Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

America’s Data Crisis: Restoring Trust in the Facts That Unite Us

How strengthening federal data can rebuild shared reality and restore trust across the political spectrum

News

America’s Data Crisis: Restoring Trust in the Facts That Unite Us
a close up of a window with a building in the background

At a moment when Americans can’t even agree on the basic facts that mold our public life, the nation faces a deeper crisis than polarization alone. We are living through a collapse of shared reality. When people lose confidence in the numbers, surveys, and official information that once anchored civic debate, democracy itself begins to drift. Trustworthy government data isn’t a technical issue — it is core infrastructure that holds a self‑governing society together. And right now, that infrastructure is under strain.

The public has lost trust in government information on many levels and across the political spectrum. To restore that trust, we need to address the challenges facing government data — including low survey response rates, data protection concerns, and outdated or flawed statistical methods.


The Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration are meeting this challenge through their Fellows for Democracy and Public Service partnership, a cross‑sector fellowship intended to elevate distributed leadership and advance actionable reform and renewal.

Join the webinar on June 30th to hear the fellows discuss issues in federal data, possible government solutions, and the role of supplementary data from nongovernment research, citizen‑generated projects, and “nontraditional” sources.

The Panelists

Joel Gurin (moderator)

President and Founder of the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and author of Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he conceptualized and led the development team for the GovLab’s Open Data 500 project, the first comprehensive study of how the private sector uses open government data.

Chris Jackson

Senior Vice President and Civil Society Research Lead at SSRS. His work integrates politics, governance, media, information, commerce, and the economy to illuminate the full picture of American public life. Chris is an expert on electoral and public polling with deep experience in the American political system.

Beth Jarosz

Senior Fellow at the Massive Data Institute at Georgetown University and Vice President of the Association of Public Data Users. With more than 25 years of experience across government, academia, nonprofits, and research organizations, she specializes in helping decision‑makers examine complex data responsibly and effectively.

Francesca Perucci

Director of Policy and Partnerships at Open Data Watch. A global expert in development data and statistical capacity, she previously served for decades at the United Nations, most recently as Assistant Director of the UN Statistics Division. She is a leading voice in using data to inform policy, monitor progress, and strengthen institutions.

Stefaan Verhulst

Co‑Founder of The GovLab (New York) and The Data Tank (Brussels), Research Professor at NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering, Editor‑in‑Chief of Data & Policy (Cambridge University Press), and Co‑Chair of the Data for Policy Conference. Dr. Verhulst is a global expert on using data and technology for social impact.

Renewing trust in government information is not optional — it is foundational. A democracy cannot function when citizens doubt the integrity of the data that guide public decisions, shape policy, and inform civic debate. Restoring that trust requires transparency, modernized methods, along with a commitment to meeting people where they are — but it also requires leadership.

The Fellows for Democracy and Public Service are helping chart that route forward. By strengthening the nation’s data ecosystem and elevating trustworthy information, they are working to rebuild the shared civic reality on which a healthy democracy depends.

Register Here

David Nevins is the publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.


Read More

person reading a computer screen
man using computer inside room

Student-Led AI Initiative Aims to Tackle Misinformation

PRINCETON JUNCTION, NJ — As generative artificial intelligence reshapes the digital landscape, a New Jersey student researcher is using the technology to combat media bias. Shaurya Jindal, an AI researcher and student at West Windsor-Plainsboro High School South, has launched Cogito News, an educational platform designed to build modern media literacy skills.

Cogito News was founded in response to growing concerns about partisan framing and selective sourcing in contemporary journalism. Recognizing that cognitive biases often influence how news is packaged and consumed, Jindal sought to build a tool that helps users critically evaluate the information they encounter daily. The platform's real-world impact and timely relevance were highlighted when Jindal was my guest on The Fulcrum Democracy Forum, an interview series dedicated to civic renewal and examining innovative approaches to strengthening democratic systems.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Young adult woman accessing artificial intelligence

Young adult woman accessing artificial intelligence, managing digital information, and exploring future technology within an office setting

Getty Images

When One Person Can Do the Work of a Team

The harder question is how many capable people organizations will need. My latest lesson about artificial intelligence did not come from a research report or technology conference. It came from running the Security and Sustainability Forum.

Until recently, I depended heavily on an assistant to manage much of the website and webinar production process. Now I can do many of those tasks myself with Claude and ChatGPT. They help me develop content, revise web pages, solve technical problems, and manage projects that once required considerably more human support.

Keep ReadingShow less
photograph shows a handheld smartphone displaying the icons of some of the main artificial intelligence based apps

This photograph shows a handheld smartphone displaying the icons of some of the main artificial intelligence based apps, including LLMs, chatbots and generative AI, with logos (from L) of Proton AG's Lumo, Meta AI, Mistral Vibe (formerly Le Chat), xAI's Grok, Microsoft's Copilot, Google's Gemini, Anthropic's Claude, Perplexity, Deepseek, OpenAI's Chat GPT, Google's Notebook LLM and generative AI music app Suno, in Saint-Mande, east of Paris, on July 15, 2026.

Photo by Martin LELIEVRE / AFP via Getty Images)

The Second AI Election: Testing the Safeguards Before November

The 2024 U.S. presidential election was supposed to be the “first AI election.” Experts warned that generative AI could flood voters with deepfakes and fabricated evidence of fraud, U.S. intelligence officials declassified intel reports on foreign influence operations already experimenting with the technology, and leading AI companies pledged to combat deceptive election content. But foreign nations faced significant barriers to deploying AI to influence that election, according to the now-shuttered U.S. Foreign Malign Influence Center.

Two years later, the picture looks very different. AI tools have become far more sophisticated and widely available. Russia, China, and Iran are deploying a wide variety of cutting-edge AI tools in more sophisticated ways in foreign influence operations aimed at the United States and its citizens, among others. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has itself used AI in misleading ways, while at the same time dismantling or defunding the federal and independent bodies that identified and countered election-related influence campaigns. With the potential for AI-driven misinformation campaigns to escalate sharply in this year’s midterms, we tested some of the most popular AI models to learn how they can be exploited to peddle false election narratives. The results are clear: AI companies, lawmakers, and civil society must do more to blunt the threat ahead of elections this November and in 2028 to help ensure free and fair elections. We outline the steps they can take to do so below.

Keep ReadingShow less
Robot Holding a Resume Doing HR Work Vector Illustration

AI résumé screening can filter out qualified candidates before a human ever looks. Here's why transparency and human oversight in hiring matter.

nicoletaionescu/Getty Images

When AI Screens the Resume, Who Gets a Fair Shot at Work?

A job seeker can spend hours tailoring a résumé, checking qualifications and writing a thoughtful application, believing the next step will be a person deciding whether to schedule an interview.

Increasingly, that assumption may be wrong.

Keep ReadingShow less