Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Spirit of 1776 – Rejected by Project 2025, Embraced by NPVIC

Opinion

Full frame shot of pins that say “vote” with red, white, and blue American flag theme.

An analysis of Project 2025, the Electoral College, and the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, examining democracy, representation, and presidential elections.

Adrienne Bresnahan / Getty Images

Project 2025 is a structural undoing of the "Spirit of 1776." It fundamentally undermines the foundational principles of the Declaration of Independence in the following areas: democratic representation, equality, liberty, and checks/balances. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) restores the founding ideals of civic equality.

Spirit of 1776 – Rejected by Project 2025, Embraced by NPVIC


Project 2025 is a manifesto that fundamentally rejects the "Spirit of 1776," it replaces the founding ideals of decentralized liberty, civic equality, and resistance to authoritarian rule with a blueprint for a highly centralized, imperial presidency. The 900-page “Mandate for Leadership” operates not as a preservation of 1776, but as its structural undoing.

The primary arguments positioning Project 2025 as a rejection of the original American revolutionary principles, follow:

Swapping Rebellion Against Monarchy for the "Imperial Presidency": The American Revolution was to overthrow the overreaching, centralized authority of a single ruler (King George III) and to establish a system of strict checks and balances. Project 2025 seeks to drastically expand executive power. It advocates for the Unitary Executive Theory, which places the entirety of the executive branch, including independent regulatory bodies—under direct presidential control.

Dismantling the Separation of Powers: The Framers deliberately fragmented government authority across three branches to prevent any single entity from usurping total control. The Project 2025 blueprint encourages the executive branch to bypass congressional intent. For example, it outlines strategies to unilaterally reallocate federal funds and deploy the military domestically via the Insurrection Act, effectively eroding legislative and judicial counterweights.

Replacing a Merit-Based Civil Service with a Loyalty-Based Bureaucracy: Early American governance sought to transition away from the European "spoils system," where governance depended on royal patronage and absolute fealty to the Crown. A central pillar of Project 2025 is the revival of "Schedule F," a classification mechanism allowing the president to strip civil service protections from tens of thousands of federal employees. Critics argue that converting apolitical experts into political appointees establishes a modern-day system of political patronage that demands absolute loyalty to the executive, running counter to Enlightenment-era principles of public accountability.

Narrowing the Scope of Liberty and Universal Rights: The Declaration of Independence asserted that all individuals possess unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Though flawed in execution, it established a trajectory toward expanding individual self-determination. Human rights advocacy groups emphasize that Project 2025 outlines a highly prescriptive, state-sanctioned vision for American society. By utilizing federal machinery to restrict reproductive freedoms, rollback LGBTQ+ protections, and legally enforce a specific traditionalist religious framework, critics argue the project replaces individual liberty with state-enforced moral conformity.

While proponents claim the Project 2025 as a necessary reclamation of national sovereignty, opponents see it as a structural counter-revolution that swaps the foundational principles of American democracy for centralized authoritarianism.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) and Project 2025 represent opposite approaches to American democracy, differing fundamentally in their views on voter enfranchisement, states' rights, and the balance of political power.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) aligns with the democratic ideals of the "spirit of 1776" by ensuring the president is chosen directly by all citizens. This restores foundational principles of the American Revolution—popular sovereignty and political equality—by guaranteeing every voter's ballot carries the exact same weight, regardless of where they live.

Reclaiming "Consent of the Governed" :The Declaration of Independence asserts that governments derive "their just powers from the consent of the governed". In modern presidential elections, the winner-take-all Electoral College system means millions of votes are effectively nullified if a candidate loses a specific state. By transitioning to a national popular vote, the NPVIC ensures every single citizen’s voice directly contributes to the national outcome, honoring the revolutionary promise that true authority comes from the people.

Ensuring "All Men Are Created Equal": The 1776 spirit is rooted in the ideal of fundamental equality. Currently, the Electoral College creates a system of unequal representation where a voter in a swing state holds disproportionate sway over the presidency, while voters in safe partisan states are ignored. The NPVIC restores this ideal by making one person's vote equal to any other person's vote nationwide.

Fulfilling the Promise of "No Taxation Without Representation": The core grievance of the Revolutionary era was being subjected to laws and taxes without having a voice in the legislature. Today, an American living in a deeply red or blue state is effectively disenfranchised when it comes to the nation's highest office. By pooling the voting power across states, the NPVIC ensures that every American participates in electing the commander-in-chief, eliminating modern-day electoral disenfranchisement.

The NPVIC: Leverages federalism to achieve a national goal. Using Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which gives state legislatures the authority to direct the appointment of their electors, states collaboratively enter into a binding compact to reflect the will of the entire American electorate.

