Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Democrats and Republicans Express Bipartisan Concern Regarding Loan Caps for Graduate Nursing Degrees

News

Democrats and Republicans Express Bipartisan Concern Regarding Loan Caps for Graduate Nursing Degrees
A person with a blood pressure device in their hand
Photo by Julia Taubitz on Unsplash

WASHINGTON — Of the five minutes Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla, had to question Department of Education Secretary Linda McMahon about the 2027 Department of Education budget, he spent four of them expressing his concerns about how a new rule creating a federal cap on student loans for nursing graduate students affected nursing shortages.

“Are you willing to work together to try to make sure that maybe we give a little bit less to the lawyers … and we make sure in these critical medical fields, where I believe [the loan cap] is going to do real damage, we can try to make sure we get the staff that we need?” Fine asked.


“Well, that rule is final,” McMahon said.

Fine wasn’t the first nor last to bring up the cap. During the hearing on May 14, representatives expressed bipartisan concerns about how the exclusion of graduate nursing degrees from a new federal “professional” classification impacted a growing nursing shortage in the U.S.

The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” introduced the rule that subjected all graduate degrees to a new classification: “professional” or not. Students pursuing a graduate degree marked “professional” could receive $50,000 in federal loans annually. Meanwhile, students pursuing degrees not designated as “professional” were capped at $20,500 in federal loans per year.

Over the course of a graduate degree, “professional” programs’ federal loans are capped at an aggregate total of $200,000, while other programs are capped at $100,000.

As of May 1, following the DOE’s student loan provision negotiations, graduate nursing programs were officially excluded from the “professional” designation.

The programs listed as “professional” included pharmacy, dentistry, veterinary medicine, chiropractic, law, medicine, optometry, osteopathic medicine, podiatry, and theology, as well as “all programs that are adjacent to the 10 programs listed.” None of these adjacent programs included graduate nursing degrees.

The Education Department said in a Nov 24, 2025, press release that “the definition of a ‘professional degree’ is an internal definition used by the Department to distinguish among programs that qualify for higher loan limits, not a value judgment about the importance of programs.”

However, during the hearing, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., said her home state had a projected shortage of 30,000 nurses over the next 4 years.

“Our nurses, obviously, are limited in their capacity,” Omar said. “They're overworked, and they're worried. So I know you said the decision is final, but I'm just trying to figure out, if you can answer, why did you move forward with an action that you know is going to be creating a problem or worsening a problem that already exists?”

McMahon said the caps were partly done to try to drive down the costs of graduate programs. She said that with the loan caps, colleges would reduce costs for graduate nurse programming.

“There are places to go and get these degrees that cost less,” McMahon said. “I really do believe, as market competition is available, you will see universities and colleges bring down these costs.”

McMahon said the enrollment rate drop was an incentive for colleges to lower their tuition.

But Rep. Lisa C. McClain, R-Mich., said it instead deters would-be nurses.

“I've been getting feedback quite heavily … to the contrary from both the hospitals and the schools, they see their enrollment rates going down for the graduate nursing programs, right? I'm not talking about the undergrads, but the graduate nursing programs. I don't know if there's something we can do to bridge the gap.” McClain said.

Omar asked how the caps would incentivize colleges to lower tuition rates, which McMahon said was already happening at the University of California, Irvine, and Purdue University in Indiana. When Omar asked what program colleges lowered tuition for, McMahon said they’d lowered business tuition.

“We're talking about nursing,” Omar said.

Rep. Donald Norcross, D-N.J., asked how the department chose the ten “professional” degrees, which McMahon said was “rule-making.”

“I get it's rule-making,” Norcross said. “What criteria did you use to make that list of ten?”

She offered no criteria but said the department spoke with lobbyists. She said the department “wanted to make sure that we weren't affecting a lot of professions that you know that were out there.”

The decision won’t affect undergraduate programs, but many states currently experience a shortage of graduate-level nurses, such as nurse anesthetists and advanced practice registered nurses.

According to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, “Approximately 29,200 new APRNs, which are prepared in master’s and doctoral programs, will be needed each year through 2032 to meet the rising demand for primary and specialty care.”

By 2038, the Health Resources and Services Administration projected the U.S. would have a shortage of 141,160 nurse anesthetists.

Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla, said he was concerned that nurse anesthetists’ degree programs qualify for the same level of government loans as registered nursing programs. Even though a certified registered nurse anesthetist needs a doctorate degree, which requires at least three years on top of a registered nurse degree.

“We've sort of taken all nurses, and we lumped them all together,” Fine said. “A registered nurse is super important as well. But, $100,000 for a registered nurse is probably not the same as $100,000 for the person who makes sure you don't die when you go under surgery.”

