Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Preventing a Decade-Long Republican Lock In the House of Representatives

Preventing a Decade-Long Republican Lock
In the House of Representatives
gray stone columns worm's-eye view photo
Photo by Jesse Collins on Unsplash

Political developments in the United States highlighted a trend of democratic slippage…. Today, the state and fate of democracy in the world is perhaps more uncertain than it has been in our lifetimes.”

Kevin Casas-Zamora, 2025, International IDEA


Donald Trump has caused a decline globally in democracy, the authoritative international institute V-Dem declaring that he is “unraveling the democratic era.” Pay-to-play, government fostered disinformation, an obsequious legislature, White House grifting, a President above the law, and a deeply partisan Supreme Court – no wonder U.S. democracy in 2025 was rated a dismal 66th by Freedom House – less democratic than Mongolia or Panama, little better than Bulgaria or Ghana.

While Trump is blamed, he is merely the chalice. The poison is his enablers - the canny, corrupt Roberts Supreme Court Republican majority. They are a throwback to the Fuller court of Plessy v Ferguson notoriety that exalted Jim Crow. The Encyclopedia of the American Constitution explains that during the Fuller era:

blacks, through one scheme or another, were disenfranchised on a grand scale. The Fifteenth Amendment was reduced to a nullity.”

And while they are most certainly not the first white supremacist court, the Roberts Republicans are acknowledged to be the first partisan court in U.S. history, scheming to enact their Republican patrons' agenda – even mimicking Weimar era justices in granting unconstitutional monarchical powers to a cruel narcissist authoritarian.

The evidence is the Roberts Court history of rulings – Shelby County, Brnovich, and Rucho - that kneecapped both minority voting rights and the Democratic Party. Those twin goals are most recently exemplified by their April 2026 ruling in Callais, which will diminish minority power in Congress.

Moreover, Callais may well enable their Republican patrons to create a stranglehold on the House of Representatives for many years to come. That danger arises from the combined impact of Callais and Congressional reapportionment following the 2030 decennial census.

Congressional Reapportionment

From their base of 19 traditionally blue states and the District of Columbia (plus one electoral vote from Nebraska), Democratic presidential nominees in the 2020’s needed to win just the three upper-midwest swing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to accumulate 273 electoral votes (EV), surpassing the 270 majority threshold.

Reapportionment following the 2030 decennial census will make Democrats' path to 270 EV more treacherous. Out-migration during the 2020’s from California, New York, and other blue states will likely shift 12 of the 435 Congressional seats (and 12 EV in the Electoral College) from blue to red states. The Democrats’ base of 273 EV will shrink to 261 EV. Thus, to reach 270 EV in the 2030s, a Democratic presidential nominee will have to retain the three upper-midwest swing states plus win either Arizona (11 EV), Georgia (16 EV), or North Carolina (16 EV).

Voters in Arizona, Georgia, and North Carolina are typically Republicans – having supported Democratic nominees just once (2020) since 2000 and then very narrowly.

Winning a Governing Trifecta in 2028

To improve their Electoral College odds in these six swing states, Democrats have just a few years to upgrade their political profile. Yet to realistically have a chance to conduct such a makeover, they must win a governing trifecta in 2028 – both houses of Congress and the presidency.

That makeover - as Party experts like James Carville and Stan Greenberg have repeatedly urged - should center the Party’s agenda on economic challenges such as stagnant wages, inflation, and AI that bedevil working- and middle-class voters. Surveys, for instance, affirm that financially precarious working-class women in particular are promising Democratic electoral targets. And leading strategists cite polling showing that 74% of all voters want Democrats to focus on affordability, especially lowering health care costs, and 82% want them to protect Social Security and Medicare.

Other important issues are elitist Trump administration policies, including tax cuts for the wealthy, and spiking gasoline and food prices. Moreover, 61% of independents see Trump as corrupt, an issue that recently doomed the Hungarian Viktor Orbán. Trump grifted $3 billion in 2025 and routinely sells pardons for millions – freeing convicted thieves and international drug lords incarcerated by Democrats. In addition, the Democrats should deemphasize social issues, partly responsible for their historically poor polling, perhaps adopting the Olympics’ new objective standard for women's sports.

Winning a trifecta in 2028 will afford Democrats a chance to rectify their reputation for incompetence by showing swing state voters that they can deliver on promises. It would enable them, for example, to resurrect the Biden-era refundable child tax credit that cut child poverty in half and to protect Social Security and Medicare, extremely popular programs being reduced and privatized by Republicans. Success on these and other impactful middle-class economic policies would embellish Democrats’ standing. And it would lift spirits, renewing faith in government as an instrument for good, faith battered by decades of Republicans and their billionaire donors who view successful government programs as an abomination.

Callais Can Prevent a Democratic Trifecta

The partisan Callais ruling markedly darkens Democrats’ prospects of winning that vital trifecta in 2028.

