Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

If It Quacks Like a Fascist

Eagles, executions, and an executive branch angling to be the villain.

Opinion

If It Quacks Like a Fascist

A Navy veteran argues the Trump administration keeps reaching for fascist symbols, from eagle imagery to a livestreamed execution.

Ira L. Black/Getty Images

The Trump administration is evoking neo-fascism on purpose. I want to say that plainly, because when a pattern is this consistent, it would be naive to call it a coincidence. They may deny the intent, but they keep reaching for fascist symbols. If it looks like a fascist and quacks like a fascist, it probably is one.

When a reporter at opening night of Les Misérables asked Trump whether he identified more with Jean Valjean, the protagonist who steals bread to feed the hungry, or Javert, the villain who treats mercy as weakness, Trump called it a tough one. It’s not a tough one, unless you want to be the bad guy. And he might. In their new book, Regime Change, New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan describe a moment when President Trump showed them a list that placed him alongside Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Attila the Hun, and Genghis Khan. By Swan’s account, the president relished the company. Trump is less worried about his approval ratings or the law than about expanding his personal power.


The symbolism is far from subtle. In June, Trump posted an AI-generated image of a giant gilded eagle spread across the Truman Balcony, and the official White House account shared it. People quickly saw its resemblance to the Reichsadler, the Nazi eagle. On October 3, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth addressed Air Force Academy cadets in front of an eagle emblem with rigid, straight-edged wings, breaking from the department’s own brand guide. I served as a Naval officer for ten years, and it’s hard to think of a group that takes symbols more seriously than the military. We salute flags, memorize insignia, and can identify a squadron by its patch. When the people running the Pentagon redesign the imagery, they know what they’re doing.

It’s not just imagery. This spring, a Colorado state intelligence center warned law enforcement nationwide that the Department of Homeland Security’s ICE recruitment posts carried so many white supremacist themes they could endanger the public. Cops were warning other cops about their own government’s memes while DHS called its tactics “bold and effective.” DHS was also urging people to “remigrate,” a word Europe’s far right uses to mean ethnic expulsion and one historians tie to Nazi-era deportation rhetoric. Meanwhile, neo-Nazi forums keep urging their members to join ICE. DHS is preaching to the choir, and recruiting from it.

That’s just the advertising. The product looks like people getting disappeared on their way to work, and a father shot in front of his child, and more than 500 American citizens detained by immigration agents, some held for at least a day without being able to call a lawyer or their family. Deaths in detention have hit a record, in facilities some human rights scholars are calling modern concentration camps. As a reminder, 100% of detainees are human beings.

There is no remorse from this administration. If anything, they’ve doubled down. In late September, the White House spent more than $1.7 million in taxpayer money on TV ads in which the president vows to drive out the globalists and cast out the communists and Marxists. Even Republican Senator Thom Tillis likened it to Viktor Orbán’s Hungary. Historian Timothy Snyder, who literally wrote the book on tyranny, called it fascist.

Last week, Hegseth announced that Nidal Hasan, the man responsible for the murder of 13 people at Fort Hood in 2009, will be executed by a firing squad of soldiers, and that it will be public. The Pentagon confirmed it will be livestreamed. A military court convicted Hasan and sentenced him to death, but why must there be an audience? Last year, only two countries are known to have carried out public executions: Iran and Afghanistan. Is that the company we want to keep?

England and Wales abolished public executions in 1868, partly out of alarm at what watching hangings did to the crowd. As historian Rosalind Crone told The Guardian, public executions didn’t deter crime, and sometimes had the opposite effect. Psychiatrists have warned that the livestream could cause PTSD in viewers, not to mention what it may do to the soldiers chosen to pull the triggers. As a veteran who was trained to fire torpedoes and Hellfire missiles, I still find it sickening to glorify violence of any kind. But this administration has posted hype reels splicing a montage of actual strikes on Iran with Call of Duty clips. If they can post war slop with such gleeful abandon, turning an execution into “content” is on brand.

Ultimately, we know this administration is not actually trying to deter violence. At Trump’s recent rally for Ken Paxton, a man in a MAGA hat grabbed a protester by the hair and tried to pull him to the ground. The president reacted by saying, “Is there anything like a Trump rally?” Then he joked that the man was going home to his mother, who, Trump added, had voted for him. An American was exercising his right to protest, he was assaulted, and his president mocked him. For this administration, the cruelty has always been a spectacle. Now they just want a bigger audience.