The American Nurses Association released a statement on Feb. 3, where it said it was “deeply concerned” about the decision.

In the statement, Jennifer Mensik Kennedy, president of the American Nurses Association, said the decision “sent an alarming message to nurses and the public.”

“The Department of Education’s reasoning distorts how nursing education, licensure, and practice work and, in doing so, sends an alarming message to nurses and to the public,” Kennedy said. “Excluding nursing from the professional degree category has the potential to put patient care at risk, especially in areas where nurses are the only healthcare providers in their communities. We urge the department to correct this proposal and explicitly include nursing as a professional degree before the rule is finalized.”

McMahon reiterated the ruling to withhold the “professional” label from graduate nursing degrees was final multiple times during the hearing, both to Republicans and Democrats, as they asked her to reconsider.

The rule will come into effect on July 1.

Omar said to McMahon that the decision made education less accessible.

“Your specific job is to try to make sure, as the head of the Department of Education, to make education accessible for Americans,” Omar said. “When you create policies that make education unreachable for Americans that want that education, you are failing at your job.”

Matthew Junkroski is a graduate student at Northwestern University.


Read More

Students in a classroom.​

Civics is a practice, not a quiz. See how immigrant and Indigenous communities are teaching schools to build, not blend in, as America turns 250.

Getty Images, andresr

Schools Can’t Teach Democracy Without Valuing Students’ Lived Experiences

Recently, I gathered with a group of dads outside Philadelphia to clear out a neighborhood park through Dads for All, the organization I co-founded. Some of us grew up in that neighborhood, some had never set foot in it, and plenty of us had no idea what we were doing. Our kids, ages three to seventeen, hauled branches and swung tools nearly as long as they were tall — and they were delighted.

Here's what I watched them figure out: A park is where a kid gets to be free. It's where you run, where you pretend to be a superhero, where the ground belongs to you. And you assume it just shows up. That morning, our children learned that it doesn't. Somebody has to see what it could be. Somebody has to partner with the people who own it and the people who use it. And then somebody has to pick up the loppers. That was the most honest civics lesson my son has ever had, and unfortunately, that is where the problem is.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Window to Safely Managing the Education Freedom Tax Credit is Closing Fast
Empty wooden tables and chairs in a library with shelves of books
Photo by Tuyen Vo on Unsplash

The Window to Safely Managing the Education Freedom Tax Credit is Closing Fast

There is a major change in how students, schools, and educational programs can be funded, taking effect on January 1, 2027, with a small window of time to ensure the program is well managed. We have to move fast.

The Education Freedom Tax Credit (EFTC) creates a new federal tax credit for taxpayers who make qualified contributions to approved nonprofit Scholarship Granting Organizations (SGOs). SGOs, in turn, use that money to award scholarships for tutoring, tuition, or other qualified education expenses for students, regardless of whether they attend public, private, or charter schools. The money is contributed directly to SGOs by taxpayers, who can receive a dollar-for-dollar tax credit on their 2027 tax filing, up to $1,700 for individuals and $3,400 for married taxpayers filing jointly.

Keep ReadingShow less
child reading a book
silhouette of child sitting behind tree during sunset
Photo by Aaron Burden on Unsplash

The Future Of Puerto Rico: Consider Needs of The Children

When I entered my second-grade classroom in 1982 at Chicago’s Moos Elementary School, in the heart of the Puerto Rican community of Humboldt Park, I was greeted with “Mirelsie, que nombre bello, de donde tu eres?”

“Mirelsie, what a beautiful name, where are you from?”

Keep ReadingShow less
library
a large library filled with lots of books

Beyond Campus Walls: Why the Attack on Minority Support Should Worry Every Donor

In President Donald Trump’s latest attempt to bring private universities to heel through policy change in the tax code, the administration is threatening to revoke tax-exempt status from schools that offer targeted support to minority students. This move should have everyone who cares about education, public works, and charitable giving ringing the alarm bell.

U.S. citizens have enjoyed tax incentives to support the good works, charitable causes, or public-serving organizations we care about for more than a century—since the implementation of the Revenue Act of 1913. Beginning in 1969, entities like private schools and colleges, museums, arts centers, and charitable foundations qualified as not-for-profit, donation-eligible organizations through section 501(c)(3) in the U.S. tax code. A not-for-profit designation grants the institution federal tax-free status, meaning it doesn’t pay federal taxes, and allows taxpayers to deduct donations from their federal tax return. Federal tax deductions incentivize individual and corporate donors to open their wallets for charitable giving.

Keep ReadingShow less