The American stage has long served as a place where we gather to confront the deeper truths of who we are. Across the generations, playwrights and performers have turned the theater into a kind of public square, inviting us to face our history, our contradictions, and our aspirations. In recent years, works as different as Hamilton and What the Constitution Means to Me have shown how powerful theatre can be for both reflection and change. They tell us that democracy is not only debated in courtrooms or decided at the ballot box; it is equally shaped by the stories we tell, the questions we ask, and the courage we summon to look deeply within ourselves.
Recently, at Cape May Stage in Cape May, New Jersey, I attended a performance of What the Constitution Means to Me. The play centers on fifteen-year-old Heidi Schreck, who financed her college education by winning national constitutional debate competitions, using the nation’s founding document as both a guide and a lens for interpreting the world.
As an adult, Heidi reflects on her adolescence, and she presents a narrative that is both deeply personal and distinctly American. She perceives the Constitution not as a remote, outdated document, but as an influential force shaping her family, her identity, and her understanding of the nation’s expectations and promises. Her account demonstrates that the Constitution is not merely a historical relic but remains embedded in our daily lives, decisions, vulnerabilities, and aspirations.
By integrating humor, historical context, and candid storytelling, the play prompts the audience to reconsider democracy, individual rights, and civic responsibility without the acrimony we witness every day in mainstream and social media.
I departed from the show with a renewed sense of optimism that civil discourse on challenging topics remains achievable, and that genuine reflection is still possible in a nation where polarization often undermines nuance and critical thought.
When the final applause faded, I found myself thinking not only about Heidi’s story, but also asking myself, if a single play can open a space for honest, unguarded reflection on the Constitution, then perhaps this is exactly the kind of reflection we need, especially now, as we are living through a moment when polarization can feel like the country’s defining feature, when the distance between us seems to widen faster than our attempts to bridge it.
The Constitution was never meant to be an artifact or a weapon; it was meant to be a shared inheritance, a living framework that “We the People” must continually interpret, renew, and keep. Benjamin Franklin understood this fragility. When asked what kind of government the delegates had created, he famously replied, “A republic — if you can keep it.” His warning was not for the politicians of his day but for every generation that would follow. It was an alert for us today.
Keeping the republic has always depended on citizens willing to look inward, to ask what democracy itself means to them, and to do that work not in isolation but together. If we can reclaim that shared act of reflection, if we can remember that the story of America is still ours to write, then perhaps the next chapter can be one that draws us closer rather than drives us apart.
That is why Civic Season, a growing national tradition stretching from Juneteenth to July 4, feels so vital. Civic Season is a nationwide invitation — especially to young Americans — to explore our history honestly, participate meaningfully with our democracy, and imagine the future we desire to build together. It connects our newest federal holiday, Juneteenth, with our oldest, Independence Day, symbolically linking the full arc of the American story: the triumphs, failures, reckonings, and unfinished work.
As the nation approaches its 250th anniversary, Civic Season serves as a reminder that democracy is not a static inheritance but an evolving project. Its endurance depends on the active participation of each generation. The future of the republic will be determined by the curiosity, courage, and engagement of young people and their successors. These qualities are not merely commendable; they are indispensable. Let Civic Season serve as a reaffirmation that Franklin’s challenge remains relevant: “a republic, if you can keep it,” and that its preservation has always relied on our collective commitment.
Do You Want to Make a Difference?
Democracy is not a spectator activity; it requires active participation from every individual. When civic engagement declines, collective influence over decisions that shape our lives and communities diminishes. In such circumstances, hope is often replaced by cynicism.
The freedoms valued by society rarely vanish abruptly; rather, they erode gradually through neglect if permitted. It is imperative to recognize that democracy merits our sustained time, attention, and courage.
Now is the moment for yall Americans to step forward, embrace our individual and collective role as stewards of our nation, and boldly shape the next chapter. If you believe in a stronger, more inclusive future, your voice and actions are essential. Let us rise to Franklin's challenge and show that together, we can keep the republic—strong, vital, and united.