NPVIC is an agreement among U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to the presidential ticket that wins the overall popular vote in all fifty states and the District of Columbia. It is considered a pragmatic, voluntary state-based initiative because it aims to ensure the winner of the national popular vote wins the presidency without requiring a constitutional amendment, operating instead within the existing Electoral College framework by utilizing states' constitutional authority to appoint electors. If enough states join the NPVIC to reach 270 electoral votes, the United States will effectively shift from a winner-take-all (WTA) regime to a national popular vote system for electing the President.

With Virginia’s adoption, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact has been adopted by eighteen states and the District of Columbia, which collectively hold 222 electoral votes. The compact requires 270 electoral votes (a majority of the 538 total) to take effect. It currently needs forty-eight more electoral votes to become active.

In 2026, NPVIC will be a relevant issue in several state elections, particularly in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. As the compact needs forty-eight more electoral votes to reach the 270-vote threshold, these purple or contested states are key battlegrounds where legislative control could determine whether they join the nineteen jurisdictions already signed on.”


Hugh J. Campbell, Jr., CPA, is a Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) professional and a student of W. Edwards Deming, the American statistician often credited as the catalyst for the Japanese economic miracle after WWII.


Read More

A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Clerk Matthew Sandbar, 34, demonstrates part of the ballot-sorting process to members of the media attending a walkthrough of the Philadelphia Ballot Processing Center used to process the ballots of the 2022 US midterm elections, in Philadelphia on October 27, 2022.

Photo by Ryan Collerd / AFP via Getty Images

A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Tallying the results of Washington, DC’s first ranked-choice election in June took about 10 days—longer than many voters are used to. In an age when artificial intelligence can generate an answer in seconds, waiting days for election results can feel old-fashioned, inefficient, even suspicious. And it is about to matter far more widely. This November, 17 states, cities, and counties will use ranked-choice voting, including Maine and Alaska statewide, in races that could help decide control of Congress. More voters than ever will watch results take days to resolve, and more will be asked to trust a count they cannot see.

But that slowness may be one of its most democratic features.

Keep ReadingShow less
People waiting in a line outside as the sun sets.

Voters wait in line outside the Metropolitan Multi-Service Center to cast their ballots in Houston, Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2025. A recent state investigation confirmed that some registered voters flagged as potential noncitizens by a federal system had already provided proof of citizenship.

Brett Coomer/Houston Chronicle via Getty Images

Texas Confirms Some Flagged As Potential Noncitizens on Voter Rolls Had Provided DPS Proof of Citizenship

Election officials across the state should immediately reinstate some voters who were incorrectly flagged as potential noncitizens through a federal program, the Texas Secretary of State’s Office told county officials Wednesday.

Christina Adkins, the state elections director, told county officials the state had reviewed Texas Department of Public Safety records confirming the citizenship of some of the 2,724 registered voters who were flagged as potential noncitizens, according to an audio recording of her comments obtained by Votebeat and The Texas Tribune, as well as election officials who heard them. The voters were flagged after the state checked its voter roll through a federal program called Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements, or SAVE, used to verify the citizenship of people registered to vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. President Donald Trump sitting in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during an announcement on American nuclear innovation in the Oval Office at the White House on July 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Eric Lee/Getty Images

Trump’s Elections Speech Was Not the Opening Shot; It was the Latest Salvo

President Donald Trump’s recent address repeating his claim that he won the 2020 election was widely portrayed as a dramatic escalation of his attacks on our election system. It wasn’t.

It is nothing new!

Keep ReadingShow less
  Creative Images Creative Images & Video Images Creative Editorial Video Creative Editorial  Search by image or video Close-up of woman holding a smartphone.

Can secure mobile voting expand election access? Explore how smartphone voting could increase turnout, improve accessibility, and modernize U.S. elections.

Sitthiphong/Getty Images

Mail-In Ballots Are Still Under Attack. Mobile Voting Can Protect Access To The Ballot Box.

Late last year, I became CEO of The Mobile Voting Project. Previously, I served as Chief of Staff to two United States senators, Chief of Staff at the US Department of Education, and Chief of Staff for Vice President Kamala Harris's presidential campaign. At every step in my public service career, I have always had one clear goal: making government work better for everyday people.

I believe that we cannot make government work better if we do not start at the very foundation of our government itself: democracy and voting. In my current role with The Mobile Voting Project, we are focused on making voting more seamless, secure, and accessible. We believe that putting democracy — literally — into the palms of every American’s hand is how we can boost turnout, reduce extremism, and strengthen our democracy.

Keep ReadingShow less