Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

A Transcontinental Railroad Means a Stronger U.S. Economy

A Transcontinental Railroad Means a Stronger U.S. Economy
black and brown chess piece on white tray

Upheaval in international trade over the last few years and the resulting squeeze on Americans’ pocketbooks have highlighted the benefits that Americans receive from having partners and supply chains that are proven and reliable—and the costs that come when that dependability is threatened.

American infrastructure and transportation are critical factors in the equation. The proposed combination of Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS) railroads is being positioned as part of the answer to American economic resiliency for years to come. Especially significant as North American trade continues to advance American prosperity.


While not always on the front pages, rail freight is in fact a pillar for the U.S. economy. Each year, railroads move about 1.5 billion tons of agricultural products, construction materials, vehicles, energy, and other goods. The U.S. is one of the few developed nations without a coast-to-coast railroad, leaving freight to change hands at congested gateways that add costs and delays.

A report from the Association of American Railroads (AAR) notes that “rail is a major driver of economic activity, generating $233.4 billion in total economic output in 2023.”

Another mainstay of the American economy, perhaps surprisingly, continues to be trade with Mexico. In 2024, over 80 percent of Mexico's total exports were to the United States, and over 40 percent of its total imports were from the United States. Motor vehicle parts, cell phones, industrial equipment, and a multitude of other goods amounted to a record $872.83 billion in trade last year.

As one might expect with a neighbor of that size, rail is a pivotal factor in capturing the full economic benefit of growth in U.S.-Mexico trade and allows American businesses to capture an even greater share of future growth.

In 2023, Union Pacific launched a new eastbound intermodal service connecting Mexican industrial markets with key U.S. Southeast markets such as Florida and North Carolina. The proposed merger with Norfolk Southern will expand these connections along the East Coast, establishing new single-line connections for U.S. distribution hubs across the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic, connecting 43 states and more than 100 ports.

Opening new American markets to cross-border commerce would give U.S. businesses more direct access to one of the world’s most dynamic trade corridors. American industries would gain improved access to existing trade flows, including inland agricultural producers, Midwest manufacturers, and Southeastern distribution centers.

The operations of a faster, more reliable freight network capitalize on American advantages in infrastructure and logistics. Fewer handoffs and fewer interchange delays mean more reliability and faster delivery times for businesses and consumers. The efficiency is especially significant for small businesses, as it makes their growth more viable.

The improved efficiency is also projected to take an estimated 2.1 million trucks off the road annually and save shippers an estimated $3.5 billion each year — savings that flow through to consumers.

The U.S. Department of Transportation previously forecasted that U.S. freight movement would rise by 30% by 2040. Those projections occurred well before a merger was even discussed, meaning that the benefits will be enhanced by growing investment and demand now predicated on the merger itself.

Macroeconomic gains are built from countless local ones. For communities located along key rail hubs, increased job creation and activity would certainly be a welcome boost. Workers in rural areas and other underserved communities already make up a vital share of the industrial and transportation workforce. These workers bear the brunt of supply chain disruptions, but they also stand to benefit most when systems become faster, cheaper, and more reliable.

Americans now navigating economic uncertainty and pressure on their family budgets from trade disruptions, tariffs, and the effects of war on energy prices could use a healthy dose of stability. The infrastructure and systemic improvements from the realization of a long-sought-after transcontinental railroad stand as a bright spot. And with U.S.-Mexico trade more valuable to American economic interests than ever before, now is the time to push toward measures that promote cooperation and mutual prosperity.

Mario H. Lopez is the President of the Hispanic Leadership Fund, a public policy advocacy organization that promotes liberty, opportunity, and prosperity for all.


Read More

Construction worker


Low angle view of male construction workers framing a new house

Getty Images

Latino Workers Are the Backbone of America — But Inequities Persist

WASHINGTON — As the nation pauses today to mark Labor Day 2026, a glaring spotlight is shining on the massive economic influence, historical legacy, and evolving challenges of the Latino labor force. Once relegated to the margins of the broader American labor narrative, Latino workers are stepping into the national conversation as the indisputable backbone of the modern United States economy.