David Nevins is the publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.




















U.S. President Donald Trump boards Air Force One on August 14, 2026 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Trump is traveling to Long Island to tour law enforcement facilities in Nassau County and rally support for local Republican candidates ahead of the upcoming midterm elections
Travel Far Enough, You Meet Yourself
Is it possible that our President has simply not traveled enough?
Born and raised in Queens and attending Fordham University in the Bronx, Donald Trump has no record of traveling outside New York until he was over 20, when he transferred to a college in the neighboring state of Pennsylvania. Were his formative years amiss, then, in his learning about other places and other people?
Is his view akin to the famous New Yorker cover by Saul Steinberg, an illustration of the United States with New York City as the epicenter of the country and the Hudson River the border of the known world? We can now at least add Washington, D.C., and Mar-a-Lago to the map of “the realm.”
Our President has now traveled some, but what we recommend is another kind of travel. Not a state-sponsored trip or a venture to scout locations for future Trump Towers. This would be a genuine travel experience, enriching and eye-opening, showcasing other cultures and ways of living.
It will extend far beyond viewing military parades, hobnobbing with such “understanding” world leaders as Kim Jong Un, or taking tea with the King.
WHERE, then, should the President go? As Elon Musk’s Starship spacecraft is not yet ready to take passengers to Mars, perhaps he could explore our own vast country?
Maybe he could travel to “flyover country,” the farming states, where his ying-yanging tariffs and trade restrictions have played havoc with rural economies. Or possibly to California, number one in homeless U. S. citizens, and while there, regale homeless veterans (approximately 32,500 nationwide) with tales of his brave exploits invading and bombing foreign countries.
Or he might tour the Great Lakes, and rename the other four?
WHEN should he go? This will be tough, as he is very busy building his ballroom and renaming bodies of water.
How about a trip in early November, around the midterm elections? Despite the long-discredited accusation of widespread voter fraud, it would be reassuring to know he might be so caught up divvying out ladles of soup in a soup kitchen somewhere that he wouldn’t remember to deploy the military for “election security.”
HOW will he travel? He should definitely not take his Qatari-donated, newly renovated 747, especially after last time, when he had to be smuggled off clandestinely in a catering truck. It’s unlikely any traveling companions, like the Secretary of State or of the Treasury, are going to fall for the ruse a second time. Besides, we may need those people. No more decoys!
Perhaps the President could fly commercially, although this likely would expose him to undue suffering. Without gold bathroom fixtures and maple wood floors, the trip will be no “Luxury Experience.” If only he still had his “Trump Shuttle,” bought with a massive loan he later defaulted on, saying then, “I’m smart. I got out at a good time.”
Considering the potential pitfalls, maybe it’s best the President travel incognito, disguised perhaps as an elderly woman wearing a lot of bronzer.
Wherever, whenever, however: our President needs a vacation.
Moreover, we need a vacation from him.
If the President refuses our travel suggestions, here’s another idea:
Let’s get him a pet! He has never owned a pet. As we know with our children, pets teach essential life lessons: compassion and empathy; they instill a sense of responsibility. There is a well-established connection between those who can care for a pet and those who can care for people.
So, which pet should we choose? A puppy? A kitten? A boa constrictor?
Imagine, the President may even decide he likes having a pet. After all, what is more obedient than a well-trained dog, besides possibly the Cabinet? And what is more docile than a sweet kitten, other than plausibly the Supreme Court?
The President may even become more mellow with a pet afoot and less likely to slap tariffs on our allies, or attempt to annex our neighbors, or bully our Congress. (Realizing, of course, a bully requires active participation from the bullied to maintain his status.)
Maybe we should do both: get the President a pet and devise a travel plan for him. (Do you think we could possibly convince him to leave his phone at home?)
Let’s go for it! After all:
Travel far enough, you meet yourself. (David Mitchell)
And for our President, that would likely be the most profound discovery of all.
Amy Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."