Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Women Are Reviving a Historic Resistance Tactic at Protests: Singing

In a return to form for U.S. social justice movements, organizers are turning to group singing to unite crowds and sustain demonstrations against Trump and ICE.

A person holding a megaphone in a crowd.

Groups like the Resistance Revival Chorus (pictured here) are at the forefront of bringing singing back to U.S. protests.

Candice Helfand-Rogers

On a cold early-February evening in New York City, the first of what would become several “ICE Out Sing-Ins” was held.

Co-hosted by two ensembles – the Resistance Revival Chorus and the Jerriese Johnson Gospel Choir – as well as New York City’s Interfaith Alliance, the event’s purpose was singular: Teach the hundreds who assembled at Manhattan’s Middle Church a set of songs to sing at protests against the Trump administration and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.


When the Resistance Revival Chorus led the crowd in singing a particularly poignant piece – “Hold On,” by Vermont song leader Heidi Wilson – a ripple began to visibly spread. A few choir members reached out to embrace one another, followed by more. Within a minute, the entire ensemble was as bonded physically as they were musically, and spiritually.

The moment serves as a metaphor for the broader, growing use this year of singing – group singing, specifically – as a form of resistance. Many see it as a powerful act of intention, rippling out from a center until it touches all who are open to it.

The renewed interest in group singing as a protest tool – often associated with demonstrations in the 1960s and early 1970s related to the civil rights struggle and denouncing the Vietnam War – cropped up after organizers in Minneapolis began responding to the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti at the hands of ICE agents. In January, a small group there began singing, in English and in Spanish, to help console and unite a grieving community. Hundreds joined in. Videos of Singing Resistance, a musical grassroots collective based in Minneapolis, quickly went viral.

Now, organizers in dozens of other cities are forming their own chapters after seeing those early examples. Though Singing Resistance is focused on immigrant solidarity and anti-ICE campaigning, there is an expectation – and a hope – that group singing may soon be used at protests around other acts committed by the Trump administration, such as recent bombings in Iran.

Famous musicians have already taken notice. Singer-songwriter Brandi Carlile recently led some 15,000 people in singing protest songs – and was joined onstage at one point by members of Singing Resistance – at a solidarity concert she hosted in Minnesota. Performers from Bruce Springsteen to Sara Bareilles have been sharing new protest songs as well.

ArinMaya, co-musical director of the Resistance Revival Chorus, says “this moment we’re in now, it’s a continuation” of work she and others have been doing. “Music, and song, and the power of song keeps us lifted, keeps us encouraged, keeps spirits high.”

And many of these organizers and song leaders – those lifting others’ spirits through music – are women, as they have been through history.

‘Just like a tree that’s planted by the water’

In the U.S., protest singing has been a tool for organizers since the nation’s founding – literally. Songs like “Yankee Doodle” and “Free Americay” were used to push back against British imperialism as often as muskets.

Singing also helped shape other sea changes in American history, from the movement to abolish slavery in the 1800s, to the Women’s Suffrage and Labor movements of the early 1900s, on into the farmworkers’ strikes, Civil Rights marches and anti-war demonstrations that would follow several decades later.

Sometimes people would sing new compositions in chorus with one another; other times, it would be familiar tunes featuring new lyrics. Many of both forms were taught, and often penned, by women. African-American spirituals like “Go Down Moses,” often sung by Harriet Tubman herself, “Which Side Are You On?” written by union organizer Florence Reece, “We Shall Not Be Moved,” a hymn-turned-protest-song performed often by the Freedom Singers, gospel singer Shirley Caesar’s own “This Joy” and many others would regularly be sung as groups organized against oppression, theirs and others.

- YouTube youtu.be

Tammy Kernodle, a PhD of music history and a professor at Miami University in Ohio, notes that organizers turned to group singing, time and time again, as a form of “embodied resistance,” or, “when a group of people or a person goes into a space and they use their bodies to disrupt the energy of that space.” And these physical acts – from sit-ins to singing – are unavoidably powerful, she adds, because “everything stops” for it.

Throughout the history of American protests, women have often served as song leaders. That includes suffragist Ethel Smyth, workers’ rights activist Aunt Molly Jackson and domestic-worker-turned-folk-singer Odetta, as well as those involved in mixed-gender ensembles like the Hutchinson Family Singers of the abolitionist movement, and the Freedom Singers and Sweet Honey in the Rock (founded by another prominent activist, Bernice Johnson Reagon) of the Civil Rights era.

One of Kernodle’s favorite examples is voting-rights activist Fannie Lou Hamer. “We know [her] as an orator. We know her from the ‘64 Democratic Convention. But she always began those speeches with songs. And she would have people sing” with her. Noted farmworker rights activist Dolores Huerta also used music to protest unfair working conditions for migrants, despite being better known as a speaker.

