Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Mail-In Ballots Are Still Under Attack. Mobile Voting Can Protect Access To The Ballot Box.

Opinion

  Creative Images Creative Images & Video Images Creative Editorial Video Creative Editorial  Search by image or video Close-up of woman holding a smartphone.

Can secure mobile voting expand election access? Explore how smartphone voting could increase turnout, improve accessibility, and modernize U.S. elections.

Sitthiphong/Getty Images

Late last year, I became CEO of The Mobile Voting Project. Previously, I served as Chief of Staff to two United States senators, Chief of Staff at the US Department of Education, and Chief of Staff for Vice President Kamala Harris's presidential campaign. At every step in my public service career, I have always had one clear goal: making government work better for everyday people.

I believe that we cannot make government work better if we do not start at the very foundation of our government itself: democracy and voting. In my current role with The Mobile Voting Project, we are focused on making voting more seamless, secure, and accessible. We believe that putting democracy — literally — into the palms of every American’s hand is how we can boost turnout, reduce extremism, and strengthen our democracy.


Our efforts are even more critical as the main option for accessible voting right now — mail-in ballots — is under attack. President Trump has issued multiple executive orders aiming to restrict vote-by-mail. One of these orders seeks to turn the US Postal Service into a political arm that can decide who can and cannot use a mail-in ballot. It would require the USPS to create a federal list of approved voters and only permit states to send ballots to these voters. Considering this is such a radical overhaul to how we vote, it is no surprise that a federal judge recently blocked the order from taking effect. Yet Trump has appealed, demonstrating how dead set he is on making it harder to vote by mail.

At the moment, it seems as if the only guardrail protecting accessible voting is the judicial branch. But it remains fragile. In late June, the Supreme Court, in a narrow 5-4 decision, upheld state laws that allow for mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted after. While this is good news, if just one justice had ruled the other way, millions of mail-in ballots could have been invalidated and millions of Americans disenfranchised in upcoming elections.

Imagine you are serving in the military, defending our democracy abroad, a rural voter living far from an in-person poll site, or a home-bound voter with limited mobility. You have applied for a mail-in ballot. You fill it out before Election Day and find the time to physically send it back to your local Board of Elections. But through no fault of your own, delivery is delayed, and your ballot arrives late. The Supreme Court could have invalidated your ballot and disenfranchised you.

But what if there was a way for Americans to vote from wherever they are, no matter their circumstances, without relying on the postal service? The solution is secure smartphone voting.

Mobile voting isn't a radical idea from the future. Millions of Americans already conduct highly sensitive transactions, from banking to healthcare, on their phones every day. Mobile voting is an option in Canadian local elections and has been piloted for limited groups of voters in dozens of states in the US, like for voters in the military from West Virginia or Utah. In April 2026, some cities in Alaska used a version of mobile voting in their local elections too. And the results have been promising. Turnout skyrocketed in a water district election in Seattle. 100% of voters preferred mobile voting over other methods in Denver.

With recent advancements in technology, we are now at a point where we can safely expand mobile voting to many more voters and cities. The technology that exists is end-to-end verifiable and end-to-end encrypted. It verifies voter identity in the same ways it’s done at poll sites, whether through a signature match or ID verification. Every ballot cast on a smartphone would only be tabulated once taken offline at the Board of Elections, and a paper copy is printed out and mixed among traditional mail-in ballots.

While mobile voting is an important additional option and never a replacement for all the other ways we vote now, it can uniquely meet the realities and challenges of modern life in ways that other methods cannot. It's for the nurse who works a double shift on Election Day. Families displaced by wildfires or hurricanes who cannot access their mail or poll site. The person recovering from surgery who is in an extended hospital stay. Blind voters who cannot fill out a mail-in ballot but have accessibility tools built into their smartphones.

Right now, our organization is working in cities and states to provide mobile voting as a secure additional option in municipal elections. We believe that starting small, and in elections that have long suffered from much lower turnout than presidential contests, is where we can have the greatest impact and build public trust as we grow.

Mobile voting is an overdue evolution of how we vote and ensure access. If we want our government to work better and a democracy that is fully representative, we need to build voting systems that meet people where they are. Mobile voting is how we do that, and especially in light of the attacks on voting, we are working to make it a reality.


Sheila Nix is the CEO of The Mobile Voting Project, a nonpartisan nonprofit working to make secure mobile voting an option for all Americans. With nearly three decades of leadership in political, domestic policy, and innovative nonprofit operations, Sheila previously served as Chief of Staff to Vice President Kamala Harris, Chief of Staff at the U.S. Department of Education, and U.S. Executive Director of Bono’s ONE campaign.


Read More

multiethnic American voters participating in the US election, showcasing the concept of choice in a democracy

Presidents who lost the popular vote often faced economic turmoil. See the pattern from Harrison to Trump and how a 50-state strategy could change it.

Alan Mazzocco/Getty Images

Path Forward from Economic Consequences of Non-Popular Vote Presidents

While losing the popular vote does not inherently cause economic ruin, the structural political weakness of entering office without a democratic majority mandate often compounded the economic challenges their administrations faced. These terms were marked by distinct economic hardships, structural imbalances, or severe financial crises.

Destabilizing Partisan Protectionism

Keep ReadingShow less
people filling out their ballots at voting booths and submitting their vote.

Independent voters may hand Democrats control of Congress this fall — but as history shows, they'll get nothing in return. Here's how to change that.

Pressmaster/Getty Images

Swinging Outcomes Is Not Enough

The midterms are six weeks away, and polls predict that independent voters, who broke for Donald Trump in 2024, are planning on voting for Democrats by wide margins. Among Latinos, the numbers are staggering, to the point that the Republican gerrymanders in Florida and Texas may actually result in Democratic victories.

If the Democrats take control of Congress, it will be because of independents. And what do independents get in return?

Keep ReadingShow less
Diverse People At Voting Booth. Vote Here Elections Sign

A political scientist examines how automatic voter registration is quietly turning non-affiliation into America's largest voting bloc.

AndreyPopov/Getty Images

When Neither Party Is the Default: Rethinking Representation As America’s Electorate Changes

For most of my career as a political scientist, representation was the central theme of my teaching and research. Early on, I studied how legislators understood their responsibilities to constituents — whether they saw themselves as delegates carrying out constituent mandates, trustees exercising independent judgment, or politicos combining both. That work asked a question that still matters: What does it mean to represent the public in a changing democracy?

Today I find myself asking a related question: What happens when the electorate changes but the institutions built to represent it do not?

Keep ReadingShow less
A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

A person looks out at the North Tower pool at the 9/11 Memorial and Museum ahead of the 25th anniversary of the attack on the World Trade Center on September 7, 2026, in New York City.

Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

How 9/11’s Memory Continues to Shape American Citizenship

Twenty‑five years after September 11th, the burden of that day continues to affect us in ways that are difficult to express. It was a moment of profound loss, but also one that revealed both the vulnerability and resilience of our national fabric. The memories remain vivid for many of us: where we were, what we felt, and how the world appeared to change in an instant. Even now, a quarter century later, the impact of that morning continues to shape how we understand our country, our responsibilities, and our relationships with one another.

To help us all reflect on that day, I invited four contributors to the Fulcrum to share reflections not to revisit the tragedy, but to commemorate the ways it has persisted in our consciousness twenty-five years later.

Keep ReadingShow less