Neo-fascism is upon us. This administration has shown off an eagle that looks like Hitler’s, ridiculed a beaten protester, courted neo-Nazis, and packed warehouses full of humans who are dying in record numbers. Now they want to livestream an execution by firing squad. They want to embolden the Nazis among us, and to provoke everyone else. Elon Musk, who, according to the mother of one of his children, told her he wanted “a legion of children before the civil war,” was just tapped by Hegseth to co-lead the Pentagon’s study on the future of warfare. It would not be an overreaction to be upset, but don’t take the bait.

Some insist we’re nowhere near fascism because they’re naive or haven’t been paying attention. Others are hoping that’s exactly where we end up. Learn to tell the difference. The first group can still wake up, and we can help. Show them how far down the authoritarian playbook we already are, and welcome them into the resistance. To anyone who says I’m fearmongering, consider this: if we sound the alarm and then never lose our democracy, we might feel a little embarrassed for being dramatic. But when the cost of not sounding the alarm could be losing our country to neo-fascism, dismissing the threat is negligent, at best.

So join me. Call your representatives and ask them, on the record, whether DHS should be recruiting with white supremacist messaging and whether the Pentagon should be livestreaming executions. Talk about it with your family and friends, too. And be prepared to show up for your neighbors. All of them.

Valjean wins in the end, by the way. Not because he’s stronger, but because he refuses to stop being decent.


Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.


Read More

A microphone in the foreground and a crowd, blurry in the background.

INC ‘26 gathered independent leaders in D.C. to unveil a seven-candidate slate, a Fulcrum Caucus strategy and new tools for corruption-free governance.

Getty Images, uschools

Independent Movement Unites at INC ’26 to Build National Power

From September 23–25, leaders from across the American independent political movement gathered at the JW Marriott in Washington, D.C., for the fourth Independent National Convention (INC ’26). Produced by United Independents, the event brought together hundreds of participants representing political reform organizations, independent campaigns, alternative parties, civic initiatives and grassroots organizing efforts.

The gathering reflected the breadth of activity outside the traditional two-party system while addressing a persistent challenge: translating America's large independent constituency into greater political representation, institutional capacity, and coordinated action.

Keep Reading Show less
​U.S. Deaf athletes celebrated at the Opening Ceremony of the 25th Summer Deaflympics

U.S. Deaf athletes celebrated at the Opening Ceremony of the 25th Summer Deaflympics on November 15, 2025, in Tokyo, Japan.

(Hugh Carey, USA Deaf Sports Federation)

The USOPC Ought to Reassess the Ted Stevens Act

Last month was National Deaf Awareness Month.

It is a time to raise awareness of Deaf culture and language and to advocate for the rights and inclusion of Deaf and Hard of Hearing individuals.

Keep Reading Show less
John Kennedy display a sign

John Kennedy display a sign accusing former Special Counsel Jack Smith of meeting with Fulton County, Georgia, District Attorney Fani Willis during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Sept. 29, 2026, in Washington, D.C. The committee is holding the hearing to examine Smith’ s probe into Donald Trump.

(Getty Images)

Schmitt’s smoking gun backfires on him

Tuesday was supposed to be a big day for Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt, a little-known first-term junior Senator whose main claim to fame thus far was the 25 lawsuits he filed against President Joe Biden’s administration in a span of 20 months while Missouri’s attorney general.

But congressional hearings have long been a place not to do actual legislating but to make a name for oneself, and Schmitt was going to take his opportunity on Tuesday, when he got to question former Special Counsel Jack Smith in the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Keep Reading Show less
 U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks from the Cross Hall of the White House on April 1, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Pool/Getty Images

How Presidential Primetime Addresses Shape Public Trust in Democratic Institutions

A question still being studied is the effects on public trust when the head of the Executive casts doubt on the institutions that run elections, enforce laws, and decide legal disputes. The President of the United States is arguably the most powerful man in the world. He is the commander in chief of a nation #1 in nominal gross domestic product as well as #1 in military power, budget, and spending as of 2026. The actions he takes spew ripple effects across the world and follow many generations. A way you can measure the executive's power can also be measured in how much influence his speeches have on the markets, opinions of the masses, news outlets, lawmakers, social media reactions, etc. His framing of an issue can shape the next day’s political conversation.

These conversations become extremely dangerous/consequential when discussing a principle as embedded in our country as Democracy. In his July primetime speech, Trump continued to pedal the claims about election security and argued for stricter voting rules. He continued to portray the country as facing a moment of corruption and uncertainty, followed by presenting himself as the one prepared to restore order. The address continued with repeated claims about his loss in the 2020 election that have not been supported by the evidence compiled over years of investigation by many parties. Professional reviews, audits, and courts have yet to find significant evidence of foul play substantial enough to influence the outcome of that election.

Keep Reading Show less