2026 is here. We are less than one hundred days from Independence Day, the apex of our yearlong celebration of America’s 250th birthday. Still, we will miss the purpose of this moment if we don’t think beyond it.
For guidance, we can look at a university’s commencement ceremony. When I was in college, ‘commencement’ felt like a funny word. I was ending my time there, wasn’t I? But, a little reflection provides a lot of clarity. The more I thought about graduation, the more commencement felt like the perfect definition. School is not meant to be our final destination. It’s a preparatory season.
So what does that mean for the commemoration of our semiquincentennial? What parallels can we draw from these yearly college ceremonies?
The ceremonies themselves do, in fact, commemorate. We celebrate the rewards of long hours and deep thinking. But crossing the stage is just as much of a beginning as an end. Moving the tassel from right to left symbolizes a new chapter; a commencement.
To only focus on the commemoration, in fact, is dangerous for democracy. Alexis de Tocqueville reflected on this danger in Democracy in America. “If long-term interest could prevail over the passions and needs of the moment,” he pondered, “there would never be tyrannical sovereigns or an exclusive democracy.” In this vein, commemoration alone may encourage us to add more red, white, and blue to our wardrobe, but it will not strengthen the collective civic resolve our constitutional democracy craves.
To be meaningful, this year must rejuvenate our sense of purpose for the preservation of our nation. We can leverage this moment to build civic momentum that doesn’t just commemorate America250, but commence America250+.
There are a lot of ways that we can do this. America250+ is not confined to a particular course of action. It’s not defined by a particular field, region, or political persuasion. Many groups are already realizing this and demonstrating an America250+ mindset. Democracy2076 is working to inspire renewed faith in a pro-democratic future by anticipating our tricentennial. Made by Us launched Youth250, acknowledging that Gen Z will write the next chapter of the American story. Such initiatives see commemoration as a pathway to commencement.
At my organization, Thinking Nation, we see our call to action as strengthening history education. We want to leverage the study of the past in ways that can better our collective future. In order to do this, we need to re-evaluate our approach to history education in American classrooms.
We are not satisfied with students leaving classrooms where the measure of their success is defined by the strength of their memory. Therefore, in the spirit of America250+ we are calling for a new minimum standard in history education; one where thinking is the minimum. We seek to raise the floor for every classroom and expectations for every student.
A new minimum standard is accessible for everyone. Still, it demands a paradigm shift. History can not be defined simply as the past. Rather, it must be embraced as a discipline, where students are agentic humans that evaluate evidence, contextualize stories, and relish in the complexity and nuance of the past. This not only defines the epistemology inherent to the discipline of history, as articulated by the American Historical Association, but cultivates the dispositions our 21st century constitutional democracy craves.
At a time where AI is supplanting humanity, learning how to think is perhaps more important than ever. Even Anthropic’s president acknowledges this. Every student takes history courses, but these courses have fallen flat on their promise to prepare students for civil society. Advocating for a new minimum standard is one way that we can take the commemoration of America250 and transform it into a democracy-strengthening America250+.
At Thinking Nation, we are realists in acknowledging that we will likely never agree on what to teach in a pluralistic society; but we are idealists in that we believe a new philosophical and pedagogical minimum standard is attainable. Classrooms must be inquiry-based, rooted in historical thinking, and literacy-rich. Teachers must be collaborative and data-informed. Without meeting this standard, we will remain a marginalized discipline.
If history education continues to be marginalized, lacking resources compared to ‘tested subjects’ like STEM and English Language Arts, we cannot act surprised at the visible deterioration of democracy.
History is a human-centered discipline. We learn about—and from—humans, engaging with a variety of perspectives. In an age of self-absorption, where algorithms feed us only what we want, history asks us to turn outside of ourselves. Through it, we cultivate empathy for people we have little in common with and ask deeper questions of the things we see.
The discipline of history empowers us to question sources, interrogate information, and seek truth. At this moment, are there more important dispositions to equip participants in our democracy with?
It is to this end that our America250+ initiative is to establish a new minimum standard in history education. We are dissatisfied with the status quo of the field. The students in our classrooms deserve to be better prepared to renovate our democracy. Without doing so, our commemorations are meaningless celebrations rooted in nostalgia, lacking the reflective patriotism required to strengthen the American experiment.
