Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

If It Quacks Like a Fascist

Eagles, executions, and an executive branch angling to be the villain.

Opinion

If It Quacks Like a Fascist

A Navy veteran argues the Trump administration keeps reaching for fascist symbols, from eagle imagery to a livestreamed execution.

Ira L. Black/Getty Images

The Trump administration is evoking neo-fascism on purpose. I want to say that plainly, because when a pattern is this consistent, it would be naive to call it a coincidence. They may deny the intent, but they keep reaching for fascist symbols. If it looks like a fascist and quacks like a fascist, it probably is one.

When a reporter at opening night of Les Misérables asked Trump whether he identified more with Jean Valjean, the protagonist who steals bread to feed the hungry, or Javert, the villain who treats mercy as weakness, Trump called it a tough one. It’s not a tough one, unless you want to be the bad guy. And he might. In their new book, Regime Change, New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan describe a moment when President Trump showed them a list that placed him alongside Mao, Stalin, Hitler, Attila the Hun, and Genghis Khan. By Swan’s account, the president relished the company. Trump is less worried about his approval ratings or the law than about expanding his personal power.


The symbolism is far from subtle. In June, Trump posted an AI-generated image of a giant gilded eagle spread across the Truman Balcony, and the official White House account shared it. People quickly saw its resemblance to the Reichsadler, the Nazi eagle. On October 3, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth addressed Air Force Academy cadets in front of an eagle emblem with rigid, straight-edged wings, breaking from the department’s own brand guide. I served as a Naval officer for ten years, and it’s hard to think of a group that takes symbols more seriously than the military. We salute flags, memorize insignia, and can identify a squadron by its patch. When the people running the Pentagon redesign the imagery, they know what they’re doing.

It’s not just imagery. This spring, a Colorado state intelligence center warned law enforcement nationwide that the Department of Homeland Security’s ICE recruitment posts carried so many white supremacist themes they could endanger the public. Cops were warning other cops about their own government’s memes while DHS called its tactics “bold and effective.” DHS was also urging people to “remigrate,” a word Europe’s far right uses to mean ethnic expulsion and one historians tie to Nazi-era deportation rhetoric. Meanwhile, neo-Nazi forums keep urging their members to join ICE. DHS is preaching to the choir, and recruiting from it.

That’s just the advertising. The product looks like people getting disappeared on their way to work, and a father shot in front of his child, and more than 500 American citizens detained by immigration agents, some held for at least a day without being able to call a lawyer or their family. Deaths in detention have hit a record, in facilities some human rights scholars are calling modern concentration camps. As a reminder, 100% of detainees are human beings.

There is no remorse from this administration. If anything, they’ve doubled down. In late September, the White House spent more than $1.7 million in taxpayer money on TV ads in which the president vows to drive out the globalists and cast out the communists and Marxists. Even Republican Senator Thom Tillis likened it to Viktor Orbán’s Hungary. Historian Timothy Snyder, who literally wrote the book on tyranny, called it fascist.

Last week, Hegseth announced that Nidal Hasan, the man responsible for the murder of 13 people at Fort Hood in 2009, will be executed by a firing squad of soldiers, and that it will be public. The Pentagon confirmed it will be livestreamed. A military court convicted Hasan and sentenced him to death, but why must there be an audience? Last year, only two countries are known to have carried out public executions: Iran and Afghanistan. Is that the company we want to keep?

England and Wales abolished public executions in 1868, partly out of alarm at what watching hangings did to the crowd. As historian Rosalind Crone told The Guardian, public executions didn’t deter crime, and sometimes had the opposite effect. Psychiatrists have warned that the livestream could cause PTSD in viewers, not to mention what it may do to the soldiers chosen to pull the triggers. As a veteran who was trained to fire torpedoes and Hellfire missiles, I still find it sickening to glorify violence of any kind. But this administration has posted hype reels splicing a montage of actual strikes on Iran with Call of Duty clips. If they can post war slop with such gleeful abandon, turning an execution into “content” is on brand.

Ultimately, we know this administration is not actually trying to deter violence. At Trump’s recent rally for Ken Paxton, a man in a MAGA hat grabbed a protester by the hair and tried to pull him to the ground. The president reacted by saying, “Is there anything like a Trump rally?” Then he joked that the man was going home to his mother, who, Trump added, had voted for him. An American was exercising his right to protest, he was assaulted, and his president mocked him. For this administration, the cruelty has always been a spectacle. Now they just want a bigger audience.

Neo-fascism is upon us. This administration has shown off an eagle that looks like Hitler’s, ridiculed a beaten protester, courted neo-Nazis, and packed warehouses full of humans who are dying in record numbers. Now they want to livestream an execution by firing squad. They want to embolden the Nazis among us, and to provoke everyone else. Elon Musk, who, according to the mother of one of his children, told her he wanted “a legion of children before the civil war,” was just tapped by Hegseth to co-lead the Pentagon’s study on the future of warfare. It would not be an overreaction to be upset, but don’t take the bait.

