Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

A Transcontinental Railroad Means a Stronger U.S. Economy

A Transcontinental Railroad Means a Stronger U.S. Economy
black and brown chess piece on white tray

Upheaval in international trade over the last few years and the resulting squeeze on Americans’ pocketbooks have highlighted the benefits that Americans receive from having partners and supply chains that are proven and reliable—and the costs that come when that dependability is threatened.

American infrastructure and transportation are critical factors in the equation. The proposed combination of Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS) railroads is being positioned as part of the answer to American economic resiliency for years to come. Especially significant as North American trade continues to advance American prosperity.


While not always on the front pages, rail freight is in fact a pillar for the U.S. economy. Each year, railroads move about 1.5 billion tons of agricultural products, construction materials, vehicles, energy, and other goods. The U.S. is one of the few developed nations without a coast-to-coast railroad, leaving freight to change hands at congested gateways that add costs and delays.

A report from the Association of American Railroads (AAR) notes that “rail is a major driver of economic activity, generating $233.4 billion in total economic output in 2023.”

Another mainstay of the American economy, perhaps surprisingly, continues to be trade with Mexico. In 2024, over 80 percent of Mexico's total exports were to the United States, and over 40 percent of its total imports were from the United States. Motor vehicle parts, cell phones, industrial equipment, and a multitude of other goods amounted to a record $872.83 billion in trade last year.

As one might expect with a neighbor of that size, rail is a pivotal factor in capturing the full economic benefit of growth in U.S.-Mexico trade and allows American businesses to capture an even greater share of future growth.

In 2023, Union Pacific launched a new eastbound intermodal service connecting Mexican industrial markets with key U.S. Southeast markets such as Florida and North Carolina. The proposed merger with Norfolk Southern will expand these connections along the East Coast, establishing new single-line connections for U.S. distribution hubs across the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic, connecting 43 states and more than 100 ports.

Opening new American markets to cross-border commerce would give U.S. businesses more direct access to one of the world’s most dynamic trade corridors. American industries would gain improved access to existing trade flows, including inland agricultural producers, Midwest manufacturers, and Southeastern distribution centers.

The operations of a faster, more reliable freight network capitalize on American advantages in infrastructure and logistics. Fewer handoffs and fewer interchange delays mean more reliability and faster delivery times for businesses and consumers. The efficiency is especially significant for small businesses, as it makes their growth more viable.

The improved efficiency is also projected to take an estimated 2.1 million trucks off the road annually and save shippers an estimated $3.5 billion each year — savings that flow through to consumers.

The U.S. Department of Transportation previously forecasted that U.S. freight movement would rise by 30% by 2040. Those projections occurred well before a merger was even discussed, meaning that the benefits will be enhanced by growing investment and demand now predicated on the merger itself.

Macroeconomic gains are built from countless local ones. For communities located along key rail hubs, increased job creation and activity would certainly be a welcome boost. Workers in rural areas and other underserved communities already make up a vital share of the industrial and transportation workforce. These workers bear the brunt of supply chain disruptions, but they also stand to benefit most when systems become faster, cheaper, and more reliable.

Americans now navigating economic uncertainty and pressure on their family budgets from trade disruptions, tariffs, and the effects of war on energy prices could use a healthy dose of stability. The infrastructure and systemic improvements from the realization of a long-sought-after transcontinental railroad stand as a bright spot. And with U.S.-Mexico trade more valuable to American economic interests than ever before, now is the time to push toward measures that promote cooperation and mutual prosperity.

Mario H. Lopez is the President of the Hispanic Leadership Fund, a public policy advocacy organization that promotes liberty, opportunity, and prosperity for all.


Read More

U.S. Capitol.

A rundown of the House bills most likely to become law this week — from seafood fraud enforcement to a sanctions bill critics call a tariff bill.

Photo by Andy Feliciotti on Unsplash

Both Chambers in Session this Week

Last Minute Rush

We’re not going to describe every bill the House aims to take action on this week because there’s lots. Instead, we’re going to focus on the ones that will become law if passed by the House and pull a few notable bills at the beginning of the legislative process. We’ll use the same level of discretion at the end of this week when we review what actually happened between today, Monday Sept. 14 and Friday, Sept. 18.

Probable New Laws

In addition to the bills listed below are also a couple of park renamings. All of these will, if passed, then go to the President for signing and once that’s done, become law.

Keep ReadingShow less

Alaska Is Voting on More Than Ranked Choice Voting. It’s Voting on Who Gets to Vote

Alaska voters will once again vote on a measure to repeal its nonpartisan election system. Those fighting to preserve the system have gone to the courts to make a simple case: It’s only fair that voters know exactly what is on their ballot.

Specifically the consequences of Ballot Measure 2, which would give parties the ability to shut out 60% of Alaska voters registered as independents. This is what attorney Scott Kendall argued before the Alaska Supreme Court last week.

Keep ReadingShow less
Group of young adult students sit at desks in classroom listening to teacher

Why do Americans respond so differently to hard history lessons? A look at the three psychological mindsets driving the patriotism debate — and a path past it.

Lighthouse Films/Getty Images

“They Hate America”: Patriotism in the Face of Historical Updates

I happened upon a civil discussion blog and read a post by a man who said he was happy to report that when he attended a panel discussion about teaching patriotism in the schools, all went well. He said that’s because most of the people in the bridging organization that hosted the event are “pretty patriotic.” He clarified that by writing, “None of the type of bad actors (and there are many) who want to teach kids to hate America and Western Civilization were represented.”

Someone made a comment about why we can’t incorporate historical change into curriculum and objected to the notion that a segment of the population wants to teach kids to hate America. The man who posted cited what he believes is proof. A last commenter simply input the emoji for a sleeping person, as though the argument was boring or unimportant.

Keep ReadingShow less