According to recent findings from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the overall labor market has shown unexpected strength, with a stable baseline keeping the Hispanic and Latino unemployment rate hovering around 4.8%. While this reflects a significant drop from the 5.3% peak recorded a year ago, advocacy groups argue that the metrics mask deeper inequalities that holiday celebrations tend to overlook.

Keep ReadingShow less
ball under basketball ring
ball under basketball ring
Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Fairness and Inclusion in Women’s Sports

Two former NBA players have said they want to play in the Women’s National Basketball Association (WNBA). Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White announced their intent to enter the WNBA draft, claiming—falsely—that they identify as women to force the WNBA to clarify its policy, which restricts participation to women without defining what it means to be a woman. The players’ announcement followed closely on the heels of WNBA player Sophie Cunningham’s public comments that it was “common sense” that only “biological women” be permitted to compete in the WNBA. Cunningham’s comments drew competing rallies to her games, either supporting or denouncing her stance. Her statement was preceded by the first Supreme Court ruling on eligibility for female sports competitions at the school and college level, a ruling that does not apply to professional sports. In West Virginia v. B. P. J., the Supreme Court affirmed that U.S. states may legally bar transgender girls and women from female school or collegiate sports teams, leaving states to decide.

Public discussion of this issue has been deeply polarized. Some on the political left have asserted that “trans women are women” and that anyone who opposes their participation in elite women’s sports is a bigot. Meanwhile, some on the political right have presented trans women athletes as male athletes stealing women’s trophies. This is a classic case of affective polarization—a phenomenon in which people feel their identities, values, or rights are at stake. They become less willing to consider alternative perspectives and demonize those with opposing views.

Keep ReadingShow less
 In an aerial view, the Stargate Oracle AI data center campus.

In an aerial view, the Stargate Oracle AI data center campus is seen on August 26, 2026 in Abilene, Texas

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Is AI Worth the Cost to Communities?

Picture a family living on a quiet street in an idyllic small town. Then a data center moves in next door. Trees are knocked down for a sprawling industrial campus, an enormous windowless building rises, and a maddening hum continues day and night. The family closes its windows, abandons the backyard, and struggles to sleep. Open space disappears, electric bills rise, and the company announces plans to expand—all in the name of jobs, tax revenue, and so-called progress.

While the family is fictional, its experience is not. Across the country, communities are confronting noise, rising electricity demand, water consumption, lost open space, and data centers approved with little public discussion. These costs raise a question the technology industry would rather avoid: Are the promised benefits of the artificial-intelligence boom worth what communities are being asked to sacrifice?

Keep ReadingShow less
Judge's hand holding wooden hammer

A lawyer breaks down 'rule of law' using everyday analogies—sports, board games—to explain why recent government actions threaten this founding principle.

naruecha jenthaisong/Getty Images

The Rule of Law Is Simple—and Essential to American Democracy

This series from Lawyers Defending American Democracy connects the words of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution to current events that threaten democracy and the justice system. Each piece highlights the unique responsibility lawyers carry—through their oath, professional obligations, and roles in their communities—to help the public understand what’s at risk and to speak out when democratic principles are under threat. LDAD’s call to action is straightforward: as the Founders once did, we must recognize threats to constitutional values, demand accountability, and act to defend them.

Before the first No Kings rally last year, I carefully hand-lettered a sign that I thought perfectly encapsulated the day's theme. On one side, it read “IN THIS COUNTRY, THE RULE OF LAW IS KING." On the other, it read, "A GOVERNMENT OF LAWS, NOT OF MEN (John Adams)." I carried my sign proudly, certain that it would be a big hit. But the only reaction I got was someone asking me, “Are you a lawyer?” I wonder what gave me away.

Keep ReadingShow less