Indeed, “women played an essential but often underrated role in such movements,” says Dorian Lynskey, author of “33 Revolutions Per Minute: A History of Protest Songs.” A lengthy list of prominent women artists have woven social justice into their musical work over the years, too, he notes — Marian Anderson, Billie Holiday, Aretha Franklin, Joan Baez, Sinéad O’Connor and Erykah Badu, and groups like Le Tigre and Pussy Riot. But it’s the on-the-ground, in-group singing that Lynskey says is “perhaps the most natural expression of solidarity and unity of purpose.”

Beheld, a vocal ensemble based in Washington, D.C., that’s performed at conferences, demonstrations and even the vigil following U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s September 2020 death, has woven that same spirit of women’s sung resistance into their work. One of its members, Julie James, explains that “there’s a symbolism of [group singing]” that makes it a potent protest tool. “The many are greater than the one. When you lift your voice with someone else’s, there’s this alchemy that happens, and it’s just holy.”

It’s the kind of singing civil rights leader Dr. Martin Luther King himself once called “the soul of the movement.”

‘We who believe in freedom cannot rest’

In the past several decades, however, group singing at protests has waned. The collective musical work never stopped – but it stopped being centered as an integral part of marches and demonstrations. If singing does occur, it’s usually done individually by featured artists, and is still scant at best. Experts suggest a combination of reasons.

“We’ve lost community spaces where people are used to singing together,” says Chelsea MacMillan, who is heading up much of the actions of the New York City chapter of Singing Resistance, and who is a full-time climate organizer with Greenfaith. Even congregational singing in houses of worship is on the decline. And, she continues, “singing has become so professionalized,” with reality talent competitions such as FOX’s “American Idol” warping mass perception of the very act of singing into something one should only do if they excel at it – or be mocked for if they don’t.

Lynskey offers another theory: The encroachment of American individualism into the music itself. Consider songs like “We Shall Overcome” and “Give Peace a Chance,” once popular at protests. And, “note the use of ‘we:’ ‘We shall overcome, ‘All we are saying is give peace a chance.’” It’s not a spirit seen in modern pop music, he adds.

Hundreds gathered to sing together in protest of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement violence in New York City.Hundreds gathered to sing together in protest of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement violence as part of a national Singing Resistance call to action. (Candice Helfand-Rogers)

The 1990s also saw deep cuts in music programs at U.S. public schools. And more recently, the Covid pandemic did its own damage, turning group singing into dangerous super-spreader events, for a time.

So while communal, crowd-involved singing moments still happen at concerts, and organizations like the Gaia Music Collective have been bringing accessible choral experiences to an increasing number of cities over the past few years, the practice is simply no longer an organic, expected part of American culture – or American protests. “We’re not going to religious spaces anymore; we’re not singing in schools; there aren’t community spaces for singing,” MacMillan summarizes.

But once all eyes were drawn to Minnesota earlier this year, people were opened up once more to the ways in which music can be used in organizing – and the ways in which it can be woven into protests with intention. And women organizers and song leaders – like the members of the Resistance Revival Chorus, Singing Resistance and Beheld, those who kept the practice alive and waiting – have now been hopping on this current spike in interest to effectively guide folks back en masse.

But it’s not just about making everyone feel good, these experts add. As ArinMaya notes, group singing “doesn’t happen in a vacuum. It has to be connected to action.” MacMillan points, for example, to the ways in which Minnesota organizers used group singing as a cry for ICE agents to defect, through songs like “It’s Okay to Change Your Mind” by Minneapolis song leader Annie Schlaefer. (The tactic is inspired by the Serbian “Otpor!” movement of the 1990s to oust dictator Slobodan Milošević – by, in part, encouraging members of his regime to step away.)

These organizations also do work beyond song-leading. Through their online channels, they share news updates and other critical pieces of information, and partner with like-minded groups to further the social-justice work. And, Carlile’s concert wasn’t just about “vibes” – it raised over $600,000 for families affected by ICE activity.

The movement has grown legs. In Lower Manhattan’s Foley Square, next to the building where ICE detainees are taken, several hundred people gathered at the end of February as part of a nationwide day of musical action organized by Singing Resistance. There were dozens of such rallies around the U.S. – in all, over 90 gatherings were hosted, and over $100,00 was raised by attendees to aid immigrants directly.

And, organizers add, over 230 Singing Resistance groups have now been formed.

Standing and singing in solidarity with the Lower Manhattan assembly was Brad Lander, former New York City comptroller and current Congressional candidate. He was drawn to attend the event, and to lead the crowd in singing African-American spiritual and anti-war song “Down By the Riverside,” after watching protesters in Minneapolis sing “It’s Okay to Change Your Mind” outside of ICE agents’ hotels.

“They found this way of showing how furious they are at the murders of Renee Good and Alex Pretti … and also found this beautiful song” for expressing that rage, he said. “People are steadfast – but soulfully so. And that comes out in the songs.”

‘Here comes the dawn’

As part of its ongoing efforts, Singing Resistance has shared a toolkit for organizers throughout the country, including a full songbook with tunes like “Hold On” – the song that created the ripple effect seen at that first packed event in New York City’s Middle Church.

The song’s simple-yet-fervent melody and slower tempo make it more of a prayer than a rallying cry – and movements need that spirit, too, says Melinda St. Louis of Beheld. “Something I’ve been loving about what is happening in this moment, what is happening in Minneapolis, and what is happening in uprisings all over the country is, it’s not just all f—ing wanting to punch something all the time.”

“There’s something to group singing that [reminds us] not everything has to be a fist in the air,” she continues. “Sometimes it is the embrace. It’s the wiping of a tear. It is just a human touch.”

And, she and several other sources noted, this too is often women’s work: Caring when it’s difficult, loving with bruised hearts, pouring from drained cups. Showing up unsteady, yet ready.

Gathering the scared and the tired and transforming that exhausted assembly into a robust choir.

Yet there is joy derived on both sides of that effort, “Hold On” composer Wilson says. Joy, and restoration, and hope for something better on the horizon. “In this moment, collective singing offers us a chance to stand up against rising authoritarianism and violence in a way that is also simultaneously creating the world that we want to inhabit – one rooted in love.”


Women Are Reviving a Historic Resistance Tactic at Protests: Singing originally appeared on The Story Exchange, published on The 19th, and is reshared with permission.


Read More

Trump’s Racism Carries No Consequences—And That’s Scary

Trump's unchecked racism reveals just how fragile the state of American democracy is.

Cage Rivera/Rewire News Group

Trump’s Racism Carries No Consequences—And That’s Scary

Donald Trump posted a video online depicting the Obamas as apes.

This isn’t shocking—or at least it shouldn’t be. Trump has built an entire political career out of saying the quiet racist part out loud and then daring the country to do something about it.

Keep Reading Show less
Sexual Assault Thrives in Silence

Co-founder of the United Farm Workers Association, Dolores Huerta, August 16, 2025 in Austin, Texas.

.(Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

Sexual Assault Thrives in Silence

Dolores Huerta broke her silence 60 years after Cesar Chavez had assaulted her. In her statement, Dolores Huerta said, “I carried this secret for as long as I did because building the movement and securing farmworker rights was my life’s work”. She did not want to hurt the movement.

After 15 years of working with survivors and supporting domestic violence and sexual assault programs, I know this instinct well. Most survivors do not want to rock the boat or damage the reputation of leaders, bosses, or ex-partners. Speaking up can mean destabilizing families, workplaces, and entire communities. Survivors will deny their own pain to protect institutions and the people they care about, especially in oppressed and marginalized communities.

Keep Reading Show less
Constitutional Barriers to Nationalizing Elections
US Capitol
US Capitol

Constitutional Barriers to Nationalizing Elections

In the run-up to the midterms, President Trump continues to call for nationalizing congressional elections. He has sought to initiate the process through executive orders, such as one proposing to set “a ballot receipt deadline of Election Day for all methods of voting.” The words and spirit of the United States Constitution—the bedrock textualism and originalism of conservative constitutional interpretation—say he can’t nationalize elections.

Unlike some consequential constitutional questions, it’s not a close call.

Keep Reading Show less
Unpacking War Powers in the U.S.-Iran Conflict: Who Decides When America Goes to War?

Smoke billows after overnight airstrikes on oil depots on March 8, 2026 in Tehran, Iran.

(Photo by Majid Saeedi/Getty Images)

Unpacking War Powers in the U.S.-Iran Conflict: Who Decides When America Goes to War?

What Is The War Powers Resolution of 1973?

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 is a law enacted by Congress that limits the U.S. president’s ability to wage or escalate military operations overseas. Passed on November 7, 1973 amid the Vietnam War, the War Powers Resolution reasserts Congress’ constitutional power “to declare war” and “to raise and support Armies.” A key provision of the War Powers Resolution requires the president to submit a report to Congress within 48 hours of military deployment in the absence of an official declaration of war by Congress detailing:

  • The circumstances requiring U.S. forces;
  • The constitutional or legislative justification for the president’s actions;
  • The estimated duration of U.S. involvement in the hostilities.

If Congress does not formally declare war or enact special authorization for continuation of the U.S’ involvement in a conflict within 60 days of the report’s submission, the president must withdraw U.S. troops from the hostilities. If Congress does declare war, the president is instructed under the War Powers Resolution to report to Congress periodically on the status of the hostilities no less than once every 6 months.

Keep Reading Show less