Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Democrats and Republicans Express Bipartisan Concern Regarding Loan Caps for Graduate Nursing Degrees

News

Democrats and Republicans Express Bipartisan Concern Regarding Loan Caps for Graduate Nursing Degrees
A person with a blood pressure device in their hand
Photo by Julia Taubitz on Unsplash

WASHINGTON — Of the five minutes Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla, had to question Department of Education Secretary Linda McMahon about the 2027 Department of Education budget, he spent four of them expressing his concerns about how a new rule creating a federal cap on student loans for nursing graduate students affected nursing shortages.

“Are you willing to work together to try to make sure that maybe we give a little bit less to the lawyers … and we make sure in these critical medical fields, where I believe [the loan cap] is going to do real damage, we can try to make sure we get the staff that we need?” Fine asked.


“Well, that rule is final,” McMahon said.

Fine wasn’t the first nor last to bring up the cap. During the hearing on May 14, representatives expressed bipartisan concerns about how the exclusion of graduate nursing degrees from a new federal “professional” classification impacted a growing nursing shortage in the U.S.

The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” introduced the rule that subjected all graduate degrees to a new classification: “professional” or not. Students pursuing a graduate degree marked “professional” could receive $50,000 in federal loans annually. Meanwhile, students pursuing degrees not designated as “professional” were capped at $20,500 in federal loans per year.

Over the course of a graduate degree, “professional” programs’ federal loans are capped at an aggregate total of $200,000, while other programs are capped at $100,000.

As of May 1, following the DOE’s student loan provision negotiations, graduate nursing programs were officially excluded from the “professional” designation.

The programs listed as “professional” included pharmacy, dentistry, veterinary medicine, chiropractic, law, medicine, optometry, osteopathic medicine, podiatry, and theology, as well as “all programs that are adjacent to the 10 programs listed.” None of these adjacent programs included graduate nursing degrees.

The Education Department said in a Nov 24, 2025, press release that “the definition of a ‘professional degree’ is an internal definition used by the Department to distinguish among programs that qualify for higher loan limits, not a value judgment about the importance of programs.”

However, during the hearing, Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., said her home state had a projected shortage of 30,000 nurses over the next 4 years.

“Our nurses, obviously, are limited in their capacity,” Omar said. “They're overworked, and they're worried. So I know you said the decision is final, but I'm just trying to figure out, if you can answer, why did you move forward with an action that you know is going to be creating a problem or worsening a problem that already exists?”

McMahon said the caps were partly done to try to drive down the costs of graduate programs. She said that with the loan caps, colleges would reduce costs for graduate nurse programming.

“There are places to go and get these degrees that cost less,” McMahon said. “I really do believe, as market competition is available, you will see universities and colleges bring down these costs.”

McMahon said the enrollment rate drop was an incentive for colleges to lower their tuition.

But Rep. Lisa C. McClain, R-Mich., said it instead deters would-be nurses.

“I've been getting feedback quite heavily … to the contrary from both the hospitals and the schools, they see their enrollment rates going down for the graduate nursing programs, right? I'm not talking about the undergrads, but the graduate nursing programs. I don't know if there's something we can do to bridge the gap.” McClain said.

Omar asked how the caps would incentivize colleges to lower tuition rates, which McMahon said was already happening at the University of California, Irvine, and Purdue University in Indiana. When Omar asked what program colleges lowered tuition for, McMahon said they’d lowered business tuition.

“We're talking about nursing,” Omar said.

Rep. Donald Norcross, D-N.J., asked how the department chose the ten “professional” degrees, which McMahon said was “rule-making.”

“I get it's rule-making,” Norcross said. “What criteria did you use to make that list of ten?”

She offered no criteria but said the department spoke with lobbyists. She said the department “wanted to make sure that we weren't affecting a lot of professions that you know that were out there.”

The decision won’t affect undergraduate programs, but many states currently experience a shortage of graduate-level nurses, such as nurse anesthetists and advanced practice registered nurses.

According to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, “Approximately 29,200 new APRNs, which are prepared in master’s and doctoral programs, will be needed each year through 2032 to meet the rising demand for primary and specialty care.”

By 2038, the Health Resources and Services Administration projected the U.S. would have a shortage of 141,160 nurse anesthetists.

Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla, said he was concerned that nurse anesthetists’ degree programs qualify for the same level of government loans as registered nursing programs. Even though a certified registered nurse anesthetist needs a doctorate degree, which requires at least three years on top of a registered nurse degree.

“We've sort of taken all nurses, and we lumped them all together,” Fine said. “A registered nurse is super important as well. But, $100,000 for a registered nurse is probably not the same as $100,000 for the person who makes sure you don't die when you go under surgery.”

The American Nurses Association released a statement on Feb. 3, where it said it was “deeply concerned” about the decision.