In the months prior to Callais, the red states of Texas, Missouri, North Carolina, and Ohio gerrymandered at Trump’s urging nine blue Congressional districts to favor Republicans. Those actions were partly offset by California’s gerrymandering.

Then, in April 2026, the Roberts Republicans issued the Callais ruling.

By largely gutting the Voting Rights Act (VRA), Callais will enable Republican states to flip as many as 19 additional majority-minority Democratic congressional districts heretofore shielded by the VRA. Many could even be flipped by energized Republicans prior to the 2026 midterm election - including five seats hurriedly gerrymandered in Florida and Tennessee in May. Minority representation in Congress will plunge as it did during the Jim Crow era.

Preserving Democracy: Countering the Callais Ruling

To sustain hopes for a 2028 trifecta, Democratic states must offset as many of these blue Congressional districts as possible from being flipped by Republicans. Specifically, there are a large number of majority-minority districts in blue states like California. And a number of districts can be redistricted, spreading out Democratic voters to eliminate neighboring Republican districts. Importantly, blue states have engaged in less partisan gerrymandering than Republicans in recent years. Thus, there are as many as 22 Republican districts in blue states such as Colorado and New York that could be flipped in 2027 and 2028. And Virginia may redistrict again. Republicans acknowledge that Democrats could offset all the red-state gerrymandering now underway by 2028.

Gerrymandering these districts to blue, however, will not be easy. Democrats will need to win state legislative majorities in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania in the 2026 midterm elections, for instance. Moreover, many blue states like New York and Virginia have laws specifically barring gerrymandering that must now be set aside.

The Jim Crow Supreme Court has confronted Democrats with a Hobson’s choice: conduct tawdry gerrymandering that reduces racial representational equality for their minority supporters – or allow Republicans to seize the House of Representatives by default for a decade or more.

Quickly countering Republican gerrymandering is the only pathway to a 2028 trifecta and the opportunity to enact an epochal agenda enabling the Democrats to survive the reapportionment tsunami in 2032.

George Tyler is a former deputy assistant treasury secretary and World Bank official. He is the author of books including Billionaire Democracy and What Went Wrong.


Read More

Judicial Courage?
a wooden judge's hammer sitting on top of a table
Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash

Judicial Courage?

While some believe that being a judge is an easy gig that requires only a dartboard, it is a challenging position that takes courage, especially when a judge must render an unpopular decision. There are many examples of judicial courage throughout history, such as the biblical King Solomon, whose decision to cut a baby in half must have caused quite a commotion, at least until the true mother’s selfless concern for her baby rendered his judgment unnecessary.

In recent years, many judges have been criticized for issuing decisions that don’t sit well with the present administration in Washington, DC. Many are plagued by death threats and bomb scares. (See Jaffe, “Judges Face Rising Threats but Are Barred from Responding,” Our Town, Oct. 18, 2025, https://www.ourtownny.com/voices/judges-face-rising-threats-but-are-barred-from-responding-EN5179240) (providing statistics on judicial threats). Consequently, courage is an essential judicial trait.

Keep Reading Show less
We're Failing Gen Alpha
a computer chip with the letter a on top of it
Photo by Igor Omilaev on Unsplash

We're Failing Gen Alpha

Just about around 2035, we’ll be celebrating the first Gen Alpha graduates from college. Hallmark is going to need to work on some new cards before then.

A few recommendations:

Keep Reading Show less
After Callais: The Amendment Agenda the Framers Built

Article V Convention is a mechanism in the U.S. Constitution that empowers state legislatures to bypass Congress and propose amendments to the Constitution.

After Callais: The Amendment Agenda the Framers Built

On April 29, 2026, the Supreme Court decided Louisiana v. Callais. Louisiana had been ordered by a federal court to draw a majority-Black congressional district. It drew one. The Court held the drawing unconstitutional and rewrote the Section 2 standard, raising the evidentiary burden for successful challenges and immunizing maps that satisfy a state’s stated partisan goals. As Justice Kagan wrote in dissent, the trap closes perfectly. States cannot draw majority-minority districts, and the mechanism that would require them to cannot be satisfied under the new standard.

Shelby County v. Holder (2013) removed Section 5 preclearance — the preventive mechanism. Callais has removed Section 2 enforcement — the remedial mechanism. Both statutory pathways to voting rights protection are now closed.

Keep Reading Show less
Kalshi Wants to Help Americans Hedge Risk. Lawmakers Say It’s Just Gambling with a Different Name

Senator Adam Schiff, D-Calif, speaks at the Brookings Institution panel to make the case for regulating prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket

(Erika Tulfo, Medill News Service)

Kalshi Wants to Help Americans Hedge Risk. Lawmakers Say It’s Just Gambling with a Different Name

WASHINGTON – Prediction market platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket are facing mounting pressure in Congress as lawmakers debate whether the platforms should be treated as financial exchanges or gambling operations.

The platforms allow users to bet on real-world events from sports to politics, which are classified as a type of financial derivative overseen by the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Keep Reading Show less