For the future of our country, this year must be a catalyst for lasting impact. Individuals and organizations cannot only commemorate America250, but consider the ways that they can commence America250+.
Zachary Cote is the executive director of Thinking Nation, a social studies education nonprofit based in Los Angeles. Prior to this role, he taught middle school history at a public charter school in South Los Angeles.




















U.S. President Donald Trump boards Air Force One on August 14, 2026 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Trump is traveling to Long Island to tour law enforcement facilities in Nassau County and rally support for local Republican candidates ahead of the upcoming midterm elections
Travel Far Enough, You Meet Yourself
Is it possible that our President has simply not traveled enough?
Born and raised in Queens and attending Fordham University in the Bronx, Donald Trump has no record of traveling outside New York until he was over 20, when he transferred to a college in the neighboring state of Pennsylvania. Were his formative years amiss, then, in his learning about other places and other people?
Is his view akin to the famous New Yorker cover by Saul Steinberg, an illustration of the United States with New York City as the epicenter of the country and the Hudson River the border of the known world? We can now at least add Washington, D.C., and Mar-a-Lago to the map of “the realm.”
Our President has now traveled some, but what we recommend is another kind of travel. Not a state-sponsored trip or a venture to scout locations for future Trump Towers. This would be a genuine travel experience, enriching and eye-opening, showcasing other cultures and ways of living.
It will extend far beyond viewing military parades, hobnobbing with such “understanding” world leaders as Kim Jong Un, or taking tea with the King.
WHERE, then, should the President go? As Elon Musk’s Starship spacecraft is not yet ready to take passengers to Mars, perhaps he could explore our own vast country?
Maybe he could travel to “flyover country,” the farming states, where his ying-yanging tariffs and trade restrictions have played havoc with rural economies. Or possibly to California, number one in homeless U. S. citizens, and while there, regale homeless veterans (approximately 32,500 nationwide) with tales of his brave exploits invading and bombing foreign countries.
Or he might tour the Great Lakes, and rename the other four?
WHEN should he go? This will be tough, as he is very busy building his ballroom and renaming bodies of water.
How about a trip in early November, around the midterm elections? Despite the long-discredited accusation of widespread voter fraud, it would be reassuring to know he might be so caught up divvying out ladles of soup in a soup kitchen somewhere that he wouldn’t remember to deploy the military for “election security.”
HOW will he travel? He should definitely not take his Qatari-donated, newly renovated 747, especially after last time, when he had to be smuggled off clandestinely in a catering truck. It’s unlikely any traveling companions, like the Secretary of State or of the Treasury, are going to fall for the ruse a second time. Besides, we may need those people. No more decoys!
Perhaps the President could fly commercially, although this likely would expose him to undue suffering. Without gold bathroom fixtures and maple wood floors, the trip will be no “Luxury Experience.” If only he still had his “Trump Shuttle,” bought with a massive loan he later defaulted on, saying then, “I’m smart. I got out at a good time.”
Considering the potential pitfalls, maybe it’s best the President travel incognito, disguised perhaps as an elderly woman wearing a lot of bronzer.
Wherever, whenever, however: our President needs a vacation.
Moreover, we need a vacation from him.
If the President refuses our travel suggestions, here’s another idea:
Let’s get him a pet! He has never owned a pet. As we know with our children, pets teach essential life lessons: compassion and empathy; they instill a sense of responsibility. There is a well-established connection between those who can care for a pet and those who can care for people.
So, which pet should we choose? A puppy? A kitten? A boa constrictor?
Imagine, the President may even decide he likes having a pet. After all, what is more obedient than a well-trained dog, besides possibly the Cabinet? And what is more docile than a sweet kitten, other than plausibly the Supreme Court?
The President may even become more mellow with a pet afoot and less likely to slap tariffs on our allies, or attempt to annex our neighbors, or bully our Congress. (Realizing, of course, a bully requires active participation from the bullied to maintain his status.)
Maybe we should do both: get the President a pet and devise a travel plan for him. (Do you think we could possibly convince him to leave his phone at home?)
Let’s go for it! After all:
Travel far enough, you meet yourself. (David Mitchell)
And for our President, that would likely be the most profound discovery of all.
Amy Lockard is an Iowa resident who regularly contributes to regional newspapers and periodicals. She is working on the second of a four-book fictional series based on Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice."