Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

When Politicians Sound Like Preachers

Many politicians are speaking to our “moral moment.”

Opinion

Old Bible with background of American flag

Old Bible with background of American flag

Getty Images

Andy Beshear, Kentucky's democratic governor, has a new book out this week called Go and Do Likewise: How We Heal a Broken Country. The publisher describes it as an effort to “reclaim faith as a force for good” and counter people who use religion to harm and discriminate. Given Beshear’s prominence in Democratic politics and his having been named a presidential frontrunner, it is all but certain to be a New York Times bestseller.

Beshear isn’t alone. A growing number of politicians are writing and running for office in a faith-inflected register:


• Cory Booker, NJ Senator (Stand: An Urgent Call to Rekindle Our Shared American Ideals) • Raphael Warnock, Georgia Senator, ordained minister (The Crooked Places Made Straight)

• Josh Shapiro, Governor of Pennsylvania (Where We Keep the Light)

• Chris Murphy, CT Senator (Crisis of the Common Good)

• Spencer Cox, Governor of Utah (R) (Off Ramp)

• James Talarico, Democrat running for Senate in Texas, seminarian

• Adam Hamilton, running for Senate in Kansas, ordained minister and longtime author

Whatever their deeper motivations, one thing is clear—at least for Democrats: they are betting that faith-inflected political language and moral storytelling will be strategic assets heading into the midterms and the 2028 presidential election.

The words “faith,” “spiritual crisis,” “spirituality,” even “cults” saturate these books. This vocabulary lets politicians address the country’s emotional and civic anxieties without sounding partisan or technocratic. It also allows Democrats to reclaim moral language from the religious right and potentially broaden their coalition among Black and Latino voters—communities that are more religious than average Americans and essential to electoral success. In a moment when politicians are widely reviled, it lets them cast themselves as healers, even prophets.

Is This a Sign of a “Turning”?

I’ve often compared our time to the Gilded Age—another era of dizzying inequality, institutional fragility, and social fragmentation. That period, and the Progressive Era that followed, was drenched in moral and religious rhetoric.

Politicians like Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and William Jennings Bryan didn’t merely use faith language; they wrapped themselves in it. Roosevelt thundered, “We stand at

Armageddon, and we battle for the Lord.” Wilson spoke of America’s “spiritual purpose” and its calling to “show the world a new path of justice and peace.” Bryan, the most prophetic of them all, confronted financial elites with his famous warning: “You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns; you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.”

This surge of moral rhetoric wasn’t stylistic flourish. It was part of a broader effort to stabilize a society coming apart at the seams—what some historians describe as a Great Turning, a moment when a society undergoes sweeping shifts in its moral, political, and economic structure.

The same destabilizing forces are at work today:

• Breakneck technological change

• Staggering wealth inequality

• Untrustworthy institutions

• Historically high stress and loneliness

In such moments, politicians reach for the language of conscience, purpose, sacrifice, and redemption because citizens are searching for grounding—not just governance.

If Politicians Sound Like Preachers…

If politicians sound like preachers, it may be because citizens are listening like congregants— hungry for moral steadiness in a spiritually unsettled time. The Gilded Age shows that moral rhetoric resonates when people feel overwhelmed. Today, 76% of Americans report deep anxiety about the nation’s future.

Whether this moment marks a Great Turning or merely a shrewd political tactic will become clear in time. But if a turning is underway, its direction will depend less on politicians invoking moral language than on whether citizens step forward as moral agents.

That work begins not in Washington but in neighborhoods, congregations, and civic groups— where ordinary Americans choose to build trust, repair what is frayed, and take responsibility for one small piece of our common life.

Richard McKnight, PhD, is the author of When We The People Lead, The Leaders Will Follow.


Read More

Israel's Path to Peace and Security

A voter casts her ballot at a polling station on October 27, 2026 in Jerusalem, Israel.

Noam Galai/Getty Images

Israel's Path to Peace and Security

Most people do not think that such a thing—peace and security for Israel—is possible. Yet it is possible—but it requires the wisdom and courage to chart a new path.

The old path has been to think of the Arabs—including Palestinians, even including Palestinian Israeli citizens—as being the enemy. And peace and security could only be achieved through military superiority and dominance over an implacable enemy. Whether the government was Labor (liberal) or Likud (right-wing), that has been the underlying assumption of this country founded in the aftermath of the Holocaust and driven by its memory.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mahatma Gandhi addressing some of his thousands of followers on a lawn.

Mahatma Gandhi addressing some of his thousands of followers on the lawn of the home of Dr. Ansari where Gandhi stopped during his peace meetings with Viceroy Lord Irwin.

Bettmann/Getty Images

Everyone Wants Peace. That’s the Problem.

In 2007, the United Nations gathered to declare an International Day of Non-Violence. It fittingly chose Gandhi’s birthday, October 2nd, for the occasion: a day to affirm “the universal relevance of the principle of non-violence” and strive toward a common culture of tolerance and understanding.

The resolution passed by consensus, co-sponsored by 140 member nations. Each attested to what nearly everyone believes: that they—their culture, their country, their party, their movement—want peace.

Keep ReadingShow less
The U.S. Capitol in autumn.

New surveys of nearly 20,000 battleground voters find bipartisan majorities say Congress ignores the public, and that more public influence would help.

Philip Yabut/Getty Images

Americans Say the People Can Lead Congress to Common Ground; It Appears They Are Right

New surveys in battleground states and districts across the country, as well as nationwide, find that Americans—both Republicans and Democrats—believe Congress does what most Americans would do less than half the time.

They also found that majorities agree that if Congress were to be more influenced by the people, it would be more likely to find common ground. In fact, surveys show that majorities of Republicans and Democrats agree on what to do about many issues that Congress is stuck on.

Keep ReadingShow less
Man holding American flag

Is America still great? An immigrant entrepreneur argues that free speech, opportunity, and the rule of law, not military or economic power, are the real test.

Getty Images

This Is What Makes America Great

After World War II, America stood victorious over Germany and Japan. Instead of permanent retribution, it helped them rebuild and welcomed former enemies as partners and allies. For me, that moment signaled America’s greatness: power guided by humanity. America earned something that power alone could never command — the respect and admiration of people around the world.

Today, a question once almost unthinkable is being asked: Is America still great — and will it remain so?

Keep ReadingShow less