Some insist we’re nowhere near fascism because they’re naive or haven’t been paying attention. Others are hoping that’s exactly where we end up. Learn to tell the difference. The first group can still wake up, and we can help. Show them how far down the authoritarian playbook we already are, and welcome them into the resistance. To anyone who says I’m fearmongering, consider this: if we sound the alarm and then never lose our democracy, we might feel a little embarrassed for being dramatic. But when the cost of not sounding the alarm could be losing our country to neo-fascism, dismissing the threat is negligent, at best.

So join me. Call your representatives and ask them, on the record, whether DHS should be recruiting with white supremacist messaging and whether the Pentagon should be livestreaming executions. Talk about it with your family and friends, too. And be prepared to show up for your neighbors. All of them.

Valjean wins in the end, by the way. Not because he’s stronger, but because he refuses to stop being decent.


Julie Roland was a Naval Officer for ten years, deploying to both the South China Sea and the Persian Gulf as a helicopter pilot before separating in June 2025 as a Lieutenant Commander. She has a law degree from the University of San Diego, a Master of Laws from Columbia University, and is a member of the Truman National Security Project.


Read More

Donald Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump on February 6, 2026.

(Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

A Demagogue in the White House: Will the Guardrails Hold?

A demagogue does not seize all power at once. He takes it piece by piece.

In Trump’s second administration, those pieces accumulated in plain sight. The president generated so much disruption and noise that Americans struggled to keep pace. Each new controversy displaced the last, obscuring a more consequential story: the steady accumulation of presidential power.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner at the White House.

Chinese President Xi Jinping (L) and U.S. President Donald Trump followed by Chinese first lady Peng Liyuan and U.S. first lady Melania Trump arrive for a state dinner in the East Room of the White House on September 24, 2026 in Washington, DC.

Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

When Leaders Disagree, Ceremony Plays an Important Role

When Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived at the White House on 24 September, the U.S. welcomed him with an elaborate display of ceremony. The Army Herald Trumpets sounded a fanfare, the Chinese and American national anthems were played, and the Old Guard Fife and Drum Corps performed. A military review was followed by a flyover involving a B-2 bomber and four F-22 fighter jets, according to the White House. It was an extraordinary production for two countries that still disagree on some of the most important issues in international politics.

Talks between President Donald Trump and Xi touched on trade, artificial intelligence and Taiwan. The visit was marked by warm words and some signs of cooperation, but it did not erase the fundamental competition between the United States and China. So why was all this ceremony staged? It is tempting to dismiss political pomp as mere window dressing: an expensive historical relic surrounding the serious business taking place behind closed doors. As a music historian, however, I think this misunderstands what ceremony does. Ceremony can become particularly valuable when words alone are not enough.

Keep ReadingShow less
A ​fire burns and destroys the city hall  in Limoges, central France.

A fire burns and destroys the city hall after a group of individuals forced entry into the building during ongoing protest action against the "high cost of living," in Limoges, central France on Oct. 17, 2026.

Pascal Lachenaud/AFP/Getty Images/Tribune

What Americans can learn from the French protests

On Monday, France’s Interior Minister Laurent Nuñez admitted that police have “lost control” as some cities continue to see massive waves of looting and mayhem. Social media brims with images of stores being ransacked, cars burning, and mask-wearing goons running wild. In Limoges, the beautiful Hôtel de Ville was burnt to the ground.

But the chaos, as is so often the case, began peacefully. And many supporters and leaders of the protests have condemned the violence. I think that violence has more to do with France’s miserable record of assimilating immigrants from North Africa and the Middle East than with budget cuts. Call me cynical, but I don’t believe the goons pillaging Louis Vuitton stores are planning to resell the handbags to buy better school supplies or to bolster their teachers’ salaries.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hands raised in the air, holding each other.​

America’s polarization has closed us off to each other’s humanity. The Golden Rule and the churches may be the way back to common ground.

Getty Images, PeopleImages

Land of the Free, Home of the Brave? How Trump Is Destroying America's Soul

The recent actions by both some Jewish leaders and pro-Palestinian activists against NY mayor Zohran Mamdani are an example of just how far our nation has come from our ideals under the presidency of Donald Trump.

Even with Mamdani's consistent pro-Palestinian statements, he was called a "coward" and a "sellout" because he stood with the Jewish community in remembering the October 7 Hamas attack. Jewish leaders condemned him for his criticism of Israel and Palestinian sympathies expressed in the same breath as remembrance of the attack. But Mamdani understands the connection between the treatment by Israel of Palestinians and Palestinian treatment of Israel.

Keep ReadingShow less