Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Independence Day 250: Why America Needs an Independent Caucus

Giving 60 million independents a real voice is the next step in renewing American democracy.

Opinion

Independence Day 250: Why America Needs an Independent Caucus
flag of USA with flag pole
Photo by Brandon Day on Unsplash

For Independence Day 2026, the 250th Anniversary of the birth of our nation, Americans should celebrate this momentous Anniversary by reflecting on a problem concerning the very concept of independence. We should think about how we could resolve the problem by drawing on the same values and strategies as the founding fathers.

Gallup reports that in 2025, 45% of American voters did not identify as either Democrats or Republicans. Instead, they identified as independents. The problem with the concept of independence that warrants reflection is how we can call ourselves a democracy when almost half of our citizens do not identify with the two political parties that have basically run the country since the late 19th century.


The next major stage of American democracy should concern the structure of our democracy, namely, the process of democratic deliberation, rather than the outcomes. In short, it should not be about a leftward, rightward, or centrist turn, or about some transformation that transcends the political spectrum as we know it. Nor should our reflections focus on whether we support President Trump.

Instead, the next major stage of American democracy should concern the process by which laws are made and how the president, any U.S. president, and Congress should work together.

I have argued in The Fulcrum the last three years close to a dozen times -- and had my columns reprinted via Tribune in 40-50 U.S. newspapers -- for a concept of democratic government I call "tripartisanship." In a tripartisanship system, there are three, not two, major political forces on Capitol Hill: the two major parties and an Independent Caucus in the Senate made up of 5-6 U.S. senators who are independents.

Dartmouth economist Charles Wheelan argued for this “fulcrum strategy” in The Centrist Manifesto, but he proposed a Centrist Political Party to animate it. I propose a different course of action.

The Independent Caucus plays a peacemaker role on the Hill, but it does more than act as a marriage counselor. The Independent Caucus is designed to insert its beliefs, interests, and values into the deliberative process itself.

Moreover, the senators, by design, would not all be centrists. Rather, they would represent a diverse range of independent perspectives. Yet, as an Independent Caucus, they would have to make sacrifices at times to help the Senate reach 60 votes on major policies.

Tripartisanship derives its energy in part from the concept of independence itself and in part from cooperation with other independents. No one in Washington gets everything they want, not the Democrats in Congress, not the Republicans in Congress, and not the President.

What is distinctive about the coming stage of American democracy -- in 2028, 2032 and beyond -- is that it will not focus on the content of public policies as the New Deal did or the Reagan Revolution did. Rather, it will focus on turning a widely agreed-upon dysfunctional Congress and Washington overall into a functional Congress and Washington overall.

The Tripartisan Turn, if it ever comes to be, will stand out not for the new laws that it promised to pass but for the new process of deliberation that it promised to establish. It will stand out for using the leverage of 5-6 U.S. Senators, who were either elected to office or who converted while in office. It will stand out for creating peace between the two major parties and bringing the substantive concerns of independents to the table.

The Tripartisan Turn can save American democracy by providing representation for 60 million-plus independents in our country and by reshaping, rather than dismantling, the two-party system. We should continue to have two major parties, but we also need an Independent Caucus that contains America in miniature.

The most respectful way to celebrate Independence Day 2026 is to honor the concept of independence by encouraging the country to bring us to the place where we can have an Independent Caucus. Integrating the beliefs and values of independents in our political system would do justice to Independence Day 2026.

Dave Anderson edited "Leveraging: A Political, Economic and Societal Framework," has taught at five universities and ran for the Democratic nomination for a Maryland congressional seat in 2016.


Read More

What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

Charles De Ketelaere #17 of Belgium scores his team’s first goal past Unai Simon #23 of Spain during the FIFA World Cup 2026 Quarter Final match between Spain and Belgium at Los Angeles Stadium on July 10, 2026, in Inglewood, California.

(Photo by David Ramos/Getty Images)

What the World Cup Teaches Us About Democracy

As live sporting events go, nothing comes close to the World Cup. I was in the stands when South Africa, my birth country, hosted the event in 2010 after decades of exclusion from global athletics. In June of this year, I had a full-circle moment when South Africa played in the knockout rounds for the first time, and I stood with my two American sons, arms around them, singing South Africa's anthem — the only national anthem that weaves multiple languages into a single, unifying song. Later in the week, I was in the stands again, cheering Spain's win over Austria, a country to which my only connections are a brief holiday…and the fact that my mother's family fled from there during the Inquisition.

The magic of the World Cup is that everyone in the stands wears the flags and shirts of countries that are “theirs” in some way. For some, it’s where they were born; for others, where they live or where their ancestors hailed from. For some, it is simply a country they have adopted for the afternoon. It is impossible to know how deep a person’s connection runs simply by looking at them. And next to a person waving one team’s colors is a stranger, family member, or close friend supporting the opposing team—or wearing the jersey of a team that isn’t playing that day at all.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose together.

Former President Joe Biden, former President Barack Obama, former President George W. Bush, and former President Bill Clinton pose ahead of the dedication ceremony for the opening of the Barack Obama Presidential Center, in John Lewis Plaza, on June 18, 2026, in Chicago, Illinois.

Pablo Martinez Monsivais - Pool / Getty Images

America Shouldn't Need a Political Savior to Hold It Together

America is waiting for a political savior, but the problem is structural.

This dynamic was illustrated during two recent broadcast appearances by journalist Katy Tur. Discussing modern secessionist movements on June 15, 2026, Tur found optimism in a poll showing 54 percent of Americans still believe we share core values, and she later expressed hope that future leaders could reunite the country.

Keep ReadingShow less
Constitution of the United State with the U.S. flag in the background.

The Framers designed a republic with the intention to manage factionalism through deliberate compromise and institutional guardrails, whereas 21st-century polarization often treats compromise as a moral failing.

Douglas Sacha, Getty Images

Our Framers on 21st Century Primaries and Polarization

The Framers would view 21st-century closed primaries and political polarization as the exact manifestation of "factionalism" they spent the 1787 Constitutional Convention trying to prevent. They would argue these systems force candidates to appeal to ideological extremes rather than the broad, moderate consensus required for stable governance.

The Danger of Factionalism: In Federalist No. 10, James Madison defined a "faction" as a group of citizens united by a passion or interest adverse to the rights of others. He argued that while factions are inevitable, their effects must be controlled. The Framers would recognize 21st-century hyper-polarization as the dominance of unyielding factions that prioritize absolute ideological purity over democratic compromise.

Keep ReadingShow less