In the statement, Jennifer Mensik Kennedy, president of the American Nurses Association, said the decision “sent an alarming message to nurses and the public.”

“The Department of Education’s reasoning distorts how nursing education, licensure, and practice work and, in doing so, sends an alarming message to nurses and to the public,” Kennedy said. “Excluding nursing from the professional degree category has the potential to put patient care at risk, especially in areas where nurses are the only healthcare providers in their communities. We urge the department to correct this proposal and explicitly include nursing as a professional degree before the rule is finalized.”

McMahon reiterated the ruling to withhold the “professional” label from graduate nursing degrees was final multiple times during the hearing, both to Republicans and Democrats, as they asked her to reconsider.

The rule will come into effect on July 1.

Omar said to McMahon that the decision made education less accessible.

“Your specific job is to try to make sure, as the head of the Department of Education, to make education accessible for Americans,” Omar said. “When you create policies that make education unreachable for Americans that want that education, you are failing at your job.”

Matthew Junkroski is a graduate student at Northwestern University.


Read More

This Year Colleges Raced to Embrace Viewpoint Diversity. That’s a Mistake

students sitting in class

Photo by Dom Fou on Unsplash

This Year Colleges Raced to Embrace Viewpoint Diversity. That’s a Mistake

We have just completed another tough year for America’s most prestigious colleges and universities. Problems are legion; solutions are hard to find.

By their own telling, the richest places are confronting a gloomy economic future. They are cutting staff, freezing hiring, and limiting faculty salary increases. They are also beginning to face the ugly reality of runaway grade inflation and student disengagement from the academic work that is supposedly the lifeblood of their institutions.

Keep ReadingShow less
Academic Tracking in K-12 Schools: Improving Achievement or Widening Gaps?
red apple fruit on four pyle books

Academic Tracking in K-12 Schools: Improving Achievement or Widening Gaps?

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Tracking is widespread and begins early. Currently, 75 percent of eighth graders nationwide are affected by tracking and the process begins in first and second grade.
  • Successful detracking requires adequate support. Districts that detrack with enough support and resources for both teachers and students can narrow achievement gaps without lowering performance.Successful examples often come from communities with extensive resources.
  • Research on the impact of tracking on achievement is mixed. Some studies show tracking benefits advanced students at no cost to others, but other studies have shown the opposite; minimum educational gains with significant costs in equity.

What is Academic Tracking?

Academic tracking is the practice of assigning students to different classrooms based on earlier academic achievement or perceived ability. It affects approximately 75 percent of eighth graders nationwide and begins as early as first and second grade. Unlike temporary ability grouping, where a teacher might divide students into small groups for a single lesson on fractions, tracking sorts students into specific pathways such as remedial math, regular Algebra I, or honors Algebra I, with math being the most heavily tracked subject in American schools.

Keep ReadingShow less
Our Nation’s Teachers: Appreciated in Name, Dishonored in Practice
a hand writing on a chalkboard

Our Nation’s Teachers: Appreciated in Name, Dishonored in Practice

Earlier this month, the United States celebrated Teacher Appreciation Week, the one week during the year when a Starbucks discount is supposed to stand in for respect. This week is often filled with corporations praising teacher sacrifice, but the Department of Education had a different idea.

Across its social media, the DoE shared images of Ms. Fowl, Ms. Hoover, Mrs. Puff, Miss Nelson, and Ms. Frizzle, fictional teachers who are often well-meaning but marred by burnout, incompetence, eccentricity, and paranoia. If they truly wanted to honor teachers, they could have chosen Ms. Keane from the PowerPuff Girls, Mr. Ratburn from Arthur, or Miss Grotke from Recess — teachers depicted as competent, caring, and respected. But they didn’t. The selection offered plausible deniability. The characters are beloved enough to pass as celebration, but flawed enough to communicate contempt. The White House couldn’t have made its disregard for educators plainer if it tried.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of a person reading a book in a bookstore.

As literacy declines in America, what happens to democracy? This essay explores how falling reading levels, digital media, and the loss of “deep literacy” threaten self-government and the foundations of equality.

Getty Images, LAW Ho Ming

Promoting Civic Literacy for America’s 250th

We Americans have always felt anxious about our democracy. As Benjamin Franklin famously said, ours is only “a republic, if you can keep it,” and we’ve been plagued by a nagging feeling ever since that we can’t. The latest bout of handwringing is brought on by declining literacy and the threat it poses to liberal democracy, and—aware of our penchant for anxiety though we may be—it is hard not to feel concerned.

The fact is that we have large and growing numbers of kids who can’t read well. National Assessment of Education Progress scores reveal that the number of students scoring below NAEP basic has grown steadily since 2019. While the percentage of students considered proficient has held steady, decreased literacy is reported even in elite colleges and universities. Adult reading is way down as well.

Keep ReadingShow less