the growing issue of privacy and Flock cameras are all presenting a brand-new mine field for politicians and party leaders, and they are scrambling to adapt.

The issues are so new to voters, in fact, that neither Democrats nor Republicans seem to have a good handle on what their positions are.

In Pennsylvania, an important swing state with a number of key House races in play, Gov. Josh Shapiro did an about-face last month, seemingly acknowledging the growing opposition.

Just this past February, the Democratic potential presidential contender touted new data centers, promising it would help mitigate the risk that China would outpace us on AI.

But just a few months later, Shapiro signed an executive order dramatically reining in the tech, and calling out “predatory” developers.

Over on the right, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott performed the same jiujitsu, at first welcoming a $40 billion investment from Google last year, and then pausing approvals for about 1,800 data center projects this month.

Democrats seem to be settling into arguments over environmental and quality of life concerns, where Republicans are increasingly embracing arguments for more local control.

It’s undoubtedly a hasty response to a dramatic shift in public opinion this year, perhaps thanks to a high-profile case in Utah involving Kevin O’Leary from “Shark Tank,” in which public backlash forced him to drastically scale back his development plans from 40,000 acres down to roughly 20,000.

A new UMass Amherst poll shows 65% of Americans do not want data centers in their communities, and it’s the rare issue that crosses party lines.

Compounding fears was a terrifying warning from a former AI executive last week that AI could end civilization within a decade and the tech companies aren’t doing enough about it.

Rounding off the trifecta of worrisome tech issues are Flock cameras, automated license plate readers installed everywhere that capture vehicle and driver data.

None of this is popular with voters. But while both parties and candidates all over the country seem keenly aware of this fact, one political figure does not: Donald Trump.

In the past week, Trump has weighed into the controversies with what seems like reckless abandon in an election year.

He’s come out in favor of data centers, telling voters that otherwise they’ll be “backwards and poor.”

He’s called fears over AI “a hoax,” likening them to fears over climate change (also a hoax, to him), and rejected calls for more regulation.

And this week, he said he liked Flock cameras, despite jam-packed town halls full of angry citizens protesting the invasive technology.

Trump’s been unmoved by public opinion on other issues, of course, including the war in Iran, tariffs, abortion, and the Epstein files. And that may just see Republicans lose their majority this November. It’s never a good idea to tell voters they’re wrong about how they feel.

It’s also not often a brand-new issue threatens to upend an election cycle, and the president is telling worried voters it doesn’t matter.

Whether he cares or not, the people disagree.

S.E. Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.


Read More

President Trump answers questions from reporters.

U.S. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters before boarding Air Force One on August 21, 2026 in Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Trump’s White House Press Ban Violates 1st Amendment

The principle is simple. Just like politicians are not supposed to pick their voters, government officials don’t get to pick the reporters who cover them.

If they did, the First Amendment would be meaningless. and we would no longer live in anything resembling a constitutional republic. That is why President Trump’s September 18 announcement that he is banning reporters from CNN, MSNow, and Politico from the White House is so dangerous.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person interacts with an AI chatbot on a smartphone. The screen displays a conversation interface with the text "Hi, may I help you?" suggesting the use of an AI assistant app. A laptop is visible in the background, emphasizing a tech-savvy environment.

A 2026 study found AI beat elite debaters, until it was slowed to human speed. Why persuasion throughput matters and how to make chatbot tempo transparent.

Chong Kee Siong/Getty Images

Political Chatbots Should Not Be Allowed To Set the Pace

A political chatbot can answer before a citizen has finished reading its previous message. It can add statistics, historical examples, causal claims, and links at a rate no human campaign volunteer could match. That does not necessarily make its case wiser. It changes the contest by allowing one speaker to control the tempo.

A June 2026 preprint offers unusually direct evidence of this problem. Across four preregistered experiments involving 18,978 conversations from 6,923 people, frontier AI systems were more persuasive than laypeople, tournament winners, professional canvassers and elite competitive debaters. The human experts were not casual opponents: the study included world and continental champions, paid preparation, live practice and substantial performance incentives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Camera pointing at Donald Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump is seen in the electronic viewfinder of a television camera in the Oval Office at the White House on September 18, 2026, in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

How Democracy Dies Alongside a Constricted Press

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists.

We asked Malory Shaw, a Fall Fulcrum Fellow, to share what democracy means to her and how she sees its current health.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hasan Piker

Influencer and left-wing political commentator Hasan Piker is introduced during a campaign rally for Wisconsin Gubernatorial candidate Francesca Hong on Aug. 2, 2026, in Milwaukee.

(Joshua Lott/Getty Images/TNS)

While the world is on fire, the media are still obsessed with Israel

No one likes to think they’re being hysterical. And nothing makes hysterical people angrier than being described as such. So, let me offer my apologies in advance for what follows.

Jeremy Musighi, an independent researcher, recently released a study analyzing 14.7 million news articles published across 65 languages over the last decade. He found that, in 2024, news outlets published “more than twice as many stories about Israel as about all 48 countries of sub-Saharan Africa combined.”

Keep ReadingShow less